An approach to non-homogenous phase-type distributions through multiple cut-points

References

• Acal, C., J. E. Ruiz-Castro, A. M. Aguilera, F. Jiménez-Molinos, and J. B. Roldan. 2019. Phase-type distributions for studying variability in resistive memories. Journal of Computational and Applied Mathematics 345:23–32. doi:10.1016/j.cam.2018.06.010.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Acal, C., J. E. Ruiz-Castro, D. Maldonado, and J. B. Roldán. 2021. One cut-point phase-type distributions in reliability. An application to resistive random access memories. Mathematics 9 (21):2734. doi:10.3390/math9212734.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Albrecher, H., and M. Bladt. 2019. Inhomogeneous phase-type distributions and heavy tails. Journal of Applied Probability 56 (4):1044–64. doi:10.1017/jpr.2019.60.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Asmussen, S. 2000. Ruin probabilities. Hong Kong, China: World Scientific.
   Google Scholar
• Asmussen, S., and M. Bladt. 1996. Phase-type distributions and risk processes with state-dependent premiums. Scandinavian Actuarial Journal 1996 (1):19–36. doi:10.1080/03461238.1996.10413960.
   Google Scholar
• Asmussen, S., O. Nerman, and M. Olsson. 1996. Fitting phase-type distributions via the EM algorithm. Scandinavian Journal of Statistics 23 (4):419–41.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ausín, M., M. P. Wiper, and R. E. Lillo. 2004. Bayesian estimation for the M/G/1 queue using a phase-type approximation. Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference 118 (1–2):83–101. doi:10.1016/S0378-3758(02)00398-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Basawa, I. V., and B. L. S. Rao. 1980. Statistical Inference for stochastic processes. London: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bladt, M., B. F. Nielsen, and G. Samorodnitsky. 2015. Calculation of ruin probabilities for a dense class of heavy tailed distributions. Scandinavian Actuarial Journal 2015 (7):573–91. doi:10.1080/03461238.2013.865257.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buchholz, P., J. Kriege, and I. Felko. 2014. Input modeling with phase-type distributions and Markov models: theory and applications. Cham Heidelberg New York Dordrecht London: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Cazorla, M., S. Aldana, M. Maestro, M. Bargalló-González, F. Campabadal, E. Moreno, F. Jiménez-Molinos, and J. B. Roldán. 2019. Thermal study of multilayer resistive random access memories based on HfO2 and Al2O3 oxides. Journal of Vacuum Science & Technology B 37 (1):012204. doi:10.1116/1.5058294.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coolen, F. P. 2008. Parametric probability distributions in reliability. Encyclopedia of Quantitative Risk Analysis and Assessment. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Epstein, B., and M. Sobel. 1953. Life testing. Journal of the American Statistical Association 48 (263):486–502. doi:10.1080/01621459.1953.10483488.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freels, J. K., D. A. Timme, J. J. Pignatiello, R. L. Warr, and R. R. Hill. 2019. Maximum likelihood estimation for the poly-Weibull distribution. Quality Engineering 31 (4):545–52. doi:10.1080/08982112.2018.1557685.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frost, J. 2019. Regression analysis: an intuitive guide for using and interpreting linear models. EEUU: Statistics By Jim Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Gordon, A. S., A. H. Marshall, and M. Zenga. 2018. Predicting elderly patient length of stay in hospital and community care using a series of conditional coxian phase-type distributions, further conditioned on a survival tree. Health care Management Science 21 (2):269–80. doi:10.1007/s10729-017-9411-9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• He, Q. M. 2014. Fundamentals of matrix-analytic methods. New York: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Ielmini, D., and R. Waser. 2015. Resistive switching: from fundamentals of nanoionic redox processes to memristive device applications. New York: Wiley-VCH.
   Google Scholar
• Kollu, R., S. R. Rayapudi, S. Narasimham, and K. M. Pakkurthi. 2012. Mixture probability distribution functions to model wind speed distributions. International Journal of Energy and Environmental Engineering 3 (1):27. doi:10.1186/2251-6832-3-27.
   Google Scholar
• Lanza, M., A. Sebastian, W. D. Lu, M. L. Gallo, M. F. Chang, D. Akinwande, F. M. Puglisi, H. N. Alshareef, M. Liu, and J. B. Roldán. 2022. Memristive technologies for data storage, computation, encryption, and radio-frequency communication. Science 376 (6597):1066. doi:10.1126/science.abj9979.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mahmoodi, S., S. H. Ranjkesh, and Y. Q. Zhao. 2020. Condition-based maintenance policies for a multi-unit deteriorating system subject to shocks in a semi-Markov operating environment. Quality Engineering 32 (3):286–97. doi:10.1080/08982112.2020.1731754.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marques, F. J., C. A. Coelho, and M. de Carvalho. 2015. On the distribution of linear combinations of independent Gumbel random variables. Statistics and Computing 25 (3):683–701. doi:10.1007/s11222-014-9453-5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mauri, A., R. Sacco, and M. Verri. 2015. Electro-thermo-chemical computational models for 3D heterogeneous semiconductor device simulation. Applied Mathematical Modelling 39 (14):4057–74. doi:10.1016/j.apm.2014.12.008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McPherson, J. W. 2013. Reliability physics and engineering: time-to-failure modeling. Heidelberg: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Neuts, M. F. 1975. Probability distributions of phase type. In Liber Amicorum, ed. Emeritus H. Florin, 173–206. Belgium: Department of Mathematics, University of Louvain.
   Google Scholar
• Neuts, M. F. 1981. Matrix-geometric solutions in stochastic models: an algorithmic approach. Baltimore, MA: John Hopkins University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pan, F., S. Gao, C. Chen, C. Song, and F. Zeng. 2014. Recent progress in resistive random access memories: materials, switching mechanisms and performance. Materials Science and Engineering: R: Reports 83:1–59. doi:10.1016/j.mser.2014.06.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pérez-Ocón, R., D. Montoro-Cazorla, and J. E. Ruiz-Castro. 2006. Transient analysis of a multi-component system modeled by a general Markov process. Asia-Pacific Journal of Operational Research 23 (03):311–27. doi:10.1142/S0217595906000954.
   Google Scholar
• Pérez-Ocón, R., J. E. Ruiz-Castro, and M. L. Gámiz-Pérez. 1998. A multivariate model to measure the effect of treatments in survival to breast cancer. Biometrical Journal 40 (6):703–15. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1521-4036(199810)40:6 < 703::AID-BIMJ703 > 3.0.CO;2-7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramirez-Cobo, P., R. E. Lillo, and M. P. Wiper. 2010. Nonidentifiability of the two-state Markovian arrival process. Journal of Applied Probability 47 (3):630–49. doi:10.1239/jap/1285335400.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reinecke, P., T. Krauß, and K. Wolter. 2012. Cluster-based fitting of phase-type distributions to empirical data. Computers & Mathematics with Applications 64 (12):3840–51. doi:10.1016/j.camwa.2012.03.016.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruiz-Castro, J. E., and M. Zenga. 2020. A general piecewise multi-state survival model: application to breast cancer. Statistical Methods & Applications 29 (4):813–43. doi:10.1007/s10260-019-00505-6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruiz-Castro, J. E., C. Acal, A. M. Aguilera, M. C. Aguilera-Morillo, and J. B. Roldán. 2021. Linear-phase-type probability modelling of functional PCA with applications to resistive memories. Mathematics and Computers in Simulation 186:71–9. doi:10.1016/j.matcom.2020.07.006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Titman, A. C. 2014. Estimating parametric semi-Markov models from panel data using phase-type approximations. Statistics and Computing 24 (2):155–64. doi:10.1007/s11222-012-9360-6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Titman, A. C., and L. D. Sharples. 2010. Semi-Markov models with phase-type sojourn distributions. Biometrics 66 (3):742–52. doi:10.1111/j.1541-0420.2009.01339.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar