Works cited
- Bakeless, John Edwin. The Tragicall History of Christopher Marlowe, Vol. 2, Harvard U P, 1942.
- Bloom, Harold, and Christopher Marlowe. Bloom’s Major Dramatists. 2nd ed., New York: Chelsea House, 2002.
- Brooke, C. F. Tucker, ed. The Shakespeare Apocrypha: Being a Collection of Fourteen Plays Which Have Been Ascribed to Shakespeare. Oxford: The Clarendon P, 1908.
- Burrows, John, and Hugh Craig. “The Joker in the Pack? Marlowe, Kyd, and the Co-Authorship of Henry Vi, Part 3.” The New Oxford Shakespeare Authorship Companion, edited by Gary Taylor and Gabriel Egan, OUP, 2017, pp. 194–217.
- Craig, H., and J. Burrows. “A Collaboration about A Collaboration: the Authorship of King Henry Vi, Part Three.” Collaborative Research in the Digital Humanities, edited by Marilyn Deegan and Willard McCarty, Ashgate, 2012, pp. 27–65.
- Eisen, Mark, et al. “Stylometric Analysis of Early Modern Period English Plays.” Digital Scholarship in the Humanities, vol. 33, no. 3, 2018, pp. 500–28. doi:10.1093/llc/fqx059.
- Grieve, Jack. “Quantitative Authorship Attribution: an Evaluation of Techniques.” Literary and Linguistic Computing, vol. 22, no. 3, 2007, pp. 251–70. doi:10.1093/llc/fqm020.
- Hartman, Charles. Virtual Muse: Experiments in Computer Poetry. Hanover, NH: Wesleyan U P, 1996.
- Logan, Robert A. Shakespeare’s Marlowe: the Influence of Christopher Marlowe on Shakespeare’s Artistry. Aldershot, England; Burlington, VT: Ashgate, 2007.
- McDonald, Russ. “Marlowe and Style.” The Cambridge Companion to Christopher Marlowe, edited by Patrick Cheney, Cambridge U P, 2004, pp. 55–69.
- Merriam, Thomas. “Tamburlaine Stalks In ‘Henry Vi’.” Computers and the Humanities, vol. 30, no. 3, 1996, pp. 267–80. doi:10.1007/BF00055110.
- Merriam, Thomas V.N., and Robert A. J. Matthews. “Neural Computation in Stylometry Ii: an Application to the Works of Shakespeare and Marlowe.” Literary and Linguistic Computing, vol. 9, 1994, pp. 1–6. doi:10.1093/llc/9.1.1.
- OED. “Markov, N.” Oxford University Press, <www.oed.com/view/Entry/114201>. Accessed 26 Jul. 2019a.
- –––. “Stochastic, Adj.” Oxford University Press, <www.oed.com/view/Entry/190593>. Accessed 26 Jul. 2019b.
- Pollack-Pelzner, Daniel. “The Radical Argument of the New Oxford Shakespeare.” New Yorker, <www.newyorker.com/books/page-turner/the-radical-argument-of-the-new-oxford-shakespeare>. Accessed 19 Feb. 2017.
- Rizvi, Pervez. “Authorship Attribution for Early Modern Plays Using Function Word Adjacency Networks: A Critical View.” ANQ: A Quarterly Journal of Short Articles, Notes and Reviews, 2018, doi:10.1080/0895769X.2018.1554473.
- ––– “A Response to Egan Et Al.” 2019, <http://www.shakespearestext.com/wan.htm>. accessed 25 Jul. 2019.
- Segarra, Santiago, et al. “Attributing the Authorship of the Henry Vi Plays by Word Adjacency.” Shakespeare Quarterly, vol. 67, no. 2, 2016, pp. 232–56. doi:10.1353/shq.2016.0024.
- –––. “A Response to Pervez Rizvi’s Critique of the Word Adjacency Method for Authorship Attribution.” ANQ: A Quarterly Journal of Short Articles, Notes and Reviews, 2019, doi: 10.1080/0895769X.2019.1590797.
- –––. “Authorship Attribution through Function Word Adjacency Networks.” IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing, vol. 63, no. 20, 2015, pp. 5464–78. doi:10.1109/TSP.2015.2451111.
- Shannon, C. E. “Prediction and Entropy of Printed English.” Bell System Technical Journal, vol. 30, no. 1, 1951, pp. 50–64. doi:10.1002/bltj.1951.30.issue-1.