Publication Cover
Inhalation Toxicology
International Forum for Respiratory Research
Volume 11, 1999 - Issue 6-7
36
Views
2
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

CURRENT TRENDS IN TOXICOLOGICAL RISK ASSESSMENT: Perspectives from the Committee on Toxicology

Pages 459-476 | Published online: 01 Oct 2008

References

  • Ames, B. N., and Gold, L. S. 1990. Chemical carcinogenesis: Too many rodent carcinogens. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 87:7772–7776.
  • Ames, B. N., Lee, F. D., and Durston, W. E. 1973. An improved bacterial test system for the detection and classification of mutagens and carcinogens. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 70:782–786.
  • Andersen, M. E., Clewell, H. J. I., Gargas, M. L., Smith, F. A., and Reitz, R. H. 1987. Physiologically based pharmacokinetics and the risk assessment process for methylene chloride. Toxicol. Appl. PharmacoL 87:185–205.
  • Andersen, M. E., Krewski, D., and Withey, J. R. 1993. Physiologic pharmacokinetics and cancer risk assessment. Cancer Lett. 69:1–14.
  • Armitage, P., and Doll, R. 1961. Stochastic models for carcinogenesis. In Proceedings of the Fourth Berkeley Symposium on Mathematical Statistics and Probability, ed. J. Neyman, pp. 19–37. Berkeley: University of California Press.
  • Barnes, D. G., and Dourson, M. 1988. Reference dose (RfD): Description and use in health risk assessments. ReguL Toxicol. Pharmacol. 8:471–486.
  • Crump, K. S., Clewell, H. J., and Andersen, M. E. 1997. Cancer and non-cancer risk assessment should be harmonized. Hum. EcoL Risk Assess. 3:495–499.
  • Crump, K. S., Krewski, D., and Wang, Y. 1998. Estimates of the number of liver carcinogens in bioas-says conducted by the National Toxicology Program. Risk Anal. 18:299–308.
  • Cullen, A. 1999. Addressing uncertainty-Lessons drawn from probabilistic exposure analysis. InhaL Toxicol. 11:603–610.
  • Daston, G. P. 1999. Recent advances in reproductive and developmental toxicology. Inhal. ToxicoL 11:535–540.
  • Faustman, E., Lewandowksi, T. A., Ponce, R. A., and Bartell, S. M. 1999. Biologically based dose-response models for developmental toxicants: Lessons from methylmercury. Inhal. Toxicol. 11: 559–572.
  • French, J. E., Spalding, J. W., Dunnick, J. K., Tice, R. R., Furedi-Machacek, M., and Tennant, R. W. 1999. The use of transgenic animals in cancer testing. Inhal. Toxicol. 11: 541–544.
  • Gaylor, D., Ryan, L., Krewski, D., and Zhu, Y. 1998. Procedures for calculating benchmark doses for health risk assessment. ReguL ToxicoL Pharmaco1.28:150–164.
  • Gaylor, D. W., Kodell, R. L., Chen, J. J., and Krewski, D. 1999. A unified approach to risk characteri-zation InhaL Toxicol. 11:575–578.
  • Goddard, M. J., and Krewski, D. 1995. The future of mechanistic research in risk assessment: Where are we going and can we get there from here? Toxicology102:53–70.
  • Health Canada. 1997. Human health and the environment Ottawa: Health Canada.
  • Hrudey, S. E., and Krewski, D. 1995. Is there a safe level of exposure to a carcinogen? Environ. Sci. Technol. 29:370A–375A.
  • Hulka, B. S., and Margolin, B. H. 1992. Methodological issues in epidemiologic studies using biolog-ical markers. Am.]. Epidemiol. 135:200–209.
  • International Agency for Research on Cancer. 1992. Solar and ultraviolet radiation. ARC Monogr. Eval. Carcinogen. Risks Hum. 55. Lyon: IARC.
  • International Expert Panel on Carcinogen Risk Assessment. 1996. The use of mechanistic data in the risk assessments of ten chemicals: An introduction to chemical-specific reviews. Pharmacol. Ther. 71:1–5.
  • Karol, M., and Stoliker, D. 1998. Immunotoxioology: Past, present, and future. Inhal. Toxicol. 11: 523–534.
  • Krewski, D., Leroux, B. G., Bleuer, S. R., and Broekhoven, L. 1993. Modeling the Ames Salmonella/ microsome assay. Biometrics 49:499–510.
  • Krewski, D., Withey, J. R., Ku, L.-F., and Andersen, M. E. 1994. Applications of physiologic pharmaco-kinetic modeling in carcinogenic risk assessment. Environ. Health Perspect. 102\(suppl. 11):37–50.
  • Krewski, D., Gaylor, D. W., and Lutz, W. K. 1995. Additivity to background and linear extrapolation. In Low dose extrapolation of cancer risks: Issues and perspectives, eds. S. Olin, W. Farland, C. Park, L. Rhomberg, R. Scheuplein, T. Starr, and J. Wilson, pp. 105–121, Washington, DC: ILSI Press.
  • Krewski, D., Zhu, Y., and Fung, K. Y. 1999. Benchmark doses for developmental toxicants. Inhal. Toxicol. 11:579–591.
  • Le, X. C., Xing, J. Z., Lee, J., Leadon, S. A., and Weinfeld, M. 1998. Inducible repair of thymine gly-col detected by an ultrasensitive assay for DNA damage. Science 280:1066–1069.
  • Lehman, A. J., and Fitzhugh, 0. G. 1954.100-Fold margin of safety. Assoc. Food Drug Off. Q. Bull. 18: 33.
  • Leroux, B. G., Leisenring, W. M., Moolgavkar, S. H., and Faustman, E. M. 1996. A biologically-based dose-response model for developmental toxicology. Risk Anal. 16:449–458.
  • Lioy, P. J. 1999. Exposure analysis and assessment in the 21st Century. Inhal. Toxicol. 11:623-635. Margolin, B. H., Kaplan, N., and Zeiger, E. 1981. Statistical analysis of the Ames Salmonella/micro-some test. Proc. NatL Acad. ScL USA 78:3779–3783.
  • McKone, T. E. 1999. The rise of exposure assessment among the risk sciences: An evaluation through case studies. Inhal. Toxicol. 11:611–622.
  • MacPha il, R. C. 1999. Recent developments in neurotoxicology. Inhal. Toxicol. 11:519–521.
  • Moolgavkar, S. H., Krewski, D., Zeiss, L., Cardis, E., and Moller, H. 1998. Quantitative estimation and prediction of human cancer risks. IARC Scientific Publications No. 131. Lyon: IARC.
  • National Research Council. 1964. Letter report on a list of chemicals with toxicity ratings. Committee on Toxicology. Ref: MMT, 3161/3,10 February 1964. U.S. Coast Guard, Headquarters. March 19.
  • National Research Council. 1971. Basis for Establishing Guides for Short-Term Exposures of the Public to Air Pollutants. Committee on Toxicology. Washington, DC: NAS-NRC.
  • National Research Council. 1979. Criteria for Short-Term Exposure to Air Pollutants. Committee on Toxicology, Board on Environmental Health Hazards. Washington, DC: National Academy of Sciences.
  • National Research Council. 1980. Epidemiological Investigation of Health Effects in Air Force Personnel Following Exposure to Herbicide Orange. Panel on the Proposed Air Force Study of Herbicide Orange, Committee on Toxicology, Board on Environmental Health Hazards. Wash-ington, DC: National Academy of Sciences.
  • National Research Council. 1983. Risk assessment in the federal government: Managing the process. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
  • National Research Council. 1984. Letter report on dieldrin. This report provides advice on emer-gency water standard dieldrin for personnel consuming dieldrin contaminated water in Diego Garcia. August 16. Committee on Toxicology. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
  • National Research Council. 1985. Emergency and continuous exposure limits for selected airborne contaminants, Vol. 5. Committee on Toxicology, Board on Toxicology and Environmental Health Hazards. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
  • National Research Council. 1986a. Emergency and continuous exposure guidance levels for selected airborne contaminants, Vol. 6. Benzene and ethylene oxide. Committee on Toxicology, Board on Environmental Studies and Toxicology. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
  • National Research Council. 1986b. Criteria and Methods for Preparing Emergency Exposure Guidance Level (EEGL), Short-Term Public Emergency Guidance Level (SPEGL), and Continuous Exposure Guidance Level (CEGL) Documents. Committee on Toxicology, Board on Environmental Studies and Toxicology. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
  • National Research Council. 1987. Emergency and continuous exposure guidance levels for selected air-borne contaminants, Vol. 7. Ammonia, hydrogen chloride, lithium bromide, and toluene Com-mittee on Toxicology, Board on Environmental Studies and Toxicology. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
  • National Research Council. 1988a. Submarine air quality: Monitoring the air in submarines; Health effects in divers of breathing submarine air under hyperbaric conditions. Panel on Monitoring and Panel on Hyperbarics and Mixtures, Subcommittee on Submarine Air Quality, Committee on Toxicology, Board on Environmental Studies and Toxicology, Commission on Life Sciences. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
  • National Research Council. 1988b. Acceptable Levels of Dioxin Contamination in An Office Building Following a Transformer Fire. Subcommittee on Dioxin, Committee on Toxicology, Board on Environmental Studies and Toxicology, Commission on Life Sciences. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
  • National Research Council. 1 988c. Letter report on the Army's proposed time-weighted average (TWA) for hydrogen chloride under the INF Treaty. Committee on Toxicology. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
  • National Research Council. 1991. Review of the U.S. Army Environmental Hygiene Agency Toxicology Division. Subcommittee on the U.S. Army Environmental Hygiene Agency Toxicology Program, Committee on Toxicology, Board on Environmental Studies and Toxicology. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
  • National Research Council. 1992. Guidelines for developing spacecraft maximum allowable concen-trations for space station contaminants. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
  • National Research Council. 1993. Health effects of ingested fluoride. Washington, DC: National Acad-emy Press.
  • National Research Council. 1994a. Spacecraft maximum allowable concentrations for selected air-borne contaminants,Vol. 1. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
  • National Research Council. 1 994b. Science and judgement in risk assessment. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
  • National Research Council. 1995a. Nitrate and Nitrite in Drinking Water. Committee on Toxicology, Board on Environmental Studies and Toxicology. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
  • National Research Council. 1995b. Guidelines for Chemical Warfare Agents in Military Field Drinking Water. Committee on Toxicology, Board on Environmental Studies and Toxicology. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
  • National Research Council. 1 996a. Permissible exposure levels for selected military fuel vapors. Committee on Toxicology, Board on Environmental Studies and Toxicology. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
  • National Research Council. 1996b. Spacecraft maximum allowable concentrations for selected air-borne contaminants, Vol. 2. Committee on Toxicology, Board on Environmental Studies and Toxicology. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
  • National Research Council. 1996c. Spacecraft maximum allowable concentrations for selected air-borne contaminants, Vol. 3. Committee on Toxicology, Board on Environmental Studies and Toxicology. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
  • National Research Council. 1997a. Toxicologic Assessment of the Army's Zinc Cadmium Sulfide Dis-persion Tests. Subcommittee on Zinc Cadmium Sulfide, Committee on Toxicology, Board on Environmental Studies and Toxicology, Commission on Life Sciences. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
  • National Research Council. 1 997b. Toxicologic Assessment of the Army's Zinc Cadmium Sulfide Dispersion Tests: Answers to Commonly Asked Questions. Subcommittee on Zinc Cadmium Sulfide, Committee on Toxicology, Board on Environmental Studies and Toxicology, Commis-sion on Life Sciences. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
  • National Research Council. 1998. Research priorities for airborne particulate matter: Immediate pri-orities and a long-term research portfolio. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
  • National Research Council. 1999. Health effects of exposure to radon. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
  • Olin, S., Farland, W., Park, C., Rhomberg, L., Schenplein, R., Starr, T., and Wilson, J., eds. 1995. Low dose extrapolation of cancer risks: Issues and perspectives. Washington, DC: ILSI Press.
  • Preston, R. J. 1999. Recent advances in genetic toxicology and their relevance to cancer risk assess-ment. lnhaL Toxicol. 11:555–557.
  • Rai, S. N., and Krewski, D. 1998. Analysis of uncertainty and variability in multiplicative risk models. Risk Analysis18:37–45.
  • Rai, S. N., Krewski, D., and Bartlett, S. 1996. A general framework for the analysis of uncertainty and variability in risk assessment. Health Ecol. Risk Assess. 2:972–989.
  • Stayner, L., Smith, R. J., Gilbert, S., and Bailer, A. J. 1999. Epidemiologic approaches to risk assess-ment. Inhal. Toxicol. 11:549–554.
  • Tennant, R. W., Spalding, J., Stasiewicz, 5, and Ashby, J. 1990. Prediction of the outcome of rodent carcinogenicity bioassays currently being conducted on 44 chemicals by the National Toxicol-ogy Program. Mutagenesis. 5: 95–102.
  • U.S. Presidential/Congressional Commission on Risk Assessment and Risk Management. 1997. Framework for environmental health risk management. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office. Vainio, H., Magee, P. N., McGregor, D. B., and McMichael, A. J. (eds.). 1992. Mechanisms of carcinogenesis in risk identification Lyon: International Agency for Research on Cancer.
  • Williams, G. M. 1999. Mechanistic considerations in cancer risk assessment. lnhal. Toxicol. 11:549–554.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.