Emergent Challenges and Opportunities to Sustaining Age-friendly Initiatives: Qualitative Findings from a Canadian Age-friendly Funding Program

References

• Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3, 77–101. doi:https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
   Google Scholar
• Buffel, T., & Phillipson, C. (2018). A manifesto for the age-friendly movement: Developing a new urban agenda. Journal of Aging & Social Policy, 30, 173–192. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/08959420.2018.1430414
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Community Accounts. (2018). Profiles: All communities [dataset]. Retrieved from http://nl.communityaccounts.ca
   Google Scholar
• Farmer, J., & Kilpatrick, S. (2009). Are rural health professionals also social entrepreneurs? Social Science & Medicine, 69(11), 1651–1658. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2009.09.003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fitzgerald, K., & Caro, F. G. (2014). An overview of age-friendly cities and communities around the world. Journal of Aging & Social Policy, 26, 1–18. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/08959420.2014.860786
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fowler, K., & Etchegary, H. (2008). Economic crisis and social capital: The story of two rural fishing communities. Journal of Occupational & Organizational Psychology, 81, 319–341. doi:https://doi.org/10.1348/096317907X226972
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Golant, S. M. (2014, February). Age-friendly communities: Are we expecting too much? IRPP Insight 5. Montreal, Quebec: Institute for Research on Public Policy.
   Google Scholar
• Government of NL. (2007). Provincial healthy aging policy framework. St. John’s, NL: Government of Newfoundland and Labrador.
   Google Scholar
• Grantmakers in Aging. (2015). Guiding principles for the sustainability of age-friendly community efforts. Arlington, VA: Community AGEnda Initiative.
   Google Scholar
• Greenfield, E. A. (2012). Using ecological frameworks to advance a field of research, practice, and policy on aging-in-place initiatives. The Gerontologist, 52(1), 1–12. doi:https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/gnr108
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greenfield, E. A. (2018). Getting started: An empirically derived logic model for age-friendly community initiatives in the early planning phase. Journal of Gerontological Social Work, 61(3), 295–312. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/01634372.2018.1432736
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greenfield, E. A., Oberlink, M., Scharlach, A. E., Neal, M. B., & Stafford, P. B. (2015). Age-friendly community initiatives: Conceptual issues and key questions. The Gerontologist, 55(2), 191–198. doi:https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/gnv005
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keating, N., Eales, J., & Phillips, J. E. (2013). Age-friendly rural communities: Conceptualizing ‘best-fit’. Canadian Journal on Aging, 32(4), 319–332. doi:https://doi.org/10.1017/S0714980813000408
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keating, N., Swindle, J., & Fletcher, S. (2011). Aging in rural Canada: A retrospective and review. Canadian Journal on Aging, 30, 323–338. doi:https://doi.org/10.1017/S0714980811000250
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lehning, A. J., & Greenfield, E. A. (2017). Research on age-friendly community initiatives: Taking stock and moving forward. Journal of Housing for the Elderly, 31(2), 178–192. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/02763893.2017.1309937
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lui, C.-W., Everingham, J.-A., Warburton, J., Cuthill, M., & Bartlett, H. (2009). What makes a community age-friendly: A review of international literature. Australasian Journal on Ageing, 28, 116–121. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-6612.2009.00355.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martinson, M., & Minkler, M. (2006). Civic engagement and older adults: A critical perspective. The Gerontologist, 46, 318–324. doi:https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/46.3.318
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Menec, V. H. (2017). Conceptualizing social connectivity in the context of age-friendly communities. Journal of Housing for the Elderly, 31(2), 99–116. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/02763893.2017.1309926
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Menec, V. H., Bell, S., Novek, S., Minnigaleeva, G. A., Morales, E., Ouma, T., … Winterton, R. (2015). Making rural and remote communities more age-friendly: Experts’ perspectives on issues, challenges, and priorities. Journal of Aging & Social Policy, 27, 173–191. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/08959420.2014.995044
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Menec, V. H., & Brown, C. (2018). Facilitators and barriers to becoming age-friendly: A review. Journal of Aging & Social Policy, 1–23. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/08959420.2018.1528116
   Google Scholar
• Menec, V. H., Means, R., Keating, N., & Parkhurst, G. (2011). Conceptualizing age-friendly communities. Canadian Journal on Aging, 30, 479–493. doi:https://doi.org/10.1017/S0714980811000237
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Menec, V. H., Novek, S., Veselyuk, D., & McArthur, J. (2014). Lessons learned from a Canadian province-wide age-friendly initiative: The age-friendly Manitoba Initiative. Journal of Aging & Social Policy, 26, 33–51. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/08959420.2014.854606
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neville, S., Napier, S., Adams, J., Wham, C., & Jackson, D. (2016). An integrative review of the factors related to building age-friendly rural communities. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 25, 2402–2412. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.13299
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ozanne, E., Biggs, S., & Kurowski, W. (2014). Competing frameworks in planning for the aged in the growth corridors of Melbourne. Journal of Aging & Social Policy, 26, 147–165. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/08959420.2014.860311
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Plouffe, L. A., Garon, S., Brownoff, J., Eve, D., Foucault, M. L., Lawrence, R., … Toews, V. (2013). Advancing age-friendly communities in Canada. Canadian Review of Social Policy, (68/69), 24–38.
   Google Scholar
• Putnam, R. (2000). Bowling alone: The collapse and revival of American community. New York, NY: Simon and Schuster.
   Google Scholar
• Russell, E. (2015a). Age-friendly community capacity building in Newfoundland and Labrador ( Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Memorial University, St. John’s, NL.
   Google Scholar
• Russell, E. (2015b). Program evaluation of the Age-Friendly Newfoundland and Labrador Grants Program. Report prepared for the Department of Seniors, Wellness, and Social Development, Government of Newfoundland and Labrador.
   Google Scholar
• Savaya, R., & Spiro, S. E. (2012). Predictors of sustainability of social programs. American Journal of Evaluation, 33, 26–43. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/1098214011408066
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scharf, T., Walsh, K., & O’Shea, E. (2016). Ageing in rural places. In M. Shucksmith & D. L. Brown (Eds.), Routledge international handbook of rural studies (pp. 50–61). London and New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Scharlach, A. E. (2016). Age-friendly cities: Form whom? By whom? For what purpose? In T. Moulaert & S. Garon (Eds.), Age-friendly cities and communities in international comparison (pp. 305–331). Cham, Heidelberg, NY, Dordrecht, London: Springer International Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Scharlach, A. E., & Lehning, A. J. (2016). Creating aging-friendly communities. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schoenberg, N. E., Miller, E. A., & Pruchno, R. (2011). The qualitative portfolio at The Gerontologist: Stronger and getting stronger. The Gerontologist, 51(3), 281–284. doi:https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/gnr032
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skinner, M. W., & Hanlon, N. (2016). Ageing resource communities: New frontiers of rural population change, community development and voluntarism. London and New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Skinner, M. W., & Rosenberg, M. W. (2006). Managing competition in the countryside: Non-profit and for-profit perceptions of long-term care in rural Ontario. Social Science & Medicine, 63, 2864–2876. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2006.07.028
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spina, J., & Menec, V. H. (2015). What community characteristics help or hinder rural communities in becoming age-friendly? Perspectives from a Canadian prairie province. Journal of Applied Gerontology, 34(4), 444–464. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0733464813496164
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Statistics Canada. (2017). Population trends by age and sex, 2016 census of population. Retrieved from http://www.statcan.gc.ca/pub/11-627-m/11-627-m2017016-eng.htm
   Google Scholar
• Torres-Gil, F., & Hofland, B. (2012). Vulnerable populations. In H. Cisneros, M. Dyer-Chamberlain, & J. Hickie (Eds.), Independent for life: Homes and neighborhoods for an aging America (pp. 221–232). Austin: University of Texas Press.
   Google Scholar
• Winterton, R. (2016). Organizational responsibility for age-friendly social participation: Views of Australian rural community stakeholders. Journal of Aging & Social Policy, 28, 261–276. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/08959420.2016.1145504
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Winterton, R., & Hulme Chambers, A. (2017). Developing sustainable social programmes for rural ethnic seniors: Perspectives of community stakeholders. Health & Social Care in the Community, 25, 868–877. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/hsc.12373
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• World Health Organization (WHO). (2007). Global age-friendly cities: A guide. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization.
   Google Scholar
• World Health Organization (WHO). (2015). World report on ageing and health. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization.
   Google Scholar