Sentencing Recommendations by Probation Officers and Judges: An Examination of Adult Offenders Across Gender

REFERENCES

• Abonetti, C. (1991). An integration of theories to explain judicial discretion. Social Problems, 2, 247–266.
   Google Scholar
• Andrews, D. A., Bonta, J., & Wormith, J. S. (2006). The recent past and near future of risk and/or need assessment. Crime and Delinquency, 52, 7–27.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berk, R. A. (1983). An introduction to sample selection bias in sociological data. American Sociological Review, 48, 386–398.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bickle, G. S., & Peterson, R. D. (1991). The impact of gender-based family roles on criminal sentencing. Social Problems, 38, 372–394.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bishop, D. M., & Frazier, C. E. (1996). Race effects in juvenile justice decision-making: Findings of a statewide analysis. The Journal of Criminal Law & Criminology, 86, 392–414.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bloom, B., Owen, B., & Covington, S. (2004). Women offenders and the gendered effects of public policy. Review of Policy Research, 21, 31–48.
   Google Scholar
• Brennan, P. K. (2006). Sentencing female misdemeanants: An examination of the direct and indirect effects of race/ethnicity. Justice Quarterly, 23, 60–91.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bushway, S., Johnson, B. D., & Slocum, L. A. (2007). Is the magic still there? The use of the Heckman two-step correction for selection bias in criminology. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 23, 151–178.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campbell, M. A., French, S., & Gendreau, P. (2009). The prediction of violence in adult offenders a meta-analytic comparison of instruments and methods of assessment. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 36, 567–590.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chesney-Lind, M. (1977). Judicial paternalism and the female status offender: Training women to know their place. NPPA Journal, 23, 121–130.
   Google Scholar
• Crew, K. B. (1991). Sex differences in criminal sentencing: Chivalry or patriarchy? Justice Quarterly, 8, 59–83.
   Google Scholar
• Daly, K. (1987). Structure and practice of familial-based justice in a criminal court. Law and Society Review, 21, 267–290.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Daly, K. (1994). Gender, crime, and punishment. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dixon, D. (1995). Crime, criminology and public policy. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Criminology, 1, 1–5.
   Google Scholar
• Doerner, J. K., & Demuth, S. (2014). Gender and sentencing in the federal courts: Are women treated more leniently? Criminal Justice Policy Review, 25, 242–269.
   Google Scholar
• Embry, R., & Lyons, P. M. (2012). Sex-based sentencing: Sentencing discrepancies between male and female sex offenders. Feminist Criminology, 7, 146–162.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eisenstein, J., & Jacob, H. (1977). Felony justice: An organizational analysis of criminal courts. Boston, MA: University Press of America.
   Google Scholar
• Feldmeyer, B., & Ulmer, J. T. (2011). Racial/ethnic threat and federal sentencing. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 48, 238–270.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frazier, C. E., Bock, E. W., & Henretta, J. C. (1983). The role of probation officers in determining gender differences in sentencing severity. The Sociological Quarterly, 24, 305–318.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freiburger, T. L., & Hilinski, C. M. (2011). Probation officers’ recommendations and final sentencing outcomes. Journal of Crime and Justice, 34, 45–61.
   Google Scholar
• Gaarder, E., Rodriguez, N., & Zatz, M. S. (2004). Criers, liars, and manipulators: Probation officers’ views of girls. Justice Quarterly, 21, 547–578.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gendreau, P., Little, T., & Goggin, C. (1996). A meta‐analysis of the predictors of adult offender recidivism: what works! Criminology, 34, 575–608.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guevara, L., Herz, D., & Spohn, C. (2006). Gender and juvenile justice decision making: What role does race play? Feminist Criminology, 1, 258–282.
   Google Scholar
• Hagan, J., Hewitt, J. D., & Alwin, D. F. (1979). Ceremonial justice: Crime and punishment in a loosely coupled system. Social Forces, 58, 506–527.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heckman, J. J. (1976). The common structure of statistical models of truncation, sample selection and limited dependent variables and a simple estimator for such models. Annals of Economic and Social Measurement, 5, 475–492.
   Google Scholar
• Horn, R., & Evans, M. (2000). The effect of gender on pre-sentence reports. Howard Journal of Criminal Justice, 39, 184–197.
   Google Scholar
• Horowitz, R., & Pottieger, A. E. (1991). Gender bias in juvenile justice handling of seriously crime-involved youths. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 28, 75–100.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, B. (2006). The multilevel context of criminal sentencing: Integrating judge- and county-level influences. Criminology, 44, 259–298.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kingsnorth, R. F., MacIntosh, R. C., & Sutherland, S. (2002). Criminal charge or probation violation? Prosecutorial discretion and implications for research in criminal court processing. Criminology, 40, 553–577.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koons-Witt, B. A. (2002). The effect of gender on the decision to incarcerate before and after the introduction of sentencing guidelines. Criminology, 40, 297–327.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koons-Witt, B. A., Sevigny, E. L., Burrow, J. D., & Hester, R. (2014). Gender and sentencing in South Carolina: Examining the interactions with race, age, and offense type. Criminal Justice Policy Review, 25, 299–324.
   Google Scholar
• Leiber, M., Reitzel, J., & Mack, K. (2011). Probation officer recommendations for sentencing relative to judicial practice: The implications for African Americans. Criminal Justice Policy Review, 22, 301–329.
   Google Scholar
• Leiber, M., Peck, J. H., Valentin Rosa, M., & Shreve, T. (2017). The relationship between the gender of the probation officer and judicial sentencing: Implications for black male offenders. In J. T. Ulmer & M. Bradley (Eds.), Punishment decisions: Sites of disparity. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Leiber, M., & Mack, K. (2003). The individual and joint effects of race, gender, and family status on juvenile justice decision-making. Journal of Research in Crime & Delinquency, 40, 34–70.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leifker, D., & Sample, L. L. (2010). Do judges follow sentencing recommendations, or do recommendations simply reflect what judges want to hear? An examination of one state court. Journal of Crime and Justice, 33, 127–151.
   Google Scholar
• Leifker, D., & Sample, L. L. (2011). Probation recommendations and sentences received: The association between the two and the factors that affect recommendations. Criminal Justice Policy Review, 22, 494–517.
   Google Scholar
• MacDonald, J. M., & Chesney-Lind, M. (2011). Gender bias and juvenile justice revisited: A multiyear analysis. Crime & Delinquency, 47, 173–195.
   Google Scholar
• Mallicoat, S. (2007). Gendered justice: Attributional differences between males and females in the juvenile courts. Feminist Criminology, 2, 4–30.
   Google Scholar
• Miller, J. (1996). Race, gender, and juvenile justice: An examination of dispositional decision-making for delinquent girls. In M. Schwartz & D. Milovanovic (Eds.), Race, gender, and class in Criminology: The intersection (pp. 219–246). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Monahan, J., & Skeem, J. L. (2014). Risk redux: The resurgence of risk assessment in criminal sanctioning. Federal Sentencing Reporter, 26, 158–166.
   Google Scholar
• Morash, M. (2006). Understanding gender, crime, and justice. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Neubauer, D. W. (2005). American’s courts and the criminal justice system (9th ed.). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
   Google Scholar
• Paternoster, R., Brame, R., Mazerolle, P., & Piquero, A. (1998). Using the correct statistical test for the equality of regression coefficients. Criminology, 36, 859–866.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rodriguez, N., & Webb, V. J. (2007). Probation violations, revocations, and imprisonment the decisions of probation officers, prosecutors, and judges pre-and post-mandatory drug treatment. Criminal Justice Policy Review, 18, 3–30.
   Google Scholar
• Rosecrance, J. (1988). Maintaining the myth of individualized justice: Probation presentence reports. Justice Quarterly, 5, 235–256.
   Google Scholar
• Sharp, S., Braley, A., & Marcus-Mendoza, S. (2000). Focal concerns, race & sentencing of female drug offenders. Free Inquiry in Creative Sociology, 28, 3–16.
   Google Scholar
• Spohn, C. (1990). The sentencing decisions of Black and White judges: Expected and unexpected similarities. Law and Society Review, 24, 1197–1216.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spohn, C. (1998). Gender and sentencing of drug offenders: Is chivalry dead? Criminal Justice Policy Review, 9, 365–399.
   Google Scholar
• Spohn, C. (2008). How do judges decide: The search for fairness and justice in punishment (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Spohn, C., & Spears, J. (1997). Gender and case processing decisions: A comparison of case outcomes for male and female defendants charged with violent felonies. Women & Criminal Justice, 8, 29–58.
   Google Scholar
• Spohn, C., & Beichner, D. (2000). Is preferential treatment of female offenders a thing of the past? Criminal Justice Policy Review, 2, 149–184.
   Google Scholar
• Spohn, C., Beichner, D., & Davis-Frenzel, E. (2001). Prosecutorial justifications for sexual assault case rejection: Guarding the “gateway to justice.” Social problems, 48, 206–235.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spohn, C., & Hemmens, C. (2009). Courts: A text/reader. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Steffensmeier, D., & Demuth, S. (2006). Does gender modify the effects of race/ethnicity on criminal sanctioning? Sentences for male and female White, Black, and Hispanic defendants. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 22, 241–261.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steffensmeier, D., & Hebert, C. (1999). Women and men policymakers: Does the judge’s gender affect the sentencing of criminal defendants? Social Forces, 77, 1163–1196.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steffensmeier, D., Ulmer, J., & Kramer, J. (1998). The interaction of race, gender, and age in criminal sentencing: The punishment cost of being young, black, and male. Criminology, 36, 763–798.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stolzenberg, R. M., & Relles, D. A. (1990). Theory testing in a world of constrained research design: The significance of Heckman’s censored sampling bias correction for nonexperimental research. Sociological Methods & Research, 18, 395–415.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sudnow, D. (1965). Normal crimes: Sociological features of the pearl code in the public defender’s office. Social Problems, 12, 255–277.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tillyer, R., Hartley, R., & Ward, J. (2015). Differential treatment of female defendants: Does criminal history moderate the effect of gender on sentence length in federal narcotics cases? Criminal Justice & Behavior, 42, 703–721.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ulmer, J. T. (1997). Social worlds of sentencing: Court communities under sentencing guidelines. Albany: State University of New York Press.
   Google Scholar
• United States Census Bureau. (2000). Census summary file 1. Retrieved from http://factfinder2.census.gov/faces/nav/jsf/pages/searchresults.xhtml?refresh=t
   Google Scholar
• United States Department of Justice, Federal Bureau of Investigation. (2005). Crime in the United States, 2005. Retrieved from https://ucr.fbi.gov/crime-in-the-u.s/2005
   Google Scholar