Effects of Diversity on Knowledge Sharing and Creativity of Work Teams: Status Differential Among Members as a Facilitator

References

• Aiken, L. S., & West, S. G. (1991). Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Aime, F., Humphrey, S., Derue, D. S., & Paul, J. B. (2014). The riddle of heterarchy: Power transitions in cross-functional teams. Academy of Management Journal, 57, 327–352. doi:10.5465/amj.2011.0756
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Allen, N. J., Stanley, D. J., Williams, H., & Ross, S. J. (2007). Assessing dissimilarity relations under missing data conditions: Evidence from computer simulations. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92, 1414–1426. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.92.5.1414
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson, C., Hildreth, J. A. D., & Howland, L. (2015). Is the desire for status a fundamental human motive? A review of the empirical literature. Psychological Bulletin, 141, 574–601. doi:10.1037/a0038781
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson, C., Srivastava, S., Beer, J., Spataro, S., & Chatman, J. A. (2006). Knowing your place: Self-perceptions of status in face-to-face groups. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 91, 1094–1110. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.91.6.1094
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson, C., Willer, R., Kilduff, G. J., & Brown, C. E. (2012). The origins of deference: When do people prefer low status?. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 102, 1077–1088. doi:10.1037/a0027409
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson, N., Potočnik, K., & Zhou, J. (2014). Innovation and creativity in organizations: A state-of-the-science review, prospective commentary, and guiding framework. Journal of Management, 40, 1297–1333. doi:10.1177/0149206314527128
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bell, S.T., Villado, A. J., Lukasik, M. A., Belau, L., & Briggs, A. L. (2011). Getting specific about demographic diversity variable and team performance relationships: A meta-analysis. Journal of Management, 37, 709–743. doi:10.1177/0149206310365001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bendersky, C., & Hays, N. A. (2012). Status conflict in groups. Organization Science, 23, 323–340. doi:10.1287/orsc.1110.0734
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berger, J., Fişek, M. H., Norman, R. Z., & Zelditch, M., Jr. (1977). Status characteristics and expectation states: A graph–Theoretical formulation. In J. Berger (Ed.), Status characteristics and social interaction: An expectations states approach (pp. 91–134). New York, NY: Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Bunderson, J. S. (2003). Recognizing and utilizing expertise in work groups: A status characteristics perspective. Administrative Science Quarterly, 48, 557–591. doi:10.2307/3556637
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bunderson, J. S., & Boumgarden, P. (2010). Structure and learning in self–Managed teams: Why bureaucratic teams can be better learners. Organization Science, 21, 609–624. doi:10.1287/orsc.1090.0483
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bunderson, J. S., & Reagans, R. E. (2010). Power, status, and learning in organizations. Organization Science, 22, 1182–1194. doi:10.1287/orsc.1100.0590
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bunderson, J. S., & Sutcliffe, K. M. (2002). Comparing alternative conceptualizations of functional diversity in management teams: Process and performance effects. Academy of Management Journal, 45, 875–893.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Choi, J. N. (2007). Group composition and employee creative behaviour in a Korean electronics company: Distinct effects of relational demography and group diversity. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 80, 213–234. doi:10.1348/096317906X110250
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Choi, J. N., & Sy, T. (2010). Group-level organizational citizenship behavior: Effects of demographic faultlines and group conflict in small work groups. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 31, 1032–1054.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cunningham, G. B., & Sagas, M. (2004). Examining the main and interactive effects of deep and surface-level diversity on job satisfaction and organizational turnover intentions. Organizational Analysis, 12, 319–341.
   Google Scholar
• Edwards, J. R., & Lambert, L. S. (2007). Methods for integrating moderation and mediation: A general analytical framework using moderated path analysis. Psychological Methods, 12, 1–22. doi:10.1037/1082-989X.12.1.1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fragale, A. R., Sumanth, J. J., Tiedens, L. Z., & Northcraft, G. B. (2012). Appeasing equals: Lateral deference in organizational communication. Administrative Science Quarterly, 57, 373–406. doi:10.1177/0001839212461439
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geldhof, G. J., Preacher, K. J., & Zyphur, M. J. (2014). Reliability estimation in a multilevel confirmatory factor analysis framework. Psychological Methods, 19, 72–91. doi:10.1037/a0032138
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gino, F., Argote, L., Miron-Spektor, E., & Todorova, G. (2010). First, get your feet wet: The effects of learning from direct and indirect experience on team creativity. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 111, 102–115. doi:10.1016/j.obhdp.2009.11.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gould, R. V. (2003). Collision of wills: How ambiguity about social rank breeds conflict. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Groysberg, B., Polzer, J. T., & Elfenbein, H. A. (2011). Too many cooks spoil the broth: How high-status individuals decrease group effectiveness. Organization Science, 22, 722–737. doi:10.1287/orsc.1100.0547
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gruenfeld, D. H., & Tiedens, L. Z. (2010). Organizational preferences and their consequences. In S. T. Fiske, D. T. Gilbert, & G. Lindzey (Eds.), Handbook of Social Psychology (pp. 1252–1287). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Halevy, N., Chou, E. Y., & Galinsky, A. D. (2011). A functional model of hierarchy: Why, how, and when vertical differentiation enhances group performance. Organizational Psychology Review, 1, 32–52. doi:10.1177/2041386610380991
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Han, J., Han, J., & Brass, D. J. (2014). Human capital diversity in the creation of social capital for team creativity. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 35, 54–71. doi:10.1002/job.1853
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harrison, D. A., & Klein, K. J. (2007). What’s the difference? Diversity constructs as separation, variety, or disparity in organizations. Academy of Management Review, 32, 1199–1229. doi:10.5465/amr.2007.26586096
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoever, I. J., Van Knippenberg, D., Van Ginkel, W. P., & Barkema, H. G. (2012). Fostering team creativity: Perspective taking as key to unlocking diversity’s potential. Journal of Applied Psychology, 97, 982–996. doi:10.1037/a0029159
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horwitz, S. K., & Horwitz, I. B. (2007). The effects of team diversity on team outcomes: A meta–Analytic review of team demography. Journal of Management, 33, 987–1015. doi:10.1177/0149206307308587
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Howell, T. M., Harrison, D. A., Burris, E. R., & Detert, J. R. (2015). Who gets credit for input? Demographic and structural status cues in voice recognition. Journal of Applied Psychology, 6, 1765–1784. doi:10.1037/apl0000025
   Google Scholar
• Hülsheger, U. R., Anderson, N., & Salgado, J. F. (2009). Team-level predictors of innovation at work: A comprehensive meta–Analysis spanning three decades of research. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94, 1128–1145. doi:10.1037/a0015978
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• James, L. R., Demaree, R. G., & Wolf, G. (1984). Estimating within-group interrater reliability with and without response bias. Journal of Applied Psychology, 69, 85–98. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.69.1.85
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jia, L. D., Shaw, J. D., Tsui, A. S., & Park, T. Y. (2014). A social-structural perspective on employee-organization relationships and team creativity. Academy of Management Journal, 57, 869–891. doi:10.5465/amj.2011.0147
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Joshi, A., & Roh, H. (2009). The role of context in work team diversity research: A meta-analytic review. Academy of Management Journal, 52, 599–627. doi:10.5465/amj.2009.41331491
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Katrichis, J. (1993). The conceptual implications of data centering in interactive regression models. Journal of the Market Research Society, 35, 183–192. doi:10.1177/147078539303500203
   Google Scholar
• Kearney, E., & Gebert, D. (2009). Managing diversity and enhancing team outcomes: The promise of transformational leadership. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94, 77–89. doi:10.1037/a0013077
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kee, T. S. (2008). Influences of confucianism on Korean corporate culture. Asian Profile, 36, 1–15.
   Google Scholar
• LeBreton, J. M., & Senter, J. L. (2008). Answers to 20 questions about inter-rater reliability and inter-rater agreement. Organizational Research Methods, 11, 815–852. doi:10.1177/1094428106296642
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, H. W., Choi, J. N., & Kim, S. (2018). Does gender diversity help teams constructively manage status conflict? An evolutionary perspective of status conflict, team psychological safety, and team creativity. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 144, 187–199. doi:10.1016/j.obhdp.2017.09.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leenders, R. T. A. J., Van Engelen, J. M. L., & Kratzer, J. (2003). Virtuality, communication, and new product team creativity: A social network perspective. Journal of Engineering & Technology Management, 20, 69–92. doi:10.1016/S0923-4748(03)00005-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacKinnon, D. P., Fairchild, A. J., & Fritz, M. S. (2007). Mediation Analysis. Annual Review of Psychology, 58, 593–614. doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.58.110405.085542
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mohammed, S., Klimoski, R., & Rentsch, J. R. (2000). The measurement of team mental models: We have no shared schema. Organizational Research Methods, 3, 123–165. doi:10.1177/109442810032001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moreland, R. L., & Myaskovsky, L. (2000). Exploring the performance benefits of group training: Transactive memory or improved communication?. Organizational Behavior & Human Decision Processes, 82, 117–133. doi:10.1006/obhd.2000.2891
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Overbeck, J. R., Correll, J., & Park, B. (2005). Internal status sorting in groups: The problem of too many stars. In M. A. Neale, E. A. Mannix, & M. Thomas-Hunt (Eds.), Research on managing groups and teams (pp. 169–199). New York, NY: Elsevier, JAI.
   Google Scholar
• Owens, D. A., & Sutton, R. I. (2002). Status contests in meetings: Negotiating the informal order. In M. E. Turner (Ed.), Groups at work: Advance in theory and research (pp. 299–316). Manwah, NJ: LEA.
   Google Scholar
• Pearce, J. L., & Gregersen, H. B. (1991). Task interdependence and extra-role behavior: A test of mediating effects of felt responsibility. Journal of Applied Psychology, 76, 838–844. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.76.6.838
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perry–Smith, J. E., & Shalley, C. E. (2003). The social side of creativity: A static and dynamic social network perspective. Academy of Management Review, 28, 89–106. doi:10.5465/amr.2003.8925236
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pieterse, A. N., Van Knippenberg, D., & Van Dierendonck, D. (2013). Cultural diversity and team performance: The role of team member goal orientation. Academy of Management Journal, 56, 782–804. doi:10.5465/amj.2010.0992
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pirola–Merlo, A., & Mann, L. (2004). The relationship between individual creativity and team creativity: Aggregating across people and time. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 25, 235–257. doi:10.1002/job.240
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Preacher, K. J., Rucker, D. D., & Hayes, A. F. (2007). Addressing moderated mediation hypotheses: Theory, methods and prescriptions. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 42, 185–227. doi:10.1080/00273170701341316
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sung, S. Y., & Choi, J. N. (2012). Effects of team knowledge management on the creativity and financial performance of organizational teams. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 118, 4–13. doi:10.1016/j.obhdp.2012.01.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor, A., & Greve, H. R. (2006). Superman or the fantastic four? Knowledge combination and experience in innovative teams. Academy of Management Journal, 49, 723–740. doi:10.5465/amj.2006.22083029
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Teachman, J. D. (1980). Analysis of population diversity. Sociological Methods and Research, 8, 341–361. doi:10.1177/004912418000800305
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Usoro, A., Sharratt, M. W., Tsui, E., & Shekhar, S. (2007). Trust as an antecedent to knowledge sharing in virtual communities of practice. Knowledge Management Research & Practice, 5, 199–212. doi:10.1057/palgrave.kmrp.8500143
   Google Scholar
• Van der Vegt, G. S. (2002). Effects of attitude dissimilarity and tune on social integration: A longitudinal panel study. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 75, 439–452. doi:10.1348/096317902321119592
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van der Vegt, G. S., Van de Vliert, E., & Huang, X. (2005). Location-level links between diversity and innovative climate depend on national power distance. Academy of Management Journal, 48, 1171–1182. doi:10.5465/amj.2005.19573116
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Dijk, H., & Van Engen, M. L. (2013). A status perspective on the consequences of work group diversity. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology., 86, 223–241. doi:10.1111/joop.2013.86.issue-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Knippenberg, D. (2007). Understanding diversity. Rotterdam, Netherlands: Erasmus Research Institute of Management.
   Google Scholar
• Van Knippenberg, D., De Dreu, C. K., & Homan, A. C. (2004). Work group diversity and group performance: An integrative model and research agenda. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89, 1008–1022. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.89.6.1008
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Knippenberg, D., & Schippers, M. C. (2007). Work group diversity. Ann, Rev, Psychol, 58, 515–541. doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.58.110405.085546
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Mierlo, H., Vermunt, J. K., & Rutte, C. G. (2009). Composing group-level constructs from individual-level survey data. Organizational Research Methods, 12, 368–392. doi:10.1177/1094428107309322
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wegge, J., Roth, C., Neubach, B., & Schmidt, K.-H. (2008). Age and gender diversity as determinants of performance and health in a public organization: The role of task complexity and group size. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93, 1301–1313. doi:10.1037/a0012680
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhou, J., Shin, S. J., Brass, D. J., Choi, J., & Zhang, Z. X. (2009). Social networks, personal values, and creativity: Evidence for curvilinear and interaction effects. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94, 1544–1552. doi:10.1037/a0016285
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar