Shared leadership and team effectiveness: The examination of LMX differentiation and servant leadership on the emergence and consequences of shared leadership

References

• Aryee, S., Walumbwa, F. O., Zhou, Q., & Hartnell, C. A. (2012). Transformational leadership, innovative behavior, and task performance: Test of mediation and moderation processes. Human Performance, 25, 1–25. doi:10.1080/08959285.2011.631648
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator–mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1173–1182. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.51.6.1173
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bauer, T. N., & Green, S. G. (1996). Development of leader-member exchange: A longitudinal test. Academy of Management Journal, 39, 1538–1567. doi:10.2307/257068
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blader, S. L., & Tyler, T. R. (2009). Testing and extending the group engagement model: Linkages between social identity, procedural justice, economic outcomes, and extra role behavior. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94, 445–464. doi:10.1037/a0013935
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bliese, P. D. (2000). Within-group agreement, non-independence, and reliability: Implications for data aggregation and analysis. In K. J. Klein & S. W. Kozlowski (Eds.), Multilevel theory, research, and methods in organizations (pp. 349–381). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Boies, K., & Howell, J. M. (2006). Leader–member exchange in teams: An examination of the interaction between relationship differentiation and mean LMX in explaining team-level outcomes. The Leadership Quarterly, 17, 246–257. doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2006.02.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brislin, R. (1986). The wording and translation of research instruments. In W. J. Lonner & J. W. Berry (Eds.), Field methods in cross-cultural research (pp. 137–164). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, M. E., & Treviño, L. K. (2006). Ethical leadership: A review and future directions. The Leadership Quarterly, 17, 595–616. doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2006.10.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carson, J. B., Tesluk, P. E., & Marrone, J. A. (2007). Shared leadership in teams: An investigation of antecedent conditions and performance. Academy of Management Journal, 50, 1217–1234. doi:10.2307/20159921
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chan, D. (1998). Functional relations among constructs in the same content domain at different levels of analysis: A typology of composition models. Journal of Applied Psychology, 83, 234–246. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.83.2.234
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Contractor, N. S., DeChurch, L. A., Carson, J., Carter, D. R., & Keegan, B. (2012). The topology of collective leadership. The Leadership Quarterly, 23, 994–1011. doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2012.10.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cox, J. F., Pearce, C. L., & Perry, M. L. (2003). Toward a model of shared leadership and distributed influence in the innovation process: How shared leadership can enhance new product development, team dynamics and effectiveness. In C. L. Pearce & J. A. Conger (Eds.), Shared leadership: Reframing the hows and whys of leadership (pp. 48–76). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Day, D. V., Gronn, P., & Salas, E. (2006). Leadership in team-based organizations: On the threshold of a new era. The Leadership Quarterly, 17, 211–216. doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2006.02.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dienesch, R. M., & Liden, R. M. (1986). Leader–member exchange model of leadership: A critique and further development. Academy of Management Review, 11, 618–634.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Drescher, M. A., Korsgaard, M. A., Welpe, I. M., Picot, A., & Wigand, R. T. (2014). The dynamics of shared leadership: Building trust and enhancing performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 99(5), 771–783. doi:10.1037/a0036474
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edwards, J. R., & Lambert, L. S. (2007). Methods for integrating moderation and mediation: A general analytical framework using moderated path analysis. Psychological Methods, 12, 1–22. doi:10.1037/1082-989X.12.1.1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ehrhart, M. G. (2004). Leadership and procedural justice climate as antecedents of unit-level organizational citizenship behavior. Personnel Psychology, 57, 61–94. doi:10.1111/peps.2004.57.issue-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ehrhart, M. G., & Naumann, S. E. (2004). Organizational citizenship behavior in work groups: A group norms approach. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89, 960–974. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.89.6.960
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Erdogan, B., & Bauer, T. N. (2010). Differentiated leader–member exchanges: The buffering role of justice climate. Journal of Applied Psychology, 95, 1104–1120. doi:10.1037/a0020578
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Euwema, M. C., Wendt, H., & Van Emmerik, H. (2007). Leadership styles and group organizational citizenship behavior across cultures. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 28, 1035–1057. doi:10.1002/(ISSN)1099-1379
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gonzalez-Mulé, E., Courtright, S. H., DeGeest, D., Seong, J. Y., & Hong, D. S. (2016). Channeled autonomy the joint effects of autonomy and feedback on team performance through organizational goal clarity. Journal of Management 42(7), 2018–2033. doi:10.1177/0149206314535443
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gupta, V. K., Huang, R., & Niranjan, S. (2010). A longitudinal examination of the relationship between team leadership and performance. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 17, 335–350. doi:10.1177/1548051809359184
   Google Scholar
• Hale, J. R., & Fields, D. L. (2007). Exploring servant leadership across cultures: A study of followers in Ghana and the USA. Leadership, 3, 397–417. doi:10.1177/1742715007082964
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harris, T. B., Li, N., & Kirkman, B. L. (2014). Leader–member exchange (LMX) in context: How LMX differentiation and LMX relational separation attenuate LMX’s influence on OCB and turnover intention. The Leadership Quarterly, 25, 314–328. doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2013.09.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hiller, N. J., DeChurch, L. A., Murase, T., & Doty, D. (2011). Searching for outcomes of leadership: A 25-year review. Journal of Management, 37, 1137–1177. doi:10.1177/0149206310393520
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hofstede, G. (2001). Culture’s consequences: Comparing values, behaviors, institutions, and organizations across nations (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Hu, J., & Liden, R. C. (2011). Antecedents of team potency and team effectiveness: An examination of goal and process clarity and servant leadership. Journal of Applied Psychology, 96, 851–862. doi:10.1037/a0022465
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ishikawa, J. (2012). Transformational leadership and gatekeeping leadership: The roles of norm for maintaining consensus and shared leadership in team performance. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 29, 265–283. doi:10.1007/s10490-012-9282-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• James, L. R., Demaree, R. G., & Wolf, G. (1984). Estimating within-group interrater reliability with and without response bias. Journal of Applied Psychology, 69, 85–98. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.69.1.85
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jiang, W., & Gu, Q. (2016). How abusive supervision and abusive supervisory climate influence salesperson creativity and sales team effectiveness in China. Management Decision, 54, 455–475. doi:10.1108/MD-07-2015-0302
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jiang, W., Wang, L., & Lin, H. (2016). The role of cognitive processes and individual differences in the relationship between abusive supervision and employee career satisfaction. Personality and Individual Differences, 99, 155–160. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2016.04.088
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Joseph, E. E., & Winston, B. E. (2005). A correlation of servant leadership, leader trust, and organizational trust. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 26, 6–22. doi:10.1108/01437730510575552
   Google Scholar
• Kirkman, B. L., Chen, G., Farh, J. L., Chen, Z. X., & Lowe, K. B. (2009). Individual power distance orientation and follower reactions to transformational leaders: A cross-level, cross-cultural examination. Academy of Management Journal, 52, 744–764. doi:10.5465/AMJ.2009.43669971
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, A. N., & Liao, H. (2014). How do leader–member exchange quality and differentiation affect performance in teams? An integrated multilevel dual process model. Journal of Applied Psychology, 99, 847–866. doi:10.1037/a0037233
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liden, R. C., Erdogan, B., Wayne, S. J., & Sparrowe, R. T. (2006). Leader–member exchange, differentiation, and task interdependence: Implications for individual and group performance. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 27, 723–746. doi:10.1002/(ISSN)1099-1379
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liden, R. C., Wayne, S. J., Liao, C., & Meuser, J. D. (2014). Servant leadership and serving culture: Influence on individual and unit performance. Academy of Management Journal, 57, 1434–1452. doi:10.5465/amj.2013.0034
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liden, R. C., Wayne, S. J., Zhao, H., & Henderson, D. (2008). Servant leadership: Development of a multidimensional measure and multi-level assessment. Leadership Quarterly, 19, 161–177. doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2008.01.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lind, E. A., & Tyler, T. R. (1988). The social psychology of procedural justice. New York, NY: Plenum.
   Google Scholar
• Liu, S., Hu, J., Li, Y., Wang, Z., & Lin, X. (2014). Examining the cross-level relationship between shared leadership and learning in teams: Evidence from China. The Leadership Quarterly, 25, 282–295. doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2013.08.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Locke, E. A. (2003). Leadership: Starting at the top. In C. L. Pearce & J. A. Conger (Eds.), Shared leadership: Reframing the hows and whys of leadership (pp. 271–284). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Ma, L., & Qu, Q. (2010). Differentiation in leader–member exchange: A hierarchical linear modeling approach. The Leadership Quarterly, 21, 733–744. doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2010.07.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacKinnon, D. P., Lockwood, C. M., & Williams, J. (2004). Confidence limits for the indirect effect: Distribution of the product and resampling methods. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 39, 99–128. doi:10.1207/s15327906mbr3901_4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marks, M. A., Mathieu, J. E., & Zaccaro, S. J. (2001). A temporally based framework and taxonomy of team processes. Academy of Management Review, 26, 356–376.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mittal, R., & Dorfman, P. W. (2012). Servant leadership across cultures. Journal of World Business, 47, 555–570. doi:10.1016/j.jwb.2012.01.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muethel, M., Gehrlein, S., & Hoegl, M. (2012). Socio-demographic factors and shared leadership behaviors in dispersed teams: Implications for human resource management. Human Resource Management, 51, 525–548. doi:10.1002/hrm.v51.4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nahapiet, J., & Ghoshal, S. (1998). Social capital, intellectual capital, and the organizational advantage. Academy of Management Review, 23, 242–266.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parris, D. L., & Peachey, J. W. (2013). A systematic literature review of servant leadership theory in organizational contexts. Journal of Business Ethics, 113, 377–393. doi:10.1007/s10551-012-1322-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pearce, C.L. & Manz, C.C. (2005). The new silver bullets of leadership: the importance of selfand shared leadership in Knowledge work. Organizational Dynamics, 34(2), 130–140. doi:10.1016/j.orgdyn.2005.03.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pearce, C. L., Manz, C. C., & Sims, H. P. (2008). The roles of vertical and shared leadership in the enactment of executive corruption: Implications for research and practice. The Leadership Quarterly, 19, 353–359. doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2008.03.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Podsakoff, P. M., & MacKenzie, S. B. (1997). Impact of organizational citizenship behavior on organizational performance: A review and suggestion for future research. Human Performance, 10, 133–151. doi:10.1207/s15327043hup1002_5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J. Y., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88, 879–903. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.879
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Preacher, K. J., & Hayes, A. F. (2008). Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models. Behavior Research Methods, 40, 879–891. doi:10.3758/BRM.40.3.879
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scandura, T. A., & Graen, G. B. (1984). Moderating effects of initial leader-member exchange status on the effects of a leadership intervention. Journal of Applied Psychology, 69, 428–436. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.69.3.428
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sparrowe, R. T., Liden, R. C., Wayne, S. J., & Kraimer, M. L. (2001). Social networks and the performance of individuals and groups. Academy of Management Journal, 44, 316–325. doi:10.2307/3069458
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sparrowe, R. T., Soetjipto, B. W., & Kraimer, M. L. (2006). Do leaders’ influence tactics relate to members’ helping behavior? It depends on the quality of the relationship. Academy of Management Journal, 49, 1194–1208. doi:10.5465/AMJ.2006.23478645
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (1979). An integrative theory of intergroup relations. In W. G. Austin & S. Worchel (Eds.), The social psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 33–47). Monterey, CA: Brooks/Cole.
   Google Scholar
• Takeuchi, R., Chen, G., & Lepak, D. P. (2009). Through the looking glass of a social system: Cross-level effects of high-performance work systems on employees’ attitudes. Personnel Psychology, 62, 1–29. doi:10.1111/j.1744-6570.2008.01127.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tyler, T. R., & Blader, S. L. (2003). The group engagement model: Procedural justice, social identity, and cooperative behavior. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 7, 349–361. doi:10.1207/S15327957PSPR0704_07
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Knippenberg, D., & Schippers, M. C. (2007). Work group diversity. Annual Review of Psychology, 58, 515–541. doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.58.110405.085546
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walumbwa, F. O., Hartnell, C. A., & Oke, A. (2010). Servant leadership, procedural justice climate, service climate, employee attitudes, and organizational citizenship behavior: A cross-level investigation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 95, 517–529. doi:10.1037/a0018867
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, D., Waldman, D. A., & Zhang, Z. (2014). A meta-analysis of shared leadership and team effectiveness. Journal of Applied Psychology, 99, 181–198. doi:10.1037/a0034531
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, X. H. F., Fang, Y., Qureshi, I., & Janssen, O. (2015). Understanding employee innovative behavior: Integrating the social network and leader–member exchange perspectives. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 36, 403–420. doi:10.1002/job.1994
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wren, D. A., Bedeian, A. G., & Breeze, J. D. (2002). The foundations of Henri Fayol’s administrative theory. Management Decision, 40, 906–918. doi:10.1108/00251740210441108
   Google Scholar
• Yukl, G. (2012). Effective leadership behavior: What we know and what questions need more attention. The Academy of Management Perspectives, 26, 66–85. doi:10.5465/amp.2012.0088
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhou, Q., & Pan, W. (2015). A cross-level examination of the process linking transformational leadership and creativity: The role of psychological safety climate. Human Performance, 28, 405–424. doi:10.1080/08959285.2015.1021050
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar