Recent progress in high pressure X-ray absorption spectroscopy studies at the ODE beamline

References

• Fontaine A, Baudelet F, Dartyge E, et al. Two time-dependent, focus-dependent experiments using the energy-dispersive spectrometer at LURE. Rev Sci Instrum. 1992;63:960–965. doi: 10.1063/1.1143791
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blank H, Neff B, Steil S, et al. A new energy dispersive X-ray monochromator for soft X-ray applications. Rev Sci Instrum. 1992;63:1334–1337. doi: 10.1063/1.1143062
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D'Acapito F, Boscherini F, Marcelli A, et al. Dispersive EXAFS apparatus at Frascati. Rev Sci Instrum. 1992;63:899–901. doi: 10.1063/1.1143771
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dent AJ, Wells MP, Farrow RC, et al. Combined energy dispersive EXAFS and X-ray diffraction. Rev Sci Instrum. 1992;63:903–906. doi: 10.1063/1.1143774
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mastelaro VR, Zanotto ED. X-ray absorption fine structure (XAFS) studies of oxide glasses – a 45-year overview. Materials. 2018;11:204. doi: 10.3390/ma11020204
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mino L, Borfecchia E, Segura-Ruiz J, et al. Materials characterization by synchrotron X-ray microprobes and nanoprobes. Rev Mod Phys. 2018;90:025007. doi: 10.1103/RevModPhys.90.025007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Di Cicco A. X-ray absorption spectroscopy investigations of disordered matter. Rad Phys Chem. 2018. DOI:10.1016/j.radphyschem.2018.11.031
   Google Scholar
• Baudelet F, Kong Q, Nataf L, et al. ODE: a new beam line for high-pressure XAS and XMCD studies at SOLEIL. High Pressure Res. 2011;31:136–139. doi: 10.1080/08957959.2010.532794
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baudelet F, Nataf L, Torchio R. New scientific opportunities for high pressure research by energy-dispersive XMCD. High Pressure Res. 2016;36:429–444. doi: 10.1080/08957959.2016.1211274
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tetsuo I, Ayako K, Shizue S, et al. Materials: ultrahard polycrystalline diamond from graphite. Nature. 2003;421:599–600.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ishimatsu N, Matsumoto K, Maruyama H, et al. Glitch-free X-ray absorption spectrum under high pressure obtained using nano-polycrystalline diamond anvils. J Synchrotron Rad. 2012;19:768–772. doi: 10.1107/S0909049512026088
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oliéric V, Ennifar E, Meents A, et al. Using X-ray absorption spectra to monitor specific radiation damage to anomalously scattering atoms in macromolecular crystallography. Acta Crystallogr D. 2007;63:759–768. doi: 10.1107/S0907444907019580
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Holton JM. A beginner's guide to radiation damage. J Synchrotron Rad. 2009;16:133–142. doi: 10.1107/S0909049509004361
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kubin M, Kern J, Guo M, et al. X-ray-induced sample damage at the Mn L-edge: a case study for soft X-ray spectroscopy of transition metal complexes in solution. Phys Chem Chem Phys. 2018;20:16817–16827. doi: 10.1039/C8CP03094D
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nienaber KH, Pushie MJ, Cotelesage JJH, et al. Cryoprotectants severely exacerbate X-ray-induced photoreduction. J Phys Chem Lett. 2018;9:540–544. doi: 10.1021/acs.jpclett.7b03111
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jonah CD. A short history of the radiation chemistry of water. Radiat Res. 1995;144:141–147. doi: 10.2307/3579253
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Le Caer S. Water radiolysis: influence of oxide surfaces on H2 production under ionizing radiation. Water. 2011;3:235–253. doi: 10.3390/w3010235
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Joshi S, Patil S, Iyer V, et al. Radiation induced synthesis and characterization of copper nanoparticles. Nanostruct Mater. 1998;10:1135–1144. doi: 10.1016/S0965-9773(98)00153-6
   Google Scholar
• Lee HJ, Je JH, Hwu Y, et al. Synchrotron X-ray induced solution precipitation of nanoparticles. Nucl Instrum Methods B. 2003;199:342–347. doi: 10.1016/S0168-583X(02)01561-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oyanagi H, Orimoto Y, Hayakawa K, et al. Nanoclusters synthesized by synchrotron radiolysis in concert with wet chemistry. Sci Rep. 2014;4:7199. doi: 10.1038/srep07199
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuzmin A, Anspoks A, Nataf L, et al. Influence of pressure and temperature on X-ray induced photoreduction of nanocrystalline CuO. Latvian J Phys Tech Sci. 2018;55:13–19. doi: 10.2478/lpts-2018-0039
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Corbett MC, Latimer MJ, Poulos TL, et al. Photoreduction of the active site of the metalloprotein putidaredoxin by synchrotron radiation. Acta Crystallogr D. 2007;63:951–960. doi: 10.1107/S0907444907035160
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Meents A, Gutmann S, Wagner A, et al. Origin and temperature dependence of radiation damage in biological samples at cryogenic temperatures. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2010;107:1094–1099. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0905481107
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Timoshenko J, Kuzmin A, Purans J. EXAFS study of hydrogen intercalation into ReO3 using the evolutionary algorithm. J Phys: Condens Matter. 2014;26:055401.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jonane I, Anspoks A, Nataf L, et al. Pressure-induced structural changes in α-MoO3 probed by X-ray absorption spectroscopy. IOP Conf Series: Mater Sci Eng. 2019;503:012018. doi: 10.1088/1757-899X/503/1/012018
   Google Scholar
• Liu D, Lei W, Hao J, et al. High-pressure Raman scattering and X-ray diffraction of phase transitions in MoO3. J Appl Phys. 2009;105:023513. doi: 10.1063/1.3056049
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Åsbrink S, Kihlborg L, Malinowski M. High-pressure single-crystal X-ray diffraction studies of MoO3. I. Lattice parameters up to 7.4 GPa. J Appl Crystallogr. 1988;21:960–962. doi: 10.1107/S0021889888008271
   Google Scholar