Opposed type double stage cell for Mbar pressure experiment with large sample volume

References

• Katsura T, Funakoshi K-i, Kubo A, et al. A large-volume high-pressure and high-temperature apparatus for in situ X-ray observation, ‘SPEED-Mk. II’. Phys Earth Planet Int. 2004;143:497–506. doi: 10.1016/j.pepi.2003.07.025
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang Y, Rivers M, Sutton S, et al. The large-volume high-pressure facility at GSECARS: a ‘Swiss-army-knife’ approach to synchrotron-based experimental studies. Phys Earth Planet Int. 2009;174:270–281. doi: 10.1016/j.pepi.2008.06.017
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ishii T, Yamazaki D, Tsujino N, et al. Pressure generation to 65 GPa in a Kawai-type multi-anvil apparatus with tungsten carbide anvils. High Press Res. 2017;37:507–515. doi: 10.1080/08957959.2017.1375491
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yamazaki D, Ito E, Yoshino T, et al. Over 1 Mbar generation in the Kawai-type multianvil apparatus and its application to compression of (Mg0. 92Fe0. 08) SiO3 perovskite and stishovite. Phys Earth Planet Int. 2014;228:262–267. doi: 10.1016/j.pepi.2014.01.013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boehler R, Guthrie M, Molaison JJ, et al. Large-volume diamond cells for neutron diffraction above 90 GPa. High Press Res. 2013;33:546–554. doi: 10.1080/08957959.2013.823197
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Egami T. Structural study by energy dispersive X-ray diffraction. In: Güntherodt HJ, Beck H, editors. Glassy metals I. Berlin: Springer; 1981. p. 25–44.
   Google Scholar
• Kono Y, Park C, Kenney-Benson C, et al. Toward comprehensive studies of liquids at high pressures and high temperatures: combined structure, elastic wave velocity, and viscosity measurements in the Paris–Edinburgh cell. Phys Earth Planet Int. 2014;228:269–280. doi: 10.1016/j.pepi.2013.09.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klotz S, Hamel G, Frelat J. A new type of compact large-capacity press for neutron and X-ray scattering. High Press Res. 2004;24:219–223. doi: 10.1080/08957950410001661963
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Endo S, Ito K. Electrical resistance of αFe2O3 under ultrahigh static pressure. Solid State Commun. 1980;36:189–190. doi: 10.1016/0038-1098(80)90680-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kunimoto T, Irifune T, Sumiya H. Pressure generation in a 6-8-2 type multi-anvil system: a performance test for third-stage anvils with various diamonds. High Press Res. 2008;28:237–244. doi: 10.1080/08957950802246530
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kunimoto T, Irifune T. Pressure generation to 125 GPa using a 6-8-2 type multianvil apparatus with nano-polycrystalline diamond anvils. J Phys Conf Ser. 2010;215:012190. Epub 1. doi: 10.1088/1742-6596/215/1/012190
   Google Scholar
• Tsuchiya T. First-principles prediction of the P-V-T equation of state of gold and the 660-km discontinuity in Earth’s mantle. J Geophys Res. 2003;108:2462. doi: 10.1029/2003JB002446
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kono Y, Kenney-Benson C, Ikuta D, et al. Ultrahigh-pressure polyamorphism in GeO2 glass with coordination number> 6. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2016;113:3436–3441. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1524304113
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Funamori N, Sato T. A cubic boron nitride gasket for diamond-anvil experiments. Rev Sci Instrum. 2008;79:053903.
   Google Scholar
• Kono Y, Shibazaki Y, Kenney-Benson C, et al. Pressure-induced structural change in MgSiO3 glass at pressures near the Earth’s core–mantle boundary. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2018;115:1742–1747.
   Google Scholar
• Ohira I, Kono Y, Shibazaki Y, et al. Ultrahigh pressure structural changes in a 60 mol.% Al2O3–40 mol.% SiO2 glass. Geochem Perspect Lett. 2019;10.
   Google Scholar
• Shibazaki Y, Kono Y, Shen G. Compressed glassy carbon maintaining graphite-like structure with linkage formation between graphene layers. Sci Rep. 2019;9:7531.
   Google Scholar
• Dunstan DJ, Spain IL. Technology of diamond anvil high-pressure cells: I. Principles, design and construction. J Phys E Sci Instrum. 1989;22:913.
   Google Scholar
• O’Bannon Iii EF, Jenei Z, Cynn H, et al. Contributed review: culet diameter and the achievable pressure of a diamond anvil cell: implications for the upper pressure limit of a diamond anvil cell. Rev Sci Instrum. 2018;89:111501.
   Google Scholar
• Nakamoto Y, Sakata M, Sumiya H, et al. Note: high-pressure generation using nano-polycrystalline diamonds as anvil materials. Rev Sci Instrum. 2011;82:066104. doi: 10.1063/1.3600794
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar