The Incremental Validity of Honesty–Humility Over Cognitive Ability and the Big Five Personality Traits

REFERENCES

• Ashton, M. C., & Lee, K. (2005a). A defense of the lexical approach to the study of personality structure. European Journal of Personality, 19, 5–24.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ashton, M. C., & Lee, K. (2005b). Honesty-Humility, the Big Five, and the five-factor model. Journal of Personality, 73, 1321–1353.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ashton, M. C., & Lee, K. (2007). Empirical, theoretical, and practical advantages of the HEXACO model of personality structure. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 11, 150–166.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ashton, M. C., Lee, K., & Goldberg, L. R. (2004). A hierarchical analysis of 1,710 English personality-descriptive adjectives. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 87, 707–721.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ashton, M. C., Lee, K., Perugini, M., Szarota, P., De Vries, R. E., Di Blas, L., et al. (2004). A six-factor structure of personality-descriptive adjectives: solutions from psycholexical studies in seven languages. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 86, 356–366.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barrick, M. R., & Mount, M. K. (1991). The Big Five personality dimensions and job performance: A meta-analysis. Personnel Psychology, 44, 1–26.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barrick, M. R., Mount, M. K., & Judge, T. A. (2001). Personality and performance at the beginning of the new millennium: What do we know and where do we go next. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 9, 9–30.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barrick, M. R., Stewart, G. L., & Piotrowski, M. (2002). Personality and job performance: Test of the mediating effects of motivation among sales representatives. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87, 43–51.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bennett, R. J., & Robinson, S. L. (2000). Development of a measure of workplace deviance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85, 349–360.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borman, W. C., & Motowidlo, S. J. (1993). Expanding the criterion domain to include elements of contextual performance. In N. Schmitt & W. C. Borman ( Eds.), Personnel selection in organization ( pp. 71–98). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Borman, W. C., & Motowidlo, S. J. (1997). Task performance and contextual performance: The meaning for personnel selection research. Human Performance, 10, 99–110.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bourdage, J. S., Lee, K., Lee, J-H., & Shin, K-H. (2012). Motives for organizational citizenship behavior: Personality correlates and co-worker ratings of OCB. Human Performance, 25, 179–200.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brogden, H. E. (1949). When testing pays off. Personnel Psychology, 2, 171–183.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, K. G., Le, H., & Schmidt, F. L. (2006). Specific aptitude theory revisited: Is there incremental validity for training performance? International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 14, 87–100.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campbell, J. P., McCloy, R. A. Oppler, S. H., & Sager, C. E. (1993). A theory of performance. In N. Schmitt & W. C. Borman ( Eds.), Personnel selection in organization ( pp. 71–98). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Chiaburu, D. S., Oh, I.-S., Berry, C. M., Li, N., & Gardener, R. G. (2011). The Five-Factor Model of personality traits and organizational citizenship behaviors: A meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 96, 1140–1166.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clevenger, J., Pereira, G. M., Wiechmann, D., Schmitt, N., & Harvey, V. S. (2001). Incremental validity of situational judgment tests. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86, 410–417.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coleman, V. I., & Borman, W. C. (2000). Investigating the underlying structure of the citizenship performance domain. Human Resource Management Review, 10, 25–44.
   Google Scholar
• Connelly, B. S., & Ones, D. S. (2010). An other perspective on personality: Meta-analytic integration of observers’ accuracy and predictive validity. Psychological Bulletin, 136, 1092–1122.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Costa, P. T., Jr., & McCrae, R. R. (1992). NEO Personality Inventory Revised (NEO–PI–R) and NEO Five-Factor Inventory (NEO-FFI) Professional Manual. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.
   Google Scholar
• Digman, J. M. (1990). Personality structure: Emergence of the five-factor model. Annual Review of Psychology, 41, 417–440.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dilchert, S., Ones, D. S., Davis, R. D., & Rostow, C. D. (2007). Cognitive ability predicts objectively measured counterproductive work behaviors. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92, 616–627.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dunnette, M. D. (1966). Personnel selection and placement. Oxford, England: Wadsworth.
   Google Scholar
• Goldberg, L. R. (1990). An alternative description of personality: The Big Five factor structure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59, 1216–1229.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldberg, L. R. (1999). A broad-bandwidth, public domain, personality inventory measuring the lower-level facets of several five-factor models. In I. Mervielde, I. Deary, F. De Fruyt, & F. Ostendorf ( Eds.), Personality psychology in Europe (Vol. 7, pp. 7–28). Tilburg, the Netherlands: Tilburg University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gottfredson, L. S. (1997). Why g matters? The complexity of everyday life. Intelligence, 24, 79–132.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grant, A. M., & Mayer, D. M. (2009). Good soldiers and good actors: Prosocial and impression management motives as interactive predictors of affiliative citizenship behaviors. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94, 900–912.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hilbig, B. E., & Zettler, I. (2009). Pillars of cooperation: Honesty-Humility, social value orientations, and economic behavior. Journal of Research in Personality, 43, 516–519.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hogan, J., & Holland, B. (2003). Using theory to evaluate personality and job performance relations: A socioanalytic perspective. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88, 100–112.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hough, L. M., & Furnham, A. (2003). Use of personality variables in work settings. In W. C. Borman, D. R. Ilgen, & R. J. Klimoski ( Eds.), Handbook of psychology, Vol. 12: Industrial and organizational psychology ( pp. 131–169). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Hunter, J. E., & Cohen, S. H. (1969). PACKAGE: A system of computer routines for the analysis of correlational data. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 29, 697–700.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hunter, J. E., & Hunter, R. F. (1984). Validity and utility of alternate predictors of performance. Psychological Bulletin, 96, 72–98.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hunter, J. E., & Schmidt, F. L. (2004). Methods of meta-analysis: Correcting error and bias in research findings. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Hunter, J. E., Schmidt, F. L., & Le, H. (2006). Implications of direct and indirect range restriction for meta-analysis methods and findings. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91, 594–612.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ilies, R., Fulmer, I. S., Spitzmuller, M., & Johnson, M. D. (2009). Personality and citizenship behavior: The mediating role of job satisfaction. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94, 945–959.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ilies, R., Scott, B. A., & Judge, T. A. (2006). The interactive effects of personal traits and experienced states on intraindividual patterns of citizenship behavior. Academy of Management Journal, 49, 561–575.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, J. W. (2000). A heuristic method for estimating the relative weight of predictor variables in multiple regression. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 35, 1–19.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, J. W., & LeBreton, J. M. (2004). History and use of relative importance indices in organizational research. Organizational Research Methods, 7, 238–257.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Judge, T. A., Jackson, C. L., Shaw, J. C., Scott, B. A., & Rich, B. L. (2007). Self-efficacy and work-related performance: The integral role of individual differences. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92, 107–127.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Landy, F. J. (2005). Some historical and scientific issues on emotional intelligence. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 26, 411–424.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, C., Lee, S., Yoo, T.-Y., & Lee, D. (2002, December). Development and assessment of the Korea Police Agency test battery: Personality, bio-data, and general mental ability [Korean]. Technical report.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, K., & Allen, N. J. (2002). Organizational citizenship behavior and workplace deviance: The role of affect and cognitions. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87, 131–142.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, K., & Ashton, M. C. (2004). Psychometric properties of the HEXACO personality inventory. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 39, 329–358.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, K., & Ashton, M. C. (2005). Psychopathy, Machiavellianism, and Narcissism in the Five-Factor Model and the HEXACO model of personality structure. Personality and Individual Differences, 38, 1571–1582.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, K., Ashton, M. C., & de Vries, R. E. (2005a). Predicting workplace delinquency and integrity with the HEXACO and Five-Factor models of personality structure. Human Performance, 18, 179–197.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, K., Ashton, M. C., Pozzebon, J. A., Visser, B. A., Bourdage, J. S., & Ogunfowora, B. (2009). Similarity and assumed similarity in personality reports of well-acquainted persons. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 96, 460–472.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, K., Ogunfowora, B., & Ashton, M. C. (2005b). Personality traits beyond the Big Five: Are they within the HEXACO space? Journal of Personality, 73, 1437–1463.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marcus, B., Lee, K., & Ashton, M. C. (2007). Personality dimensions explaining relationships between integrity tests and counterproductive behavior: Big Five, or one in addition? Personnel Psychology, 60, 1–34.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McHenry, J. J., Hough, L. M., Toquam, J. L., Hanson, M. A., & Ashworth, S. (1990). Project A validity results: The relationship between predictor and criterion domains. Personnel Psychology, 43, 335–354.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mitchell, T. R., & Daniels, D. (2001). Motivation. In W.C. Borman, D. R. Ilgen, & R. J. Klimoski ( Eds.), Comprehensive handbook of psychology, Vol. 12: Industrial and organizational psychology (225–254). New York: Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Morgeson, F. P., Campion, M. A., Dipboye, R. L., Hollenbeck, J. R., Murphy, K., & Schmitt, N. (2007). Reconsidering the use of personality tests in personnel selection contexts. Personnel Psychology, 60, 683–729.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Motowidlo, S. J., & van Scotter, J. R. (1994). Evidence that task performance should be distinguished from contextual performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 79, 475–480.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mount, M. K., & Barrick, M. R. (1995). Personal Characteristics Inventory. Libertyville, IL: Wonderlic, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Mount, M. K., Witt, L. A., & Barrick, M. R. (2000). Incremental validity of empirically keyed biodata scales over GMA and the five factor personality constructs. Personnel Psychology, 53, 1–24.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murphy, K. R. (2006). Four conclusions about emotional intelligence. In K. R. Murphy ( Ed.), Critique of emotional intelligence: What are the problems and how can they be fixed? (245–254). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Murphy, K. R., & Dzieweczynski, J. L. (2005). Why don’t measures of broad dimensions of personality perform better as predictors of job performance? Human Performance, 18, 343–357.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nguyen, B., Ogunfowora, B., & Bourdage, J. S. (2010, April). An investigation of major personality traits underlying self-monitoring. Paper presented at the Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology Conference, Atlanta, GA.
   Google Scholar
• Nielsen, R., Marrone, J. A., & Slay, H. S. (2010). A new look at humility: Exploring the humility concept and its role in socialized charismatic leadership. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 17, 33–43.
   Google Scholar
• Oh, I.-S., Wang, G., & Mount, M. K. (2011). Validity of observer ratings of the Five-Factor Model of personality: A meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 96, 762–773.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Organ, D. W., & Ryan, K. (1995). A meta-analytic review of attitudinal and dispositional predictors of organizational citizenship behavior. Personnel Psychology, 48, 775–802.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rotundo, M., & Sackett, P. R. (2002). The relative importance of task, citizenship, and counterproductive performance to global ratings of job performance: A policy-capturing approach. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87, 66–80.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rowatt, W. C., Powers, C., Targhetta, V., Comer, J., Kennedy, S., & LaBouff, J. (2006). Development and initial validation of an implicit measure of humility relative to arrogance. Journal of Positive Psychology, 1, 198–211.
   Google Scholar
• Salgado, J. F. (2002). The Big Five personality dimensions and counterproductive Behaviors. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 10, 117–125.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salgado, J. F., Anderson, N., Moscoso, S., Bertua, C., & de Fruyt, F. (2003). International validity generalization of GMA and cognitive abilities: A European community meta-analysis. Personnel Psychology, 56, 573–605.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salgado, J. F., Viswesvaran, C., & Ones, D. S. (2001). Predictors used in personnel selection: An overview of constructs, methods and techniques. In N. Anderson, D. S. One, H. K. Sinangil, & C. Viswesvaran ( Eds.), International handbook of work and organizational psychology (Vol. 1) (pp. 166–199). London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Schmidt, F. L., & Hunter, J. E. (1996). Measurement error in psychological research: Lessons from 26 research scenarios. Psychological Methods, 1, 199–223.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmidt, F. L., & Hunter, J. E. (1998). The validity and utility of selection methods in personnel psychology: Practical and theoretical implications of 85 years of research findings. Psychological Bulletin, 124, 262–274.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmidt, F. L., Hunter, J. E., & Urry, V. W. (1976). Statistical power in criterion-related validity studies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 61, 473–485.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmidt, F. L., Oh, I.-S., & Le, H. (2006). Increasing the accuracy of corrections for range restriction: Implications for selection procedure validities and other research results. Personnel Psychology, 59, 281–305.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmidt, F. L., Shaffer, J. A., & Oh, I.-S. (2008). Increased accuracy for range restriction corrections: Implications for the role of personality and general mental ability in job and training performance. Personnel Psychology, 61, 827–868.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmitt, N., Cortina, J. M., Ingerick, M., & Wiechmann, D. (2003). Personnel selection and employee performance. In W. C. Borman, D. R. Ilgen, & R. J. Klimoski ( Eds.), Comprehensive handbook of psychology: Volume 12: Industrial and organizational psychology (pp. 77–105). New York: Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Schneider, B., & Schmitt, N. (1986). Staffing organizations. Glenview, IL: Foresman & Co.
   Google Scholar
• Thomas, J., Whitman, D. S., & Viswesvaran, C. (2010). An integrative meta-analysis of constructs that reflect a global proactive orientation. Journal of Organizational and Occupational Psychology, 83, 275–300.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tyler, G. P., & Newcombe, P. A. (2006). Relationships between work performance and personality traits in Hong Kong organizational settings. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 14, 37–50.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Scotter, J. R., & Motowidlo, S. J. (1996). Interpersonal facilitation and job dedication as separate facets of contextual performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 81, 525–531.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Viswesvaran, C., Schmidt, F. L., & Ones, D. S. (2005). Is there a general factor in rating of job performance? A meta-analytic framework for disentangling substantive and error influences. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90, 108–131.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whitman, D. S., Van Rooy, D. L., & Viswesvaran, C. (2010). Satisfaction, citizenship behaviors, and performance in work units: A meta-analysis of collective construct relations. Personnel Psychology, 63, 41–81.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams, L. J., & Anderson, S. E. (1991). Job satisfaction and organizational commitment as predictors of organizational citizenship and in-role behaviors. Journal of Management, 17, 601–617.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wonderlic & Associates (1983). Wonderlic Personnel Test manual. Northfield, IL: Wonderlic.
   Google Scholar
• Yoo, T. Y., & Kim, D. Y. (2004, April). The components of contextual performance in Korean work organizations. Paper presented at the 19th Annual Conference of the Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology, Chicago, IL.
   Google Scholar