Kyd, Edward III, and “The Shock of the New”

Works cited

• Baldwin, T. W. William Shakspere’s Small Latine & Lesse Greeke, vol. 2, Illinois UP, 1944. Print.
   Google Scholar
• Binns, J. W. Intellectual Culture in Elizabethan and Jacobean England, Francis Cairns, 1990. Print.
   Google Scholar
• Boas, Frederick S., ed. The Works of Thomas Kyd, Oxford UP, 1901. 1951. Print.
   Google Scholar
• Bolgar, R. R. “Classical Reading in Renaissance Schools.” Durham Research Review, vol. 6, 1955, pp. 18–26. Print.
   Google Scholar
• Byrne, M. St Clare. “Bibliographic Clues in Collaborate Plays.” Library, vol. 13, 1932, pp. 21–48. doi:10.1093/library/s4-XIII.1.21.
   Google Scholar
• Carrère, Félix. Le Théâtre De Thomas Kyd. Contribution À L’étude Du Drame Élizabéthain, Edouard Privain, 1951. Print.
   Google Scholar
• Craig, Hugh, and Arthur F. Kinney, eds. Shakespeare, Computers, and the Mystery of Authorship, Cambridge UP, 2009. Print.
   Google Scholar
• Cunningham, J. S., ed. Tamburlaine the Great. Christopher Marlowe, Manchester UP, 1981. Print.
   Google Scholar
• de Lord, G. Homeric Renaissance. The Odyssey of George Chapman, Chatto and Windus, 1956. Print.
   Google Scholar
• Duff, J. W., ed. and tr. Lucan. Harvard UP, 1928, 2006. Print.
   Google Scholar
• Duncan, Simon S. “The Isolation of Scientific Discovery: Indifference and Resistance to a New Idea.” Science Studies, vol. 4, 1974, pp. 109–34. Print. doi:10.1177/030631277400400201.
   Google Scholar
• Edwards, Philip, ed. Thomas Kyd. The Spanish Tragedy. 1959. Print. Methuen
   Google Scholar
• Erne, Lukas. Beyond the Spanish Tragedy. A Study of the Works of Thomas Kyd, Manchester UP, 2001. Print.
   Google Scholar
• Erne, Lukas, ed. Thomas Kyd. Soliman and Perseda [1592/93], Manchester UP, 2014. Malone Society Reprints. Print.
   Google Scholar
• France, Peter, ed. The Oxford Guide to Literature in English Translation, Oxford UP, 2000. Print.
   Google Scholar
• Freebury-Jones, Darren. “In Defence of Kyd: Evaluating the Claim for Shakespeare’s Part Authorship of Arden of Faversham.” Authorship, vol. 7, no. 2, 2018. doi:10.21825/aj.v7i2.9736.
   Google Scholar
• Freebury-Jones, Darren. “The Diminution of Thomas Kyd.” Journal of Early Modern Studies, vol. 8, 2019, pp. 251–77.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freebury-Jones, Darren, and Marcus Dahl. “The Limitations of Microattribution.” Texas Studies in Literature and Language, vol. 60, 2018, pp. 467–95. Print. doi:10.7560/TSLL60404.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hughes, Robert. The Shock of the New: Art and the Century of Change. 1991. Print, Thames & Hudson.
   Google Scholar
• Jackson, M. P. Material for an Edition of Arden of Faversham. 1963. Oxford U, unpubl. B. Litt. thesis. Print.
   Google Scholar
• Jackson, M. P. “New Research on the Dramatic Canon of Thomas Kyd.” Research Opportunities in Medieval and Renaissance Drama, vol. 47, 2008, pp. 107–27. Print.
   Google Scholar
• Jackson, M. P. Determining the Shakespeare Canon. Arden of Faversham and A Lover’s Complaint, Oxford UP, 2014. Print.
   Google Scholar
• Jackson, M. P. “A Supplementary Lexical Test for Arden of Faversham.” The New Oxford Shakespeare: Authorship Companion, edited by Gary Taylor and Gabriel Egan, Oxford U P, 2017, pp. 182–93.
   Google Scholar
• Lambrechts, Guy. “Edward III. Oeuvre De Thomas Kyd.” Etudes Anglaises, vol. 16, 1963, pp. 160–74. Print.
   Google Scholar
• Lazarus, Micha. “Greek Literacy in Sixteenth-Century England.” Renaissance Studies, vol. 29, 2014, pp. 434–58. Print.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lebègue, Raymond, ed. Œvres Complètes De Robert Garnier. Porcie, Cornélie, Belles Lettres, 1973. Print.
   Google Scholar
• MacLure, Millar, ed. Marlowe, the Poems, Methuen, 1968. Print.
   Google Scholar
• McKerrow, R. B., ed. The Works of Thomas Nashe, Vol. 5, Blackwell, 1952. Print.
   Google Scholar
• Melchiori, Giorgio, ed. Shakespeare. King Edward III, Cambridge UP, 1998. Print.
   Google Scholar
• Miola, Robert S., ed. George Chapman. Homer’s Iliad, Cambridge MHRA, 2017. Print.
