Biological changes in C57BL/6 mice following 3 weeks of inhalation exposure to cigarette smoke or e-vapor aerosols

References

• Ackermann M, Strimmer K. (2009). A general modular framework for gene set enrichment analysis. BMC Bioinformatics 10:47.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benjamini Y, Hochberg Y. (1995). Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. J R Stat Soc Series B Stat Methodol 57:289–300.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bradford MM. (1976). A rapid and sensitive method for the quantitation of microgram quantities of protein utilizing the principle of protein-dye binding. Anal Biochem 72:248–54.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cervellati F, Muresan XM, Sticozzi C, et al. (2014). Comparative effects between electronic and cigarette smoke in human keratinocytes and epithelial lung cells. Toxicol in Vitro 28:999–1005.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheng T. (2014). Chemical evaluation of electronic cigarettes. Tob Control 23 Suppl 2:ii11–7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• [CORESTA] Cooperation Centre for Scientific Research Relative to Tobacco. (2015). CORESTA recommended method N° 81, routine analytical machine for e-cigarette aerosol generation and collection – definitions and standard conditions; [accessed 2018 July 4]. Available from: https://www.coresta.org/sites/default/files/technical_documents/main/CRM_81.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Crotty Alexander LE, Drummond CA, Hepokoski M, et al. (2018). Chronic inhalation of e-cigarette vapor containing nicotine disrupts airway barrier function and induces systemic inflammation and multiorgan fibrosis in mice. Am J Physiol Integr Comp Physiol 314:R834–47.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• [FDA] Food and Drug Administration. (2016). Draft guidance for industry: premarket tobacco product applications for electronic nicotine delivery systems; [accessed 2018 July 4]. Available from: https://www.fda.gov/downloads/tobaccoproducts/labeling/rulesregulationsguidance/ucm499352.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Flora JW, Wilkinson CT, Wilkinson JW, et al. (2017). Method for the determination of carbonyl compounds in e-cigarette aerosols. J Chromatogr Sci 55:142–8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fujimoto H, Tsuji H, Okubo C, et al. (2015). Biological responses in rats exposed to mainstream smoke from a heated cigarette compared to a conventional reference cigarette. Inhal Toxicol 27:224–36.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gautier L, Cope L, Bolstad BM, et al. (2004). affy--analysis of Affymetrix GeneChip data at the probe level. Bioinformatics 20:307–315. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/14960456
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glynos C, Bibli SI, Katsaounou P, et al. (2018). Comparison of the effects of e-cigarette vapor with cigarette smoke on lung function and inflammation in mice. Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol 315:L662–72.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goniewicz ML, Knysak J, Gawron M, et al. (2014). Levels of selected carcinogens and toxicants in vapour from electronic cigarettes. Tob Control 23:133–9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haussmann HJ, Fariss MW. (2016). Comprehensive review of epidemiological and animal studies on the potential carcinogenic effects of nicotine per se. Crit Rev Toxicol 46:701–34.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herbrich SM, Cole RN, West KP, Jr, et al. (2013). Statistical inference from multiple iTRAQ experiments without using common reference standards. J Proteome Res 12:594–604.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoeng J, Talikka M, Martin F, et al. (2014). Case study: the role of mechanistic network models in systems toxicology. Drug Discov Today 19:183–92.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huber W, Von Heydebreck A, Sültmann H, et al. (2002). Variance stabilization applied to microarray data calibration and to the quantification of differential expression. Bioinformatics 18:S96–S104.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hultin-Rosenberg L, Forshed J, Branca RM, et al. (2013). Defining, comparing, and improving iTRAQ quantification in mass spectrometry proteomics data. Mol Cell Proteomics 12:2021–31.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kanehisa M, Furumichi M, Tanabe M, et al. (2017). KEGG: new perspectives on genomes, pathways, diseases and drugs. Nucleic Acids Res 45:D353–61.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin F, Sewer A, Talikka M, et al. (2014). Quantification of biological network perturbations for mechanistic insight and diagnostics using two-layer causal models. BMC Bioinformatics 15:238.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCall MN, Bolstad BM, Irizarry RA. (2010). Frozen robust multiarray analysis (fRMA). Biostatistics 11:242–53.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McRobbie H, Phillips A, Goniewicz ML, et al. (2015). Effects of switching to electronic cigarettes with and without concurrent smoking on exposure to nicotine, carbon monoxide, and acrolein. Cancer Prev Res (Phila) 8:873–8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ménache MG, Miller FJ, Raabe OB. (1995). Particle inhalability curves for humans and small laboratory animals. Ann Occup Hyg 39:317–28.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Misra M, Leverette RD, Cooper BT, et al. (2014). Comparative in vitro toxicity profile of electronic and tobacco cigarettes, smokeless tobacco and nicotine replacement therapy products: e-liquids, extracts and collected aerosols. Int J Environ Res Public Health 11:11325–47.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• [NAS] National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. (2018). Committee on the review of the health effects of electronic nicotine delivery systems. Public health consequences of e-cigarettes. Washington (DC): The National Academies Press.
   Google Scholar
• [NRC] National Research Council. (2011). Guide for the care and use of laboratory animals. 8th ed. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nutt DJ, Phillips LD, Balfour D, et al. (2014). Estimating the harms of nicotine-containing products using the MCDA approach. Eur Addict Res 20:218–25.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Obot CJ, Lee K, Fuciarelli AF, et al. (2004). Characterization of mainstream cigarette smoke (MS)-induced biomarker responses in ICR and C57Bl/6 mice. Inhal Toxicol 16:701–19.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ogunwale MA, Li M, Ramakrishnam Raju MV, et al. (2017). Aldehyde detection in electronic cigarette aerosols. ACS Omega 2:1207–14.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• [OECD] Organisation for economic co-operation and development. (2009). Guidance document on acute inhalation toxicity testing, No. 39; [accessed 2018 Sept 16]. Available from: https://ntp.niehs.nih.gov/iccvam/suppdocs/feddocs/oecd/oecd-gd39.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Phillips B, Titz B, Kogel U, et al. (2017). Toxicity of the main electronic cigarette components, propylene glycol, glycerin, and nicotine, in Sprague-Dawley rats in a 90-day OECD inhalation study complemented by molecular endpoints. Food Chem Toxicol 109:315–32.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Phillips B, Veljkovic E, Boué S, et al. (2016). An 8-month systems toxicology inhalation/cessation study in Apoe-/- mice to investigate cardiovascular and respiatory exposure effects of a candidate modified risk tobacco product, THS 2.2, compared with conventional cigarettes. Toxicol Sci 149:411–32.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Phillips B, Veljkovic E, Peck MJ, et al. (2015). A 7-month cigarette smoke inhalation study in C57BL/6 mice demonstrates reduced lung inflammation and emphysema following smoking cessation or aerosol exposure from a prototypic modified risk tobacco product. Food Chem Toxicol 80:328–45.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raabe OG, Al-Bayati MA, Teague SV, Rasolt A. (1988). Regional deposition of inhaled monodisperse coarse and fine aerosol particles in small laboratory animals. Ann Occup Hyg 31:53–63.
   Google Scholar
• [RCP UK] Royal College of Physicians. (2016). Nicotine without smoke: tobacco harm reduction; [accessed 2018 July 4]. Available from: https://www.rcplondon.ac.uk/projects/outputs/nicotine-without-smoke-tobacco-harm-reduction-0.
   Google Scholar
• Smyth GK. (2004). Linear models and empirical bayes methods for assessing differential expression in microarray experiments. Stat Appl Genet Mol Biol 3:Article3.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• St Helen G, Havel C, Dempsey DA, et al. (2016). Nicotine delivery, retention and pharmacokinetics from various electronic cigarettes. Addiction 111:535–44.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Talikka M, Boue S, Schlage WK. (2015). Causal biological network database: a comprehensive platform of causal biological network models focused on the pulmonary and vascular systems. In: Hoeng J, Peitsch MC, editors. Computational systems toxicology. New York, NY: Humana Press. p. 65–93.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor M, Carr T, Oke O, et al. (2016). E-cigarette aerosols induce lower oxidative stress in vitro when compared to tobacco smoke. Toxicol Mech Methods 26:465–76.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Thomson TM, Sewer A, Martin F, et al. (2013). Quantitative assessment of biological impact using transcriptomic data and mechanistic network models. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 272:863–78.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsuji H, Fujimoto H, Lee KM, et al. (2015). Characterization of biochemical, functional and structural changes in mice respiratory organs chronically exposed to cigarette smoke. Inhal Toxicol 27:342–53.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsuji H, Fujimoto H, Matsuura D, et al. (2011). Comparison of mouse strains and exposure conditions in acute cigarette smoke inhalation studies. Inhal Toxicol 23:602–15.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (US DHHS) (2014). The Health Consequences of Smoking—50 Years of Progress. A Report of the Surgeon General. Available from https://www.surgeongeneral.gov/library/reports/50-years-of-progress/exec-summary.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Vansickel AR, Edmiston JS, Liang Q, et al. (2018). Characterization of puff topography of a prototype electronic cigarette in adult exclusive cigarette smokers and adult exclusive electronic cigarette users. Regul Toxicol Pharmacol 98:250–6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wagner KA, Flora JW, Melvin MS, et al. (2018). An evaluation of electronic cigarette formulations and aerosols for harmful and potentially harmful constituents (HPHCs) typically derived from combustion. Regul Toxicol Pharmacol 95:153–60.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Werley MS, Kirkpatrick DJ, Oldham MJ, et al. (2016). Toxicological assessment of a prototype e-cigaret cartridge and three flavor formulations: a 90-day inhalation study in rats. Inhal Toxicol 28:22–38.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Werley MS, McDonald P, Lilly P, et al. (2011). Non-clinical safety and pharmacokinetic evaluations of propylene glycol aerosol in Sprague-Dawley rats and Beagle dogs. Toxicology 287:76–90.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar