Contextual anomaly detection for multivariate time series data

References

• Aleroud, A., and G. Karabatis. 2017. Contextual information fusion for intrusion detection: A survey and taxonomy. Knowledge and Information Systems 52 (3):563–619. doi:10.1007/s10115-017-1027-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• An, J., and S. Cho. 2015. Variational autoencoder based anomaly detection using reconstruction probability. Special Lecture on IE 2 (1):1–18.
   Google Scholar
• Canizo, M., I. Triguero, A. Conde, and E. Onieva. 2019. Multi-head CNN–RNN for multi-time series anomaly detection: An industrial case study. Neurocomputing 363:246–60. doi:10.1016/j.neucom.2019.07.034.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Paola, A., P. Ferraro, S. Gaglio, G. L. Re, and S. K. Das. 2016. An adaptive Bayesian system for context-aware data fusion in smart environments. IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing 16 (6):1502–15. doi:10.1109/TMC.2016.2599158.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feng, C., T. Li, and D. Chana. 2017. Multi-level anomaly detection in industrial control systems via package signatures and LSTM networks. In 2017 47th Annual IEEE/IFIP International Conference on Dependable Systems and Networks (DSN), Denver, CO, 261–72. IEEE. doi:10.1109/DSN.2017.34.
   Google Scholar
• Goodfellow, I., Y. Bengio, and A. Courville. 2016. Deep Learning. MIT Press. http://www.deeplearningbook.org.
   Google Scholar
• Graves, A., A-r Mohamed, and G. Hinton. 2013. Speech recognition with deep recurrent neural networks. In 2013 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing, Vancouver, BC, Canada, 6645–9. IEEE.
   Google Scholar
• Harris, K., K. Triantafyllopoulos, E. Stillman, and T. McLeay. 2016. A multivariate control chart for autocorrelated tool wear processes. Quality and Reliability Engineering International 32 (6):2093–106. doi:10.1002/qre.2032.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hochreiter, S., and J. Schmidhuber. 1997. Long short-term memory. Neural Computation 9 (8):1735–80. doi:10.1162/neco.1997.9.8.1735.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karaoglan, A. D., and G. M. Bayhan. 2014. A regression control chart for autocorrelated processes. International Journal of Industrial and Systems Engineering 16 (2):238–56. doi:10.1504/IJISE.2014.058838.
   Google Scholar
• Kim, H., and H. Kim. 2018. Functional logistic regression with fused lasso penalty. Journal of Statistical Computation and Simulation 88 (15):2982–99. doi:10.1080/00949655.2018.1491975.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, H., and H. Kim. 2022a. Contextual anomaly detection for high-dimensional data using dirichlet process variational autoencoder. IISE Transactions. doi:10.1080/24725854.2021.2024925.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, H., and H. Kim. 2022b. Deep embedding kernel mixture networks for conditional anomaly detection in high-dimensional data. International Journal of Production Research. doi:10.1080/00207543.2022.2027040.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, T.-Y., and S.-B. Cho. 2018. Web traffic anomaly detection using C-LSTM neural networks. Expert Systems with Applications 106:66–76. doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2018.04.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ko, T., and H. Kim. 2019. Fault classification in high-dimensional complex processes using semi-supervised deep convolutional generative models. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics 16 (4):2868–77. doi:10.1109/TII.2019.2941486.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kozitsin, V., I. Katser, and D. Lakontsev. 2021. Online forecasting and anomaly detection based on the ARIMA model. Applied Sciences 11 (7):3194. doi:10.3390/app11073194.
   Google Scholar
• Li, J., D. R. Jeske, Y. Zhou, and X. Zhang. 2019. A wavelet-based nonparametric CUSUM control chart for autocorrelated processes with applications to network surveillance. Quality and Reliability Engineering International 35 (2):644–58. doi:10.1002/qre.2427.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, J., J. Guo, P. Orlik, M. Shibata, D. Nakahara, S. Mii, and M. Takáč. 2018. Anomaly detection in manufacturing systems using structured neural networks. In 2018 13th World Congress on Intelligent Control and Automation (WCICA), Changsha, China, 175–80. IEEE. doi:10.1109/WCICA.2018.8630692.
   Google Scholar
• Malhotra, P., A. Ramakrishnan, G. Anand, L. Vig, P. Agarwal, and G. Shroff. 2016. Lstm-based encoder-decoder for multi-sensor anomaly detection. In Anomaly Detection Workshop at 33rd International Conference on Machine Learning, New York, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Nguyen, H., K. P. Tran, S. Thomassey, and M. Hamad. 2021. Forecasting and anomaly detection approaches using LSTM and LSTM autoencoder techniques with the applications in supply chain management. International Journal of Information Management 57:102282. doi:10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2020.102282.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pankratz, A. 2012. Forecasting with dynamic regression models. John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Pascanu, R., C. Gulcehre, K. Cho, and Y. Bengio. 2014. How to construct deep recurrent neural networks. In International Conference on Learning Representations, Banff, Canada.
   Google Scholar
• Song, X., M. Wu, C. Jermaine, and S. Ranka. 2007. Conditional anomaly detection. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering 19 (5):631–45. doi:10.1109/TKDE.2007.1009.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suh, S., D. H. Chae, H.-G. Kang, and S. Choi. 2016. Echo-state conditional variational autoencoder for anomaly detection. In 2016 International Joint Conference on Neural Networks (IJCNN), Vancouver, BC, Canada, 1015–22. IEEE. doi:10.1109/IJCNN.2016.7727309.
   Google Scholar
• Xu, H., W. Chen, N. Zhao, Z. Li, J. Bu, Z. Li, Y. Liu, Y. Zhao, D. Pei, Y. Feng, et al. 2018. Unsupervised anomaly detection via variational auto-encoder for seasonal kpis in web applications. In Proceedings of the 2018 World Wide Web Conference, 187–96. doi:10.1145/3178876.3185996.
   Google Scholar
• Yaacob, A. H., I. K. Tan, S. F. Chien, and H. K. Tan. 2010. ARIMA based network anomaly detection. In 2010 Second International Conference on Communication Software and Networks, Singapore, 205–9. IEEE. doi:10.1109/ICCSN.2010.55.
   Google Scholar
• Yang, L., and Z. Zhang. 2020. Wind turbine gearbox failure detection based on SCADA data: A deep learning-based approach. IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement 70:1–11. doi:10.1109/TIM.2020.3045800.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yu, L., J. Qu, F. Gao, and Y. Tian. 2019. A novel hierarchical algorithm for bearing fault diagnosis based on stacked LSTM. Shock and Vibration 2019:1–11. doi:10.1155/2019/2756284.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yu, Q., L. Jibin, and L. Jiang. 2016. An improved ARIMA-based traffic anomaly detection algorithm for wireless sensor networks. International Journal of Distributed Sensor Networks 12 (1):9653230(1–9. doi:10.1155/2016/9653230.
   Google Scholar
• Zheng, A., and A. Casari. 2018. Feature engineering for machine learning: Principles and techniques for data scientists. O’Reilly Media, Inc.
   Google Scholar