Uncovering differences and similarities among quality function deployment-based methods in Design for X: Benchmarking in different domains

References

• Abdolshah, M., and M. Moradi. 2013. Fuzzy quality function deployment: an analytical literature review. Journal of Industrial Engineering 2013 Article ID 682532:11.
   Google Scholar
• Akao, Y. 1990. Quality function deployment: Integrating customer requirements into product design. Cambridge, MA: Productivity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Akao, Y., and G. H. Mazur. 2003. The leading edge in QFD: past, present and future. International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management 20 (1):20–35.
   Google Scholar
• Almannai, B., R. Greenough, and J. Kay. 2008. A decision support tool based on QFD and FMEA for the selection of manufacturing automation technologies. Journal of Robotics and Computer-Integrated Manufacturing 24 (4):501–507.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alting, L., and J. B. Legarth. 1995. Life cycle engineering and design. CIRP Annals—Manufacturing Technology 44 (2):569–580.
   Google Scholar
• Altshuller, G., and H. Altov. 1996. And suddenly the inventor appeared-TRIZ, the theory of inventive problem solving. Worcester, MA: Technical Innovation Center.
   Google Scholar
• Arai, T., and Y. Shimomura. 2005. Service CAD system—evaluation and quantification. CIRP Annals—Manufacturing Technology 54 (1):463–466.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Asadabadi, M. R. 2014. A hybrid QFD-based approach in addressing supplier selection problem in product improvement process. International Journal of Industrial Engineering Computations 5 (4):543–560.
   Google Scholar
• Aurich, J. C., C. Fuchs, and C. Wagenknecht. 2006. Life cycle oriented design of technical product-service systems. Journal of Cleaner Production 14 (17):1480–1494.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barad, M., and S. Dror. 2008. Strategy maps as improvements paths of enterprises. International Journal of Production Research 46 (23):6627–6647.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barberá, L., A. Crespo, P. Viveros, and R. Stegmaier. 2012. Advanced model for maintenance management in a continuous improvement cycle: integration into the business strategy. International Journal of System Assurance Engineering and Management 3 (1):47–63.
   Google Scholar
• Bas, E. 2014. An integrated quality function deployment and capital budgeting methodology for occupational safety and health as a systems thinking approach: The case of the construction industry. Accident Analysis & Prevention 68:42–56.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bashkansky, E., and S. Dror. 2016. Matrix approach to analysis of human errors and their prevention by quality engineering and managerial tools. Quality and Reliability Engineering International 32 (2):535–545.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bereketli, I., and M. E. Genevois. 2013. An integrated QFDE approach for identifying improvement strategies in sustainable product development. Journal of Cleaner Production 54 (1):188–198.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bergquist, K., and J. Abeysekera. 1996. Quality Function Deployment(QFD)—A means for developing usable products. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics 18:269–275.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bovea, M. D., and V. Pérez-Belis. 2012. A taxonomy of ecodesign tools for integrating environmental requirements into the product design process, Journal of Cleaner Production 20 (1):61–71.
   Google Scholar
• Bovea, M. D., and B. Wang. 2007. Redesign methodology for developing environmentally conscious products. International Journal of Production Research 45 (18–19):4057–4072.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buyukozkan, G., T. Ertay, C. Kahraman, and D. Ruan. 2004. Determining the importance weights for the design requirements in the house of quality using the fuzzy analytic network approach. International Journal of Intelligent Systems 19:443–461.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bylund, N., M. Wolf, and G. Mazur. 2009. Reducing lead time in cutting tool development by implementing blitz QFD. In: Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on Engineering Design, ICED 09, Palo Alto, CA, 6 (2):255–266.
   Google Scholar
• Carnevalli, J. A., and P. C. Miguel. 2008. Review, analysis and classification of the literature on QFD-Types of research, difficulties and benefits. International Journal of Production Economics 114 (2):737–754.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chan, L. K., and M. L. Wu. 2002. Quality f unction deployment: A literature review. European Journal of Operational Research 143:463–497.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, W., C. Hoyle, and H. J. Wassenaar. 2013. Decision-based design: Integrating consumer preferences into engineering design. London, UK: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Cole, R. E. 2002. From continuous improvement to continuous innovation. Total Quality Management 13 (2):1051–1056.
   Google Scholar
• Costantino, F., M. De Minicis, V. González-Prida, and A. Crespo. 2012. On the use of quality function deployment (QFD) for the identification of risks associated to warranty programs. In: Proc. of 11th International Probabilistic Safety Assessment and Management Conference and the Annual European Safety and Reliability Conference, Helsinki, Finland, 6:4440–4449.
   Google Scholar
• Cristiano, J. J., J. K. Liker, and C. C. White. 2001. Key factors in the successful application of Quality Function Deployment (QFD). IEEE Transaction on Engineering Management 48 (1):81–95.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cudney, E. A., and C. C. Elrod. 2011. Quality function deployment in continuous improvement. Six sigma projects and personal experiences, ed. A. Coskun, vol. 3:46–78, NY: InTech.
   Google Scholar
• Davidson, J. 1988. The reliability of mechanical systems. London, UK: Mechanical Engineers Publications Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Dixon, J., and C. Poli. 1995. Engineering design & design for manufacturing: A structured approach. Conway, MA: Field Stone Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Dong, C., C. Zhang, and B. Wang. 2003. Integration of green quality function deployment and fuzzy multi-attribute utility theory-based cost estimation for environmentally conscious product development. International Journal of Environmentally Conscious Design & Manufacturing 11 (1):12–28.
   Google Scholar
• Dror, S. 2010. A methodology for realignment of quality cost elements. Journal of Modelling in Management 5 (2):142–157.
   Google Scholar
• Dror, S., and M. Barad. 2006. House of Strategy (HOS)—from strategic objectives to competitive priorities. International Journal of Production Research 44 (18–19):3879–3895.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dror, S., E. Bashkansky, and R. Ravid. 2012. House of security: A structured system design & analysis approach. International Journal of Safety and Security Engineering 2 (4):1–13.
   Google Scholar
• Eres, M. H., M. Bertoni, M. Kossmann, and J. Scanlan. 2014. Mapping customer needs to engineering characteristics: an aerospace perspective for conceptual design. Journal of Engineering Design 25 (1–3):64–87.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ernzer, M., and H. Birkhofer. 2002. Selecting methods for Life cycle design based on the needs of a company. In: Proceedings of the 7th International Design Conference, Design 2002, Dubrovnik, Croatia, 1305–1310.
   Google Scholar
• EU. 2010. Guide to application of Directive 2006/42/EC, General ed. I., Fraser, 2nd ed - June 2010. Brussels: European Commission Enterprise and Industry.
   Google Scholar
• Fargnoli, M., and F. Kimura. 2006. The screening life cycle modelling in the sustainable product design. Innovation in life cycle engineering and sustainable development, London: Springer-Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Fargnoli, M. 2005. An integrated approach for the development and management of environmentally conscious products. In: 4th International Symposium on Environmentally Conscious Design and Inverse Manufacturing, Tokyo, JP: IEEE, 361–367.
   Google Scholar
• Fargnoli, M., M. De Minicis, and M. Tronci. 2014. Design management for sustainability: An integrated approach for the development of sustainable products. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management 34:29–45.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fargnoli, M., and T. Sakao. 2008. Coordinating ecodesign methods in early stages of industrial product design. International Journal of Environmentally Conscious Design & Manufacturing 14 (2):35–65.
   Google Scholar
• Fargnoli, M., and U. Pighini. 2002. Quality improvement in the design of mechanical systems. In: Proceedings of Design 2002, the 7th International Design Conference. Dubrovnik, Croatia. DS 30:1755–760.
   Google Scholar
• Fargnoli, M., L. Vita, D. Gattamelata, V. Laurendi, and M. Tronci. 2012. A reverse engineering approach to enhance machinery design for safety. In: Proceedings of the 12th International Design Conference, Design 2012, Dubrovnik, Croatia, 627–636.
   Google Scholar
• Franceschini, F., M. Galetto, D. Maisano, and L. Mastrogiacomo. 2015. Prioritisation of engineering characteristics in QFD in the case of customer requirements orderings. International Journal of Production Research 53 (13):3975–3988.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Franceschini, F., and D. Maisano. 2015. Prioritization of QFD customer requirements based on the law of comparative judgments. Quality Engineering 27 (4):437–449.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Halog, A., F. Schultmann, and O. Rentz. 2001. Using quality function deployment for technique selection for optimum environmental performance improvement. Journal of Cleaner Production 9:387–394.
   Google Scholar
• Hassan, A., A. Siadat, J. Y. Dantan, and P. Martin. 2010. Conceptual process planning—An improvement approach using QFD, FMEA, and ABC methods. Journal of Robotics and Computer-Integrated Manufacturing 26 (4):392–401.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holt, R., and C. Barnes. 2010. Towards an integrated approach to ‘‘Design for X’’: an agenda for decision-based DFX research. Research in Engineering Design 21:123–136.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hosseinpour, A., Q. Peng, and P. Gu. 2015. A benchmark-based method for sustainable product design. Benchmarking: An International Journal 22 (4):643–664.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang, G. Q. 1996. Design for X: Concurrent engineering imperatives. London, UK: Chapman & Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Hubka, V., M. M. Andreasen, and W. E. Eder. 1988. Practical studies in systematic design. London, UK: Butterworths.
   Google Scholar
• Hubka, V., and W. E. Eder. 1996. Design science: Introduction to the needs, scope and organization of engineering design knowledge. London: Springer-Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Knowles, G. 2002. QFD. Customer driven design of products and services. In: Understanding, managing and implementing quality: Frameworks, techniques and cases, eds. A. Jiju, D. Preece, 57–80. London, UK: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Kobayashi, H. 2005. Strategic evolution of eco-products: a product life cycle planning methodology. Research in Engineering Design 16:1–16.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kong, Z. 2013. Research on theory and method for maintenance function deployment. In: Proceedings of 20th International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management, New York, NY: Springer-Verlag, 437–444.
   Google Scholar
• Korayem, M. H., and A. Iravani. 2008. Improvement of 3P and 6R mechanical robots reliability and quality applying FMEA and QFD approaches. Journal of Robotics and Computer-Integrated Manufacturing 24 (3):472–487.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lai, X., M. Xie, K. C. Tan, and B. Yang. 2008. Ranking of customer requirements in a competitive environment. Computers and Industrial Engineering 54 (2):202–14.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, Y. C., L. C. Sheu, and Y. G. Tsou. 2008. Quality function deployment implementation based on Fuzzy Kano model: An application in PLM system. Computers & Industrial Engineering 55 (1):48–63.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, Y. L., J. F. Tang, K. S. Chin, X. G. Luo, Y. Pu, and Y. S. Jiang. 2012. On integrating multiple type preferences into competitive analyses of customer requirements in product planning. International Journal of Production Economics 139 (1):168–179.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, Y. L., J. F. Tang, X. Luo, J. Yao, and J. Xu. 2010. A quantitative methodology for acquiring engineering characteristics in PPHOQ. Expert Systems with Applications 37:187–193.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin, L. H., and I. Y. Lu. 2006. Product quality as a determinant of product innovation: an empirical analysis of the global automotive industry. Total Quality Management & Business Excellence 17 (2):141–147.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin, Y. H., H. P. Cheng, and M. L. Tseng. 2010. Using QFD and ANP to analyze the environmental production requirements in linguistic preferences. Expert Systems with Applications 37 (3):2186–2196.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, H. T. 2009. The extension of fuzzy QFD: From product planning to part deployment. Expert Systems with Applications 36:11131–11144.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, H. T., and Y. L. Tsai. 2012. A fuzzy risk assessment approach for occupational hazards in the construction industry. Safety Science 50:1067–1078.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, S. F., Y. Lee, and Y. Huang. 2009. A brief fatigue inventory of shoulder health developed by quality function deployment technique. Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery 18 (3):418–423.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marsot, J. 2005. QFD: a methodological tool for integration of ergonomics at the design stage. Applied Ergonomics 36:185–192.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Masui, K., T. Sakao, M. Kobayashi, and A. Inaba. 2003. Applying quality function deployment to environmentally conscious design. International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management 20 (1):90–106.
   Google Scholar
• Mazur, G. H. 2012. Using quality function deployment to write an ISO standard for QFD. Quality Engineering 24 (3):436–443.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meerkamm, H. 1994. Design for X—A core area of design methodology. Journal of Engineering Design 5 (2):165–181.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mehrjerdi, Y. Z. 2010. Quality function deployment and its extensions. International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management 27 (6):616–640.
   Google Scholar
• Mehta, C., and B. Wang. 2001. Green quality function deployment III: A methodology for developing environmentally conscious products. Journal of Design and Manufacturing Automation 1 (1–2):1–16.
   Google Scholar
• Meier, H., R. Roy, and G. Seliger. 2010. Industrial Product-Service systems—IPS². CIRP Annals—Manufacturing Technology 59 (2):607–627.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nahm, Y. E., H. Ishikawa, and M. Inoue. 2013. New rating methods to prioritize customer requirements in QFD with incomplete customer preferences. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology 65 (9–12):1587–1604.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Newman, A. B., and N. A. Menai. 2011. U.S. Patent No. 7,937,286. Washington, DC: U.S. Patent and Trademark Office.
   Google Scholar
• Pahl, G., W. Beitz, J. Feldhusen, and K. H. Grote. 2007. Engineering design: A systematic approach. London, UK: Springer-Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Park, T., and K. J. Kim. 1998. Determination of an optimal set of design requirements using house of quality. Journal of Operations Management 16:569–581.
   Google Scholar
• Pramod, V. R., S. R. Devadasan, S. Muthu, V. P. Jagathyraj, and G. Dhakshina Moorthy. 2006. Integrating TPM and QFD for improving quality in maintenance engineering. Journal of Quality in Maintenance Engineering 12 (2):150–171.
   Google Scholar
• Puglieri, F. N., A. Ometto, and P. A. Cauchick Miguel. 2011. Eco-design methods for developing new products based on QFD: a literature analysis. Product: Management & Development 9 (1):23–29.
   Google Scholar
• Raharjo, H., M. Xie, and A. C. Brombacher. 2011. A systematic methodology to deal with the dynamics of customer needs in quality function deployment. Expert Systems with Applications 38 (4):3653–3662.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rahimi, M., and M. Weidner. 2002. Integrating Design for Environment (DfE) impact matrix into Quality Function Deployment (QFD) process. The Journal of Sustainable Product Design 2 (1):29–41.
   Google Scholar
• Ramani, K., D. Ramanujan, W. Z. Bernstein, F. Zhao, J. Sutherland, C. Handwerker, J.-K. Choi, H. Kim, and D. Thurston. 2010. Integrated sustainable life cycle design: A review. Journal of Mechanical Design 1332 (9):0910041–09100415.
   Google Scholar
• ReVelle, J. B., J. W. Moran, and C. A. Cox. 1998. The QFD handbook. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Sakao, T. 2007. A QFD-centred design methodology for environmentally conscious product design. International Journal of Production Research 45 (18–19):4143–4162.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sakao, T. 2010. Impact on company's product development. Course material for Integrated Product Service Engineering (TKMJ32). SE: Linköping University.
   Google Scholar
• Sakao, T., H. Birkhofer, V. Panshef, and E. Dörsam. 2009. An effective and efficient method to design services: Empirical study for services by an investment-machine manufacturer. International Journal of Internet Manufacturing and Services 2 (1):95–110.
   Google Scholar
• Sakao, T., and M. Fargnoli. 2010. Customization in ecodesign: A demand-side approach bringing new opportunities? Journal of Industrial Ecology 14 (4):529–532.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sakao, T., and M. Lindahl. 2015. A method to improve integrated product service offerings based on life cycle costing. CIRP Annals—Manufacturing Technology 64 (1):33–36.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sakao, T., and Y. Shimomura. 2007. Service engineering: A novel engineering discipline for producers to increase value combining service and product. Journal of Cleaner Production 15 (6):590–604.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sakao, T., A. Öhrwall Rönnbäck, G. Ölundh Sandström. 2013. Uncovering benefits and risks of integrated product service offerings—using a case of technology encapsulation. Journal of Systems Science and Systems Engineering 22 (4):421–439.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saleh, N., A. A. Sharawi, M. A. Elwahed, A. Petti, D. Puppato, and G. Balestra. 2015. Preventive maintenance prioritization index of medical equipment using quality function deployment. IEEE J Biomed Health Informatics 19 (3):1029–1035.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shiu, M. L., J. C. Jiang, and M. H. Tu. 2013. Quality strategy for research and development hoboken. NJ: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Sivasamy, K., C. Arumugam, S. R. Devadasan, R. Murugesh, and V. M. M. Thilak. 2016. Advanced models of quality function deployment: a literature review. Quality & Quantity 50 (3):1399–1414.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Song, W., X. Ming, and Z. Wu. 2013. An integrated rough number-based approach to design concept evaluation under subjective Environments. Journal of Engineering Design 24 (5):320–341.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soota, T., H. Singh, and R. Mishra. 2008. Defining characteristics for product development using quality function deployment: A case study on Indian bikes. Quality Engineering 20 (2):195–208.
   Google Scholar
• Sun, N., X. Mei, and Y. Zhang. 2009. A simplified systematic method of acquiring design specifications from customer requirements. Journal of Computing and Information Science in Engineering 9 (3):031004–031004–10.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tischner, U., M. Verkuijl, and A. Tukker. 2002. First draft PSS review. Cologne: Econcept.
   Google Scholar
• Tukker, A., and U. Tischner. 2006. Product-services as a research field: past, present and future. Reflections from a decade of research. Journal of Cleaner Production 14 (17):1552–1556
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ulrich, K. T., and S. D. Eppinger. 2004. Product design and development. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Umeda, Y., S. Takata, F. Kimura, T. Tomiyama, J. W. Sutherland, S. Kara, C. Herrmann, and J. R. Duflou. 2012. Toward integrated product and process life cycle planning—An environmental perspective. CIRP Annals—Manufacturing Technology 61 (2):681–702.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van de Poel, I. 2007. Methodological problems in QFD and directions for future development. Research in Engineering Design 18 (1):21–36.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vianello, G., and S.Ahmed. 2012. Transfer of knowledge from the service phase: a case study from the oil industry. Research in Engineering Design 23 (2):125–139.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vinayak, K., and R. Kodali. 2013. Benchmarking the quality function deployment models. Benchmarking: An International Journal 20 (6):825–854.
   Google Scholar
• Wang, C. H., and J. N. Chen. 2012. Using quality function deployment for collaborative product design and optimal selection of module mix. Computers & Industrial Engineering 63:1030–1037.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wimmer, W., R. Züst, and K. M. Lee. 2004. ECODESIGN Implementation: A systematic guidance on integrating environmental considerations into product development. Norwell, MA: Spinger.
   Google Scholar
• Wise, R., and P. Baumgartner. 1999. Go downstream: The new profit imperative in manufacturing, harvard business review 77 (September):133–141.
   Google Scholar
• Xu, J., X. Xu, and S. Q. Xie. 2010. A comprehensive review on recent developments in quality function deployment. International Journal of Productivity and Quality Management 6 (4):457–494.
   Google Scholar
• Yousefie, S., M. Mohammadi, and J. H. Monfared. 2011. Selection effective management tools on setting European Foundation for Quality Management (EFQM) model by a quality function deployment (QFD) approach. Expert Systems with Applications 38 (8):9633–9647.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zaitsev, N., and S. Dror. 2013. Water quality function deployment. Quality Engineering 25 (4):356–369.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, X., S. Tong, H. Eres, K. Wang, and M. Kossmann. 2015. Towards avoiding the hidden traps in QFD during requirements establishment. Journal of Systems Science and Systems Engineering 24 (3):316–336.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, Z., and X. Chu. 2010. A new approach for conceptual design of product and maintenance. International Journal of Computer Integrated Manufacturing 23 (7):603–618.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zheng, G., N. Zhu, Z. Tian, Y. Chen, and B. Sun. 2012. Application of a trapezoidal fuzzy AHP method for work safety evaluation and early warning rating of hot and humid environments. Safety Science 50:228–239.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar