300
Views
6
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Measuring Social Support among Soldiers with the Experienced Post-Deployment Social Support Scale (EPSSS): A Rasch-Based Construct Validity Study

, &
Pages 131-139 | Received 21 Mar 2019, Accepted 19 Sep 2019, Published online: 16 Oct 2019

References

  • Polusny MA, Erbes CR, Murdoch M, et al. Prospective risk factors for new-onset post-traumatic stress disorder in National Guard soldiers deployed to Iraq. Psychol Med. 2011;41(4):687–698. doi:10.1017/S0033291710002047.
  • Ramchand R, Rudavsky R, Grant S, et al. Prevalence of risk factors for and consequences of posttraumatic stress disorder and other mental health problems in military populations deployed to Iraq and Afghanistan. Curr Psychiatr Rep. 2015;17(5):37. doi:10.1007/s11920-015-0575-z.
  • Shea TM, Reddy MK, Tyrka AR, et al. Risk factors for post-deployment posttraumatic stress disorder in national guard/reserve service members. Psychiatr Res. 2013;210(3):1042–1048. doi:10.1016/j.psychres.2013.08.039.
  • Xue C, Ge Y, Tang B, et al. A meta-analysis of risk factors for combat-related PTSD among military personnel and veterans. PLoS One. 2015;10(3):e0120270. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0120270.
  • Nash WP, Vasterling J, Ewing-Cobbs L, et al. Consensus recommendations for common data elements for operational stress research and surveillance: report of a federal interagency working group. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2010;91(11):1673–1683. doi:10.1016/j.apmr.2010.06.035.
  • Zimet GD, Dahlem NW, Zimet SG, et al. The multidimensional scale of perceived social support. J Pers Assess. 1988;52(1):30–41. doi:10.1207/s15327752jpa5201_2.
  • Vogt D, Smith BN, King LA, et al. Deployment Risk and Resilience Inventory-2 (DRRI-2): an updated tool for assessing psychosocial risk and resilience factors among service members and veterans: deployment risk and resilience inventory. J Trauma Stress. 2013;26(6):710–717. doi:10.1002/jts.21868.
  • Sarason IG, Sarason BR. Social support: mapping the construct. J Soc Pers Relat. 2009;26(1):113–120. doi:10.1177/0265407509105526.
  • Williams P, Barclay L, Schmied V. Defining social support in context: a necessary step in improving research, intervention, and practice. Q Health Res. 2004;14(7):942–960. doi:10.1177/1049732304266997.
  • Karstoft K-I, Andersen SB, Nielsen A. Assessing PTSD in the military: validation of a scale distributed to Danish soldiers after deployment since 1998. Scand J Psychol. 2017;58(3):260–268. doi:10.1111/sjop.12360.
  • Karstoft K-I, Nielsen ABS, Nielsen T. Assessment of depression in veterans across missions: a validity study using Rasch measurement models. Eur J Psychotraumatol. 2017;8(1):1326798. doi:10.1080/20008198.2017.1326798.
  • Karstoft K-I, Nielsen T, Nielsen A. Perceived danger during deployment: a Rasch validation of an instrument assessing perceived combat exposure and the witnessing of combat consequences in a war zone. Eur J Psychotraumatol. 2018;9(1).1487224. doi:10.1080/20008198.2018.
  • Nissen LR, Karstoft K-I, Vedtofte MS, et al. Cognitive ability and risk of post-traumatic stress disorder after military deployment: an observational cohort study. Br J Psychiatr Open. 2017;3(6):274–280. doi:10.1192/bjpo.bp.117.005736.
  • Zimmerman M, Ruggero CJ, Chelminski I, et al. Developing brief scales for use in clinical practice: the reliability and validity of single-item self-report measures of depression symptom severity, psychosocial impairment due to depression, and quality of life. J Clin Psychiatr. 2006;67(10):1536–1541. doi:10.4088/JCP.v67n1007.
  • Loo R. A caveat on using single‐item versus multiple‐item scales. J Manage Psychol. 2013;17(1):68–75. doi:10.1108/02683940210415933.
  • Diamantopoulos A, Sarstedt M, Fuchs C, et al. Guidelines for choosing between multi-item and single-item scales for construct measurement: a predictive validity perspective. J Acad Mark Sci. 2012;40(3):434–449. doi:10.1007/s11747-011-0300-3.
  • Linden WVD, Hambleton RK. Handbook of Modern Item Response Theory. New York: Springer Science & Business Media; 2013.
  • Fischer GH, Molenaar IW, eds. Rasch Models: Foundations, Recent Developments, and Applications. New York: Springer-Verlag; 1995. http://www.springer.com/la/book/9780387944999. Accessed January 3, 2019.
  • Kreiner S. Validity and objectivity: reflections on the role and nature of Rasch models. Nordic Psychol. 2007;59(3):268–298. doi:10.1027/1901-2276.59.3.268.
  • Kreiner S. The Rasch model for dichotomous items In: Christensen KB, Kreiner S, Mesbah M, eds. Rasch Models in Health. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.; 2013:5–26. doi:10.1002/9781118574454.ch1.
  • Kreiner S, Christensen KB. Validity and objectivity in health-related scales: analysis by graphical loglinear Rasch models. In: Carstensen CH, ed. Multivariate and Mixture Distribution Rasch Models. New York, NY: Springer New York; 2007:329–346. doi:10.1007/978-0-387-49839-3_21.
  • Jakupcak M, Vannoy S, Imel Z, et al. Does PTSD moderate the relationship between social support and suicide risk in Iraq and Afghanistan War veterans seeking mental health treatment? Depress Anxiety. 2010;27(11):1001–1005. doi:10.1002/da.20722.
  • Milner A, Krnjacki L, LaMontagne AD. Age and gender differences in the influence of social support on mental health: a longitudinal fixed-effects analysis using 13 annual waves of the HILDA cohort. Public Health. 2016;140:172–178. doi:10.1016/j.puhe.2016.06.029.
  • Griffith J. Suicide and war: The mediating effects of negative mood, posttraumatic stress disorder symptoms, and social support among army National Guard soldiers. Suicide Life-Threat Behav. 2012;42(4):453–469. doi:10.1111/j.1943-278X.2012.00104.x.
  • Rasch G. Probabilistic Models for Some Intelligence and Attainment Tests. Expanded ed edition. Chicago: University of Chicago Press; 1980.
  • Masters GN. A rasch model for partial credit scoring. Psychometrika. 1982;47(2):149–174. doi:10.1007/BF02296272.
  • Mesbah M, Kreiner S. Rasch models for ordered polytomous items. In: Christensen KB, Kreiner S, Mesbah M, eds. Rasch Models in Health. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.; 2013:27–42. doi:10.1002/9781118574454.ch2.
  • Rasch G. On general laws and the meaning of measurement in psychology. Proceedings of the Fourth Berkeley Symposium on Mathematical Statistics and Probability, Volume 4: Contributions to Biology and Problems of Medicine, University of California Press, 1961:321–333; Berkeley, CA. https://projecteuclid.org/euclid.bsmsp/1200512895
  • Andersen EB. A goodness of fit test for the Rasch model. Psychometrika. 1973;38(1):123–140. doi:10.1007/BF02291180.
  • Kelderman H. Loglinear Rasch model tests. Psychometrika. 1984;49(2):223–245. doi:10.1007/BF02294174.
  • Christensen KB, Kreiner S. Item fit statistics. In: Christensen KB, Kreiner S, Mesbah M, eds. Rasch Models in Health. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.; 2013:83–104. doi:10.1002/9781118574454.ch5.
  • Kreiner S, Christensen KB. Person parameter estimation and measurement in Rasch models. In: Christensen KB, Kreiner S, Mesbah M, eds. Rasch Models in Health. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.; 2013:63–78. doi:10.1002/9781118574454.ch4.
  • Hamon A, Mesbah M. Questionnaire reliability under the Rasch model. In: Mesbah M, Cole BF, Lee M-LT, eds. Statistical Methods for Quality of Life Studies: Design, Measurements and Analysis. Boston, MA: Springer US; 2002:155–168. doi:10.1007/978-1-4757-3625-0_13.
  • Benjamini Y, Hochberg Y. Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. J R Stat Soc Ser B (Methodol). 1995;57(1):289–300. doi:10.1111/j.2517-6161.1995.tb02031.x.
  • Cox DR, Spjøtvoll E, Johansen S, et al. The role of significance tests [with discussion and reply]. Scand J Stat. 1977;4(2):49–70.
  • Kreiner, S. Introduction to DIGRAM. Biostatistisk Afdeling, RR 03/10; 2003:114.
  • Kreiner, S., & Nielsen, T. Item analysis in DIGRAM 3.04: Part I: Guided tours. København: Department of Biostastistics, University of Copenhagen. Research Report, Biostatistisk Afdeling, Institut for Folkesundhedsvidenskab 2013 No. 06, Vol. 13.
  • Newman E, Kaloupek DG. The risks and benefits of participating in trauma-focused research studies. J Traum Stress. 2004;17(5):383–394. doi:10.1023/B:JOTS.0000048951.02568.3a.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.