   Google Scholar
• Mueller, Martin. “N-grams and the Kyd Canon: A Crude Test.” DATA 8 August 2009, and “Vickers is right about Kyd,” DATA, 23 Aug. 2009, http://www.brianvickers.uk/wp-content/uploads/2016/05/Martin-Mueller-on-Brian-Vickers-and-the-Kyd-canon.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Muir, Kenneth. Shakespeare as Collaborator, Methuen, 1960. Print.
   Google Scholar
• Nance, John V., and Gary Taylor. “Imitation or Collaboration? Marlowe and the Early Shakespeare Canon.” Shakespeare Survey, vol. 68, 2015, pp. 32–47. Print.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oreg, Shaul. “Resistance to Change: Developing an Individual Differences Measure.” Journal of Applied Psychology, vol. 88, 2003, pp. 680–93. doi:10.103/0021-9010.88.4.680.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Proudfoot, Richard, and Nicola Bennett, eds. Shakespeare King Edward III, Bloomsbury, 2017. Print.
   Google Scholar
• Rizvi, Pervez. “Shakespeare’s Text. A Collection of Resources.” 2017, http://www.shakespearestext.com/can.
   Google Scholar
• Rizvi, Pervez. “Which N-grams are the Best?” Oct. 2018, https://onedrive.live.com/?authkey=%21AL9ABAX%5FDAWKjqQ&id=68E79964A7BF0931%2111919&cid=68E79964A7BF0931.
   Google Scholar
• Rizvi, Pervez. “The Problem of Microattribution.” Digital Scholarship in the Humanities, vol. 34, no. 3, 2019, pp. 606–15. Print. doi:10.1093/digitalsh/fqy066.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rizvi, Pervez. “Arden of Faversham and the extended Kyd canon.” https://1drv.ms/f/s!AjEJv6dkmedo-XcQaPAmxKD22ytr
   Google Scholar
• Sarrazin, Gregor. Thomas Kyd Und Sein Kreis. Eine Litterarhistorische Untersuchung, Emil Felber, 1892. Print.
   Google Scholar
• Sarrazin, Gregor. Aus Shakespeares Meisterwerkstatt. Stilgeschichtliche Studien. Reimer, 1906. Print.
   Google Scholar
• Schoell, F. L. Etudes Sur L’humanisme Continental En Angleterre. 1926. Print, Champion.
   Google Scholar
• Smyth, H. W., tr. Aeschylus I. 1922. revised, 1973. Print, Harvard UP.
   Google Scholar
• Snelson, Jay. “The Ideological Immune System: Resistance to New Ideas in Science.” Skeptic, vol. 1, 1992, pp. 4, http://www.eipiphiny.org/articles/snelson.pdf. accessed 8 October 2019.
   Google Scholar
• Spedding, James, et al. eds. The Works of Francis Bacon, Vol. 14, Longman and Green, 1872. Print.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, Gary. “Empirical Middleton: Macbeth, Adaptation, and Microauthorship.” Shakespeare Quarterly, vol. 65, 2014, pp. 239–72. Print. doi:10.1353/shq.2014.0030.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor, Gary, et al. “Shakespeare and Who? Aeschylus, Edward III and Thomas Kyd.” Shakespeare Survey, vol. 70, 2017, pp. 146–53. Print.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, Gary. “Finding ‘anonymous’ in the Digital Archives: The Problem of Arden of Faversham.” Digital Scholarship in the Humanities, 2019. doi:10.1093/llc/fqy075.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vickers, Brian. Shakespeare, Co-Author. A Historical Study of Five Collaborative Plays, Oxford UP, 2002. Print.
   Google Scholar
• Vickers, Brian. “Incomplete Shakespeare: Or, Denying Coauthorship in 1 Henry VI.” Shakespeare Quarterly, vol. 58, 2007, pp. 311–52. Print.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vickers, Brian. “Thomas Kyd, Secret Sharer.” Times Literary Supplement, vol. 18 April 2008, pp. 13–15. Print.
   Google Scholar
• Vickers, Brian. “The Two Authors of Edward III.” Shakespeare Survey, vol. 67, 2014, pp. 102–18. Print.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vickers, Brian, ed. The Works of John Ford, Vol. 2, Oxford UP, 2017, Introduction 2, “Identifying Co-Authors,” especially “Dramatists repeat themselves,”, pp. 44–65. Print.
   Google Scholar
• Vickers, Brian. “Kyd, Shakespeare, and Arden of Faversham: A (Belated) Reply to MacDonald Jackson.” Research Opportunities in Medieval and Renaissance Drama, 2019. Print.
   Google Scholar
• Vickers, Brian. “Is EEBO/LION Suitable for Attribution Studies?” Early Modern Literary Studies, forthcoming. Print.
   Google Scholar
• Watt, T. I. The Authorship of the Raigne of Edward III, Craig and Kinney, 2009, pp. 116–33. Print.
   Google Scholar
• Wiggins, Martin. British Drama 1533–1642: A Catalogue, Vol. III: 1590–1597. 2012. Print, Oxford UP.
   Google Scholar
• Yang, Albert, et al. “Information Categorization Approach to Literary Authorship Disputes.” Physica A, vol. 329, 2003, pp. 473–83. Print. http://www.brianvickers.uk/ https://www.inforapid.de/html.searchreplace.htm http://plagiarism.bloomfieldmedia.com/wordpress/.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang, Albert. “Validating the Enlarged Kyd Canon: A New Approach.” American Notes and Queries, 2020. Print.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar