Restoring the Mind–Body Unity: A New Alliance Between Neurosciences and Psychotherapy

References

• Bateson, G. (1971). Steps to an ecology of mind. San Francisco, CA: Chandler Publishing Company.
   Google Scholar
• Bateson, G. (1979). Mind and nature: A necessary unity. New York, NY: E.P. Dutton.
   Google Scholar
• Bowlby, J. (1969). Attachment and loss. New York, NY: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Byng–Hall, J. (1996). Rewriting family scripts: Improvisation and systems change. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Caillè, P. (1991). Un et un font trois (One and One makes Three). Paris, France, France: ESF.
   Google Scholar
• Caille’, P., & Rey, Y. (1994). Les objets flottants (The Floating Objects). Paris, France: ESF.
   Google Scholar
• Capra, F. (1982). The turning point. New York, NY: Simon & Schuster.
   Google Scholar
• Chouhy, A. (2008). Paramètres de developpement dans la formation à la thérapie familiale: Le processus d’ppropriation de l’histoire familiale du thérapeute (Developmental parameters during training of family therapy: The process of appropriation of the therapist’s family history). Cahiers Critiques de Thérapie Familale et de Practiques de Reseaux, 41, 51–68. doi:10.3917/ctf.041.0051
   Google Scholar
• Damasio, A. (1994). Descartes’ error: Emotion, reason, and the human brain. Putnam, NY: Grosset.
   Google Scholar
• Damasio, A. (1999). The feeling of what happens: Body and emotions in the making of consciousness. Putnam, NY: Grosset.
   Google Scholar
• Duhl, F. J., Kantor, D., & Duhl, B. S. (1979). Learning space and action in family therapy: A primer of sculpture. In D. Bloch (Ed.), Techniques of family psychotherapy. New York, NY: Grune & Stratton.
   Google Scholar
• Edelman, G. (1989). The remembered present: A biological theory of consciousness. New York, NY: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Elkaim, M. (1989). Si tu m’aimes, ne m’aimes pas (If you Love Me, Don’t Love Me). Paris, France: Le Seuil.
   Google Scholar
• Ferreira, A. (1963). Family myths and homeaostasis. Archives of General Psychiatry, 9, 457–461. doi:10.1001/archpsyc.1963.01720170031005
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freud, S. (1895). Progetto per unan psicologia (Project for a Psychology). In Freud, S. Opere (Complete Works) (Vol. 2, pp. 195–285). Torino, Italy: Boringhieri.
   Google Scholar
• Galimberti, U. (1983). Il corpo (The Body). Milano, Italy: Feltrinelli.
   Google Scholar
• Gallese, V. (2005a). “Being like me:” Self-other identity, mirror neurons, and empathy. In S. Hurley & N. Chater (Eds), Perspectives on imitation: From cognitive neuroscience to social science (pp. 101–118). Cambridge, MA: M.I.T. Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gallese, V. (2005b). Embodied simulation: From neurons to phenomenal experience. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, 4, 23–48. doi:10.1007/s11097-005-4737-z
   Google Scholar
• Gallese, V., Fadiga, L., Fogassi, L., & Rizzolatti, G. (1996). Action recognition in the premotor cortex. Brain, 119, 593–609. doi:10.1093/brain/119.2.593
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gallese, V., & Lakoff, G. (2005). The brain’s concept: The role of the sensory-motor system in reason and language. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 22, 455–479. doi:10.1080/02643290442000310
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gallese, V., Migone, P., & Eagle, M. (2006). La simulazione incarnata: I neuroni specchio. Le basi neurofisiologiche dell’itersoggettività ed alcune implicazioni per la psicoanalisi (The embodied simulation: The mirror neurons. The neurophysiologic basis of inter-subjectivity and some implications for psychoanalysis). Psicoterapia e Scienze Umane, 40(3), 543–580.
   Google Scholar
• Glenberg, A. M., & Robertson, D. A. (2000). Symbol grounding and meaning: A comparison of high dimensional and embodied theories of meaning. Journal of Memory and Language, 43, 379–401. doi:10.1006/jmla.2000.2714
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldman, A. I., & Sripada, C. S. (2005). Simulationist models of face-based emotion recognition. Cognition, 94(3), 193–213.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kandel, E. R. (1999). Biology and the future of psychoanalysis: A new intellectual framework for psychiatry. American Journal of Psychiatry, 156, 505–524.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kandel, E. R. (2005). Psychiatry, psychoanalysis, and a new biology of mind. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Laing, R. (1967). The politics of experience. Harmondsorth, UK: Penguin.
   Google Scholar
• Le Doux, J. (1996). The emotional brain. New York, NY: Touchstone.
   Google Scholar
• Le Doux, J. (2002). Synaptic Self. New York, NY: Penguin.
   Google Scholar
• Lotman, J. M. (1980). Retorica. In Enciclopedia (Vol. XI, pp. 1047–1066). Torino, Italy: Einaudi.
   Google Scholar
• Mearleau-Ponty, M. (1945). Phenomenologie de la perception (Phenomenology of Perception). Milano, Italy: Il Saggiatore.
   Google Scholar
• Meltzoff, A. N., & Moore, M. K. (1998). Infant intersubjectivity: Broadening the dialogue to include imitation, identity, and intention. In S. Brate (Ed.), Intersubjective Communication and Emotion in Early Ontogeny. Carmbridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Minuchin, S. (1974). Family and family therapy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Moltzoff, A. N., & Moore, M. K. (1997). Explaining focal imitation: A theoretical model. Early Development and Parenting, 6, 179–192. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1099-0917(199709/12)6:3/4<179::AID-EDP157>3.0.CO;2-R
   Google Scholar
• Morin, E. (1977). La methode (The Method). Paris, France: Le Seuil.
   Google Scholar
• Neisser, V., & Winograd, E. (1988). Remembering reconsidered. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Neuburger, R. (1995). Le mythe familial (The Family Myth). Paris, France: ESF.
   Google Scholar
• Onnis, L. (1985). Corpo e contesto (Body and Context). Rome, Italy: NIS.
   Google Scholar
• Onnis, L. (1992). Langage due corps et langage de la therapie: La sculpture du future comme methode d’intervention systemique dans les situations psychosomatiques (Language and body language due to therapy: The shape of the future as a systemic intervention method in psychosomatic situations). Therapie Familiale, 3(1), 3–20.
   Google Scholar
• Onnis, L. (1993). Psychosomatic medicine: Toward a new epistemology. Family Systems Medicine, 11(2), 137–148. doi:10.1037/h0089125
   Google Scholar
• Onnis, L. (1994). La psicoterapia sistemica e i suoi attuali sviluppi nella teoria e nella pratica (Systemic therapy and its current developments in theory and practice). In Onnis, L. & Galluzzo, W. La terapia relazionale e i suoi contesti (Relational Therapy and its Contexts). Rome, Italy: NIS.
   Google Scholar
• Onnis, L. (1996a). Les langages du corps (The Languages of the Body). Paris, France: ESF.
   Google Scholar
• Onnis, L. (1996b). La narrazione analogica. L’uso del linguaggio metaforico nella psicoterapia sistemica. Psicobiettivo, 16(3), 17–35.
   Google Scholar
• Onnis, L. (2004). Il tempo sospeso, L’anoressia e la bulimia tra individuo, famiglia e società (The Time Suspended: Anorexia and Bulimia within Individual, Family and Society). Milan, Italy: Franco Angeli.
   Google Scholar
• Onnis, L. (2007). L’ottica della complessità. Sviluppi e prospettive dell’orientamento sistemico (The optic of complexity: Developments and perspectives from a systemic orientation). In P. Petrini & A. Zucconi (Eds.), La relazione che cura (The Healing Relationship) (pp. 495–506). Rome, Italy: Alpes Italia.
   Google Scholar
• Onnis, L. (2010). The metaphorical objects in therapy: The method of the Family Time Sculptures. European Family Therapy Association newsletter. Retrieved from http://www.europeanfamilytherapy.eu/efta-newsletters/8-june-2010/
   Google Scholar
• Onnis, L., Di Gennaro, A., Cespa, G., Agostini, B., Chouhy, A., Dentale, R. C., & Qunizi, P. (1990). Le sculture del presente e del futuro: Un modello di lavoro terapeutico nelle situazioni psicosomatiche (The sculpture of the present and the past: A systemic intervention model applied to psychosomatic families). Ecologia Della Mente, 10, 21–48. Also in English: Family Process, 33(3), 341–355, 1994. doi:10.1111/famp.1994.33.issue-3
   Google Scholar
• Onnis, L., Laurent, M., Benedetti, P., Cespa, G., Di Gennaro, A., Dentale, R. C. … Maurelli, F. (1994a). Il mito familiare: Concetti teorici e implicazioni terapeutiche (The family myth: Theoretical concepts and therapeutic implications). Ecologia Della Mente, 2, 95–112.
   Google Scholar
• Onnis, L., Di Gennaro, A., Cespa, G., Agostini, B., Chouhy, A., Dentale, R. C., & Quinzi, P. (1994b). Sculpting present and future: A systemic intervention model applied to psychosomatic families. Family Process, 33(3), 341–355. doi:10.1111/famp.1994.33.issue-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Papp, P. (1976). Family choreaography. In P. Guerin (Ed.), Family therapy: Theory and practice. New York, NY: Gardner Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ricoeur, P. (1986). La metafora viva (The Living Metaphor). Milano, Italy: Iaka Books.
   Google Scholar
• Rizzolatti, G., Fadiga, L., Gallese, V., & Fogassi, L. (1996). Premotor cortex and the recognition of motor actions. Cognitive Brain Research, 3, 131–141. doi:10.1016/0926-6410(95)00038-0
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rizzolatti, G., & Sinigaglia, C. (2006). So quel che fai: Il cervello che agisce e i neuroni Specchio. Milano, Italy: Raffaello Cortina.
   Google Scholar
• Rosenfeld, I. (1988). The invention of memory: A new view of the brain. New York, NY: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Ruggiero, G. (2006). I nuovi mondi del terapeuta sistemico: Una sinapsi tra mente e cuore (New worlds for the systemic therapist: A synapsis between mind and body). In M. Spagnuolo-Lobb (Ed.), L’implicito e l’esplicito in psicoterapia (The Implicit and the Explicit in Psychotherapy). Milano, Italy: Franco Angeli.
   Google Scholar
• Ruggiero, G. (2007). Sulla strada del ritorno: La relazione terapeutica come luogo elettivo del cambiamento (On the road to return: The therapeutic relation as place of choice for change). Psicobiettivo, 27, 57–81.
   Google Scholar
• Satir, V. (1972). Peoplemaking. Palo Alto, CA: Science and Behavioral Books.
   Google Scholar
• Siegel, D. J. (1999). The developing mind. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Stern, D. N. (1983). The interpersonal world of the infant. New York, NY: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Stern, D. N. (1995). The motherhood constellation. New York, NY: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Stern, D. N. (1998). Non-interpretive mechanism in psychoanalytic therapy: The “something more” than interpretation. International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 79, 903–918.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stern, D. N. (2004). The present moment in psychotherapy and everyday life. New York, NY: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Stern, D. N. (2006a). Il dialogo tra l’intrapsichico e l’interpersonale: Una prospettiva basata sulla psicologia dello sviluppo (A dialogue between the intrapsychic and the interpersonal: A perspective based on developmental psychology). Psicobiettivo, 26(3), 77–88.
   Google Scholar
• Stern, D. N. (2006b). L’implicito e l’esplicito in psicoterapia (The implicit and explicit in psychotherapy). In M. Spagnuolo-Lobb (Ed.), Atti del Congresso della Federazione Italiana Associazioni di Psicoterapia (Proceedings of the Congress of the Italian Federation of Associations of Psychotherapy) (pp. 28–35). Milano, Italy: FrancoAngeli.
   Google Scholar
• Threvarten, C. (1997). Brain, science, and the human spirit. In J. B. Ashbrook, et al. (Ed.), Brain culture and the human spirit (pp. 129–181). Lanham, MD: University Press of America.
   Google Scholar
• Von Foester, H. (1987). Observing Systems. Seaside, CA: Intersystems Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Whitaker, C., & Blumberry, W. (1988). Dancing with the family. A symbolic-experiential approach. New York, NY: Brunner-Mazel.
   Google Scholar
• White, M., & Epston, D. (1991). Narrative means to therapeutic ends. New York, NY: Norton.
   Google Scholar
• Winnicott, W. D. (1967). Mirror-role of mother and family in child development. In D. W. Winnicot Playing and Reality (pp. 111–118). London, UK: Tavistock Publications.
   Google Scholar