527
Views
3
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Reading the fine print: A review and analysis of business journals’ data sharing policies

ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon

References

  • Abella, A., Ortiz‐de‐Urbina‐Criado, M., & De‐Pablos‐Heredero, C. (2019). The process of open data publication and reuse. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 70(3), 296–300. doi: 10.1002/asi.24116.
  • Aguinis, H., Cascio, W. F., & Ramani, R. S. (2017). Science’s reproducibility and replicability crisis: International business is not immune. Journal of International Business Studies, 48(6), 653–663. doi: 10.1057/s41267-017-0081-0.
  • Arenas, A. E., Goh, J. M., & Matthews, B. (2019). Identifying the business model dimensions of data sharing: A value-based approach. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 70(10), 1047–1059. doi: 10.1002/asi.24180.
  • Chawinga, W. D., & Zinn, S. (2019). Global perspectives of research data sharing: A systematic literature review. Library & Information Science Research, 41(2), 109–122. doi: 10.1016/j.lisr.2019.04.004.
  • Colling, L. J., & Szucs, D. (2018). Statistical reform and the replication crisis. Review of Philosophy and Psychology, 1–27. doi: 10.1007/s13164-018-0421-4.
  • DataONE. (n.d.). Andreas: Biochemical modeler. Retrieved March 8, 2020, from https://www.dataone.org/personas/andreas-biochemical-modeller.
  • Desai, P. S. (2013). Marketing science replication and disclosure policy. Marketing Science, 32(1), 1–3. doi: 10.1287/mksc.1120.0761.
  • Diekema, A. R., Wesolek, A., & Walters, C. D. (2014). The NSF/NIH effect: Surveying the effect of data management requirements on faculty, sponsored programs, and institutional repositories. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 40(3–4), 322–331. doi: 10.1016/j.acalib.2014.04.010.
  • Gewin, V. (2016). Data sharing: An open mind on open data. Nature, 529(7584), 117–119. doi:10.1038/nj7584-117a
  • Gherghina, S., & Katsanidou, A. (2013). Data availability in political science journals. European Political Science, 12(3), 333–349. doi: 10.1057/eps.2013.8.
  • Harward, M. (2016). A study of data sharing practices within scholarly research communities (CCE Theses and Dissertations). Fort Lauderdale, FL: Nova Southeastern University. https://nsuworks.nova.edu/gscis_etd/982.
  • Janz, N. (2016). Bringing the gold standard into the classroom: Replication in university teaching. International Studies Perspectives, 17(4), 392–407. doi: 10.1111/insp.12104.
  • Jarolimkova, A., & Drobikova, B. (2019). Data sharing in social sciences: Case STUDY ON Charles University. In S. Kurbanoğlu, S. Špiranec, Y. Ünal, J. Boustany, M. L. Huotari, E. Grassian, D. Mizrachi, & L. Roy (Eds.), Information literacy in everyday life (pp. 556–565). New York, NY: Springer International Publishing. doi:10.1007/978-3-030-13472-3_52
  • Jones, L., Grant, R., & Hrynaszkiewicz, I. (2019). Implementing publisher policies that inform, support and encourage authors to share data: Two case studies. Insights, 32(1), 11. doi:10.1629/uksg.463
  • Ju, B., & Kim, Y. (2019). The formation of research ethics for data sharing by biological scientists: An empirical analysis. Aslib Journal of Information Management, 71(5), 583–600. doi:10.1108/AJIM-12-2018-0296
  • Kandori, M. (2018). Replicability of experimental data and credibility of economic theory. The Japanese Economic Review, 69(1), 4–25. doi: 10.1111/jere.12175.
  • Kim, Y., & Adler, M. (2015). Social scientists’ data sharing behaviors: Investigating the roles of individual motivations, institutional pressures, and data repositories. International Journal of Information Management, 35(4), 408–418. doi: 10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2015.04.007.
  • Levesque, R. J. R. (2017). Data sharing mandates, developmental science, and responsibly supporting authors. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 46(12), 2401–2406. doi:10.1007/s10964-017-0741-1
  • Lindsay, D. S. (2017). Sharing data and materials in psychological science. Psychological Science, 28(6), 699–702. doi:10.1177/0956797617704015
  • Loken, E., & Gelman, A. (2017). Measurement error and the replication crisis. Science (New York, N.Y.), 355(6325), 584–585. doi:10.1126/science.aal3618
  • Maienschein, J., Parker, J. N., Laubichler, M., & Hackett, E. J. (2019). Data Management and Data Sharing in Science and Technology Studies. Science, Technology, & Human Values, 44(1), 143–160. doi: 10.1177/0162243918798906
  • McCullough, B. D. (2009). Open access economics journals and the market for reproducible economic research. Economic Analysis and Policy, 39(1), 117–126. doi: 10.1016/S0313-5926. (09)50047-1
  • Mendes-Da-Silva, W. (2019). Have we been transparent enough? Challenges in replicability and credibility in business research. RAC - Revista de Administracao Contemporanea, 23(5), 696.
  • Ojala, M. (2018). Fun with numbers, the business researcher’s best friend. Online Searcher; Medford, 42(1), 62–64.
  • Paulus, F. M., Rademacher, L., Schäfer, T. A. J., Müller-Pinzler, L., & Krach, S. (2015). Journal Impact factor shapes scientists’ reward signal in the prospect of publication. PLoS One, 10(11), e0142537. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0142537.
  • Piwowar, H. A., Day, R. S., & Fridsma, D. B. (2007). Sharing detailed research data is associated with increased citation rate. PLOS One, 2(3), e308. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0000308
  • Piwowar, H., & Chapman, W. (2008). A review of journal policies for sharing research data. Nature Precedings, 1–1. doi:10.1038/npre.2008.1700.1
  • Semeler, A. R., Pinto, A. L., & Rozados, H. B. F. (2019). Data science in data librarianship: Core competencies of a data librarian. Journal of Librarianship and Information Science, 51(3), 771–780. doi: 10.1177/0961000617742465.
  • Shen, Y. (2018). Data sustainability and reuse pathways of natural resources and environmental scientists. New Review of Academic Librarianship, 24(2), 136–156. doi: 10.1080/13614533.2018.1424642.
  • Shrout, P. E., & Rodgers, J. L. (2018). Psychology, science, and knowledge construction: Broadening perspectives from the replication crisis. Annual Review Psychology, 69(1), 487–510. doi:10.1146/annurev-psych-122216-011845
  • Stodden, V., Guo, P., & Ma, Z. (2013). Toward reproducible computational research: an empirical analysis of data and code policy adoption by journals. PLOS One, 8(6), e67111. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0067111
  • Sturges, P., Bamkin, M., Anders, J. H. S., Hubbard, B., Hussain, A., & Heeley, M. (2015). Research data sharing: Developing a stakeholder-driven model for journal policies. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 66(12), 2445–2455. doi: 10.1002/asi.23336.
  • Taichman, D. B., Sahni, P., Pinborg, A., Peiperl, L., Laine, C., James, A., … Backus, J. (2017). Data sharing statements for clinical trials: A requirement of the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors. Bulletin of the World Health Organization, 95(7), 482–483. doi:10.2471/BLT.17.196733
  • Tenopir, C., Allard, S., Douglass, K., Aydinoglu, A. U., Wu, L., Read, E., … Frame, M. (2011). Data sharing by scientists: Practices and perceptions. PLoS One, 6(6), e21101. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0021101
  • UNESCO. (2017). Open science movement, united nations educational, scientific and cultural organization. Retrieved from http://www.unesco.org/new/en/communication-and-information/portals-and-platforms/goap/open-science-movement/.
  • Vasilevsky, N. A., Minnier, J., Haendel, M. A., & Champieux, R. E. (2017). Reproducible and reusable research: Are journal data sharing policies meeting the mark? PeerJ, 5, e3208. doi:10.7717/peerj.3208
  • Van den Eynden, V., & Corti, L. (2017). Advancing research data publishing practices for the social sciences: From archive activity to empowering researchers. International Journal on Digital Libraries, 18(2), 113–121. doi: 10.1007/s00799-016-0177-3.
  • Wiley, C. (2018). Data sharing and engineering faculty: An analysis of selected publications. Science & Technology Libraries, 37(4), 409–419. doi: 10.1080/0194262X.2018.1516596.
  • Yoon, A., & Kim, Y. (2017). Social scientists’ data reuse behaviors: Exploring the roles of attitudinal beliefs, attitudes, norms, and data repositories. Library & Information Science Research, 39(3), 224–233. doi: 10.1016/j.lisr.2017.07.008.
  • Zenk-Möltgen, W., & Lepthien, G. (2014). Data sharing in sociology journals. Online Information Review; Bradford, 38(6), 709–722. doi: 10.1108/OIR-05-2014-0119.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.