References
- Borgatti, S. P. (1994). A quorum of graph theoretic concepts Connections, 17(1), 47–49. https://assets.noviams.com/novi-file-uploads/insna/Connections_Archive/1994_Volume_17__Issue_1.pdf
- Buffel, T., & Phillipson, C. (2018). A manifesto for the age-friendly movement: Developing a new urban agenda. Journal of Aging & Social Policy, 30(2), 173–192. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/08959420.2018.1430414
- Campbell, J., Beilenson, J., Stein Lefeber, M., & Gonzales Jackson, M. (2015). Guiding principles for the sustainability of age-friendly community efforts. Grantmakers In Aging.
- DeLaTorre, A., & Neal, M. B. (2017). Ecological approaches to an age-friendly Portland and Multnomah County. Journal of Housing for the Elderly, 31(2), 130–145. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/02763893.2017.1309931
- Firestone, S. K., Keyes, L., & Greenhouse, E. (2018). Planners and aging professionals collaborate for livable communities. Working with Older People, 22(1), 20–29. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1108/WWOP-12-2017-0035
- Fitzgerald, K., & Caro, F. G. (2014). An overview of age-friendly cities and communities around the world. Journal of Aging & Social Policy, 26(1–2), 1–18. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/08959420.2014.860786
- Gallagher, E., & Mallhi, A. (2010). Age-friendly British Columbia: Lessons learned from October 1, 2007-September 30, 2010. Healthy Living Secretariat, Ministry of Health Services.
- Garon, S., Paris, M., Beaulieu, M., Veil, A., & Laliberté, A. (2014). Collaborative partnership in age-friendly cities: Two case studies from Quebec, Canada. Journal of Aging & Social Policy, 26(1–2), 73–87. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/08959420.2014.854583
- Gazley, B., & Guo, C. (2020). What do we know about nonprofit collaboration? A systematic review of the literature. Nonprofit Management and Leadership 31(2), 1–22 doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/nml.21433
- Gazley, B. (2017). The current state of interorganizational collaboration: Lessons for human service research and management. Human Service Organizations: Management, Leadership & Governance, 41(1), 1–5. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/23303131.2015.1095582
- Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory; Strategies for qualitative research. Aldine Pub. Co.
- Greenfield, E. A., Oberlink, M., Scharlach, A. E., Neal, M. B., & Stafford, P. B. (2015). Age-friendly community initiatives: Conceptual issues and key questions. The Gerontologist, 55(2), 191–198. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/gnv005
- Greenfield, E. A., & Reyes, L. (2020). Characterizing older adults’ engagement in age-friendly community initiatives: Perspectives from core group leaders in the Northeast U.S. Ageing & Society. S0144686X2000166X
- Greenfield, E. A. (2018). Getting started: An empirically derived logic model for age-friendly community initiatives in the early planning phase. Journal of Gerontological Social Work, 61(3), 295–312. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/01634372.2018.1432736
- Himmelman, T. A. (2002). Collaboration defined: A developmental continuum of change strategies. In Definitions, decision-making models, roles, and collaboration process guide.
- Kania, J., & Kramer, M. (2011). Collective impact. Stanford Social Innovation Review, 9(1), 36–41. https://ssir.org/articles/entry/collective_impact
- Kendig, H., Elias, A.-M., Matwijiw, P., & Anstey, K. (2014). Developing age-friendly cities and communities in Australia. Journal of Aging and Health, 26(8), 1390–1414. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0898264314532687
- Keyes, L. M., & Benavides, A. D. (2020). Responsive management: Municipal leadership for an aging population. Journal of Public Management & Social Policy, 26(2), 119–136. https://digitalscholarship.tsu.edu/jpmsp/vol26/iss2/12/?utm_source=digitalscholarship.tsu.edu%2Fjpmsp%2Fvol26%2Fiss2%2F12&utm_medium=PDF&utm_campaign=PDFCoverPages
- Lambert, V. A., & Lambert, C. E. (2012). Qualitative descriptive research: An acceptable design. Pacific Rim International Journal of Nursing Research, 16(4), 255–256. https://he02.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/PRIJNR/article/download/5805/5064
- Lehning, A. J., & Greenfield, E. A. (2017). Research on age-friendly community initiatives: Taking stock and moving forward. Journal of Housing for the Elderly, 31(2), 178–192. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/02763893.2017.1309937
- Lehning, A. J. (2014). Local and regional governments and age-friendly communities: A case study of the San Francisco Bay Area. Journal of Aging & Social Policy, 26(1–2), 102–116. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/08959420.2014.854140
- Menec, V. H., Novek, S., Veselyuk, D., & McArthur, J. (2014). Lessons learned from a Canadian province-wide age-friendly initiative: The age-friendly Manitoba initiative. Journal of Aging & Social Policy, 26(1–2), 33–51. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/08959420.2014.854606
- Merriam, S. B. (1998). Qualitative research and case study applications in education. Jossey-Bass.
- Morrison, E., Hutcheson, S., Nilsen, E., Fadden, J., & Franklin, N. (2019). Strategic doing: Ten skills for agile leadership. John Wiley & Sons.
- Neal, M. B., DeLaTorre, A. K., & Carder, P. C. (2014). Age-Friendly Portland: A university-city-community partnership. Journal of Aging & Social Policy, 26(1–2), 88–101. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/08959420.2014.854651
- Neal, M. B., & Wernher, I. (2014). Evaluating your age-friendly community program (Paper 11). Institute on Aging Publications.
- Patton, M. Q. (2011). Developmental evaluation: Applying complexity. Guilford Press.
- Plouffe, L. A., & Kalache, A. (2011). Making communities age friendly: State and municipal initiatives in Canada and other countries. Gaceta Sanitaria, 25(Suppl. 2), 131–137. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gaceta.2011.11.001
- Russell, E., Skinner, M. W., & Fowler, K. (2019). Emergent challenges and opportunities to sustaining age-friendly initiatives: Qualitative findings from a Canadian age-friendly funding program. Journal of Aging & Social Policy, 1–20. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/08959420.2019.1636595
- Scharlach, A. E., & Lehning, A. J. (2016). Creating aging-friendly communities. Oxford University Press.
- Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1998). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory (2nd ed.). Sage Publications.
- Sun, Y., Chao, T.-Y., Woo, J., & Au, D. W. H. (2017). An institutional perspective of “Glocalization” in two Asian tigers: The “Structure−Agent−Strategy” of building an age-friendly city. Habitat International, 59 (January 2017), 101–109. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.habitatint.2016.11.013
- Tamarack Institute. (2017). Tool: The collaboration spectrum. https://www.tamarackcommunity.ca/library/collaboration-spectrum-tool
- Teixeira-Poit, S. M. (2020). Examining collaboration across organizations in an age-friendly community. Journal of Women & Aging, 32(1), 91–113. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/08952841.2019.1685857
- Wetle, T. T. (2020). Age-friendly ecosystems: An aspirational goal. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 68(9), 1929–1930. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/jgs.16676
- WHO. (2018). The global network for age-friendly cities and communities: Looking back over the last decade, looking forward to the next. ARP. https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/WHO-FWC-ALC-18.4
- WHO (n.d.) About the Global Network for Age-friendly Cities and Communities. https://extranet.who.int/agefriendlyworld/who-network/