A variables multiple dependent state sampling plan based on a one-sided capability index

References

• Aslam, M., C. W. Wu, M. Azam, and C. H. Jun. 2014a. Mixed acceptance sampling plans for product inspection using process capability index. Quality Engineering 26:450– 459.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aslam, M., C. H. Yen, C. H. Chang, and C. H. Jun. 2014b. Multiple dependent state variable sampling plans with process loss consideration. International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology 71:1337–43.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aslam, M., C. H. Yen, and C. H. Jun. 2011. Variable repetitive group sampling plans with process loss consideration. Journal of Statistical Computation and Simulation 81:1417–32.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aslam, M., M. Azam, and C. H. Jun. 2016. Multiple dependent state repetitive group sampling plan for Burr XII distribution. Quality Engineering 28 (2):231–237.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Balamurali, S., and C. H. Jun. 2007. Multiple dependent state sampling plans for lot acceptance based on measurement data. European Journal of Operational Research 180 (3):1221–1230.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chou, Y. M., and D. Owen. 1989. On the distributions of the estimated process capability indices. Communications in Statistics—Theory and Methods 18 (12):4549–4560.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Govindaraju, K., and K. Subramani. 1990. Selection of multiple deferred state MDS-1 sample plans for given acceptable quality level and limiting quality level involving minimum risks. Journal of Applied Statistics 17 (3):427–434.
   Google Scholar
• Govindaraju, K., and K. Subramani. 1993. Selection of multiple deferred (dependent) state sampling plans for given acceptable quality level and limiting quality level. Journal of Applied Statistics 20 (3):423–428.
   Google Scholar
• Juran, J. M. 1974. Juran's quality control handbook, 3rd ed. New York: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Kane, V. E. 1986. Process capability indices. Journal of Quality Technology 18 (1):41–52.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kurniati, N., R. H. Yeh, and C. W. Wu. 2015a. A variables sampling plan for resubmitted lots based on one-sided capability indices. Quality Technology and Quantitative Management 12 (4):501–515.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kurniati, N., R. H. Yeh, and C. W. Wu. 2015b. Designing a variables two-plan sampling system for controlling process fraction nonconforming with unilateral specification limit. International Journal of Production Research 53 (7):2011–25.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, A. H. I., C. W. Wu, and Y. W. Chen. 2016. A modified variables repetitive group sampling plan with the consideration of preceding lots information. Annals of Operations Research 238 (1):355–373.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, S. W., and C. W. Wu. 2014. Design and construction of a variables repetitive group sampling plan for unilateral specification limit. Communications in Statistics—Simulation and Computation 43 (8):1866–1878.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Montgomery, D. C. 2009. Statistical quality control, a modern introduction, 6th ed. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Negrin, I., Y. Parmet, and E. Schechtman. 2009. Developing a sampling plan based on Cpk’. Quality Engineering 21:306–318.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Negrin, I., Y. Parmet, and E. Schechtman. 2011. Developing a sampling plan based on Cpk—unknown variance. Quality and Reliability Engineering International 27 (1):3–14.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pearn, W. L., and K. S. Chen. 2002. One-sided capability indices CPU and CPL: decision making with sample information. International Journal of Quality and Reliability Management 19 (3):221–245.
   Google Scholar
• Pearn, W. L., and C. W. Wu. 2006. Critical acceptance values and sample sizes of a variables sampling plan for very low fraction of defectives. Omega—International Journal of Management Science 34:90–101.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pearn, W. L., C. W. Wu. 2007. An effective decision making method for product acceptance. Omega—International Journal of Management Science 35 (1):12–21.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schiling, E. G., and D. V. Neubauer. 2009. Acceptance sampling in quality control, 2nd ed. Boca Raton, FL: Taylor & Francis Group.
   Google Scholar
• Seidel, W. 1997. Is sampling by variables worse than sampling by attributes? A decision theoretic analysis and a new mixed strategy for inspecting individual lots. Sankhya: The Indian Journal of Statistics, Series B 59 (1): 96–107.
   Google Scholar
• Soundararajan, V., and R. Vijayaraghavan. 1990. Construction and selection of multiple dependent (deferred) state sampling plan. Journal of Applied Statistics 17 (3):397– 409.
   Google Scholar
• Vaerst, R. 1982. A procedure to construct multiple deferred state sampling plan. Methods of Operations Research 37:477–485.
   Google Scholar
• Wortham, A. W., and R. C. Baker. 1976. Multiple deferred state sampling inspection. International Journal of Production Research 14 (6):719–731.
   Google Scholar
• Wu, C. W. 2012. An efficient inspection scheme for variables based on Taguchi capability index. European Journal of Operational Research 223 (1):116–122.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu, C. W., M. Aslam, and C. H. Jun. 2012. Variables sampling inspection scheme for resubmitted lots based on the process capability index Cpk. European Journal of Operational Research 217:560–566.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu, C. W., A. H. I., Lee, and Y. W. Chen. 2016. A novel lot sentencing method by variables inspection considering multiple dependent state. Quality and Reliability Engineering International 32 (3):985–994.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu, C. W., S. W., Liu, and A. H. I. Lee. 2015a. Design and construction of a variables multiple dependent state sampling plan based on process yield. European Journal of Industrial Engineering 9 (6):819–837.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu, C. W., Z. H. Wang, and M. H. Shu. 2015b. A lots-dependent variables sampling plan considering supplier's process loss and buyer's stipulated specifications requirement. International Journal of Production Research 53 (20):6308–6319.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar