Is Person–Organization Fit Beneficial for Employee Creativity? Moderating Roles of Leader–Member and Team–Member Exchange Quality

References

• Ambrose, M. L., Arnaud, A., & Schminke, M. (2008). Individual moral development and ethical climate: The influence of person-organization fit on job attitudes. Journal of Business Ethics, 77, 323–333. doi:10.1007/s10551-007-9352-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anand, S., Vidyarthi, P. R., Liden, R. C., & Rousseau, D. M. (2010). Good citizens in poor-quality relationships: Idiosyncratic deals as a substitute for relationship quality. Academy of Management Journal, 53, 970–988. doi:10.5465/amj.2010.54533176
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Appelbaum, E., Thomas, B., Peter, B., & Kalleberg, A. L. (2000). Manufacturing advantage: Why Abilehigh-performance work systems pay off. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ashmore, R. D., Deaux, K., & McLaughlin-Volpe, T. (2004). An organization framework for collective identity: Articulation and significance of multidimensionality. Psychological Bulletin, 130, 80–114. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.130.1.80
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bagozzi, R. P., & Edwards, J. R. (1998). A general approach for representing constructs in organizational research. Organizational Research Methods, 1, 45–87. doi:10.1177/109442819800100104
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bandalos, D. L. (2002). The effects of item parceling on good-of-fit and parameter estimate bias in structural equation modeling. Structural Equation Modeling, 9, 78–102. doi:10.1207/S15328007SEM0901_5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bandalos, D. L., & Finney, S. J. (2001). Item parceling issues in structural equation modeling. In G. A. Marcoulides & R. E. Schumacker (Eds.), Advanced structural equation modeling: New developments and techniques, pp. 269-296. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Becker, T. E. (2005). Potential problems in the statistical control of variables in organizational research: A qualitative analysis with recommendations. Organizational Research Methods, 8, 274–289. doi:10.1177/1094428105278021
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bernerth, J. B., & Aguinis, H. (2016). A critical review and best-practice recommendations for control variable usage. Personnel Psychology, 69, 229–283. doi:10.1111/peps.12103
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bidault, F., & Castello, A. (2009). Trust and creativity: Understanding the role of trust in creativity-oriented joint developments. R & D Management, 39, 259–270. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9310.2009.00557.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boon, C., & Biron, M. (2016). Temporal issues in person-organization fit, person-job fit and turnover: The role of leader-member exchange. Human Relations, 69, 2177–2200. doi:10.1177/0018726716636945
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boon, C., Den Hartog, D., Boselie, P., & Paauwe, J. (2011). The relationship between perceptions of HR practices and employee outcomes: Examining the role of person-organization and person-job fit. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 22, 138–162. doi:10.1080/09585192.2011.538978
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brislin, R. W. (1980). Translation and content analysis of oral and written material. In H. C. Triandis & J. W. Berry (Eds.), Handbook of cross-cultural psychology (Vol. 1, pp. 389–444). Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
   Google Scholar
• Byrne, D. (1971). The attraction paradigm. New York, NY: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cable, D. M., & DeRue, D. S. (2002). The convergent and discriminant validity of subjective fit perceptions. The Journal of Applied Psychology, 87, 875–884.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cha, J., Chang, Y., & Kim, T.-Y. (2014). Person-organization fit on prosocial identity: Implications on employee outcomes. Journal of Business Ethics, 123, 57–69. doi:10.1007/s10551-013-1799-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chatman, J. A. (1989). Improving interactional organizational research: A model of person-organization fit. Academy of Management Review, 14, 333–349. doi:10.5465/amr.1989.4279063
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chiaburu, D. S., Lorinkova, N. M., & Van Dyne, L. (2013). Employees’ social context and change-oriented citizenship: A meta-analysis of leader, coworker, and organizational influences. Group & Organization Management, 38, 291–333. doi:10.1177/1059601113476736
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Choi, J. N. (2004). Person-environment fit and creative behavior: Differential impacts of supplies-values and demands-abilities version of fit. Human Relations, 57, 531–552. doi:10.1177/0018726704044308
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Choi, J. N. (2007). Group composition and employee creative behaviour in a Korean electronics company: Distinct effects of relational demography and group diversity. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 80, 213–234. doi:10.1348/096317906X110250
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Damaraju, N. L., Barney, J., & Dess, G. (2010). Stigma and entrepreneurial risk taking. Paper presented at the Summer Conference 2010 on “Opening Up Innovation: Strategy, Organization and Technology”, Imperial College, London Business School in London. June 16-18, 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Dansereau, F. J., Graen, G., & Haga, W. J. (1975). A vertical dyad linkage approach to leadership within formal organizations: A Longitudinal investigation of the role-making process. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 13, 46–78. doi:10.1016/0030-5073(75)90005-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dawson, J. F., & Richter, A. W. (2006). Probing three-way interactions in moderated multiple regression: Development and application of slope difference test. The Journal of Applied Psychology, 91, 917–926. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.91.4.917
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dineen, B. R., Ash, S. R., & Noe, R. A. (2002). A web of applicant attraction: Person-organization fit in the context of web-based recruitment. The Journal of Applied Psychology, 87, 723–734.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dineen, B. R., Lewicki, R. J., & Tomlinson, E. (2006). Supervisory guidance and behavioral integrity: Relationships with employee citizenship and deviant behavior. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91, 622–635. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.91.3.622
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duffy, M. K., Ganster, D., & Pagon, M. (2002). Social undermining in the workplace. Academy of Management Journal, 45, 331–351.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edwards, J. R., & Shipp, A. J. (2007). The relationship between person-environment fit and outcomes: An integrative theoretical framework. In C. Ostroff& & T. A. Judge (Eds.), Perspectives on organizational fit (pp. 209–258). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Eisenberger, R., Stinglhamber, F., Vandenberghe, C., Sucharski, I. L., & Rhoades, L. (2002). Perceived supervisor support: Contributions to perceived organizational support and employee retention. The Journal of Applied Psychology, 87, 565–573.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Erdogan, B., Kraimer, M. L., & Liden, R. D. (2004). Work value congruence and intrinsic career success. Personnel Psychology, 57, 305–332. doi:10.1111/j.1744-6570.2004.tb02493.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fu, P. P., Tsui, A. S., & Dess, G. G. (2006). The dynamics of guanxi in Chinese high-tech firms: Implications for knowledge management and decision making. Management International Review, 46, 277–305. doi:10.1007/s11575-006-0048-z
   Google Scholar
• George, J. M., & Zhou, J. (2007). Dual tuning in a supportive context: Joint contributions of positive mood, negative mood, and supervisory behaviors to employee creativity. Academy of Management Journal, 50, 605–622. doi:10.5465/amj.2007.25525934
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goncalo, J. A., Chatman, J. A., Duguid, M. M., & Kennedy, J. A. (2015). Creativity from constraint? How the political correctness norm influences creativity in mixed-sex work groups. Administrative Science Quarterly, 60, 1–30. doi:10.1177/0001839214563975
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goncalo, J. A., & Duguid, M. M. (2012). Follow the crowd in a new direction: When conformity pressure facilitates group creativity (and when it does not). Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 118, 14–23. doi:10.1016/j.obhdp.2011.12.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gong, Y., Huang, J.-C., & Farh, J.-L. (2009). Employee learning orientation, transformational leadership, and employee creativity: The mediating role of employee creative self-efficacy. Academy of Management Journal, 52, 765–778. doi:10.5465/amj.2009.43670890
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graen, G. B., & Uhl-Bien, M. (1995). Relationship-based approach to leadership: Development of the leader-member exchange (LMX) theory of leadership over 25 years. The Leadership Quarterly, 6, 219–247. doi:10.1016/1048-9843(95)90036-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graham, J. (1986). Principled organizational dissent: A theoretical essay. In B. M. Staw & L. L. Cummings (Eds.), Research in organization behavior (Vol. 8, pp. 1–52). Greenwich, CT: JAJ Press.
   Google Scholar
• Griffin, M. A., Neal, A., & Parker, S. K. (2007). A new model of work role performance: Positive behavior in uncertain and interdependent contexts. Academy of Management Journal, 50, 327–347. doi:10.5465/amj.2007.24634438
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harris, K. J., Wheeler, A. R., & Kacmar, K. M. (2009). Leader-member exchange and empowerment: Direct and interactive effects on job satisfaction, turnover intentions, and performance. The Leadership Quarterly, 20, 371–382. doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2009.03.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harrison, D. A., & Klein, K. J. (2007). What’s the difference? Diversity constructs as separation, variety, or disparity in organizations. Academy of Management Review, 32, 1199–1228. doi:10.5465/amr.2007.26586096
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hobfoll, S. E., Johnson, R. J., Ennis, N., & Jackson, A. P. (2003). Resource loss, resource gain, and emotional outcomes among inner city women. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84, 632–643. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.84.3.632
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoever, I. J., van Knippenberg, D., van Ginkel, W. P., & Barkema, H. G. (2012). Fostering team creativity: Perspective taking as key to unlocking diversity’s potential. Journal of Applied Psychology, 97, 982–996.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoffman, B. J., & Woehr, D. J. (2006). A quantitative review of the relationship between person–Organization fit and behavioral outcomes. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 68, 389–399. doi:10.1016/j.jvb.2005.08.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hogg, M. A., & Abrams, D. (1988). Social identifications: A social psychology of intergroup relations and group processes. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Janssen, O., & Huang, X. (2008). Us and me: Team identification and individual differentiation as complementary drivers of team members’ citizenship and creative behaviors. Journal of Management, 34, 69–88. doi:10.1177/0149206307309263
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johns, G. (2006). The essential impact of context on organizational behavior. Academy of Management Review, 31, 386–408. doi:10.5465/amr.2006.20208687
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, T.-Y., Aryee, S., Loi, R., & Kim, S.-P. (2013). Person-organization fit and employee outcomes: Test of a social exchange model. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 24, 3719–3737. doi:10.1080/09585192.2013.781522
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kristof, A. L. (1996). Person-organization fit: An integrative review of its conceptualizations, measurement, and implications. Personnel Psychology, 49, 1–49. doi:10.1111/peps.1996.49.issue-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kristof-Brown, A., & Guay, R. P. (2011). Person-environment fit. In S. Zedeck (Ed.), American psychological association handbook of industrial and organizational psychology (pp. 1–50). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
   Google Scholar
• Kristof-Brown, A. L., Zimmerman, R. D., & Johnson, E. C. (2005). Consequences of individuals fit at work: A meta-analysis of person-job, person-organization, person-group, and person-supervisor fit. Personnel Psychology, 58, 281–342. doi:10.1111/peps.2005.58.issue-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LePine, J. A., & Van Dyne, L. (2001). Peer responses to low performers: An attributional model of helping in the context of groups. Academy of Management Review, 26, 67–84. doi:10.5465/amr.2001.4011953
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liao, H., Liu, D., & Loi, R. (2010). Looking at both sides of the social exchange coin: A social cognitive perspective on the joint effects of relationship quality and differentiation on creativity. Academy of Management Journal, 53, 1090–1109. doi:10.5465/amj.2010.54533207
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liden, R. C., Wayne, S. J., & Sparrowe, R. T. (2000). An examination of the mediating role of psychological empowerment on the relations between the job, interpersonal relationships, and work outcomes. The Journal of Applied Psychology, 85, 407–416.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mandel, N. (2003). Shifting selves and decision making: The effects of self-construal priming on consumer risk-taking. Journal of Consumer Research, 30, 30–40. doi:10.1086/374700
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin, R., Thomas, G., Guillaume, Y., Lee, A., & Epitropaki, O. (2016). Leader-member Exchange (LMX) and Performance: A meta-analytic review. Personnel Psychology, 69, 67–121. doi:10.1111/peps.12100
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nemeth, C. J. (1997). Managing innovation: When less is more. California Management Review, 40, 59–74. doi:10.2307/41165922
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oakman, J., & Wells, Y. (2015). Working longer: What is the relationship between person-environment fit and retirement intentions. Asia Pacific Journal of Human Resources, 54, 207–229. doi:10.1111/1744-7941.12075
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oh, I.-S., Guay, R. P., Kim, K., Harold, C. M., Lee, J.-H., Heo, C.-G., & Shin, K.-H. (2014). Fit happens globally: A meta-analytic comparison of the relationships of person-environment fit dimensions with work attitudes and performance across East Asia, Europe, and North America. Personnel Psychology, 67, 99–152. doi:10.1111/peps.2014.67.issue-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sansfacon, S., & Amiot, C. E. (2014). The impact of group norms and behavioral congruence on the internalization of an illegal downloading behavior. Group Dynamics: Theory Research and Practice, 18, 174–188. doi:10.1037/a0035797
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scandura, T., & Graen, G. B. (1984). Moderating effects of initial leader-member exchange status on the effects of a leadership intervention. Journal of Applied Psychology, 69, 428–436. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.69.3.428
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schriesheim, C. A., Castro, S. L., Zhou, X., & Yammarino, F. J. (2001). The folly of theorizing “A” but testing “B”: A selective level-of analysis review of the field and a detailed leader-member exchange illustration. Leadership Quarterly, 12, 515–551.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seers, A. (1989). Team-member exchange quality: A new construct for role-making research. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 43, 118–135. doi:10.1016/0749-5978(89)90060-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seong, J. Y., Kristof-Brown, A. L., & Hong, D. (2017). Interactive effects of person-group fit on leaving intentions and creativity. Presented at the 2017 Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology Conference in Orlando, Florida, April 27–29.
   Google Scholar
• Seong, J. Y., Park, -W.-W., & Yun, S. (2008). The effect of person-environment (organization, supervisor, coworker) fit, on organizational citizenship behavior and performance, and the mediating effect of justice. Korean Journal of Management, 16, 1–62.
   Google Scholar
• Shalley, C. E., Zhou, J., & Oldham, G. R. (2004). The effects of personal and contextual characteristics on creativity: Where should we go from here? Journal of Management, 30, 933–958. doi:10.1016/j.jm.2004.06.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spanjol, J., Tam, L., & Tam, V. (2015). Employer-employee congruence in environmental values: An exploration of effects on job satisfaction and creativity. Journal of Business Ethics, 130, 117–130. doi:10.1007/s10551-014-2208-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spector, P. E., & Brannick, M. T. (2011). Methodological urban legends: The misuse of statistical control variables. Organizational Research Methods, 14, 287–305. doi:10.1177/1094428110369842
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sutton, R. I. (2002). Weird ideas that work. New York, NY: Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Swann, W. B., Jr., Polzer, J. T., Seyle, D. C., & Ko, S. J. (2004). Finding value in diversity: Verification of personal and social self-views in diverse groups. Academy of Management Review, 29(1), 9–27. doi:10.5465/amr.2004.11851702
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swann, W. B., Jr., Stein-Seroussi, A., & Giesler, B. R. (1992). Why people self-verify. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 62, 392–401.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (1979). An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. In W. G. Austin & S. Worchel (Eds.), The social psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 33–47). Monterey, CA: Brooks-Cole.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, S. E., Sherman, D. K., Kim, H. S., Jarcho, J., Takagi, K., & Dunagan, M. S. (2004). Culture and social support: Who seeks it and why? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 87, 354–362. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.87.3.354
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tremblay, M., Hill, K., & Aube, C. (2017). A time-lagged investigation of the mediating role of person-organization fit in the relationship between leader-member exchange and employee affective organizational commitment. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 26, 53–65. doi:10.1080/1359432X.2016.1203306
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tse, H. H. M., Dasborough, M. T., & Ashkanasy, N. M. (2008). A multi-level analysis of team climate and interpersonal exchange relationships at work. The Leadership Quarterly, 19, 195–211. doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2008.01.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tu, Y., & Lu, X. (2016). Do ethical leaders give followers the confidence to go the extra mile? The moderating role of intrinsic motivation. Journal of Business Ethics, 135, 129–144. doi:10.1007/s10551-014-2463-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vadera, A. K., Pratt, M. G., & Mishra, P. (2013). Constructive deviance in organizations: Integrating and moving forward. Journal of Management, 39, 1221–1276. doi:10.1177/0149206313475816
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Venkataramani, V., & Tangirala, S. (2010). When and why do central employees speak up? An examination of mediating and moderating variables. The Journal of Applied Psychology, 95, 582–591. doi:10.1037/a0018315
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vidyarthi, P. R., Liden, R. C., Anand, S., Erdogan, B., & Ghosh, S. (2010). Where do I stand? Examining the effects of leader–Member exchange social comparison on employee work behaviors. The Journal of Applied Psychology, 95, 849–861. doi:10.1037/a0020033
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vogel, R. M., Rodell, J. B., & Lynch, J. W. (2016). Engaged and productive misfits: How job crafting and leisure activity mitigate the negative effects of value incongruence. Academy of Management Journal, 59, 1561–1584. doi:10.5465/amj.2014.0850
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Volmer, J., Spurk, D., & Niessen, C. (2012). Leader–Member exchange (LMX), job autonomy, and creative work involvement. The Leadership Quarterly, 23, 456–465. doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2011.10.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Woodman, R. W., Sawyer, J. E., & Griffin, R. W. (1993). Toward a theory of organizational creativity. Academy of Management Review, 18, 293–321. doi:10.5465/amr.1993.3997517
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, X., & Bartol, K. M. (2010). Linking empowering leadership and employee creativity: The influence of psychological empowerment, intrinsic motivation, and creative process engagement. Academy of Management Journal, 53, 107–128. doi:10.5465/amj.2010.48037118
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhou, J., & George, J. M. (2001). When do dissatisfaction leads to creativity: Encouraging the expression of voice. Academy of Management Journal, 44, 682–696.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhou, J., & Shalley, C. E. (2003). Research on employee creativity: A critical review and directions for future research. In J. Martocchio (Ed.), Research in personnel and human resource management (pp. 165–217). Oxford, England: Elsevier.
   Google Scholar