Transpersonal Efficacy: How Efficacy Perceptions of Single Others Influence Task Performance

REFERENCES

• Albanese , R. and Van Fleet , D. D. 1985 . Rational behavior in groups: The free-riding tendency . Academy of Management Review , 10 : 244 – 255 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baker , D. F. 2001 . The development of collective efficacy in small task groups . Small Group Research , 32 : 451 – 474 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bandiera , O. , Barankay , I. and Rasul , I. 2005 . Social preferences and the response to incentives: evidence from personnel data . Quarterly Journal of Economics , 120 : 917 – 962 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bandura , A. 1997 . Self-efficacy: The exercise of control , New York , NY : Freeman .
   Google Scholar
• Bandura , A. and Locke , E. A. 2003 . Negative self-efficacy and goal effects revisited . Journal of Applied Psychology , 88 : 87 – 99 .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barry , B. and Stewart , G. L. 1997 . Composition, process, and performance in self-managed groups: The role of personality . Journal of Applied Psychology , 82 : 62 – 78 .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bishop , J. W. and Scott , K. D. 2000 . An examination of organizational and team commitment in a self-directed team environment . Journal of Applied Psychology , 85 : 439 – 450 .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Child , D. 1990 . The essentials of factor analysis, second edition , London , UK : Cassel Educational .
   Google Scholar
• Condie , S. J. , Warner , W. K. and Gillman , D. C. 1976 . Volunteer donation in mass blood drives . Journal of Applied Psychology , 61 : 290 – 294 .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Devine , D. J. , Clayton , L. D. , Philips , J. L. , Dunford , B. B. and Melner , S. B. 1999 . Team in organizations: Prevalence, characteristics, and effectiveness . Small Group Research , 30 : 678 – 711 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eden , D. 2001 . “ Means efficacy: External sources of general and specific subjective efficacy ” . In Work motivation in the context of a globalizing economy , Edited by: Erez , M. , Kleinbeck , U. and Thierry , H. 73 – 86 . Hillsdale , NJ : Erlbaum .
   Google Scholar
• Eden , D. , Ganzach , Y. , Flumin-Granat , R. and Zigman , T. 2010 . Augmenting means efficacy to boost performance: Two field experiments . Journal of Management , 36 : 687 – 713 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Erez , A. , Lepine , J. A. and Elms , H. 2002 . Effects of rotated leadership and peer evaluation on the functioning and effectiveness of self managed teams: A quasi-experiment . Personnel Psychology , 55 : 929 – 948 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Falk , A. and Ichino , A. 2006 . Clean evidence on peer effects . Journal of Labor Economics , 24 : 39 – 57 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feltz , D. L. and Lirgg , C. D. 1998 . Perceived team and player efficacy in hockey . Journal of Applied Psychology , 83 : 557 – 564 .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Festinger , L. 1954 . A theory of social comparison . Human Relations , 7 : 117 – 140 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gibson , C. B. 1999 . Do they do what they believe they can? Group efficacy and group effectiveness across tasks and cultures . Academy of Management Journal , 42 : 138 – 152 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gibson , C. B. and Earley , P. C. 2007 . Collective cognition in action: Accumulation, interaction, examination, and accommodation in the development and operation of group efficacy beliefs in the workplace . Academy of Management Review , 32 : 438 – 458 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gibson , C. B. , Randel , A. and Earley , P. C. 2000 . Understanding group efficacy: An empirical test of multiple assessment methods . Group & Organization Management , 25 : 67 – 97 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gully , S. M. , Incalcaterra , K. A. , Joshi , A. and Beaubien , J. M. 2002 . A meta-analysis of team efficacy, potency, and performance: Interdependence and level of analysis as moderators of observed relationships . Journal of Applied Psychology , 87 : 819 – 832 .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guzzo , R. A. and Shea , G. P. 1992 . “ Group performance and intergroup relations in organizations ” . In Handbook of industrial and organizational psychology , 2nd , Edited by: Dunnette , M. D. and Hough , L. M. Vol. 3 , 269 – 313 . Palo Alto , CA : Consulting Psychologists Press .
   Google Scholar
• Harkins , S. G. and Jackson , J. M. 1985 . The role of evaluation in eliminating social loafing . Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin , 11 : 575 – 584 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hertel , G. , Kerr , N. L. and Messe , L. A. 2000 . Motivation gains in performance groups: Paradigmatic and theoretical developments in the Kohler effect . Journal of Personality and Social Psychology , 79 : 580 – 601 .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holden , G. 1991 . The relationship of self-efficacy appraisals to subsequent health-related outcomes: A meta-analysis . Social Work in Health Care , 16 : 53 – 93 .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ilgen , D. R. 1986 . “ Laboratory research: A question of when, not if ” . In Generalizing from lab to field settings , Edited by: Locke , E. A. 257 – 267 . Lexington , MA : Heath .
   Google Scholar
• Ilgen , D. R. , Hollenbeck , J. R. , Johnson , M. and Jundt , D. 2005 . From input-process-output models to IMOI models . Annual Review of Psychology , 56 : 517 – 543 .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ingham , A. G. , Levinger , G. , Graves , J. and Peckham , V. 1974 . The Ringelmann effect: Studies of group size and group performance . Journal of Personality and Social Psychology , 10 : 371 – 384 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jehn , K. A. 1994 . Enhancing effectiveness: an investigation of advantages and disadvantages of value-based intragroup conflict . International Journal of Conflict Management , 5 : 223 – 238 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karau , S. J. and Williams , K. D. 1993 . Social loafing: A meta-analytic review and theoretical integration . Journal of Personality and Social Psychology , 65 : 681 – 706 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karau , S. J. and Williams , K. D. 2001 . “ Understanding individual motivation in groups: The collective effort model ” . In Groups at work: Theory and research , Edited by: Turner , M. E. 113 – 142 . Mahwah , NJ : Erlbaum .
   Google Scholar
• Kerr , N. L. and Bruun , S. E. 1983 . Dispensability of member effort and group motivation losses: Free-rider effects . Journal of Personality and Social Psychology , 44 : 78 – 94 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kerr , N. L. , Mess , L. M. , Park , E. S. and Sambolec , E. 2005 . Identifiably, performance feedback and the Köhler effect . Group Processes and Intergroup Relations , 8 : 375 – 390 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kerr , N. L. , Messe , L. A. , Seok , D. , Sambolec , E. J. , Lount , R. B. Jr. and Park , E. S. 2007 . Psychological mechanisms underlying the Köhler motivation gain . Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin , 33 : 828 – 841 .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Köhler , O. 1926 . Kraftleistungen bei Einzel- und Gruppenabeit [Physical performance in individual and group situations] . Industrielle Psychotechnik , 3 : 274 – 282 .
   Google Scholar
• Köhler , O. 1927 . Über den Gruppenwirkungsgrad der menschlichen Körperarbeit und die Bedingung optimaler Kollektivkraftreaktion [On group efficiency of physical labor and the conditions of optimal collective performance] . Industrielle Psychotechnik , 4 : 209 – 226 .
   Google Scholar
• Larson , J. R. , Christensen , C. , Franz , T. M. and Abbott , A. S. 1998 . Diagnosing groups: The pooling, management, and impact of unshared case information in team-based medical decision making . Journal of Personality and Social Psychology , 75 : 93 – 108 .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Latané , B. , Williams , K. and Harkins , S. 1979 . Many hands make light the work: The causes and consequences of social loafing . Journal of Personality and Social Psychology , 37 : 822 – 832 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lent , R. W. , Schmidt , J. and Schmidt , L. 2006 . Collective efficacy beliefs in student work teams: Relation to self-efficacy, cohesion, and performance . Journal of Vocational Behavior , 68 : 73 – 84 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Littlepage , G. E. and Mueller , A. L. 1997 . Recognition and utilization of expertise in problem-solving groups: Expert characteristics and behavior . Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice , 1 : 324 – 328 .
   Google Scholar
• Locke , E. A. 2001 . Motivation by goal setting . Handbook of Organizational Behavior , 2 : 43 – 54 .
   Google Scholar
• Locke , E. A. , Latham , G. P. and Erez , M. 1988 . The determinants of goal commitment . Academy of Management Review , 13 : 23 – 39 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Magyar , T. M. , Feltz , D. L. and Simpson , I. P. 2004 . Individual and crew level determinants of collective efficacy in rowing . Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology , 26 : 136 – 153 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marks , M. A. , Sabella , M. J. , Burke , C. S. and Zaccaro , S. J. 2002 . The impact of cross-training on team effectiveness . Journal of Applied Psychology , 87 : 3 – 13 .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mas , A. and Moretti , E. 2009 . Peers at work . American Economic Review , 99 : 112 – 145 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mast , M. S. , Hall , J. A. and Schmid , P. C. 2010 . Wanting to be boss and wanting to be subordinate: Effects on performance motivation . Journal of Applied Social Psychology , 40 : 458 – 472 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mayer , R. C. and Davis , J. H. 1999 . The effect of the performance appraisal system of trust on management: A field quasi-experiment . Journal of Applied Psychology , 84 : 123 – 136 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mayer , R. C. , Davis , J. H. and Schoorman , F. D. 1995 . An integrative model of organizational trust . Academy of Management Review , 20 : 709 – 734 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moreland , R. L. 2010 . Are dyads really groups? . Small Group Research , 41 : 251 – 267 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moritz , S. E. , Feltz , D. L. , Fahrbach , K. R. and Mack , D. E. 2000 . The relation of self-efficacy measures to sport performance: A meta-analytic review . Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport , 71 : 280 – 294 .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Multon , K. D. , Brown , S. D. and Lent , R. W. 1991 . Relation of selfefficacy beliefs to academic outcomes: A meta-analytic investigation . Journal of Counseling Psychology , 38 : 30 – 38 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petty , R. E. , Harkins , S. G. and Williams , K. D. 1980 . The effects of diffusion of cognitive effort on attitudes: An information processing view . Journal of Personality and Social Psychology , 38 : 81 – 92 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Podsakoff , P. M. , Ahearne , M. and MacKenzie , S. B. 1997 . Organizational citizenship behavior and the quantity and quality of work group performance . Journal of Applied Psychology , 82 : 262 – 270 .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prussia , G. E. and Kinicki , A. J. 1996 . A motivational investigation of group effectiveness using social–cognitive theory . Journal of Applied Psychology , 81 : 187 – 198 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rousseau , D. M. , Sitkin , S. B. , Burt , R. S. and Camerer , C. 1998 . Not so different after all: Across-discipline view of trust . Academy of Management Review , 23 : 393 – 404 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seijts , G. H. , Latham , G. P. and Whyte , G. 2000 . Effects of self- and group efficacy on group performance in a mixed-motive situation . Human Performance , 13 : 279 – 298 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stajkovic , A. D. and Luthans , F. 1998 . Self-efficacy and work-related performance: A meta-analysis . Psychological Bulletin , 124 : 240 – 261 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sundstrom , E. , DeMeuse , K. P. and Futrell , D. 1990 . Work teams: Applications and effectiveness . American Psychologist , 45 : 120 – 133 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sundstrom , E. , McIntyre , M. , Halfhill , T. R. and Richards , H. 2000 . Work groups: From the Hawthorne studies to work teams of the 1990s and beyond . Group Dynamics , 4 : 44 – 67 .
   Google Scholar
• van der Vegt , G. S. , Bunderson , J. S. and Oosterhaf , A. 2006 . Expertness diversity and interpersonal helping in teams: Why those who need to most help end up getting the least . Academy of Management Journal , 49 : 877 – 893 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vroom , V. H. 1964 . Work and motivation , New York , NY : Wiley .
   Google Scholar
• Wageman , R. 1995 . Interdependence and group effectiveness . Administrative Science Quarterly , 40 : 145 – 180 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang , S. and Lin , S. S. J. 2008 . The effects of group composition of self-efficacy and collective efficacy on computer-supported collaborative learning . Computers in Human Behavior , 23 : 2256 – 2268 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watson , C. B. , Chemers , M. M. and Preiser , N. 2001 . Collective efficacy: A multilevel analysis . Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin , 27 : 1057 – 1068 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weldon , E. and Gargano , G. M. 1988 . Cognitive loafing: The effects of accountability and shared responsibility on cognitive effort . Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin , 14 : 159 – 171 .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams , K. D. and Karau , S. J. 1991 . Social loafing and social compensation: The effects of expectations on co-worker performance . Journal of Personality and Social Psychology , 61 : 570 – 581 .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar