A head-to-head comparison of the out-of-control performance of control charts adjusted for parameter estimation

References

• Albers, W., and W. C. M. Kallenberg. 2004b. Are estimated control charts in control? Statistics 38 (1):67–79. doi:10.1080/02669760310001619369.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Albers, W., and W. C. M. Kallenberg. 2004b. Estimation in Shewhart control charts: Effects and corrections. Metrika 59 (3):207–34.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Albers, W., and W. C. M. Kallenberg. 2005. New corrections for old control charts. Quality Engineering 17 (3):467–73.
   Google Scholar
• Diko, M. D., S. Chakraborti, and R. J. M. M. Does. 2019a. Guaranteed in-control performance of the EWMA chart for monitoring the mean. Quality and Reliability Engineering International 35 (4):1144–60. doi:10.1002/qre.2450.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Diko, M. D., S. Chakraborti, and R. J. M. M. Does. 2019b. An alternative design of the two-sided CUSUM chart for monitoring the mean when parameters are estimated. Computers & Industrial Engineering. Submitted for publication. doi:10.1016/j.cie.2019.106042.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ewan, W. D., and K. W. Kemp. 1960. Sampling inspection of continuous processes with no autocorrelation between successive results. Biometrika 47 (3–4):363–80. doi:10.1093/biomet/47.3-4.363.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Faraz, A., W. H. Woodall, and C. Heuchenne. 2015. Guaranteed conditional performance of the S2 control chart with estimated parameters. International Journal of Production Research 53 (14):4405–13. doi:10.1080/00207543.2015.1008112.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gandy, A., and J. T. Kvaløy. 2013. Guaranteed conditional performance of control charts via bootstrap methods. Scandinavian Journal of Statistics 40 (4):647–68.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goedhart, R., M. Schoonhoven, and R. J. M. M. Does. 2017. Guaranteed in-control performance for the Shewhart X and X-bar control charts. Journal of Quality Technology 49 (2):155–71. doi:10.1080/00224065.2017.11917986.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goedhart, R., M. M. da Silva, M. Schoonhoven, E. K. Epprecht, S. Chakraborti, R. J M. M. Does, and Á. Veiga. 2017. Shewhart control charts for dispersion adjusted for parameter estimation. IISE Transactions 49 (8):838–48. doi:10.1080/24725854.2017.1299956.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goedhart, R., M. Schoonhoven, and R. J. M. M. Does. 2018. On guaranteed in-control performance for the Shewhart X and X-bar control charts. Journal of Quality Technology 50 (1):130–2. doi:10.1080/00224065.2018.1404876.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hawkins, D. M., and Q. Wu. 2014. The CUSUM and the EWMA head-to-head. Quality Engineering 26 (2):215–22. doi:10.1080/08982112.2013.817014.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jardim, F. S., S. Chakraborti, and E. K. Epprecht. 2019. Two perspectives for designing a phase II control chart with estimated parameters: The case of the Shewhart X¯ Chart. Journal of Quality Technology :1–20. doi:10.1080/00224065.2019.1571345.
   Google Scholar
• Jensen, W. A., L. A. Jones-Farmer, C. W. Champ, and W. H. Woodall. 2006. Effects of parameter estimation on control chart properties: A literature review. Journal of Quality Technology 38 (4):349–64. doi:10.1080/00224065.2006.11918623.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, L.A., C.W. Champ, and S.E. Rigdon. 2001. The performance of exponentially weighted moving average charts with estimated parameters. Technometrics 43 (2):156–67. doi:10.1198/004017001750386279.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, M. A., and S. H. Steiner. 2012. Assessing the effect of estimation error on the risk-adjusted CUSUM chart performance. International Journal for Quality in Health Care 24 (2):176–81.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Montgomery, D. C. 2013. Introduction to statistical quality control. 7th ed. Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Nedumaran, Gunabushanam, and Joseph J. Pignatiello. 2001. On estimating control chart limits. Journal of Quality Technology 33 (2):206–12.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Page, E.S. 1954. Continuous inspection schemes. Biometrika 41 (1–2):100–14.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Psarakis, S., A. K. Vyniou, and P. Castagliola. 2014. Some recent developments on the effects of parameter estimation on control charts. Quality and Reliability Engineering International 30 (8):1113–29. doi:10.1002/qre.1556.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roberts, S. W. 1959. Control chart tests based on geometric moving averages. Technometrics 1 (3):239–50. doi:10.1080/00401706.1959.10489860.
   Google Scholar
• Saleh, N. A., M. A. Mahmoud, M. J. Keefe, and W. H. Woodall. 2015. The difficulty in designing Shewhart X-bar and X control charts with estimated parameters. Journal of Quality Technology 47 (2):127–38.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saleh, N. A., M. A. Mahmoud, L. A. Jones-Farmer, I. M. Zwetsloot, and W. H. Woodall. 2015. Another look at the EWMA control chart with estimated parameters. Journal of Quality Technology 47 (4):363–82.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsai, T. R., S. J. Wu, and H. C. Lin. 2004. An alternative control chart approach based on small number of subgroups. International Journal of Information and Management Sciences 15 (4):61–73.
   Google Scholar
• Tsai, T. R., J. J. Lin, S. J. Wu, and H. C. Lin. 2005. On estimating control limits of X-bar chart when the number of subgroups is small. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology 26 (11–12):1312–6. doi:10.1007/s00170-004-2471-2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zwetsloot, I. M., and W. H. Woodall. 2017. A head-to-head comparative study of the conditional performance of control charts based on estimated parameters. Quality Engineering 29 (2):244–53. doi:10.1080/08982112.2016.1237651.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar