New dynamic reliability assessment method based on process capability index and fault importance index

References

• Andrew, K. S. J., L. Daming, and B. Dragan. 2006. A review on machinery diagnostics and prognostics implementing condition-based maintenance. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing 20 (7):1483–510.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anh, H., D. Phuc, and I. Benoît. 2016. Investigation on the use of energy efficiency for condition-based maintenance decision-making. IFAC-PapersOnLine 49-28:73–8.
   Google Scholar
• Bracke, S., and B. Backes. 2015. Multidimensional analyses of manufacturing processes: Process capability within the case study shape drill manufacturing. IFAC-Papersonline 48 (3):2380–6. doi:10.1016/j.ifacol.2015.06.444.
   Google Scholar
• Brik, A., M. Goddi, J. Dhahri, and N. B. Fredj. 2019. Assessing process capability index using sampling plan in the presence of measurement system errors. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology 102 (9–12):3301–13. doi:10.1007/s00170-019-03404-y.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bunea, C., A. M. Thomas, S. Sarkani, and H. C. Chang. 2008. Application of modern reliability database techniques to military system data. Reliability Engineering & System Safety 93 (1):14–27. doi:10.1016/j.ress.2006.10.011.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, J., F. Zhu, G. Y. Li, Y. Z. Ma, and Y. L. Tu. 2012. Capability index of a complex-product machining process. International Journal of Production Research 50 (12):3382–94. doi:10.1080/00207543.2011.578165.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cherkaoui, H., K. T. Huynh, and A. Grall. 2016. On the assessment of performance and robustness of condition-based maintenance strategies. IFAC-Papersonline 49 (12):809–14. doi:10.1016/j.ifacol.2016.07.874.
   Google Scholar
• Doug, S., V. Brian, K. Faisal, and T. Rocky. 2017. Understanding industrial safety: Comparing Fault tree, Bayesian network, and FRAM approaches. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries 45 (S):88–101.
   Google Scholar
• Fan, C. Y., P. S. Fan, and P. C. Chang. 2010. A system dynamics modeling approach for a military weapon maintenance supply system. International Journal of Production Economics 128 (2):457–69. doi:10.1016/j.ijpe.2010.07.015.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fonseca, D. J., and G. M. Knapp. 2000. An expert system for reliability centered maintenance in the chemical industry. Expert Systems with Applications 19 (1):45–57. doi:10.1016/S0957-4174(00)00019-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gao, Z. W., C. Cecati, and S. X. Ding. 2015. A survey of fault diagnosis and fault-tolerant techniques—part i: Fault diagnosis with model-based and signal-based approaches. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics 62 (6):3757–67. doi:10.1109/TIE.2015.2417501.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gong, G., J. C. Chen, and G. J. Guo. 2017. Enhancing tensile strength of injection molded fiber reinforced composites using the taguchi-based six sigma approach. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology 91 (9–12):3385–93. doi:10.1007/s00170-017-0031-9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Joel, I., A. Kazem, A. E. Ike, G. Paul, and F. John. 2013. A systems approach towards Reliability-Centred Maintenance (RCM) of wind turbines. Procedia Computer Science 16:814–23.
   Google Scholar
• Jose, K. K., and J. A. Luke. 2012. On confidence intervals for process capability indices in a one-way random model. Communications in Statistics - Simulation and Computation 41 (10):1805–15. doi:10.1080/03610918.2011.621569.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, S. B., W. Jitpitaklert, S. K. Park, and S. J. Hwang. 2012. Data mining model-based control charts for multivariate and autocor related processes. Expert Systems with Applications 39 (2):2073–81. doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2011.08.010.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuo, C. H., and H. P. Huang. 2002. Colored timed Petri net based statistical process control and fault diagnosis to flexible manufacturing systems. IEEE International Conference on Robotics & Automation. IEEE.
   Google Scholar
• Lamperti, G., and M. Zanella. 2006. Flexible diagnosis of discrete-event systems by similarity-based reasoning techniques. Artificial Intelligence 170 (3):232–97. doi:10.1016/j.artint.2005.08.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, D. S., and P. A. Vanrolleghem. 2004. Adaptive consensus principal component analysis for on-line batch process monitoring. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment 92 (1–3):119–35. doi:10.1023/B:EMAS.0000014498.72455.18.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, G., C. F. Alcala, S. J. Qin, and D. Zhou. 2011. Generalized reconstruction-based contributions for output-relevant fault diagnosis with application to the Tennessee eastman process. IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology 19 (5):1114–27. doi:10.1109/TCST.2010.2071415.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, W. J., M. He, Y. B. Sun, and Q. G. Cao. 2019. A novel layered fuzzy Petri nets modelling and reasoning method for process equipment failure risk assessment. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries 62 (S):103953. doi:10.1016/j.jlp.2019.103953.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lupo, T. 2015. The new nino capability index for dynamic process capability analysis. Quality and Reliability Engineering International 31 (2):305–12. doi:10.1002/qre.1589.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mao, J., Y. L. Cao, S. Q. Liu, and J. X. Yang. 2009. Manufacturing environment-oriented robust tolerance optimization method. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology 41 (1–2):57–65. doi:10.1007/s00170-008-1460-2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martorell, S., V. Serradell, and G. Verdú. 1996. Safety-related equipment prioritization for reliability centered maintenance purposes based on a plant specific level 1 PSA. Reliability Engineering & System Safety 52 (1):35–44. doi:10.1016/0951-8320(95)00122-0.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Merwe, A. J. V. D., and D. Chikobvu. 2010. A process capability index for averages of observations from new batches in the case of the balanced random effects model. Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference 140 (1):20–9. doi:10.1016/j.jspi.2009.06.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mohammed, A. N., S. A. N. Emad, A. S. Adel, and K. Husam. 2019. Overview of predictive condition based maintenance research using bibliometric indicators. Journal of King Saud University – Engineering Sciences 31:355–67.
   Google Scholar
• Negrin, I., Y. Parmet, and E. Schechtman. 2011. Developing a sampling plan based on cpk—unknown variance. Quality and Reliability Engineering International 27 (1):3–318. doi:10.1002/qre.1094.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Niu, G., B. S. Yang, and M. Pecht. 2010. Development of an optimized condition-based maintenance system by data fusion and reliability-centered maintenance. Reliability Engineering & System Safety 95 (7):786–96. doi:10.1016/j.ress.2010.02.016.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Noorossana, R., A. Zadbood, F. Zandi, and K. Noghondarian. 2015. An interactive artificial neural networks approach to multiresponse optimization. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology 76 (5–8):765–77. doi:10.1007/s00170-014-6276-7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pan, J. N., and C. I. Li. 2014. New capability indices for measuring the performance of a multidimensional machining process. Expert Systems with Applications 41 (5):2409–14. doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2013.09.039.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park, G. P., and T. Y. Yoon. 2012. Application of ordinal optimization on reliability centered maintenance of distribution system. European Transactions on Electrical Power 22 (3):391–401. doi:10.1002/etep.580.
   Google Scholar
• Pearn, W. L., and K. S. Chen. 1999. Making decisions in assessing process capability index Cpk. Quality and Reliability Engineering International 15 (4):321–6. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1099-1638(199907/08)15:4<321::AID-QRE258>3.0.CO;2-5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peng, Y., M. Dong, and M. J. Zuo. 2010. Current status of machine prognostics in condition-based maintenance: A review. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology 50 (1–4):297–313. doi:10.1007/s00170-009-2482-0.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peruchi, R. S., P. R. Junior, T. G. Brito, J. J. J. Largo, and P. P. Balestrassi. 2018. Multivariate process capability analysis applied to AISI 52100 hardened steel turning. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology 95 (9–12):3513–22. doi:10.1007/s00170-017-1458-8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rausand, M. 1998. Reliability centered maintenance. Microelectronics Reliability 28 (2):181.
   Google Scholar
• Sarbayev, M., M. Yang, and H. Q. Wang. 2019. Risk assessment of process systems by mapping fault tree into artificial neural network. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries 60 (S):203–212.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seda, U., and K. Ihsan. 2011. A new reliability index based on fuzzy process capability index for travel time in multimodal networks. International Journal of Computational Intelligence Systems 4 (4):550–565.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Selmi, S., S. B. Amara, N. B. Fredj, A. Kobi, and I. B. Salah. 2018. Process capability indices and X¯,R control chart limit adjustments by taking into account measurement system errors. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology 95 (5–8):1919–1930. doi:10.1007/s00170-017-1324-8.
   Google Scholar
• Shen, Y., X. D. Steven, H. Adel, H. Y. Hao, and P. Zhang. 2012. A Comparison study of basic data-driven fault diagnosis and process monitoring methods on the benchmark Tennessee Eastman process. Journal of Process Control 22 (9):1567–1581. doi:10.1016/j.jprocont.2012.06.009.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shubharthi, B., X. D. Gao, H. Pasman, and M. S. Mannan. 2016. Bayesian network based dynamic operational risk assessment. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries 41 (S):399–410. doi:10.1016/j.jlp.2015.11.024.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spiring, F. A. 1997. A unifying approach to process capability indices. Journal of Quality Technology 29 (1):49–58. doi:10.1080/00224065.1997.11979724.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsung, F., Y. Li, and M. Jin. 2006. Statistical process control for multistage manufacturing and service operations: A Review. Service Operations and Logistics, and Informatics, 2006. IEEE International Conference on. IEEE.
   Google Scholar
• Ündey, C., E. Tatara, and A. Çınar. 2003. Real-time batch process supervision by integrated knowledge-based systems and multivariate statistical methods. Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence 16 (5–6):555–66. doi:10.1016/j.engappai.2003.09.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verhoeff, M., W. J. C. Verhagen, and R. Curran. 2015. Maximizing operational readiness in military aviation by optimizing flight and maintenance planning. Transportation Research Procedia 10:941–950. doi:10.1016/j.trpro.2015.09.048.
   Google Scholar
• Wu, C. C., H. L. Kuo, and K. S. Chen. 2004. Implementing process capability indices for a complete product. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology 24 (11–12):891–898. doi:10.1007/s00170-003-1812-x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu, C. W., and W. L. Pearn. 2005. Measuring manufacturing capability for couplers and wavelength division multiplexers. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology 25 (5–6):533–541. doi:10.1007/s00170-003-1793-9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yu, J. X., H. C. Chen, Y. Yu, and Z. L. Yang. 2019. A weakest t-norm based fuzzy fault tree approach for leakage risk assessment of submarine pipeline. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries 62:103968. doi:10.1016/j.jlp.2019.103968.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhu, W. G., S. Q. Li, and D. I. Zhao. 2008. A functional inspection model for the immeasurable potential failure state. International Journal of Plant Engineering and Management 13 (3):121–127.
   Google Scholar
• Zou, C. L., W. Jiang, and F. Tsung. 2011. A lasso-based diagnostic framework for multivariate statistical process control. Technometrics 53 (3):297–309. doi:10.1198/TECH.2011.10034.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar