1,011
Views
41
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

A General Approach to Measuring Test-Taking Effort on Computer-Based Tests

References

  • Adams, R. J., Wilson, M., & Wang, W. C. (1997). The multidimensional random coefficients multinomial logit model. Applied Psychological Measurement, 21, 1–23. doi:10.1177/0146621697211001
  • Boe, E. E., May, H., & Boruch, R. F. (2002). Student task persistence in the third international mathematics and science study: A major source of achievement differences at the national, classroom, and student levels (Research Report No. 2002-TIMSS1). Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania, Center for Research in Evaluation in Social Policy.
  • Borghans, L., & Schils, T. (2012). The leaning tower of PISA: Decomposing achievement test scores into cognitive and noncognitive components ( Unpublished manuscript).
  • Cronbach, L. J. (1960). Essentials of psychological testing (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Harper & Row.
  • Debeer, D., Bucholz, J., Hartig, J., & Janssen, R. (2014). Student, school, and country differences in sustained test-taking effort in the 2009 PISA Reading Assessment. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 39, 502–523. doi:10.3102/1076998614558485
  • Haladyna, T. M., & Downing, S. M. (2004). Construct-irrelevant variance in high-stakes testing. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 23(1), 17–27. doi:10.1111/j.1745-3992.2004.tb00149.x
  • Harmes, J. C., & Wise, S. L. (2016). Assessing engagement during the online assessment of real-world skills. In Y. Rosen, S. Ferrara, & M. Mosharraf (Eds.), Handbook of research on technology tools for real-world skill development (pp. 804–823). Hershey, PA: IGI Global.
  • Messick, S. (1984). The psychology of educational measurement. Journal of Educational Measurement, 21, 215–237. doi:10.1111/jedm.1984.21.issue-3
  • OECD. (2015). PISA-based Test for Schools technical report. Paris, France: Author.
  • Schnipke, D. L. (1995). Assessing speededness in computer-based tests using item response times ( Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD.
  • Wise, S. L. (2006). An investigation of the differential effort received by items on a low-stakes, computer-based test. Applied Measurement in Education, 19, 93–112. doi:10.1207/s15324818ame1902_2
  • Wise, S. L. (2015). Effort analysis: Individual score validation of achievement test data. Applied Measurement in Education, 28, 237–252. doi:10.1080/08957347.2015.1042155
  • Wise, S. L. (in press). Rapid-guessing behavior: Its identification, interpretation, and implications. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice.
  • Wise, S. L., & DeMars, C. E. (2005). Low examinee effort in low-stakes assessment: Problems and potential solutions. Educational Assessment, 10, 1–17. doi:10.1207/s15326977ea1001_1
  • Wise, S. L., & Kingsbury, G. G. (2016). Modeling student test-taking motivation in the context of an adaptive achievement test. Journal of Educational Measurement, 53, 86–105.
  • Wise, S. L., & Kong, X. (2005). Response time effort: A new measure of examinee motivation in computer-based tests. Applied Measurement in Education, 18, 163–183. doi:10.1207/s15324818ame1802_2
  • Wise, S. L., & Ma, L. (2012, April). Setting response time thresholds for a CAT item pool: The normative threshold method. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education, Vancouver, Canada.
  • Wise, S. L., Pastor, D. A., & Kong, X. J. (2009). Understanding correlates of rapid-guessing behavior in low stakes testing: Implications for test development and measurement practice. Applied Measurement in Education, 22, 185–205. doi:10.1080/08957340902754650
  • Wise, S. L., & Smith, L. F. (2016). The validity of assessment when students don’t give good effort. In G. T. L. Brown, & L. R. Harris (Eds.), Handbook of human and social conditions in assessment (pp. 204–220). New York, NY: Routledge.
  • Wolf, L. F., Smith, J. K., & Birnbaum, M. E. (1995). Consequence of performance, test motivation, and mentally taxing items. Applied Measurement in Education, 8, 341–351. doi:10.1207/s15324818ame0804_4
  • Zamarro, G., Hitt, C., & Mendez, I. (2016). When students don’t care: Reexamining international differences in achievement and noncognitive skills ( Unpublished manuscript) Department of Education Reform, University of Arkansas.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.