The onto-politics of entrepreneurial experimentation: re-reading Hans-Jörg Rheinberger’s understanding of ‘experimental systems’

References

• Ahuja, G., and C. M. Lampert. 2001. “Entrepreneurship in the Large Corporation: A Longitudinal Study of How Established Firms Create Breakthrough Inventions.” Strategic Management Journal 22 (6/7): 521–543. doi:10.1002/smj.176.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Audretsch, D. B. 2006. Entrepreneurship, Innovation and Economic Growth. Cheltenham UK: Edward Elgar Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Baker, T., and R. E. Nelson. 2005. “Creating Something from Nothing: Resource Construction through Entrepreneurial Bricolage.” Administrative Science Quarterly 50 (3): 329–366. doi:10.2189/asqu.2005.50.3.329.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barinaga, E. 2012. “Overcoming Inertia : The Social Question in Social Entrepreneurship.” In Handbook on Organisational Entrepreneurship, edited by D. Hjorth, 242–256. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Barinaga, E. 2017. “Tinkering with Space: The Organizational Practices of a Nascent Social Venture.” Organization Studies 38 (7): 937–958. doi:10.1177/0170840616670434.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bauer, S. 2012. “Kommentar: Verteilte Handlungsmacht im Experiment – Von der Epistemologie zu multiplen Ontologien.” Berichte zur Wissenschaftsgeschichte 35 (4): 341–350. doi:10.1002/bewi.201201601.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Beyes, T., and C. Steyaert. 2011. “Spacing Organization: Non-Representational Theory and Performing Organizational Space.” Organization 19 (1): 43–59.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borgdorff, H., Orpheus Institute Series. 2013. “Artistic Practices and Epistemic Things.” In Experimental Systems : Future Knowledge in Artistic Research, edited by M. Schwab, 112–120. Leuven: Leuven University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Calás, M. B., E. Seray, and L. Smircich. 2018. “Becoming Possible in the Anthropocene? Becoming-Socialentrepreneurship as More-than-Capitalist Practice.” In Social Entrepreneurship : An Affirmative Critique, edited by P. Dey and C. Steyaert, 264–293. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Calás, M. B., L. Smircich, and K. A. Bourne. 2009. “Extending the Boundaries: Reframing ‘Entrepreneurship as Social Change’ through Feminist Perspectives.” Academy of Management Review 34 (3): 552–569. doi:10.5465/amr.2009.40633597.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dashtipour, P., and N. Rumens. 2018. “Entrepreneurship, Incongruence and Affect: Drawing Insights from a Swedish Anti-Racist Organisation.” Organization 25 (2): 223–241. doi:10.1177/1350508417720022.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Daskalaki, M., D. Hjorth, and J. Mair. 2015. “Are Entrepreneurship, Communities, and Social Transformation Related?” Journal of Management Inquiry 24 (4): 419–423. doi:10.1177/1056492615579012.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deleuze, G., and F. Guattari. 2013. A Thousand Plateaus. Translated by Brian Massumi. London: Bloomsbury.
   Google Scholar
• Dey, P., and C. Mason. 2018. “Overcoming Constraints of Collective Imagination: An Inquiry into Activist Entrepreneuring, Disruptive Truth-Telling and the Creation of ‘Possible Worlds.’.” Journal of Business Venturing 33 (1): 84–99. doi:10.1016/j.jbusvent.2017.11.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dey, P., and C. Steyaert. 2010. “The Politics of Narrating Social Entrepreneurship.” Journal of Enterprising Communities 4 (1): 85–108. doi:10.1108/17506201011029528.
   Google Scholar
• Dey, P., and C. Steyaert. 2012. “Social Entrepreneurship: Critique and the Radical Enactment of the Social.” Social Enterprise Journal 8 (2): 90–107. doi:10.1108/17508611211252828.
   Google Scholar
• Duxbury, T. 2014. “Improvising Entrepreneurship.” Technology Innovation Management Review 4 (7): 22–26. doi:10.22215/timreview/809.
   Google Scholar
• Fleck, L. 1980. Entstehung und Entwicklung einer wissenschaftlichen Tatsache. Einführung in die Lehre vom Denkstil und Denkkollektiv, Suhrkamp Taschenbuch Wissenschaft, 312. Frankfurt a. M.: Suhrkamp.
   Google Scholar
• Hacking, I. 1983. Representing and Intervening : Introductory Topics in the Philosophy of Natural Science. Cambridge [etc.]: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hagner, M., and H.-J. Rheinberger. 1998. “Experimental Systems, Objects of Investigation, and Spaces of Representation.” In Experimental Essays: Versuche Zum Experiment, edited by M. Heidelberger and F. Steinle, 355–373. Baden-Baden: Nomos-Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Hagner, M., and H.-J. Rheinberger. 1993. Die Experimentalisierung des Lebens : Experimentalsysteme in den biologischen Wissenschaften 1850/1950. Berlin: Akademie-Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Hart, D. M., ed. 2003. The Emergence of Entrepreneurship Policy. Governance, Start-Ups, and Growth in the US Knowledge Economy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Heidelberger, M. 1998. “Die Erweiterung der Wirklichkeit im Experiment.” In Experimental Essays: Versuche zum Experiment, edited by M. Heidelberger and F. Steinle, 71–92. Baden-Baden: Nomos-Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Hjorth, D. 2005. “Organizational Entrepreneurship with De Certeau on Creating Heterotopias (Or Spaces for Play).” Journal of Management Inquiry 14 (4): 386–398. doi:10.1177/1056492605280225.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hjorth, D. 2012. “Organizational Entrepreneurship: An Art of the Weak?” In Handbook on Organisational Entrepreneurship edited by, D. Hjorth, 169–192. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Hjorth, D. 2013. “Public Entrepreneurship: Desiring Social Change, Creating Sociality.” Entrepreneurship & Regional Development 25 (1/2): 34–51. doi:10.1080/08985626.2012.746883.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hjorth, D., R. Holt, P. Fernandez, and C. Farias. 2016. “Organizational Entrepreneurship and the Political.” Entrepreneurship & Regional Development 28 (7/8): 601–604. doi:10.1080/08985626.2016.1235876.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kerr, W. R., R. Nanda, and M. Rhodes-Kropf. 2014. “Entrepreneurship as Experimentation.” The Journal of Economic Perspectives 28 (3): 25–48. doi:10.1257/jep.28.3.25.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kindi, V. 2010. “Novelty and Revolution in Art and Science: The Connection between Kuhn and Cavell.” Perspectives on Science 18 (3): 284–310. doi:10.1162/POSC_a_00011.
   Google Scholar
• Knorr-Cetina, K. D. 1992. “The Couch, the Cathedral, and the Laboratory : On the Relationship between Experiment and Laboratory in Science.” In Science as Practice and Culture, edited by A. Pickering, 113–138. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Knorr-Cetina, K. D. 2002. Die Fabrikation von Erkenntnis : Zur Anthropologie Der Naturwissenschaft. Erw. Neuaufl. Suhrkamp Taschenbuch Wissenschaft. Frankfurt, Main: Suhrkamp.
   Google Scholar
• Koethen, E. 2012. “Das Experiment des Findens als Verfahrensweise der Kunst. Gemeinsamkeiten mit - und Differenzen zur - Wissenschaft.” In Experimente in Den Künsten: Transmediale Erkundungen in Literatur, Theater, Film, Musik Und Bildender Kunst, edited by S. Kreuzer. Kultur- und Medientheorie, 337-366. Bielefeld. transcript.
   Google Scholar
• Kuhn, T. S. 1970. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, 2nd ed., Enlarged. International Encyclopedia of Unified Science. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Latour, B. 1999. Pandora’s Hope : Essays on the Reality of Science Studies. Cambridge Mass. [etc.]: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Latour, B. 2002. Science in Action: How to Follow Scientists and Engineers Through Society. Cambridge Mass. Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Latour, B., and S. Woolgar. 1986. Laboratory Life : The Social Construction of Scientific Facts. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Law, J. 2008. “Actor-Network Theory and Material Semiotics.” In The New Blackwell Companion to Social Theory, edited by B. S. Turner, Paperback edition, 141–158. Wiley Blackwell Companions to Sociology. Oxford: Blackwell
   Google Scholar
• Law, J., and J. Urry. 2004. “Enacting the Social.” Economy and Society 33 (3): 390–410. doi:10.1080/0308514042000225716.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindholm-Dahlstrand, A., M. Andersson, and B. Carlsson. 2018. “Entrepreneurial Experimentation: A Key Function in Entrepreneurial Systems of Innovation.” Small Business Economics 4: 1–20.
   Google Scholar
• Manso, G. 2016. “Experimentation and the Returns to Entrepreneurship.” Review of Financial Studies 29 (9): 2319–2340. doi:10.1093/rfs/hhw019.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Massumi, B. 2010. Ontomacht : Kunst, Affekt und das Ereignis des Politischen. Internationaler Merve Diskurs. Berlin: Merve.
   Google Scholar
• Meinel, C. 1993. “Experimentalstrategien - Realstrategien?” In Die Experimentalisierung des Lebens: Experimentalsysteme in den biologischen Wissenschaften 1850/1950, edited by H.-J. Rheinberger and M. Hagner, 219–225. Berlin: Akademie-Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Merleau-Ponty, M. 1962. Phenomenology of Perception, Translated by C. Smith. International Library of Philosophy and Scientific Method… New York: Humanities Press.
   Google Scholar
• Miles, R. E., G. Miles, and C. C. Snow. 2005. Collaborative Entrepreneurship : How Communities of Networked Firms Use Continuous Innovation to Create Economic Wealth. Stanford, Calif: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mol, A. 1999. “Ontological Politics. A Word and Some Questions.” Sociological Review Monograph 47 (1): 74–89. doi:10.1111/j.1467-954X.1999.tb03483.x.
   Google Scholar
• Müller, M., and C. Schurr. 2016. “Assemblage Thinking and Actor-Network Theory: Conjunctions, Disjunctions, Cross-Fertilisations.” Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers 41 (3): 217–229. doi:10.1111/tran.2016.41.issue-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ogbor, J. O. 2000. “Mythicizing and Reification in Entrepreneurial Discourse: Ideology-Critique of Entrepreneurial Studies.” Journal of Management Studies 37 (5): 605–635. doi:10.1111/1467-6486.00196.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oswick, C., P. Fleming, and G. Hanlon. 2011. “From Borrowing to Blending: Rethinking the Processes of Organizational Theory Building.” Academy of Management Review 36 (2): 318–337.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Polanyi, M. 1983. The Tacit Dimension. [Repr.]. Gloucester, Mass: Smith.
   Google Scholar
• Rheinberger, H.-J. 1994a. “Experimental Systems: Historiality, Narration, and Deconstruction.” Science in Context 7 (1): 65–81.
   Google Scholar
• Rheinberger, H.-J. 1994b. “Experimentalsysteme, Epistemische Dinge, Experimentalkulturen zu einer Epistemologie des Experiments.” Deutsche Zeitschrift für Philosophie 42 (3): 405–418. doi:10.1524/dzph.1994.42.3.405.
   Google Scholar
• Rheinberger, H.-J. 2001. “History of Science and the Practices of Experiment.” History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences 23 (1): 51–63.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rheinberger, H.-J. 2011. “Consistency from the Perspective of an Experimental Systems Approach to the Sciences and Their Epistemic Objects.” Manuscrito 34 (1): 307–321. doi:10.1590/S0100-60452011000100014.
   Google Scholar
• Rheinberger, H.-J. 2012. Experiment, Forschung, Kunst, 9–12. Presentation at Jahreskonferenz der Dramaturgischen Gesellschaft, Oldenburg, 26–29 April 2012. http://www.dramaturgische-gesellschaft.de/assets/Uploads/ContentElements/Attachments/Hans-Joerg-Rheinberger-Experiment-Forschung-Kunst.pdf. Accessed 20 Jan 2019.
   Google Scholar
• Rheinberger, H.-J., and M. Schwab. 2013. “Forming and Being Informend (Hans Jörg Rheinberger in Conversation with Michael Schwab).” In Experimental Systems: Future Knowledge in Artistic Research, edited by M. Schwab, 198–219. Leuven: Leuven University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rheinberger, H.-J. 2018. “Epistemics and Aesthetics of Experimentation.” In Practicing Art/Science: Experiments in an Emerging Field, edited by P. Sormani, G. Carbone, and P. Gisler, 236–249. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Rindova, V., D. Barry, and D. J. Ketchen. 2009. “Entrepreneuring as Emancipation.” Academy of Management Review 34 (3): 477–491. doi:10.5465/amr.2009.40632647.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rüdiger, K., M. P. Ortiz, and A. B. González. 2014. Entrepreneurship, Innovation and Economic Crisis. Lessons for Research, Policy and Practice. Edited by Klaus Rüdiger, Marta Peris Ortiz, Alicia Blanco González. Cham: Springer International Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Sabato, S., B. Vanhercke, and G. Verschraegen. 2017. “Connecting Entrepreneurship with Policy Experimentation? The EU Framework for Social Innovation.” Innovation: the European Journal of Social Sciences 30 (2): 147–167.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sarasvathy, S. 2004a. “Constructing Corridors to Economic Primitives.” In Opportunity Identification and Entrepreneurial Behavior, edited by J. Butler, 291–312. Greenwich: Information Age Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Sarasvathy, S. 2004b. “Making It Happen: Beyond Theories of the Firm to Theories of Firm Design.” Entrepreneurship: Theory & Practice 28 (6): 519–531.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sarasvathy, S. 2012. “Worldmaking.” In Entrepreneurial Action, edited by, J. Katz and A. C. Corbett. 14:1–24. Advances in Entrepreneurship, Firm Emergence & Growth. Bingley: Emerald.
   Google Scholar
• Schumpeter, J. A. 1947. “The Creative Response in Economic History.” The Journal of Economic History 7 (2): 149–159. doi:10.1017/S0022050700054279.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schumpeter, J. A. 2016. Capitalism, Socialism, and Democracy : Second Edition Text. Lanham: Dancing Unicorn Books.
   Google Scholar
• Schwab, M. Orpheus Institute Series. 2013. Experimental Systems : Future Knowledge in Artistic Research. Leuven: Leuven University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Shah, S. K., and M. Tripsas. 2007. “The Accidental Entrepreneur: The Emergent and Collective Process of User Entrepreneurship.” Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal 1 (1–2): 123–140. doi:10.1002/sej.15.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shepherd, D. A., and H. Patzelt. 2011. “The New Field of Sustainable Entrepreneurship: Studying Entrepreneurial Action Linking -What Is to Be Sustained- with -What Is to Be Developed-.” Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice 35 (1): 137–163. doi:10.1111/etap.2011.35.issue-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smallbone, D., ed. 2010. Entrepreneurship and Public Policy. An Elgar Research Collection. Cheltenham UK: Edward Elgar Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Spinosa, C., F. Flores, and H. Dreyfus. 1997. Disclosing New Worlds : Entrepreneurship, Democratic Action, and the Cultivation of Solidarity. Cambridge Mass. [etc.]: MIT.
   Google Scholar
• Stallschus, S., Orpheus Institute Series. 2013. “A Theory of Experimentation in Art? Reading Kubler’s History of Art after Rheinberger’s Experimental Systems.” In Experimental Systems : Future Knowledge in Artistic Research, edited by M. Schwab, 15–25. Leuven: Leuven University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Stemmler, S. 2014. Wahrnehmung, Erfahrung, Experiment, Wissen: Subjektivität und Objektivität in den Künsten. Zürich: Diaphanes.
   Google Scholar
• Steyaert, C. 2012. “Making the Multiple : Theorising Processes of Entrepreneurship and Organisation.” In Handbook on Organisational Entrepreneurship, edited by D. Hjorth, 151–168. Cheltenham UK: Edward Elgar Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Steyaert, C., and J. Katz. 2004. “Reclaiming the Space of Entrepreneurship in Society: Geographical, Discursive and Social Dimensions.” Entrepreneurship & Regional Development 16 (3): 179–196. doi:10.1080/0898562042000197135.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tennant, M. G. 2015. “Values-Led Entrepreneurship: Developing Business Models through the Exercise of Reflexivity.” Local Economy 30 (5): 520–533. doi:10.1177/0269094215589144.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tobias, J. M., J. Mair, and C. Barbosa-Leiker. 2013. “Toward a Theory of Transformative Entrepreneuring: Poverty Reduction and Conflict Resolution in Rwanda’s Entrepreneurial Coffee Sector.” Journal of Business Venturing 28 (6): 728–742. doi:10.1016/j.jbusvent.2013.03.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verduijn, K., C. Essers, P. Dey, and D. Tedmanson. 2014. “Emancipation And/Or Oppression? Conceptualizing Dimensions of Criticality in Entrepreneurship Studies.” International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behavior & Research 20 (2): 98–107. doi:10.1108/IJEBR-02-2014-0031.
   Google Scholar
• Weiskopf, R., and C. Steyaert. 2009. “Metamorphoses in Entrepreneurship Studies: Towards an Affirmative Politics of Entrepreneuring.” In The Politics and Aesthetics of Entrepreneurship, D. Hjorth edited by, 202–220. Movements in Entrepreneurship. Cheltenham UK: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar