A web-based tool to design and analyze single- and double-stage acceptance sampling plans

References

• Adams, R., and C. Essex. 2009. Calculus: A complete course. 7th ed. Canada: Pearson Education.
   Google Scholar
• Balamurali, S., and C.-H. Jun. 2007. Multiple dependent state sampling plans for lot acceptance based on measurement data. European Journal of Operational Research 180 (3):1221–30. doi: 10.1016/j.ejor.2006.05.025.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Balamurali, S., and M. Usha. 2013. Optimal designing of variables chain sampling plan by minimizing the average sample number. International Journal of Manufacturing Engineering 2013:1–12. doi: 10.1155/2013/751807.
   Google Scholar
• Bertoni, C. 2016. Sample simplification. Quality Progress 8:23–7.
   Google Scholar
• Cheng, T.-M., and Y.-L. Chen. 2007. A GA mechanism for optimizing the design of attribute double sampling plan. Automation in Construction 16 (3):345–53. doi: 10.1016/j.autcon.2006.07.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chow, B., P. Dickinson, and H. Hughes. 1972. A computer program for the solution of double sampling plans. Journal of Quality Technology 4 (4):205–9. doi: 10.1080/00224065.1972.11980552.
   Google Scholar
• Collani, E. V., and R. Göb. 2008. Acceptance sampling in modern industrial environments. In Encyclopedia of statistics in quality and reliability, eds. F. Ruggeri, R. Kenett, and F. Falting. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Dodge, H., and H. Romig. 1941. Single sampling and double inspection tables. Bell System Technical Journal 20 (1):1–61. doi: 10.1002/j.1538-7305.1941.tb00851.x.
   Google Scholar
• Duarte, B., and P. Saraiva. 2013. An optimization-based framework for designing acceptance sampling plans by variables for non-conforming proportions. International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management 27 (7):794–814. doi: 10.1108/02656711011062390.
   Google Scholar
• Duckett, J. 2014. Web design with HTML, CSS, JavaScript and jQuery set. IN: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Hahn, G. 1974. Minimum size sampling plans. Journal of Quality Technology 6 (3):121–7. doi: 10.1080/00224065.1974.11980633.
   Google Scholar
• Hailey, W. 1980. Minimum sample size single sampling plans: A computerized approach. Journal of Quality Technology 12 (4):230–5. doi: 10.1080/00224065.1980.11980970.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jennett, W., and B. Welch. 1939. The control of proportion defective as judged by a single quality characteristic varying on a continuous scale. Supplement to the Journal of the Royal Statistical Society 6 (1):80–8. doi: 10.2307/2983626.
   Google Scholar
• Kiermeier, A. 2008. Visualizing and assessing acceptance sampling plans: The R package acceptance sampling. Journal of Statistical Software 26 (6):1–20. doi: 10.18637/jss.v026.i06.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krumbholz, W., and A. Rohr. 2009. Double ASN minimax sampling plans by variables when the standard deviation is unknown. Asta Advances in Statistical Analysis 93 (3):281–94. doi: 10.1007/s10182-009-0111-8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luca, S. 2018. Modified chain sampling plans for lot inspection by variables and attributes. Journal of Applied Statistics 45 (8):1447–64. doi: 10.1080/02664763.2017.1375084.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Minitab, I. 2018. Minitab 18 statistical software. www.minitab.com.
   Google Scholar
• Montgomery, D. C. 2013. Introduction to statistical quality control. 7th ed. USA: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Neubauer, D., and S. Luko. 2012. Comparing acceptance sampling standards, part 1. Quality Engineering 25 (1):73–7. doi: 10.1080/08982112.2013.738146.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neubauer, D., and S. Luko. 2013. Comparing acceptance sampling standards, part 2. Quality Engineering 25 (2):181–7. doi: 10.1080/08982112.2013.758557.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Newman, R., and S. Yu. 2018. An alternative approach to accept on zero and accept on one sampling plans. Quality Engineering 30 (2):183–94. doi: 10.1080/08982112.2017.1328064.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olorunniwo, F., and J. Salas. 1982. An algorithm for determining double attribute sampling plans. Journal of Quality Technology 14 (3):166–71. doi: 10.1080/00224065.1982.11978810.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R Core Team. 2018. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing.
   Google Scholar
• Santos Fernãndez, E. 2016. Acceptance sampling for food quality assurance. Ph.D. thesis, Massey University.
   Google Scholar
• Schilling, E. G., and D. V. Neubauer. 2009. Acceptance sampling in quality control. 2nd ed. Statistics: A series of textbooks and monographs. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schmueli, G. 2016. Practical acceptance sampling: A hands-on guide. 2nd ed. USA: Axelrod Schnall Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Sommers, D. 1981. Two-point double variables sampling plans. Journal of Quality Technology 13 (1):25–30. doi: 10.1080/00224065.1981.11980982.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spurlock, J. 2013. Bootstrap. USA: O’Reilly Media, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, W. 1997. Selecting statistically valid sampling plans. Quality Engineering 10 (2):365–70. doi: 10.1080/08982119708919144.
   Google Scholar
• Vangjeli, E. 2012. ASN-minimax double sampling plans by variables for two-sided specification limits when the standard deviation is known. Statistical Papers 53 (1):229–38. doi: 10.1007/s00362-010-0331-8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vijayaraghavan, R. 2007. Minimum size double sampling plans for large isolated lots. Journal of Applied Statistics 34 (7):799–806. doi: 10.1080/02664760701240287.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• White, K. P. J., and K. Johnson. 2013. A framework for the derivation and verification of variables acceptance sampling plans. Revista Investigación Operacional 34 (3):220–9.
   Google Scholar
• White, K. P., J. Johnson, K. J. Creasey. and R. R. 2009. Attribute acceptance sampling as a tool for verifying requirements using Monte Carlo simulation. Quality Engineering 21 (2):203–14. doi: 10.1080/08982110902723511.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zelinka, I. 2015. A survey on evolutionary algorithms dynamics and its complexity – Mutual relations, past, present and future. Swarm and Evolutionary Computation 25:2–14. doi: 10.1016/j.swevo.2015.06.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar