International Group Heterogeneity and Students’ Business Project Achievement

References

• Adair, Wendi L., Ivona Hideg, and Jeffrey R. Spence, (2013), “The culturally intelligent team: The impact of team cultural intelligence and cultural heterogeneity on team shared values”, Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology 44 (6), 941–962.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aggarwal, Praveen, and Connie L. O’Brien, (2008), “Social loafing on group projects: Structural antecedents and effects on student satisfaction”, Journal of Marketing Education 30 (3), 255–264.
   Google Scholar
• Amato, Christie H., and Louis H. Amato, (2005), “Enhancing student team effectiveness: Application of Myers-Briggs personality assessment in business courses”, Journal of Marketing Education 27 (1), 41–51.
   Google Scholar
• Arvaja, Maarit, and Raija Hämäläinen, (2005, August), “Pedagogical structuring of collaboration: Contextual perspective”, paper presented at the 11th European Conference for Research on Learning and Instruction, Nicosia, Cyprus.
   Google Scholar
• Arvaja, Maarit, Hanna Salovaara, Päivi Häkkinen, and Sanna Järvelä, (2007), “Combining individual and group-level perspectives for studying collaborative knowledge construction in context”, Learning and Instruction 17, 448–459.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bantel, Karen A., and Susan E. Jackson, (1989), “Top management and innovations in banking: Does the composition of the top team make a difference?”, Strategic Management Journal 10, 107–124.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barsade, Sigal G., and Donald E. Gibson, (1998), “Group emotion: A view from top and bottom”, in Gruenfeld, Deborah, (ed.), Composition, (pp. 81–102; Elsevier Science/JAI Press; Atlanta, GA).
   Google Scholar
• Brewer, Marilynn B., and Roderick M. Kramer, (1986), “Choice behavior in social dilemmas: Effects of social identity, group size and decision framing”, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 3, 543–549.
   Google Scholar
• Butler, Christina, and Lena Zander, (2008), “The business of teaching and learning through multicultural teams”, Journal of Teaching in International Business 19 (2), 192–218.
   Google Scholar
• Christoffersen, Susan, (2011), “Enhance teamwork outcomes through guanxi”, American Journal of Business Education 4 (11), 19–24.
   Google Scholar
• Chudoba, Katherine M., Eleanor Wynn, Mei Lu, and Mary B. Watson-Manheim, (2005), “How virtual are we? Measuring virtuality in a global organization”, Information Systems Journal 15, 279–306.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, Elizabeth G., (1982), “Expectation states and interracial interaction in school settings”, Annual Review of Sociology 8, 209–235.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, Susan G., and Diane E. Bailey, (1997), “What makes teams work: Group effectiveness research from the shop floor to the executive suite”, Journal of Management 23, 239–290.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crook, Charles, (2000), “Motivation and the ecology of collaborative learning”, in Joiner, Richard, Littleton, Karen, Faulkner, Dorothy, and Miell, Dorothy, (eds.), Rethinking Collaborative Learning, (pp. 161–178; Free Association Books; London, UK).
   Google Scholar
• Danford, Gerard L., (2006), “Project-based learning and international business education”, Journal of Teaching in International Business 18 (1), 7–25.
   Google Scholar
• Davies, Simon P., (1993), “Externalising information during coding activities: Effects of expertise, environment, and task”, in Cook, Curtis, Scholtz, Jean, and Spohrer, James, (eds.), Empirical Studies of Programmers: 5th Workshop, (pp. 42–61; Ablex; Norwood, NJ).
   Google Scholar
• Dennis, Alan R., and Joseph S. Valacich, (1993), “Computer brainstorms: More heads are better than one”, Journal of Applied Psychology 78, 531–537.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dillenbourg, Pierre, Michael Baker, Agnes Blaye, and Claire O’Malley, (1996), “The evolution of research on collaborative learning”, in Spada, Hans, and Reiman, Peter, (eds.), Learning in Humans and Machine: Towards an Interdisciplinary Learning Science, (pp. 189–211; Elsevier; Oxford, UK).
   Google Scholar
• Ding, Ning, and Lin Wei, (2012), “Exploring the differences of undergraduate students perceptual leaming styles in international business study”, Journal of Teaching in International Business 23 (4), 310–324.
   Google Scholar
• Ding, Ning, Roel J. Bosker, and Egbert G. Harskamp, (2010), “Exploring gender and gender pairing in the knowledge elaboration processes of students using comuter-supported collaborative learning”, Computers & Education 56 (2), 325–336.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ely, Robin J., and David A. Thomas, (2001), “Cultural diversity at work: The effects of diversity perspectives on work group processes and outcomes”, Administrative Science Quarterly 46 (2), 229–273.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Forrester, William R., and Armen Tashchian, (2006), “Modelling the relationship between cohesion and performance in student work groups”, International Journal of Management 23 (3), 458–464.
   Google Scholar
• Gammie, Elizabeth, and Morag Matson, (2007), “Group assessment at final degree level: An evaluation”, Accounting Education 16 (2), 185–206.
   Google Scholar
• Gueldenzoph, Lisa E., and Gary L. May, (2002), “Collaborative peer evaluation: Best practices for group member assessments”, Business Communication Quarterly 65 (1), 9–20.
   Google Scholar
• Hackman, Richard J., (1987), “The design of work teams”, in Lorsch J. W., (ed.), Handbook of Organizational Behavior, (pp. 315–342; Prentice-Hall; Englewood Cliffs, NJ).
   Google Scholar
• Haleblian, Jerayr, and Sydney Finkelstein, (1993), “Top management team size, CEO dominance, and firm performance: The moderating roles of environmental turbulence and discretion”, Academy of Management Journal 36, 844–863.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harrison, David A., Kenneth H. Price, and Myrtle P. Bell, (1998), “Beyond relational demography: Time and effects of surface- and deep-level diversity on work group cohesion”, Academy of Management Journal 41, 96–107.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hinds, Pamela J., Kathleen M. Carley, David Krackhardt, and Doug Wholey, (2000), “Choosing work group members: Balancing similarity, competence, and familiarity”, Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 81 (2), 226–251.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hong, Guanglei, Carl Corter, Yihua Hong, and Janette Pelletier, (2012), “Differential effects of literacy instruction time and homogenous ability grouping in kindergarten classrooms: Who will benefit? Who will suffer?”, Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis 34 (1), 69–88.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jackson Susan E., (1992), “Team composition in organizational settings: Issues in managing an increasingly diverse workforce”, in Worchel, Stephen, Wood, Wendy, and Simpson, Jeffrey A., (eds.), Group Process and Productivity, (pp.138–173; Sage; Newbury Park, CA).
   Google Scholar
• Jackson, Susan E., Aparna Joshi, and Niclas L. Erhardt, (2003), “Recent research on team and organizational diversity: SWOT analysis and implications”, Journal of Management 29, 801–830.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jehn, Karen A., Clint Chadwick, and Sherry M. B. Thatcher, (1997), “To agree or not to agree: The effects of value congruence, individual demographic dissimilarity, and conflict on workgroup outcomes”, International Journal of Conflict Management 8, 287–305.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, David W., and Frank P. Johnson, (2006), “Joining Together: Group Theory and Group Skills, (9th ed.; Allyn & Bacon; Boston, MA).
   Google Scholar
• Joshi, Aparna, Hui Liao, and Hyuntak Roh, (2011), “Bridging domains in workplace demography research: A review and reconceptualization”, Journal of Management 37 (2), 521–552.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kelly, Phil, (2009), “Group work and multicultural management education”, Journal of Teaching in International Business 20 (1), 80–102.
   Google Scholar
• Kivlighan, Dennis M., Kevin London, and Joseph R. Miles, (2012), “Are two heads better than one? The relationship between number of group leaders and group members, and group climate and group member benefit from therapy. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice 16 (1), 1–13.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kulik, James A., and Chen-Lin C. Kulik, (1989), “Meta-analysis in education”, International Journal of Educational Research 13, 221–340.
   Google Scholar
• Lincoln, James R., and Jon Miller, (1979), “Work and friendship ties in organizations: A comparative analysis of relational networks”, Administrative Science Quarterly 24, 181–199.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lundgren, David C., and Dodd H. Bogart, (1974), “Group size, member dissatisfaction, and group radicalism”, Human Relations 27, 339–355.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• March, James G., and Herbert A. Simon, (1958), “Organizations”, (Wiley; New York, NY).
   Google Scholar
• Marks, Melanie Beth, and Abigail H. O’Connor, (2013), Understanding students attitudes about group work: What does this suggest for instructors of business?”, Journal of Education for Business 88 (3), 147–158.
   Google Scholar
• Mathieu, John, Travis M. Maynard, Tammy Rapp, and Lucy Gilson, (2008), “Team effectiveness 1997-2007: A review of recent advancements and a glimpse into the future”, Journal of Management 34, 410–476.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maznevski, Martha L., and Katherine M. Chudoba, (2000), “Bridging space over time: Global virtual team dynamics and effectiveness”, Organizational Science 11 (5), 473–492.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ministry of Education, Culture and Science, (2012), “Key Figures 2007-2011: Education, Culture and Science”, retrieved from http://www.government.nl/documents-and-publications/reports/2012/07/24/key-figures-2007-2011.html
   Google Scholar
• Moody, Judith, D., and Vernon D. Gifford, (1990, November), “The effect of grouping by formal reasoning ability levels, group size, and gender on achievement in laboratory chemistry”, paper presented at the annual meeting of the Mid-South Educational Research Association, New Orleans, LA.
   Google Scholar
• Myers, Michael D., (2009), “Qualitative Research in Business & Management”, (Sage; London, UK). The Netherlands Universities Foundation for International Cooperation, (2012), “Mapping Mobility 2012: International Mobility in Dutch Higher Education”, retrieved from http://www.nuffic.nl/en/expertise/mobility-statistics
   Google Scholar
• Nieva, Veronica F., Edwin A. Fleishman, and Angela Reick, (1985), “Team Dimensions: Their Identity, Their Measurement, and Their Relationships”, (Research Note 85-12; U.S. Army, Research Institute for the Behavioral and Social Sciences; Washington, DC).
   Google Scholar
• O’Dell, Jerry W., (1968), “Group size and emotional interaction”, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 8, 75–78.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Reilly, Charles A., III, David F. Caldwell, and William P. Barnett, (1989), “Work group demography, social integration, and turnover”, Administrative Science Quarterly 34, 21–37.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Reilly, Charles A., Katherine Williams Phillips, and Sigal Barsade, (1998), “Group demography and innovation: Does diversity help?”, in Gruenfeld Deborah, (ed.), Research on Managing Groups and Teams 1, (pp. 183–207; Elsevier; St. Louis, MO).
   Google Scholar
• Paletz, Susannah B., Kaiping Peng, Miriam Erez, and Christina Maslach, (2004), “Ethnic composition and its differential impact on group processes in diverse teams”, Small Group Research 35, 128–157.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pang, Elvy, Canon Tong, and Anthony Wong, (2011), “Key determinants of student satisfaction when undertaking group work”, American Journal of Business Education 4 (10), 93–104.
   Google Scholar
• Paul, Souren, Imad M. Samarah, Priya Seetharaman, and Peter P. Myktyn Jr., (2005), “An empirical investigation of collaborative conflict management style in group support system-based global virtual teams”, Journal of Management Information Systems 21, 185–222.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Payne, Brian K., Elizabeth Monk-Turner, Donald Smith, and Melvina Sumter, (2006), “Improving group work: Voices of students”, Education 126, 441–448.
   Google Scholar
• Pearce, John A., III, and Elizabeth C. Ravlin, (1987), The design and activation of self-regulating work Groups”, Human Relations 40, 751–782.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pelled, Lisa Hope, (1996), “Relational demography and perceptions of group conflict and performance: A field investigation”, International Journal of Conflict Management 7, 230–246.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pelled, Lisa Hope, Kathleen M. Eisenhardt, & Katherine R. Xin, (1999), “Exploring the black box: An analysis of work group diversity, conflict and performance”, Administrative Science Quarterly 44, 1–28.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rafferty Patricia D., (2013), “The evaluation of MBA groups: A case study of graduate student experiences and perceptions of positive group work outcomes”, Journal of Education for Business 88 (1), 43–50.
   Google Scholar
• Riordan, Christine M., and Lynn McFarlane Shore, (1997), “Demographic diversity and employee attitudes: An empirical examination of relational demography within work units”, Journal of Applied Psychology 82 (3), 342–358.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robbins, Stephen P., and Timothy A. Judge, (2011), “Organizational Behavior”, (14th ed.; Pearson Prentice Hall; Upper Saddle River, NJ).
   Google Scholar
• Roschelle, Jeremy, and Stephanie D. Teasley, (1995), “The construction of shared knowledge in collaborative problem solving”, in O’Malley, C. E., (ed.), Computer Supported Collaborative Learning, (pp. 69–197; Springer-Verlag; Berlin, Germany).
   Google Scholar
• Salas, Eduardo, Nancy Cooke, and Michael A. Rosen, (2008), “On teams, teamwork, and team performance: Discoveries and developments”, Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics 50 (3), 540–547.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sargent, Leisa D., and Christina Sue-Chan, (2001), “Does diversity affect group efficacy? The intervening role of cohesion and task interdependence”, Small Group Research 32, 426–450.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sarker, Saonee, (2005), “Knowledge transfer and collaboration in distributed U.S.–Thai teams”, Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 10 (4), article 15, retrieved from http://jcmc.indiana.edu/vol10/issue4/sarker.html
   Google Scholar
• Slavin, Robert E., (1983), “Cooperative Learning”, (Longman; New York, NY).
   Google Scholar
• Snijders, Tom A. B., and Roel J. Bosker, (1999), “Multilevel Analysis: An Introduction to Basic and Advanced Multilevel Modelling”, (Sage; London, UK).
   Google Scholar
• Stahl, Gerry, Timothy Koschmann, and Dan Suthers, (2006), “Computer-supported collaborative learning: An historical perspective”, in Sawyer, R. Keith, (ed.), Cambridge Handbook of the Learning Sciences, (pp. 409–426; Cambridge University Press; Cambridge, UK).
   Google Scholar
• Steiner, Ivan Dale, (1972), “Group Process and Productivity”, (Academic Press; New York, NY).
   Google Scholar
• Suthers, Dan, (2006), “Technology affordances for intersubjective meaning making: A research agenda for CSCL”, International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning 1 (3), 315–337.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tani, Massimiliano, (2005), “Quiet, but only in class: Reviewing the in-class participation on Asian students”, retrieved from http://conference.herdsa.org.au/2005/pdf/non_refereed/030.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Tiong, Kung-Ming, and Su-Ting Yong, (2004), “Confucian heritage culture learners’ and instructors’ expectations and preferences in collaborative learning: Convergence or divergence?”, retrieved from http://www.herdsa.org.au/wp-content/uploads/conference/2004/PDF/A055-jt.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Topping, Keith J., (2005), “Trends in peer learning”, Educational Psychology 25 (6), 631–645.
   Google Scholar
• Trimble, Kimberly D., and Robert L. Sinclair, (1987), “On the wrong track: Ability grouping and the threat to equity”, Equity and Excellence 23, 15–21.
   Google Scholar
• Tsui, Anne S., Terri D. Egan, and Charles A. O‘Reilly III, (1992), “Being different: Relational demography and organizational attachment”, Administrative Science Quarterly 37, 549–579.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Boxtel, Carla, (2000), “Collaborative concept learning. Collaborative learning task, student interaction, and the learning of physics concepts”, (Doctoral dissertation; Print Partners Ipskamp; Utrecht, The Netherlands:.
   Google Scholar
• Wagar, Terry H., and Wendy R. Carroll, (2012), “Examining student preferences of group work evaluation approaches: Evidence from business management undergraduate students”, Journal of Education for Business 87 (6), 358–362.
   Google Scholar
• Watson, Warren E., Kamalesh Kumar, and Larry K. Michaelsen, (1993), “Cultural diversity’s impact on interaction process and performance: Comparing homogeneous and diverse task groups”, Academy of Management Journal 36, 590–602.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Webb, Noreen, and Sydney Farivar, (1999), “Developing productive group interaction in middle school mathematics”, in O’Donnell, Angela M., and King, Alison, (eds.), Cognitive Perspectives on Peer Learning, (pp. 117–149; Lawrence Erlbaum Associates; Mawah, NJ).
   Google Scholar
• Webb, Noreen, Kariane Nemer, Alex Chizhik, and Brenda Sugrue, (1998), “Equity issues in collaborative group assessment: Group composition and performance”, American Educational Research Journal 35 (4), 607–651.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Webber, Sheila Simsarian, and Lisa M. Donahue, (2001), “Impact of highly and less job-related diversity on work group cohesion and performance: A meta-analysis”, Journal of Management 27, 131–162.
   Google Scholar
• Welner, Kevin G., and Jeannie Oakes, (1996), “(Li)Ability grouping: The new susceptibility of school tracking systems to legal changes”, Harvard Educational Review 66 (3), 451–470.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Westphal, James D., and Laurie P. Milton, (2000), “How experience and network ties affect the influence of demographic minorities on corporate boards”, Administrative Science Quarterly 45, 366–398.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wiersema, Margarethe F., and Karen A. Bantel, (1992), “Top management team demography and corporate strategic change”, Academy of Management Journal 35, 91–121.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams, Katherine Y., and Charles A. O’Reilly III, (1998), “Demography and diversity in organizations: A review of 40 years of research”, in Staw, Barry, and Sutton, Robert, (eds.), Research in Organizational Behavior, (Vol. 20; pp. 77–140; JAI Press; Greenwich, CT).
   Google Scholar
• Wong, Joseph Kee-Kuok, (2004), “Are the learning styles of Asian international students culturally or contextually based?”, International Education Journal 4 (4), 154–166.
   Google Scholar
• Wright, Norman S., and Glyn P. Drewery, (2006), “Forming cohesion in culturally heterogeneous teams: Differences in Japanese, Pacific Islander and Anglo experiences”, Cross Cultural Management 13 (1), 43–53.
   Google Scholar
• Zirkel, Perry A., and Ivan B. Gluckman, (1995), “It’s the law: Ability grouping”, Principal 75 (1), 62–63.
   Google Scholar