Patterns of intention: Oberkampf and Knoll as Schumpeterian entrepreneurs

References

• Ades, D. 1995. Art and Power: Europe under the Dictators 1930-45. 23 vols. London: Hayward Gallery.
   Google Scholar
• Aldrich, H. E. 2010. “Entrepreneurship.” In The Handbook of Economic Sociology, edited by P. Smelser and R. Swedberg, 451–477. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Allen, J. 2002. The Romance of Commerce and Culture: Capitalism, Modernism, and the Chicago-Aspen Crusade for Cultural Reform. rev ed. Boulder: University Press of Colorado.
   Google Scholar
• Allen, R. L. 1991. Opening Doors: The Life & Work of Joseph Schumpeter. New Brunswick: Transaction.
   Google Scholar
• Andersen, E. S. 2013. Evolutionary Economics: Post-Schumpeterian Contributions. London: Routledge Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Ankersmit, F. R. 1983. Narrative Logic: A Semantic Analysis of the Historian‘S Language. 7 vols. The Hague: Nijhoff.
   Google Scholar
• Ankersmit, F. R. 1995. “Historicism: An Attempt at Synthesis. History and Theory.” In A New Philosophy of History, edited by F. R. Ankersmit and K. Kellner, 143–161. London: Reaktion Books.
   Google Scholar
• Ankersmit, F. R. 1996. Aesthetic Politics: Political Philosophy beyond Fact and Value. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Anteby, M. 2013. Manufacturing Morals: The Values of Silence in Business School Education. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Aspers, P., and F. Godart. 2013. “Sociology of Fashion: Order and Change.” Annual Review of Sociology 39: 171–192. doi:10.1146/annurev-soc-071811-145526.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aussel, A., and C. Barjouet. 2009. Etude des styles de mobilier. Paris: Encyclopédie Dunod.
   Google Scholar
• Baumol, W. J. 1968. “Entrepreneurship in Economic Theory.” The American Economic Review 7: 64–71.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baumol, W. J. 1996. “Entrepreneurship: Productive, Unproductive, and Destructive.” Journal of Business Venturing 11 (1): 3–22. doi:10.1016/0883-9026(94)00014-X.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baxandall, M. 1985. Patterns of Intention, on the Historical Explanation of Pictures. Yale: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Baxandall, M. 1988. Painting and Experience in Fifteenth Century Italy: A Primer in the Social History of Pictorial Eye. Oxford: Oxford University press.
   Google Scholar
• Becker, M., T. Knudsen, and R. Swedberg. 2014. The Entrepreneur-Classic Texts by Joseph A. Schumpeter. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Blaug, M. 2005. “Why Did Schumpeter Neglect Intellectual Property Rights?” Review of Economic Research on Copyright Issues 2 (1): 69–74. Available at SSRN https://ssrn.com/abstract=1144888.
   Google Scholar
• Boutillier, S., and D. Uzunidis. 2014. “L‘empreinte historique de la théorie de l‘entrepreneur. Enseignements tirés des analyses de Jean-Baptiste Say et de Joseph Aloïs Schumpeter.” Innovations 3: 97–119. doi:10.3917/inno.045.0097.
   Google Scholar
• Braudel, F. 1992. “Civilization and Capitalism, 15th–18th Century.” In The Structure of Everyday Life. I vols, Berkeley Publishing. Berkeley: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bucheli, M., and R. D. Wadhwani, Eds. 2014. Organizations in Time: History, Theory, Methods. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Campbell, J. 1978. The German Werkbund: The Politics of Reform in the Applied Arts. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cantwell, J. 2002. “Innovation, Profits, and Growth: Penrose and Schumpeter.” In The Growth of the Firm: The Legacy of Edith Penrose, edited by E. T. Penrose, 215–248. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Casson, M., and A. Godley. 2005. “Entrepreneurship and Historical Explanation.” In Entrepreneurship in Theory and History, edited by Y. Cassis and I. P. Minoglou, 25–60. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Castillo, G. 2005. “Domesticating the Cold War: Household Consumption as Propaganda in Marshall Plan Germany.” Journal of Contemporary History 40 (2): 261–288. doi:10.1177/0022009405051553.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Castillo, G. 2010. Cold War on the Home Front: The Soft Power of Midcentury Design. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Chandler, A. D. 1962. Strategy and Structure: Chapters in the American Industrial Enterprise. Boston: MIT press.
   Google Scholar
• Chapman, S. D., and S. Chassagne. 1981. European Textile Printers in the Eighteenth Century: A Study of Peel and Oberkampf. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press,.
   Google Scholar
• Chassage, S. 1980. Obekampf un grand patron au siècle des Lumières, l’inventeur de la toile de Jouy. Paris: Editions Aubier.
   Google Scholar
• Chassagne, S. 1980. Oberkampf un entrepreneur capitaliste au siècle des Lumières. Paris: Aubier.
   Google Scholar
• Chassagne, S. 1981. Une femme d’affaires au XVIII^e siècle, la correspondance de Madame de Maraise, collaboratrice d’Oberkampf. Paris: Privat.
   Google Scholar
• Chassagne, S., A. Dewerpe, and Y. Gaulupeau (1976), Les ouvriers de la manufacture de toiles imprimées d’Oberkampf à Jouy-en-Josas (1760-1815), dans Mouvement social, n°97, octobre-décembre
   Google Scholar
• Chia, R., and R. Holt. 2009b. Strategy without Design: The Silent Efficacy of Indirect Action. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Chia, R. C., and R. Holt. 2009a. Strategy without Design: The Silent Efficacy of Indirect Action. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Clarke, J., and R. Holt. 2010. “The Mature Entrepreneur: A Narrative Approach to Entrepreneurial Goals.” Journal of Management Inquiry 19 (1): 69–83. doi:10.1177/1056492609343030.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, Y. 2013. Le siècle des chefs. Une histoire transnationale du commandement et de l’autorité (1890-1940). Paris: Editions Amsterdam.
   Google Scholar
• Croce, B. [2017] 1913. Aesthetic: As Science of Expression and General Linguistic. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Dawson, A., and D. Hjorth. 2012. “Advancing Family Business Research through Narrative Analysis.” Family Business Review 25 (3): 339–355. doi:10.1177/0894486511421487.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deutsche, R. 1996. Evictions: Art and Spatial Politics, 400. Cambridge: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dewerpe, A., and Y. Gaulupeau. 1990. La fabrique des prolétaires, les ouvriers de la manufacture Oberkampf à Jouy-en-Josas (1760-1815). Paris: Presse de l’Ecole Normale Supérieure.
   Google Scholar
• Dockès, P. 2015. “Les débats sur la stagnation séculaire dans les années 1937-1950.” Revue économique 66 (5): 967–992. doi:10.3917/reco.665.0967.
   Google Scholar
• Dockès, P., and B. Rosier. 1991. “Histoire ‘raisonnée’ et économie historique.” Revue économique xi: 181–208.
   Google Scholar
• Ebner, A. 2006. “Institutions, Entrepreneurship, and the Rationale of Government: An Outline of the Schumpeterian Theory of the State.” Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization 59 (4): 497–515. doi:10.1016/j.jebo.2005.06.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farias, C. 2017. “That’s What Friends are For: Hospitality and Affective Bonds Fostering Collective Empowerment in an Intentional Community.” Organization Studies 38 (5): 577–595. doi:10.1177/0170840616670437.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flaschel, P. 2009. Macrodynamics of Capitalism-Synthesis of Marx, Keynes and Schumpeter. London: Springer Science & Business Media.
   Google Scholar
• Fligstein, N., and D. McAdam. 2012. A Theory of Fields. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Floré, F. 2012. “Architect-Designed Interiors for a Culturally Progressive Upper-Middle Class: The Implicit Political Presence of Knoll International in Belgium.” In Atomic Dwelling. Anxiety, Domesticity, and Postwar Architecture, 169–185. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Floré, F., and C. McAtee, Eds.. 2017. The Politics of Furniture: Identity, Diplomacy and Persuasion in Post-War Interiors. London: Taylor & Francis.
   Google Scholar
• Freeman, C., and F. Louçã. 2001. As Time Goes By: From the Industrial Revolutions to the Information Revolution. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gartner, W. B. 1985. “A Conceptual Framework for Describing the Phenomenon of New Venture Creation.” Academy of Management Review 10 (4): 696–706. doi:10.5465/amr.1985.4279094.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gartner, W. B. 1988. ““Who Is an Entrepreneur?” Is the Wrong Question.” American Journal of Small Business 12 (4): 11–32. doi:10.1177/104225878801200401.
   Google Scholar
• Genter, R. 2010. Late Modernism, Art, Culture and Politics in Cold War America. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
   Google Scholar
• Goody, J. 1977. The Domestication of the Savage Mind. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gril-Mariotte, A. 2009. “Topical Themes from the Oberkampf Textile Manufactory, Jouy-en-Josas, France, 1760-1821.” Studies in the Decorative Arts 17 (1): 162–197. doi:10.1086/652667.
   Google Scholar
• Gril-Mariotte, A. 2015. Les toiles de Jouy. Rennes: Presses universitaires de Rennes.
   Google Scholar
• Halbwachs, M. 1992. On Collective Memory. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Harris, J. 1995. Federal Art and National Culture: The Politics of Identity in New Deal America. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hayek, F. A. 1945. “The Use of Knowledge in Society.” The American Economic Review 35 (4): 519–530.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heilbroner, R. L. 1993. “Was Schumpeter Right after All?” Journal of Economic Perspectives 7: 87–96. doi:10.1257/jep.7.3.87.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Helin, J., T. Hernes, D. Hjorth, and R. Holt, Eds.. 2014. The Oxford Handbook of Process Philosophy and Organization Studies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hirschman, A. O. 2013. The Essential Hirschman. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hjorth, D. 2003. Rewriting Entrepreneurship – For a New Perspective on Organisational Creativity. Copenhagen/Malmö/Oslo: CBS Press/Liber/Abstrakt.
   Google Scholar
• Hjorth, D. 2011. “On Provocation, Education and Entrepreneurship.” Entrepreneurship and Regional Development 23 (1–2): 49–63. doi:10.1080/08985626.2011.540411.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hjorth, D. 2012. “Organisational Entrepreneurship – An Art of the Weak?” In Handbook of Organizational Entrepreneurship, edited by D. Hjorth, 169–192. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Hjorth, D., and C. Steyaert. 2004. Narrative and Discursive Approaches in Entrepreneurship: A Second Movements in Entrepreneurship Book. London: Edward Elgar publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Hjorth, D., and C. Steyaert. 2009. “Entrepreneurship as Disruptive Event.” In The Politics and Aesthetics of Entrepreneurship: A Fourth Movements of Entrepreneurship Book. London: Edward Elgar publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Hjorth, D., and C. Steyaert, Eds. 2010. The Politics and Aesthetics of Entrepreneurship: A Fourth Movements in Entrepreneurship Book. London: Edward Elgar publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Hjorth, D., and R. Holt. 2016. “It‘S Entrepreneurship, Not Enterprise: Ai Weiwei as Entrepreneur.” Journal of Business Venturing Insights 5: 50–54. doi:10.1016/j.jbvi.2016.03.001.
   Google Scholar
• Hofstadter, R. 1948. The American Political Tradition: And the Men Who Made It. New York: Knopf Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Hofstra, P. G. 2008. “Florence Knoll. Design and the American Office Workplace.” Dissertation Thesis, University of Kansas
   Google Scholar
• Holt, R. 2018. Judgment and Strategy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Holt, R., and A. Popp. 2013. “Emotion, Succession, and the Family Firm: Josiah Wedgwood & Sons.” Business History 55 (6): 892–909. doi:10.1080/00076791.2012.744588.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• James, K. 2006. Bauhaus Culture: From Weimar to the Cold War. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jones, G. G., and R. D. Wadhwani. 2017. “Historical Change and the Competitive Advantage of Firms: Explicating the “Dynamics” in the Dynamic Capabilities Framework.” Harvard Business School Working Paper Series# 17-052.
   Google Scholar
• Kentgens-Craig, M. 1999. The Bauhaus and America: First Contacts, 1919–1936. Cambridge: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lapsansky, E. J., and A. A. Verplanck, eds. 2001. Quaker Aesthetics: Reflections on a Quaker Ethic in American Design and Consumption. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
   Google Scholar
• Larrabee, E. 1981. Knoll Design. New York: Harry N. Abrams.
   Google Scholar
• Larrabee, E., and M. Vignelli. 1990. Knoll Design. New York: Harry N. Abrams.
   Google Scholar
• Lettres patentes sur arrêt du conseil du 20 mai 1783. en faveur des sieurs Oberkampf et Sarrasin de Maraise, entrepreneurs-propriétaires de la Manufacture Royale de Toile, MFICHE F-23630 (426), L 1.15-MF2-4998
   Google Scholar
• Lippmann, S., and H. E. Aldrich. 2014. “History and Evolutionary Theory.” In Organizations in Time: History, Theory, Methods, edited by M. Bucheli and R. D. Wadhwani, 192–216. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lutz, B. 2010a. Knoll: That Which Endures. Milano: Rizzoli.
   Google Scholar
• Lutz, B. 2010b. Knoll: A Modernist Universe. New York: Rizzoli International Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Maclean, M., C. Harvey, and S. R. Clegg. 2016. “Conceptualizing Historical Organization Studies.” Academy of Management Review 41 (4): 609–632. doi:10.5465/amr.2014.0133.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Margolin, V. 1989. Design Discourse. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Margolin, V. 1995. The Idea of Design. Cambridge: MIT Press, Boston.
   Google Scholar
• Martí, I., and P. Fernández. 2015. “Entrepreneurship, Togetherness, and Emotions: A Look at (Postcrisis?) Spain.” Journal of Management Inquiry 24 (4): 424–428. doi:10.1177/1056492615579786.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin, M. 2014. “Tipu Sultan’s Ambassadors at Saint-cloud: Indomania and Anglophobia in Pre-revolutionary Paris.” West 86th: A Journal of Decorative Arts, Design History, and Material Culture, 21 (1), 37-68.
   Google Scholar
• Marx, K. [2008] 1846. The Poverty of Philosophy. New York: Cosimo.
   Google Scholar
• Marx, K. (1887). Capital, Vol. 1. The process of production of capital. Trans. S. Moore and E. Aveling, Ed. F. Engels. Moscow: Progress Publishers. URL accessed December 2007. Marx/Engels Internet Archive http://www.marxists.org/archive/marx/works/1867-c1.
   Google Scholar
• Marx, K. 1965. Capital: A Critical Analysis of Capitalistic Production. Vol. 3. New York: Progress Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Marx, K., and F. Engels. [1980] 1867. Marx & Engels Collected Works Vol 13: Marx and Engels: 1854-1855. London: Lawrence & Wishart.
   Google Scholar
• McCraw, T. K. (Ed.). (1997). Creating Modern Capitalism: How Entrepreneurs, Companies, and Countries Triumphed in Three Industrial Revolutions. Harvard: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• McCraw, T. K. 2007. Prophet of Innovation. Joseph Schumpeter and Creative Destruction. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• McDonald, G. 2004. “Selling the American Dream: MoMA, Industrial Design and Post-War France.” Journal of Design History 17 (4): 397–412. doi:10.1093/jdh/17.4.397.
   Google Scholar
• Medearis, J. 2001. Joseph Schumpeter‘S Two Theories of Democracy. Harvard: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Morris, M. 2000. “Why Schumpeter Was Wrong to Deny Citizens Participation in the Political Decision-Making Process.” UCL Jurisprudence Review 80.
   Google Scholar
• Mosca, E. 1967. “Sidelobe Reduction in Phase-Coded Pulse Compression Radars (Corresp.).” IEEE Transactions on Information Theory 13 (1): 131–134. doi:10.1109/TIT.1967.1053936.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nietzsche, F. [1888] 1998. Twilight of the Idols. Oxford: Oxford Paperbacks.
   Google Scholar
• North, D. C., J. J. Wallis, and B. R. Weingast. 2009. Violence and Social Orders. Oxford: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pareto, V., and S. E. Finer. 1966. Sociological Writings. London: Praeger.
   Google Scholar
• Penrose, E. [2009] 1959. The Theory of the Growth of the Firm. Edith Penrose; with a new introduction by Christos N. Pitelis. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Perroux, F. 1965. La pensée économique de Joseph Schumpeter. Les dynamiques du capitalisme. Genève: Librairie Droz.
   Google Scholar
• Petitcol, X. 1993. “Découverte de toiles d’Oberkampf et de papiers peints de Réveillon à décor assorti” dans Bulletin du CIETA, n°71, p.105–111
   Google Scholar
• Popp, A., and R. Holt. 2013. “Entrepreneurship and Being: The Case of the Shaws.” Entrepreneurship & Regional Development 25 (1–2): 52–68. doi:10.1080/08985626.2012.746887.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prendergast, R. 2005. “Schumpeter, Hegel and the Vision of Development.” Cambridge Journal of Economics 30 (2): 253–275. doi:10.1093/cje/bei052.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Read, S., S. Sarasvathy, N. Dew, and R. Wiltbank. 2016. Effectual Entrepreneurship. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Rousseau, J. J. 1974. The Essential Rousseau: The Social Contract, Discourse on the Origin of Inequality, Discourse on the Arts and Sciences, The Creed of a Savoyard Priest. New York: New American Library.
   Google Scholar
• Ruskin, J. [1903] 1854. The Works of John Ruskin. Vol. V. edited by E. T. Cook and A. Wedderburn. London: George Allen.
   Google Scholar
• Sarasvathy, S. D. 2003. “Entrepreneurship as a Science of the Artificial.” Journal Of Economic Psychology 24 (2): 203–220. doi:10.1016/S0167-4870(02)00203-9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schuldenfrei, R., Ed.. 2012. Atomic Dwelling: Anxiety, Domesticity, and Postwar Architecture. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Schumpeter, E. B. 1961. English Overseas Trade Statistics, 1697–1808. Clarendon press.
   Google Scholar
• Schumpeter, J. 1909. “On the Concept of Social Value.” The Quarterly Journal of Economics 23 (2): 213–232. doi:10.2307/1882798.
   Google Scholar
• Schumpeter, J. A. [1911] 2017. Theory of Economic Development. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Schumpeter, J. A. [1983] 1939. Business Cycles: A Theoretical, Historical, and Statistical Analysis of the Capitalist Process. New York: McGraw-Hill Book Company.
   Google Scholar
• Schumpeter, J. A. [2003] 1939. Business Cycles: A Theoretical, Historical, and Statistical Analysis of the Capitalist Process. Vol. 2. New York: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Schumpeter, J. A. 1934. The Theory of Economic Development. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schumpeter, J. A. 1942. Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy. New York: Harper & Brothers.
   Google Scholar
• Schumpeter, J. A. 1947. “The Creative Response in Economic History.” The Journal of Economic History 7 (2): 149–159. doi:10.1017/S0022050700054279.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schumpeter, J. A. 1949. “The Communist Manifesto in Sociology and Economics.” Journal of Political Economy 199–212. in Richard V. Clemence (1951), ed., Schumpeter J.A., Essays on Entrepreneurs, Innovations, Business Cycles, and the Evolution of Capitalism, Addison-Wesley, Cambridge. doi:10.1086/256806.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schumpeter, J. A. 1980. Methodological Individualism. Brussels: Institutum Europaeum.
   Google Scholar
• Schumpeter, J. A. 2006. History of Economic Analysis. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Schumpeter, J. A. 2017. Essays: On Entrepreneurs, Innovations, Business Cycles and the Evolution of Capitalism. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Scranton, P. 1977. Endless Novelty: Specialty Production and American Industrialization, 1865–1925. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• SEC, KNOLL INC. (2013). Commission File No. 001-12907, UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Washington, D.C. 20549 FORM 10-K;
   Google Scholar
• Sinoya, Y. 2005. The Soul of the German Historical School. Methodological Essays on Schmoller, Weber and Schumpeter. New York: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Smelser, N. J., and R. Swedberg. 2005. Introducing Economic Sociology, the Handbook of Economic Sociology, 3–25. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Smelser, N. J., and R. Swedberg. 2010. The Handbook of Economic Sociology. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, A. 1776. An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations, 2 vols. W. Strahan and T. Cadell. London: MTG
   Google Scholar
• Staniszewski, M. A. 1998. The Power of Display: A History of Exhibition Installations at the Museum of Modern Art, 160. Cambridge: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Stern, R. N., and S. R. Barley. 1996. “Organizations and Social Systems: Organization Theory‘S Neglected Mandate.” Administrative Science Quarterly 41: 146–162. doi:10.2307/2393989.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sternhell, Z. 2009. The Anti-Enlightenment Tradition. Yale: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sternhell, Z., M. Sznajder, and M. Asher. 1994. The Birth of Fascist Ideology. From Cultural Rebellion to Political Revolution. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Stinchcombe, A. L. 1997. “On the Virtues of the Old Institutionalism.” Annual Review of Sociology 23 (1): 1–18. doi:10.1146/annurev.soc.23.1.1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stolper, W. R. 1994. Joseph Alois Schumpeter: The Public Life of a Private Man. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Strauss, L. 1947. “On the Intention of Rousseau.” Social Research, 7: 455–487.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strauss, L., and J. Cropsey, Eds. 2012. History of Political Philosophy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Subrahmanyan, S. 1990. The Political Economy of Commerce: Southern India, 1500–1650. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Swedberg, R. 1991. Schumpeter: A Biography. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Swedberg, R. 2006. “Social Entrepreneurship: The View of the Young Schumpeter.” In Entrepreneurship as Social Change: A Third New Movements in Entrepreneurship Book, edited by C. Steyaert and D. Hjorth, 21–34. 3 vols. London: Edward Elgar Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Thorpe, R., and R. Holt, Eds.. 2007. The Sage Dictionary of Qualitative Management Research. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Tigerman, B. 2007. “‘I Am Not a Decorator’: Florence Knoll, the Knoll Planning Unit and the Making of the Modern Office.” Journal of Design History 20 (1): 61–74. doi:10.1093/jdh/epl042.
   Google Scholar
• Vaara, E., and J.-A. Lamberg. 2016. “Taking Historical Embeddedness Seriously: Three Historical Approaches to Advance Strategy Process and Practice Research.” Academy of Management Review 41 (4): 633–657. doi:10.5465/amr.2014.0172.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Veblen, T. 1994. Collected Works of Thorsten Veblen: The Place of Science in Modern Civilisation. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Vérin, H. 1982. Entrepreneurs, entreprise: Histoire d‘une idée, 2 vols. Paris: Presses universitaires de France.
   Google Scholar
• Vignelli, M., and L. Vignelli. 1981. Design--Vignelli. Rizzoli International Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Wadhwani, R. D. 2010. “15. Historical Reasoning and the Development of Entrepreneurship Theory.” Historical Foundations of Entrepreneurial Research 343–380. in Landström, H., & Lohrke, F. (Eds.). (2010). Historical foundations of entrepreneurial research ix. Edward Elgar Publishing
   Google Scholar
• Wadhwani, R. D., and G. Jones. 2014. “Schumpeter’s Plea: Historical Reasoning in Entrepreneurship Theory and Research.” Organizations in Time: History, Theory, Methods viii: 192–216.
   Google Scholar
• White, H. 1973. “Interpretation in History.” New Literary History 4 (2): 281–314. doi:10.2307/468478.
   Google Scholar
• Williams, R. 2017. Michael Baxandall, Vision and the Work of Words. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar