A Multilevel Analysis of Neighborhood Socioeconomic Disadvantage and Transactional Sex with Casual Partners Among Young Men Who Have Sex with Men Living in Metro Detroit

REFERENCES

• Farley R, Danzinger S, Holzer HJ. The evolution of racial segregation. In: Detroit Divided. New York: Russell Sage Foundation; 2000:144–177.
   Google Scholar
• US Census Bureau. American FactFinder fact sheet. Detroit, MI: Author;2015. http://quickfacts.census.gov/qfd/states/26/2622000.html. Accessed August 16, 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Schulz AJ, Williams DR, Israel BA, Lempert LB. Racial and spatial relations as fundamental determinants of health in Detroit. Milbank Q. 2002;80:677–707.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lopez WD, Graham LF, Reardon C, Reyes AM, Reyes A, Padilla M. “No jobs, more crime. More jobs, less crime”: Structural factors affecting the health of Latino men in Detroit. J Mens Health. 2012;9:255–260.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. HIV among gay, bisexual, and other men who have sex with men. 2014. http://www.cdc.gov/hiv/risk/gender/msm/facts/index.html.
   Google Scholar
• Michigan Department of Community Health. Annual HIV Surveillance Report, Michigan 2014. 2014. http://www.michigan.gov/documents/mdch/January_2014_ALL_446611_7.pdf. Accessed August 16, 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Sampson RJ, Groves WB. Community structure and crime: Testing social-disorganization theory. Am J Sociol. 1989;94:774–802.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Halkitis P, Kapadia F, Ompad D. Incidence of HIV infection in young gay, bisexual, and other YMSM. JAIDS J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2015;69(4):466–473.
   Google Scholar
• Mustanski BS, Newcomb ME, Du Bois SN, Garcia SC, Grov C. HIV in young men who have sex with men: A review of epidemiology, risk and protective factors, and interventions. J Sex Res. 2011;48:218–253.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bauermeister JA., Zimmerman MA., Caldwell CH. Neighborhood disadvantage and changes in condom use among African American adolescents. J Urban Heal. 2011;88:66–83.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bauermeister JA, Eaton LA, Meanley S, Pingel ES. Transactional sex with regular and casual partners among young men who have sex with men in the Detroit Metro Area. Am J Mens Health 2016: in press.
   Google Scholar
• Millett GA, Ding H, Marks G et al. Mistaken Assumptions and missed opportunities: Correlates of undiagnosed HIV Infection among black and Latino men who have sex with men. JAIDS J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2011;58:64–71.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oldenburg CE, Perez-Brumer AG, Reisner SL, Mimiaga MJ. Transactional sex and the HIV epidemic among men who have sex with men (MSM): Results from a systematic review and meta-analysis. AIDS Behav. 2015;19(12):2177–2183.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walls NE, Bell S. Correlates of engaging in survival sex among homeless youth and young adults. J Sex Res. 2011;48:423–436.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dunkle KL, Wingood GM, Camp CM, DiClemente RJ. Economically motivated relationships and transactional sex among unmarried African American and white women: results from a US national telephone survey. Public Health Rep. 2010;125:90–100.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bauermeister JA., Meanley S, Hickok A, Pingel E, Vanhemert W, Loveluck J. Sexuality-related work discrimination and its association with the health of sexual minority emerging and young adult men in the Detroit Metro Area. Sex Res Soc Policy. 2014;11:1–10.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meanley S, Gale A, Harmell C, Jadwin-Cakmak L, Pingel E, Bauermeister JA. The role of provider interactions on comprehensive sexual healthcare among young men who have sex with men. AIDS Educ Prev. 2015;27:15–26.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson LD, Johnson LD, O'Malley PM, O'Malley PM, Bachman JG, Bachman JG. National Survey Results on Drug Use from the Monitoring the Future Study, 1875–1992. Rockville, MD: National Institute on Drug Abuse; 1993.
   Google Scholar
• Johns MM, Bauermeister J, Zimmerman M. Individual and neighborhood correlates of HIV testing among African American youth transitioning from adolescence into young adulthood. AIDS Educ Prev. 2010;22(6):509–522.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raudenbush S, Bryk AS, Congdon R. HLM 7 for Windows. 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Ayala G, Bingham T, Kim J, Wheeler DP, Millett Ga. Modeling the impact of social discrimination and financial hardship on the sexual risk of HIV among Latino and black men who have sex with men. Am J Public Health. 2012;102(S2):e1–e8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Latkin CA, German D, Vlahov D, Galea S. Neighborhoods and HIV: A social ecological approach to prevention and care. Am Psychol. 68(4):210–224.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blankenship K, Bray S, Merson M. Structural nterventions in public health. Aids. 2000;14:S11–S21.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gupta GR, Parkhurst JO, Ogden J, Aggleton P, Mahal A. Structural approaches to HIV prevention. Lancet. 2008;372:764–775.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kalichman SC, Simbayi LC, Kaufman M, Cain D, Jooste S. Alcohol use and sexual risks for HIV/AIDS in sub-Saharan Africa: Systematic review of empirical findings. Prev Sci. 2007;8:141–151.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baral S, Sifakis F, Cleghorn F, Beyrer C. Elevated risk for HIV infection among men who have sex with men in low- and middle-income countries 2000–2006: A systematic review. PLoS Med. 2007;4:1901–1911.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graham LF, Crissman HP, Tocco J, Hughes LA, Snow RC, Padilla MB. Interpersonal relationships and social support in transitioning narratives of black transgender women in Detroit. Int J Transgenderism. 2014;15:100–113.
   Google Scholar
• Bauermeister JA, Elkington KS, Huebner D. Sexuality and HIV/AIDS prevention. In: Tolman DL, Diamond LM, Bauermeister JA, et al., eds. APA handbook of sexuality and psychology, Vol. 1: Person-based approaches. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association. 2014:697–724.
   Google Scholar