BENCHMARK DOSES FOR DEVELOPMENTAL TOXICANTS

REFERENCES

• Barnes, D. G., and Dourson, M. 1988. Reference dose (RfD): Description and use in health risk assessments. ReguL Toxicol. Pharmacol. 8:471–486.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bosch, R. J., Wypij, D., and Ryan, L. M. 1996. A semiparametric approach to risk assessment for quantitative outcomes. Risk Anal. 16:657–665.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bowman, D., Chen, J. J., and George, E. 0. 1995. Estimating variance functions in developmental toxicity studies. Biometrics 51:1523–1528.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carr, G. J., and Portier, C. J. 1993. An evaluation of some methods for fitting dose-response models to quantal-response developmental toxicology data. Biometrics 49:779–791.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Catalano, P. J., and Ryan, L. M. 1992. Bivariate latent variable models for clustered discrete and con-tinuous outcomes.]. Am. Stat. Assoc. 87:651–658.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Catalano, P. J., Scharfstein, D. 0., Ryan, L., Kimmel, C., and Kimmel, G. 1993. Statistical model for fetal death, fetal weight, and malformation in developmental toxicity studies. Teratology 47: 281–290.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Chen, J. J. 1993. A malformation incidence dose-response model incorporating fetal weight and/or litter size as covariates. Risk Anal. 13:559–564.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, J. J., and Kodell, R. L. 1989. Quantitative risk assessment for teratologic effects. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 84:966–971.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, J. J., and Li, L. A. 1994. Dose-response modeling of trinomial responses from developmental experiments. Stat. Sin. 4:265–274.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, J. J., Kodell, R. L., Howe, R. B., and Gaylor, D. W. 1991. Analysis of trinomial responses from reproductive and developmental toxicity experiments. Biometrics 47:1049–1058.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crump, K. S. 1984. A new method for determining allowable daily intakes. Fundam. Appl. Toxicol. 4:854–871.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Faustmann, E. M., Lewandowski, T. A., Ponce, R. A., and Bartell, S.M. 1999. Biologically based dose-response models for developmental toxicants: Lesson from methylmercury. lnhal. Toxicol. 11:559–572.
   Google Scholar
• Fung, K. Y., Krewski, D., Rao, J. N. K., and Scott, J. A. 1994. Tests for trend in developmental toxicity experiments with correlated binary data. Risk Anal. 14:639–648.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gaylor, D. W., Ryan, L., Krewski, D., and Zhu, Y. 1998. Procedures for calculating benchmark doses for health risk assessment. Regul. Toxicol. Pharmaco1.28:150–164.
   Google Scholar
• Kavlock, R. J., Schmid, J. E., and Setzer, R. W. 1996. A simulation study of the influence of study design on the estimation of benchmark doses for developmental toxicity. Risk Anal. 16:399–410.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kimmel, C. A., and Gaylor, D. W. 1988. Issues in qualitative and quantitative risk analysis for devel-opmental toxicity. Risk Anal. 8:15–20.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kodell, R. L., and West, R. W. 1993. Upper confidence limits on excess risk for quantitative responses. Risk Anal. 13:177–182.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krewski, D., and Zhu, Y. 1994. Applications of multinomial dose-response models in developmental toxicity risk assessment. Risk Anal. 14:613–627.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krewski, D., and Zhu, Y. 1995. A simple data transformation for estimating benchmark dose in devel-opmental toxicity experiments. Risk Anal. 15:29–39.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krewski, D., Zhu, Y., and Fung, K. Y. 1996. Statistical analysis of overdispersed multinomial data from developmental toxicity studies. In Statistics in toxicity, ed. B. T. Morgan, pp. 151-178. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kupper, L. L., and Haseman, J. K. 1978. The use of a correlated binomial model for the analysis of certain toxicological experiments. Biometrics 34:69–76.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kupper, L. L., Portier, C., Hogan, M. D., and Yamamoto, E. 1986. The impact of litter effects on dose-response modeling in teratology. Biometrics 42:85–98.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leisenring, W., and Ryan, L. 1992. Statistical properties of the NOAEL. ReguL ToxicoL PharmacoL 15:161–171.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liang, K. Y., and Zeger, S. L. 1986. Longitudinal data analysis using generalized linear models. Biometrika 73:13–22.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marro, L. 1996. Comparison of Quantitative Risk Assessment Procedures Based on Overdispersecl Data from Developmental Toxicity Experiments. Unpublished MSc thesis, University of Windsor, Windsor, Ontario, Canada.
   Google Scholar
• McCullagh, P., and Nelder, J. A. 1989. Generalized linear models. London: Chapman and Hall. Moore, D. F. 1987. Modelling the extraneous variation in the presence of extra-binomial variation. Appl. Stat. 36:8–14.
   Google Scholar
• Prentice, R. L. 1986. Binary regression using an extended beta-binomial distribution, with discussion of correlation induced by covariate measurementerrors. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 81:321–327.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rao, J. N. K., and Scott, A. 1992. A simple method for analysis of clustered binary data. Biometrics 48:577–585.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ryan, L. M. 1992a. The use of generalized estimating equations for risk assessment in developmental toxicity. Risk Anal. 12:439–447.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ryan, L. M. 1992 b. Quantitative risk assessment for developmental toxicity. Biometrics 48:163-174. Ryan, L. M., Catalano, P. J., Kimmel, C., and Kimmel, G. 1991. Relationship between fetal weight and malformation in developmental toxicity studies. Teratology 44:215–223.
   Google Scholar
• Stiteler, W. M., Joly, D. A., and Printup, H. A. T. 1993. Monte Carlo Investigation of Issues Relating to the Benchmark Dose Method. Task No. 2–30, Environmental Criteria and Assessment Office. Cincinnati, OH: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.
   Google Scholar
• Shuy, D., Lau, C., Logsdon, T. R., Zucker, R. M., Elstein, K. H., Narotsky, M. G., Setzer, R. W., Kavlock, R. J., and Rogers, J. M. 1994. Biologically-based dose-response modeling in devel-opmental toxicology: Biochemical and cellular sequelae of 5-fluorouracil in the developing rat. Toxicol. Applied PharmacoL 126:129–144.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. 1991. Guidelines for developmental toxicity risk assessment. Fed. Reg. 56: 63797–63826.
   Google Scholar
• Williams, D. A. 1988. Estimation bias using the beta-binomial distribution in teratology. Biometrics 44:305–309.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhu, Y., and Fung, K. Y. 1996. Statistical methods in developmental toxicity risk assessment. In Toxicology, and risk assessment principles, methods and applications, eds. A. M. Fan and L. W. Chang, pp. 413-446. New York: Marcel Dekker.
   Google Scholar
• Zhu, Y., Krewski, D., and Ross, W. H. 1994. Multinomial models for developmental toxicity experi-ments. Appl. Stat. 43:583–598.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar