US EPA's TSCA risk assessment approach: a case study of asbestos in automotive brakes

References

• Abelmann A, Glynn ME, Pierce JS, Scott PK, Serrano S, Paustenbach DJ. 2015. Historical ambient airborne asbestos concentrations in the United States – an analysis of published and unpublished literature (1960s-2000s). Inhal Toxicol. 27(14):754–766.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• American Chemistry Council (ACC). 2021. American chemistry council comments on the ORD Staff Handbook for developing IRIS assessments. Submitted to US EPA. p. 47, March 1.
   Google Scholar
• Agudo A, GonzaLez CA, Bleda MJ, Ramirez J, Hernandez S, Lopes F, Calleja A, Panades R, Turuguet D, Escolar A, et al. 2000. Occupation and risk of malignant pleural mesothelioma: a case-control study in Spain. Am J Ind Med. 37(2):159–168.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bang KM, Kim JH. 2001. Prevalence of cigarette smoking by occupation and industry in the United States. Am J Ind Med. 40(3):233–239.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bernstein DM, Toth B, Rogers RA, Kling D, Kunzendorf P, Phillips JI, Ernst H. 2020a. Evaluation of the exposure, dose-response and fate in the lung and pleura of chrysotile-containing brake dust compared to TiO2, chrysotile, crocidolite or amosite asbestos in a 90-day quantitative inhalation toxicology study – interim results part 1: experimental design, aerosol exposure, lung burdens and BAL. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol. 387:114856.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bernstein DM, Toth B, Rogers RA, Kling D, Kunzendorf P, Phillips JI, Ernst H. 2020b. Evaluation of the dose-response and fate in the lung and pleura of chrysotile-containing brake dust compared to TiO2, chrysotile, crocidolite or amosite asbestos in a 90-day quantitative inhalation toxicology study – interim results part 2: histopathological examination, confocal microscopy and collagen quantification of the lung and pleural cavity. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol. 387:114847.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bernstein DM. 2014. The health risk of chrysotile asbestos. Curr Opin Pulm Med. 20(4):366–370.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blake CL, Van Orden DR, Banasik M, Harbison RD. 2003. Airborne asbestos concentration from brake changing does not exceed permissible exposure limit. Regul. Toxicol. Pharmacol. 38(1):58–70.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boyles MSP, Poland CA, Raftis J, Duffin R. 2019. Assessment of the physicochemical properties of chrysotile-containing brake debris pertaining to toxicity. Inhal Toxicol. 31(8):325–342.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Camus M, Siemiatycki J, Case BW, Desy M, Richardson L, Campbell S. 2002. Risk of mesothelioma among women living near chrysotile mines versus US EPA asbestos risk model: preliminary findings. Ann Occup Hyg. 46(Suppl.1):95–98.
   Google Scholar
• Cardarelli JJ, II;, Ulsh BA. 2018. It is time to move beyond the linear no-threshold theory for low-dose radiation protection. Dose Response. 16(3):1559325818779651.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chatfield EJ. 1999. Correlated measurements of airborne asbestos-containing particles and surface dust. In Beard M, Rook H, editors. Advances in environmental measurement methods for asbestos. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM International; p. 378–402.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen HJ, Van Orden DR. 2008. Asbestos exposures of mechanics performing clutch service on motor vehicles. J Occup Environ Hyg. 5(3):148–156
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cooper TC, Sheehy JW, O'Brien DM, McGlothlan JD, Todd WF, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH). 1987. In-depth survey report: evaluation of brake drum service controls at United States postal service vehicle maintenance facility, Louisville, Kentucky. ECTB 152-11b, p. 33, December. https://www.cdc.gov/niosh/surveyreports/pdfs/152-11b.pdf?id=10 .26613/NIOSHEPHB15211b.
   Google Scholar
• Cooper TC, Sheehy JW, O'Brien DM, McGlothlan JD, Todd WF, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH). 1988. In-depth survey report: evaluation of brake drum service controls at cincinnati gas and electric garages, Cincinnati, Evanston, and Monroe, Ohio, and Covington, Kentucky. ECTB 152-22b, p. 30, January. https://www.cdc.gov/niosh/surveyreports/pdfs/152-22b.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Cox LA, Jr.; Goodman JE, Mayfield D, Cox Associates; Gradient. 2021. Comments on US EPA ORD staff handbook for developing IRIS assessments (Public Comment, November 2020). Report to National Stone, Sand & Gravel Association (NSSGA), p. 39, February 26.
   Google Scholar
• Crankshaw OS, Perkins RL, Beard ME. 1999. An overview of settled dust analytical methods and their relative effectiveness. In: Beard M, Rook H, editors. Advances in environmental measurement methods for asbestos. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM International; p. 350–365.
   Google Scholar
• Dement JM, Loomis D, Richardson D, Wolf S, Myers D. 2009. Estimates of historical exposures by phase contrast and transmission electron microscopy in North Carolina USA asbestos textile plants. "Occup Environ Med. 66(9):574–583.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dyken JJ, Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry (ATSDR). 2014. Letter to H. Daw (US EPA Region III) [re: Response to an asbestos release at the Hunting Point on the Potomac apartment complex in Alexandria, Virginia]; p.6, April 21.
   Google Scholar
• Elliott L, Loomis D, Dement J, Hein MJ, Richardson D, Stayner L. 2012. Lung cancer mortality in North Carolina and South Carolina chrysotile asbestos textile workers. Occup Environ Med. 69(6):385–390.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferro A, Zebedeo CN, Davis C, Ng KW, Pfau JC. 2014. Amphibole, but not chrysotile, asbestos induces anti-nuclear autoantibodies and IL-17 in C57BL/6 mice. J Immunotoxicol. 11(3):283–290.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Finley BL, Richter RO, Mowat FS, Mlynarek S, Paustenbach DJ, Warmerdam JM, Sheehan PJ. 2007. Cumulative asbestos exposure for US automobile mechanics involved in brake repair (circa 1950s–2000). J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol. 17(7):644–655.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fowler DP, Chatfield EJ. 1997. Surface sampling for asbestos risk assessment. Ann Occup Hyg. 41(inhaled particles VIII):279–286.
   Google Scholar
• Galassi T, Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA), Directorate of Enforcement Programs. 2015. Letter to D. Alford, Jr. (ALEC Services LLC) [Standard interpretation regarding whether an asbestos sampling protocol would meet the exposure assessment requirements of OSHA's asbestos construction standard, 29 CFR 1926.1101], October 7. https://www.osha.gov/laws-regs/standardinterpretations/2015-10-07.
   Google Scholar
• Garabrant DH, Alexander DD, Miller PE, Fryzek JP, Boffetta P, Teta MJ, Hessel PA, Craven VA, Kelsh MA, Goodman M. 2016. Mesothelioma among motor vehicle mechanics: an updated review and meta-analysis. ANNHYG. 60(8):1036–1026.
   Google Scholar
• Glynn ME, Keeton KA, Gaffney SH, Sahmel J. 2018. Ambient asbestos fiber concentrations and long-term trends in pleural mesothelioma incidence between urban and rural areas in the United States (1973–2012). Risk Anal. 38(3):454–471.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Godbey FW, Cooper TC, Sheehy JW, O'Brien DM, Van Wagenen HD, McGlothlan JD, Todd WF, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH). 1987. In-depth survey report: evaluation of brake drum service controls at United States Postal Service Vehicle Maintenance Facility, Nashville, Tennessee. ECTB 152-20b, p. 29, August. https://www.cdc.gov/niosh/surveyreports/pdfs/152-20b.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Goodman M, Teta MJ, Hessel PA, Garabrant DH, Craven VA, Scrafford CG, Kelsh MA. 2004. Mesothelioma and lung cancer among motor vehicle mechanics: a meta-analysis. Ann Occup Hyg. 48(4):309–326.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hatch D. 1970. Possible alternatives to asbestos as a friction material. Ann Occup Hyg. 13(1):25–29.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Health Effects Institute – Asbestos Research (HEI-AR). 1991. Asbestos in public and commercial buildings: a literature review and synthesis of current knowledge. p. 420.
   Google Scholar
• Hodgson JT, Darnton A. 2000. The quantitative risks of mesothelioma and lung cancer in relation to asbestos exposure. Ann Occup Hyg. 44(8):565–601.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Huang SXL, Jaurand MC, Kamp DW, Whysner J, Hei TK. 2011. Role of mutagenicity in asbestos fiber-induced carcinogenicity and other diseases. J Toxicol Environ Health B Crit Rev. 14(1–4):179–245.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jiang GC, Madl AK, Ingmundson KJ, Murbach DM, Fehling KA, Paustenbach DJ, Finley BL. 2008. A study of airborne chrysotile concentrations associated with handling, unpacking, and repacking boxes of automobile clutch discs. Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. 51(1):87–97.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson P, Zumwalde RD, Roberts D, [National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH)] 1979. Industrial hygiene assessment of seven brake servicing facilities: asbestos. NTIS PB2005-100060. p. 41, January 29.
   Google Scholar
• Kominsky JR, Millette JR, Brisson M, Ashley K, Lesage J, Dean SW. 2011. Evaluation of asbestos in dust on surfaces by micro-vacuum and wipe sampling. J Astm Int. 8(5):103477–103478.
   Google Scholar
• Lee RE, Van Orden DR, Stewart IM. 1999. Dust and airborne concentrations - Is there a correlation? In Beard M, Rook H, editors. Advances in environmental measurement methods for asbestos. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM International; p. 313–322.
   Google Scholar
• Lippmann M. 2014. Toxicological and epidemiological studies on effects of airborne fibers: coherence and public [corrected] health implications. Crit Rev Toxicol. 44(8):643–695.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loomis D, Dement JM, Wolf SH, Richardson DB. 2009. Lung cancer mortality and fibre exposures among North Carolina asbestos textile workers. Occup Environ Med. 66(8):535–542.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loomis D, Richardson DB, Elliott L. 2019. Quantitative relationships of exposure to chrysotile asbestos and mesothelioma mortality. Am J Ind Med. 62(6):471–477.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Madl AK, Scott LL, Murbach DM, Fehling KA, Finley BL, Paustenbach DJ. 2008. Exposure to chrysotile asbestos associated with unpacking and repacking boxes of automobile brake pads and shoes. Ann. Occup. Hyg. 52(6):463–479.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• McDonald AD, McDonald JC. 1980. Malignant mesothelioma in North America. Cancer. 46(7):1650–1656.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Millette JR, Hays SM. 1994. Settled asbestos dust sampling and analysis. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press LLC; p. 250.
   Google Scholar
• Moolgavkar SH, Chang ET, Mezei G, Mowat FS. 2017. Epidemiology of mesothelioma. In Testa JR, editor. Epidemiology of asbestos. Cham, Switzerland: Springer; p. 43–72.
   Google Scholar
• Nicholson WJ, Daum SM, Lorimer WV, Velez H, Lilis R, Selikoff IJ, Miller A, Anderson HA, Fischbein SA, Holstein EC, Mount Sinai School of Medicine, City University of New York, Environmental Sciences Laboratory, et al. 1984. Investigation of health hazards in brake lining repair and maintenance workers occupationally exposed to asbestos. Report to National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH). NTIS PB83-220897. p. 130, August.
   Google Scholar
• Paustenbach DJ, Brew D, Paustenbach and Associates. 2020. Letter report to panel members re: updated comments by Paustenbach on EPA draft risk evaluation for asbestos of March 30, 2020. p. 136, May 26.
   Google Scholar
• Paustenbach DJ, Richter RO, Finley BL, Sheehan PJ. 2003. An evaluation of the historical exposures of mechanics to asbestos in brake dust. Appl Occup Environ Hyg. 18(10):786–804.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Paustenbach DJ, Finley BL, Lu ET, Brorby GP, Sheehan PJ. 2004. Environmental and occupational health hazards associated with the presence of asbestos in brake linings and pads (1900 to present): a 'state-of-the-art' review. J Toxicol Env Hlth Part B. 7(1):33–110.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peto J, Rake C, Gilham C, Hatch J, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, Institute of Cancert Research. 2009. Occupational, domestic and environmental mesothelioma risks in Britain: a case-control study. Health and Safety Executive (UK) Research Report RR696. p. 76
   Google Scholar
• Pierce JS, Ruestow PS, Finley BL. 2016. An updated evaluation of reported no-observed adverse effect levels for chrysotile asbestos for lung cancer and mesothelioma. Crit Rev Toxicol. 46(7):561–586.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richter RO, Finley BL, Paustenbach DJ, Williams PR, Sheehan PJ. 2009. An evaluation of short-term exposures of brake mechanics to asbestos during automotive and truck brake cleaning and machining activities. J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol. 19(5):458–474.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roberts DR, Zumwalde RD, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH). 1982. Industrial hygiene summary report of asbestos exposure assessment for brake mechanics. NTIS PB87-105433, p. 45, November 22.
   Google Scholar
• Rohl AN, Langer AM, Wolff MS, Weisman I. 1976. Asbestos exposure during brake lining maintenance and repair. Environ Res. 12(1):110–128.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rolland P, Gramond C, Lacourt A, Astoul P, Chamming's S, Ducamp S, Frenay C, Galateau-Salle F, Ilg AG, Imbernon E, PNSM Study Group, et al. 2010. Occupations and industries in France at high risk for pleural mesothelioma: a population-based case-control study (1998–2002). Am J Ind Med. 53(12):1207–1219.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sheehy JW, Cooper TC, O'Brien DM, McGlothlin JD, Froehlich PA, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH). 1989. Control of asbestos exposure during brake drum service. DEHS (NIOSH) Publication No. 89-121. p. 70, August.
   Google Scholar
• Sheehy JW, Godbey FW, Cooper TC, Lenshan KL, Van Wagenen HD, McGlothlan JD, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH). 1987a. In-depth survey report: evaluation of brake drum service operations at Ohio Department of Transportation Maintenance Facility, Lebanon, Ohio. ECTB 152-18b, p.35, February. https://www.cdc.gov/niosh/surveyreports/pdfs/152-18b.pdf?id=10 .26613/NIOSHEPHB15218b.
   Google Scholar
• Sheehy JW, Todd WF, Cooper TC, Lenshan KL, Van Wagenen HD, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH). 1987b. In-depth survey report: evaluation of brake drum controls at service operations at Cincinnati Bell Maintenance Facility, Fairfax, Ohio. ECTB 152-21b, p. 28, October. https://www.cdc.gov/niosh/surveyreports/pdfs/152-21b.pdf?id=10 .26613/NIOSHEPHB15221b.
   Google Scholar
• Teschke K, Morgan MS, Checkoway H, Franklin G, Spinelli JJ, van Belle G, Weiss NS. 1997. Mesothelioma surveillance to locate sources of exposure to asbestos. Can J Public Health. 88(3):163–168.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tomasallo CD, Christensen KY, Raymond M, Creswell PD, Anderson HA, Meiman JG. 2018. An occupational legacy: malignant mesothelioma incidence and mortality in Wisconsin. J Occup Environ Med. 60(12):1143–1149.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tomasetti C, Li L, Vogelstein B. 2017. Stem cell divisions, somatic mutations, cancer etiology, and cancer prevention. Science. 355(6331):1330–1334.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• US EPA. 1988. IRIS chemical assessment summary for asbestos (CAS No. 1332-21-4), p. 14, September 26. https://www.epa.gov/iris.
   Google Scholar
• US EPA. 2008. Framework for investigating asbestos-contaminated superfund sites. Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response (OSWER). OSWER Directive 9200.0-68, p. 71, September. https://semspub.epa.gov/work/HQ/175329.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• US EPA. 2015. Investigation of indoor environments at asbestos-contaminated superfund sites. Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response (OSWER), Technical Review Workgroup Asbestos Committee. OSWER Directive # 9200.3-101, p.17, March.
   Google Scholar
• US EPA. 2016a. How to develop and maintain a building asbestos operations and maintenance (O&M) program: managing asbestos in place. December 20. https://www.epa.gov/asbestos/how-develop-and-maintain-building-asbestos-operations-and-maintenance-om-program.
   Google Scholar
• US EPA. 2016b. Subpart E – asbestos-containing materials in schools. 40 CFR 763.80-99, p. 88. https://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/CFR-2016-title40-vol34/pdf/CFR-2016-title40-vol34-part763-subpartE.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• US EPA. 2017. Scope of the risk evaluation for asbestos. Office of Chemical Safety and Pollution Prevention. EPA-740-R1-7008, p. 58, June.
   Google Scholar
• US EPA. 2018. Application of systematic review in TSCA risk evaluations (final). Office of Chemical Safety and Pollution Prevention; US EPA, Office of Pollution Prevention and Toxics. EPA Document # 740-P1-8001, p. 248, May. https://www.epa.gov/sites/production/files/2018-06/documents/final_application_of_sr_in_tsca_05-31-18.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• US EPA. 2020a. Final risk evaluation for asbestos part 1: chrysotile asbestos. Office of Chemical Safety and Pollution Prevention. EPA-740-R1-8012, p. 352, December. https://www.epa.gov/assessing-and-managing-chemicals-under-tsca/final-risk-evaluation-asbestos-part-1-chrysotile.
   Google Scholar
• US EPA. 2020b. Draft risk evaluation for asbestos. Office of Chemical Safety and Pollution Prevention. EPA-740-R1-8012, p. 310, March.
   Google Scholar
• US EPA. 2020c. Final risk evaluation for asbestos part 1: chrysotile asbestos. Summary of external peer review and public comments and disposition, supplemental file for epidemiologic studies of automotive mechanics. Office of Chemical Safety and Pollution Prevention, p. 15, December. https://www.epa.gov/assessing-and-managing-chemicals-under-tsca/final-risk-evaluation-asbestos-part-1-chrysotile.
   Google Scholar
• US EPA. 2020d. ORD staff handbook for developing IRIS assessments (version 1.0) (Public Comment Draft). Office of Research and Development. EPA/600/R-20/137, p. 280, November. https://cfpub.epa.gov/ncea/iris_drafts/recordisplay.cfm?deid=350086.
   Google Scholar
• US EPA. 2020e. Risk evaluation for trichloroethylene (CASRN: 79-01-6) (Final). Office of Chemical Safety and Pollution Prevention. EPA Document # 740R18008, p. 803, November. https://www.epa.gov/sites/production/files/2020-11/documents/1._risk_evaluation_for_trichloroethylene_tce_casrn_79-01-6.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• US EPA. 2020f. Risk evaluation for perchloroethylene (ethene, 1,1,2,2-tetrachloro-) (CASRN: 127-18-4) (Final). Office of Chemical Safety and Pollution Prevention. EPA Document # 740-R1-8011, p. 714, December. https://www.epa.gov/sites/production/files/2020-12/documents/1_risk_evaluation_for_perchloroethylene_pce_casrn_127-18-4_0.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• US EPA. 2021a. Assessing and managing chemicals under TSCA: application of systematic review in TSCA risk evaluations, February 16. https://www.epa.gov/assessing-and-managing-chemicals-under-tsca/application-systematic-review-tsca-risk-evaluations.
   Google Scholar
• US EPA. 2021c. Procedures for chemical substance risk evaluation (Part 702.33 – definitions). 40 CFR 702 subpart B, April 22. https://ecfr.gov/cgi-bin/text-idx?SID=42b4e5a02ff3755dffbec6025e0f8e5c&mc=true&node=se40.33.702_133&rgn=div8.
   Google Scholar
• US EPA. 2021d. Risk evaluation for C.I. Pigment Violet 29 (Anthra[2,1,9-def:6,5,10-d'e'f']diisoquinoline-1,3,8,10(2H,9H)-tetrone) (CASRN: 81-33-4). Office of Chemical Safety and Pollution Prevention. EPA Document #740-R-18-015, p. 137, January. https://www.epa.gov/sites/production/files/2021-01/documents/1_final_risk_evaluation_for_c.i._pigment_violet_29.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• US EPA. 2021b. EPA commits to strengthening science used in chemical risk evaluations. Office of Chemical Safety and Pollution Prevention (OCSPP), February 16. https://www.epa.gov/newsreleases/epa-commits-strengthening-science-used-chemical-risk-evaluations.
   Google Scholar
• Van den Borre L, Deboosere P. 2015. Enduring health effects of asbestos use in Belgian industries: a record-linked cohort study of cause-specific mortality (2001-2009). BMJ Open. 5(6):e007384.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yarborough CM. 2006. Chrysotile as a cause of mesothelioma: an assessment based on epidemiology. Crit Rev Toxicol. 36(2):165–187.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar