Related variety and firm heterogeneity. What really matters for short-run firm growth?

References

• Aarstad, J., O. A. Kvitastein, and S.-E. Jakobsen. 2016. “Related and Unrelated Variety as Regional Drivers of Enterprise Productivity and Innovation: A Multilevel Study.” Research Policy 45: 844–856. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2016.01.013.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alcacer, J., and W. Chung. 2007. “Location Strategies and Knowledge Spillovers.” Management Science 53: 760–776. doi:10.1287/mnsc.1060.0637.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alcacer, J., and W. Chung. 2014. “Location Strategies for Agglomeration Economies.” Strategic Management Journal 35: 1749–1761. doi:10.1002/smj.2186.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Autor, D. H., and M. G. Duggan. 2003. “The Rise in the Disability Rolls and the Decline in Unemployment.” The Quarterly Journal of Economics 118: 157–206. doi:10.1162/00335530360535171.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baltzopoulos, A. 2009. “Agglomeration Externalities and Entrepreneurship: Micro-Level Evidence from Sweden.” CESIS Electronic Working Paper No. 190, Stockholm, Centre of Excellence for Science and Innovation Studies, The Royal Institute of Technology.
   Google Scholar
• Bartik, T. J. 1991. Who Benefits from State and Local Economic Development Policies? Kalamazoo, MI, W.E: Upjohn Institute for Employment Research.
   Google Scholar
• Basile, R., C. Donati, and R. Pittiglio. 2013. “Industry Structure and Employment Growth: Evidence from Semiparametric Geoadditive Models.” Région et Développement 38: 121–160.
   Google Scholar
• Bathelt, H., A. Malmberg, and P. Maskell. 2004. “Clusters and Knowledge: Local Buzz, Global Pipelines and the Process of Knowledge Creation.” Progress in Human Geography 28: 31–56. doi:10.1191/0309132504ph469oa.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beaudry, C., and A. Schiffauerova. 2009. “Who’s Right, Marshall or Jacobs? the Localization versus Urbanization Debate.” Research Policy 38: 318–337. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2008.11.010.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boschma, R., and S. Immarino. 2009. “Related Variety, Trade Linkages, and Regional Growth in Italy.” Economic Geography 85: 289–311. doi:10.1111/j.1944-8287.2009.01034.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brioschi, F., M. S. Brioschi, and G. Cainelli. 2002. “From the Industrial District to the District Group. An Insight into the Evolution of Local Capitalism in Italy.” Regional Studies 36: 1037–1052. doi:10.1080/0034340022000022521.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cainelli, G., R. Ganau, and A. Giunta. 2018. “Spatial Agglomeration, Global Value Chains, and Productivity. Micro-Evidence from Italy and Spain.” Economics Letters 169: 43–46. doi:10.1016/j.econlet.2018.04.020.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cainelli, G., R. Ganau, and D. Iacobucci. 2016. “Do Geographic Concentration and Vertically Related Variety Foster Firm Productivity? Micro-Evidence from Italy.” Growth and Change 47: 197–217. doi:10.1111/grow.2016.47.issue-2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cainelli, G., V. Giannini, and D. Iacobucci. 2018. “Agglomeration, Networking and the Great Recession.” Regional Studies forthcoming. doi: 10.1080/00343404.2018.1511892.
   Google Scholar
• Cainelli, G., D. Iacobucci, and E. Morganti. 2006. “Spatial Agglomeration and Business Groups. New Evidence from Italian Industrial Districts.” Regional Studies 40: 1–12. doi:10.1080/00343400600757585.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cameron, A. C., and P. K. Trivedi. 2005. Microeconometrics. Methods and Applications. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Clausen, T. H. 2013. “Firm Heterogeneity within Industries: How Important Is “Industry” to Innovation.” Technology Analysis & Strategic Management 25: 527–542. doi:10.1080/09537325.2013.785512.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, W. M., and D. A. Levinthal. 1989. “Innovation and Learning: Two Faces of R&D.” The Economic Journal 99: 569–596. doi:10.2307/2233763.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, W. M., and D. A. Levinthal. 1990. “Absorptive Capacity: A New Perspective on Learning and Innovation.” Administrative Science Quarterly 35: 128–152. doi:10.2307/2393553.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Combes, -P.-P. 2000. “Economic Structure and Local Growth: France, 1984–1993.” Journal of Urban Economics 47: 329–355. doi:10.1006/juec.1999.2143.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Content, J., and K. Frenken. 2016. “Related Variety and Economic Development: A Literature Review.” European Planning Studies 24: 2097–2112. doi:10.1080/09654313.2016.1246517.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Lucio, J. J., J. A. Herce, and A. Goicolea. 2002. “The Effects of Externalities on Productivity Growth in Spanish Industry.” Regional Science and Urban Economics 32: 241–258. doi:10.1016/S0166-0462(01)00081-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eriksson, R. H. 2011. “Localized Spillovers and Knowledge Flows: How Does Proximity Influence the Performance of Plants?” Economic Geography 87: 127–152. doi:10.1111/ecge.2011.87.issue-2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Firgo, M., and P. Mayerhafer. 2018. “(Un)Related Variety and Employment Growth at the Sub-Regional Level.” Papers in Regional Science 97: 519–547. doi:10.1111/pirs.12276.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frenken, K., F. van Oort, and T. Verburg. 2007. “Related Variety, Unrelated Variety and Regional Economic Growth.” Regional Studies 41: 685–697. doi:10.1080/00343400601120296.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glaeser, E. L., H. D. Kallal, J. A. Scheinkman, and A. Shleifer. 1992. “Growth in Cities.” The Journal of Political Economy 100: 1126–1152. doi:10.1086/261856.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graham, D. J., P. C. Melo, P. Jiwattanakulpaisarn, and R. B. Noland. 2010. “Testing for Causality between Productivity and Agglomeration Economies.” Journal of Regional Science 50: 935–951. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9787.2010.00676.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hansen, L. P. 1982. “Large Sample Properties of Generalized Method of Moments Estimators.” Econometrica 50: 1029–1054. doi:10.2307/1912775.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hartog, M., R. Boschma, and M. Sotarauta. 2012. “The Impact of Related Variety on Regional Employment Growth in Finland 1993–2006: High-Tech versus Medium/Low-Tech.” Industry and Innovation 19: 459–476. doi:10.1080/13662716.2012.718874.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heckman, J. J. 1979. “Sample Selection Bias as a Specification Error.” Econometrica 47: 153–161. doi:10.2307/1912352.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henderson, J. V. 1997. “Externalities and Industrial Development.” Journal of Urban Economics 42: 449–470. doi:10.1006/juec.1997.2036.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henderson, J. V., A. Kuncoro, and M. Turner. 1995. “Industrial Development in Cities.” Journal of Political Economy 103: 1067–1090. doi:10.1086/262013.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Illy, A., M. Schwartz, C. Hornych, and M. T. W. Rosenfeld. 2011. “Local Economic Structure and Sectoral Employment Growth in German Cities.” Tijdschrift Voor Economische En Sociale Geografie – Journal of Economic and Social Geography 102: 582–593. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9663.2011.00659.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Istat. 2009. “Classificazione delle attività economiche Ateco 2007. Derivata dalla Nace Rev. 2. Metodi e Norme No. 40. Rome: Istat.
   Google Scholar
• Jacobs, J. 1969. The Economy of Cities. New York, NY: Vintage.
   Google Scholar
• Jaffe, A. B., M. Trajtenberg, and R. Henderson. 1993. “Geographic Localization of Knowledge Spillovers as Evidenced by Patent Citations.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 108: 557–598. doi:10.2307/2118401.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kleibergen, F., and R. Paap. 2006. “Generalized Reduced Rank Tests Using the Singular Value Decomposition.” Journal of Econometrics 133: 97–126. doi:10.1016/j.jeconom.2005.02.011.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lasagni, A. 2011. “Agglomeration Economies and Employment Growth: New Evidence from the Information Technology Sector in Italy.” Growth and Change 42: 159–178. doi:10.1111/grow.2011.42.issue-2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lazerson, M., and G. Lorenzoni. 1999. “The Firms that Feed Industrial Districts: A Return to the Italian Source.” Industrial and Corporate Change 82: 235–266. doi:10.1093/icc/8.2.235.
   Google Scholar
• Mameli, F., F. Faggian, and P. McCann. 2008. “Employment Growth in Italian Local Labour Systems: Issues of Model Specification and Sectoral Aggregation.” Spatial Economic Analysis 3: 343–360. doi:10.1080/17421770802353030.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marshall, A. 1890. Principles of Economics. London: MacMillan and Company.
   Google Scholar
• Martin, P., T. Mayer, and F. Mayneris. 2011. “Spatial Concentration and Plant-Level Productivity in France.” Journal of Urban Economics 69: 182–195. doi:10.1016/j.jue.2010.09.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maskell, P. 2001. “Towards a Knowledge-Based Theory of the Geographical Cluster.” Industrial and Corporate Change 10: 921–943. doi:10.1093/icc/10.4.921.
   Google Scholar
• Munari, F., M. Sobrero, and A. Malipiero. 2012. “Absorptive Capacity and Localized Spillovers: Focal Firms as Technological Gatekeepers in Industrial Districts.” Industrial and Corporate Change 21: 429–462. doi:10.1093/icc/dtr053.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nooteboom, B. 2000. Learning and Innovation in Organizations and Economies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Paci, R., and S. Usai. 2008. “Agglomeration Economies, Spatial Dependence and Local Industry Growth.” Revue D’Économie Industrielle 123: 87–109. doi:10.4000/rei.
   Google Scholar
• Sedita, S. R., I. De Noni, and L. Pilotti. 2017. “Out of the Crisis: An Empirical Investigation of Place-Specific Determinants of Economic Resilience.” European Planning Studies 25: 155–180. doi:10.1080/09654313.2016.1261804.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shaver, J. M., and F. Flyer. 2000. “Agglomeration Economies, Firm Heterogeneity and Foreign Direct Investment in the United States.” Strategic Management Journal 21: 1175–1193. doi:10.1002/(ISSN)1097-0266.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sleutjes, B., F. van Oort, and V. Schutjens. 2012. “A Place for Area-Based Policy? the Survival and Growth of Local Firms in Dutch Residential Neighborhoods.” Journal of Urban Affairs 34: 533–558. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9906.2012.00616.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van der Panne, G., and C. van Beers. 2006. “On the Marshall-Jacobs Controversy: It Takes Two to Tango.” Industrial and Corporate Change 15: 877–890. doi:10.1093/icc/dtl021.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, C. C. 2015. “Geography of Knowledge Sourcing, Search Breadth and Depth Patterns, and Innovative Performance: A Firm Heterogeneity Perspective.” Environmental and Planning A 47: 744–761. doi:10.1068/a140024p.
   Google Scholar
• Wang, C. C., and G. C. S. Lin. 2013. “Dynamics of Innovation in a Globalizing China: Regional Environment, Inter-Firm Relations and Firm Attributes.” Journal of Economic Geography 13: 397–418. doi:10.1093/jeg/lbs019.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wixe, S. 2015. “The Impact of Spatial Externalities: Skills, Education and Plant Productivity.” Regional Studies 49: 2053–2069. doi:10.1080/00343404.2014.891729.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wixe, S. 2018. “Neighbourhood Related Diversity, Human Capital and Firm Innovation.” Papers in Regional Science 97: 217–252. doi:10.1111/pirs.v97.2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wixe, S., and M. Andersson. 2017. “Which Types of Relatedness Matter in Regional Growth? Industry, Occupation and Education.” Regional Studies 51: 523–536. doi:10.1080/00343404.2015.1112369.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wooldridge, J. M. 2010. Econometric Analysis of Cross Section and Panel Data. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar