Entrepreneuring as emancipation in family business succession: a story of agony and ecstasy

References

• Aldrich, H. E., and J. E. Cliff. 2003. “The Pervasive Effects of Family on Entrepreneurship: Toward a Family Embeddedness Perspective.” Journal of Business Venturing 18 (5): 573–596. doi:10.1016/S0883-9026(03)00011-9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alvesson, M., and H. Willmott. 1992. “On the Idea of Emancipation in Management and Organization Studies.” The Academy of Management Review 17 (3): 432. doi:10.5465/amr.1992.4281977.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alvesson, M., and K. Sköldberg. 2017. Reflexive Methodology: New Vistas for Qualitative Research. 3rd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Anderson, A. R. 1995. The Arcadian Enterprise: An enquiry into the nature and conditions of rural small business ( PhD thesis). Stirling University, Scotland.
   Google Scholar
• Anderson, A., S. Jack, and S. Drakopoulou Dodd. 2005. “The Role of Family Members in Entrepreneurial Networks: Beyond Boundaries of the Family Firm.” Family Business Review 18 (2): 135–154. doi:10.1111/j.1741-6248.2005.00037.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson, A. R. 2005. “Enacted Metaphor: The Theatricality of the Entrepreneurial Process.” International Small Business Journal 23 (6): 587–603. doi:10.1177/0266242605057654.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson, A. R., and L. Warren. 2011. “The Entrepreneur as Hero and Jester: Enacting the Entrepreneurial Discourse.” International Small Business Journal 29 (6): 589–609. doi:10.1177/0266242611416417.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson, A.R., S. Drakopoulou Dodd, and S.L. Jack. 2012. “Entrepreneurship as Connecting: Some Implications for Theorising and Practice.” Management Decision 50 (5): 958–971. doi:10.1108/00251741211227708.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson, A., and S. Ronteau. 2017. “Towards an Entrepreneurial Theory of Practice; Emerging Ideas for Emerging Economies.” Journal of Entrepreneurship in Emerging Economies 9 (2): 110–120. doi:10.1108/JEEE-12-2016-0054.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Au, K., F. F. T. Chiang, T. A. Birtch, and Z. Ding. 2013. “Incubating the Next Generation to Venture: The Case of a Family Business in Hong Kong.” Asia Pacific Journal of Management 30 (3): 749–767. doi:10.1007/s10490-012-9331-7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bardon, T., and E. Josserand. 2011. “A Nietzschean Reading of Foucauldian Thinking: Constructing A Project of the Self within an Ontology of Becoming.” Organization 18 (4): 497–515. doi:10.1177/1350508410384758.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barragan, S., M. S. Erogul, and C. Essers. 2018. “‘Strategic (dis)obedience’: Female Entrepreneurs Reflecting on and Acting upon Patriarchal Practices.” Gender Work and Organization 25 (5): 575–592. doi:10.1111/gwao.12258.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barratt, E. 2008. “The Later Foucault in Organization and Management Studies.” Human Relations 61 (4): 515–537. doi:10.1177/0018726708091016.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brundin, E., and C. E. J. Härtel. 2014. “Emotions in Family Firms.” In The SAGE Handbook of Family Business, edited by L. Melin, M. Nordqvist, and P. Sharma, 529–548. London: SAGE Publications Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Caldwell, R. 2007. “Agency and Change: Re-evaluating Foucault’s Legacy.” Organization 14 (6): 769–791. doi:10.1177/1350508407082262.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Champenois, C., V. Lefebvre, and S. Ronteau. 2019. “Entrepreneurship as Practice: Systematic Literature Review of a Nascent Field.” Entrepreneurship & Regional Development 32 (3–4): 281–312.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chia, R. 1995. “From Modern to Postmodern Organizational Analysis.” Organization Studies 16 (4): 579–604. doi:10.1177/017084069501600406.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chia, R., and H. Tsoukas. 2003. “Everything Flows and Nothing Abides: Towards A “Rhizomic” Model of Organizational Change, Transformation and Action.” Process Studies 32 (2): 196–224. doi:10.5840/process20033223.
   Google Scholar
• Chowdhury, M. F. 2015. “Coding, Sorting and Sifting of Qualitative Data Analysis: Debates and Discussion.” Quality & Quantity 49 (3): 1135–1143. doi:10.1007/s11135-014-0039-2.
   Google Scholar
• Clegg, S. R., N. X. Phillips, and D. Courpasson. 2014. Power and Organizations. London: SAGE Publications Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Colebrook, C. 2002. Understanding Deleuze. Crows Nest, N.S.W: Allen & Unwin.
   Google Scholar
• Collin, S.-O. Y., and J. Ahlberg. 2012. “Blood in the Boardroom: Family Relationships Influencing the Functions of the Board.” Journal of Family Business Strategy 3 (4): 207–219. doi:10.1016/j.jfbs.2012.11.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Corley, K., and D. A. Gioia. 2004. “Identity Ambiguity and Change in the Wake of a Corporate spin-off.” Administrative Science Quarterly 49 (2): 173–208. doi:10.2307/4131471.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dalpiaz, E., P. Tracey, and N. Phillips. 2014. “Succession Narratives in Family Business: The Case of Alessi.” Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice 38 (6): 1375–1394. doi:10.1111/etap.12129.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deleuze, G., and F. Guattari. 1987. A Thousand Plateaus. Minneapolis: The University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Denzin, N. 1970. “Strategies of Multiple Triangulation.” The Research Act in Sociology: A Theoretical Introduction to Sociological Method 297: 313.
   Google Scholar
• Discua Cruz, A., E. Hamilton, and S. L. Jack. 2012. “Understanding Entrepreneurial Cultures in Family Businesses: A Study of Family Entrepreneurial Teams in Honduras.” Journal of Family Business Strategy 3 (3): 147–161. doi:10.1016/j.jfbs.2012.05.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Drakopoulou Dodd, S., and A. R. Anderson. 2007. “Mumpsimus and the Mything of the Individualistic Entrepreneur.” International Small Business Journal 25 (4): 341–360. doi:10.1177/0266242607078561.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Drakopoulou Dodd, S., A. R. Anderson, and S. Jack. 2013. “Being in Time and the Family Owned Firm.” Scandinavian Journal of Management 29 (1): 35–47. doi:10.1016/j.scaman.2012.11.006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edmondson, A. C., and S. E. Mcmanus. 2007. “Methodological Fit in Management Field Research.” Academy of Management Review 32 (4): 1246–1264. doi:10.5465/amr.2007.26586086.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eisenhardt, K. M., and M. E. Graebner. 2007. “Theory Building From Cases: Opportunities And Challenges.” Academy of Management Journal 50 (1): 25–32. doi:10.5465/amj.2007.24160888.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elfring, T., K. Klyver, and E. van Burg. 2021. Entrepreneurship as Networking: Mechanisms, Dynamics, Practices, and Strategies. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Erikson, T., R. Sørheim, and B. Reitan. 2003. “Family Angels Vs. Other Informal Investors.” Family Business Review 16 (3): 163–171. doi:10.1177/08944865030160030201.
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, M. 1970. “The Archaeology of Knowledge.” Information (International Social Science Council) 9 (1): 175–185. doi:10.1177/053901847000900108.
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, M. 1980. Power/knowledge: Selected Interviews and Other Writings, 1972-1977. New York: Pantheon Books.
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, M. 1985. The History of Sexuality. Vol. 2: The Use of Pleasure. New York: Pantheon.
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, M. 1997. The Essential Works of Foucault, 1954-1984. New York: New Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fox, M., and K. Wade-Benzoni. 2017. “The Creation of Opportunity Is an Opportunity to Create: Entrepreneurship as an Outlet for the Legacy Motive.” Research in Organizational Behavior 37: 167–184. doi:10.1016/j.riob.2017.10.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gaddefors, J., and A. R. Anderson. 2008. “Market Creation: The Epitome of Entrepreneurial Marketing Practices.” Journal of Research in Marketing and Entrepreneurship 10 (1): 19–39. doi:10.1108/01443571010996217.
   Google Scholar
• Gaddefors, J., and A. R. Anderson. 2017. “Entrepreneurship and Context: When Entrepreneurship Is Greater than Entrepreneurs.” International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behavior & Research 23 (2): 267–278. doi:10.1108/IJEBR-01-2016-0040.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gaddefors, J., and A. R. Anderson. 2019. “Romancing the Rural: Reconceptualizing Rural Entrepreneurship as Engagement with Context(s).” The International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Innovation 20 (3): 159–169. doi:10.1177/1465750318785545.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gartner, W. B., B. J. Bird, and J. A. Starr. 1992. “Acting as If: Differentiating Entrepreneurial from Organizational Behavior.” Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice 16 (3): 13–32. doi:10.1177/104225879201600302.
   Google Scholar
• Gartner, W. B. 1993. “Words Lead to Deeds: Towards an Organizational Emergence Vocabulary.” Journal of Business Venturing 8 (3): 231–239. doi:10.1016/0883-9026(93)90029-5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gioia, D. A., K. G. Corley, and A. L. Hamilton. 2013. “Seeking Qualitative Rigor in Inductive Research: Notes on the Gioia Methodology.” Organizational Research Methods 16 (1): 15–31. doi:10.1177/1094428112452151.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goss, D., R. Jones, M. Betta, and J. Latham. 2011. “Power as Practice: A Micro-sociological Analysis of the Dynamics of Emancipatory Entrepreneurship.” Organization Studies 32 (2): 211–229. doi:10.1177/0170840610397471.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Helin, J. 2011. Living Moments in Family Meetings: A Process Study in the Family Business Context. Jönköping: International Business School.
   Google Scholar
• Helin, J., T. Hernes, D. Hjorth, and R. Holt. 2014. Process Is How Process Does. Vol. 1. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Henfridsson, O., and Y. Yoo. 2014. “The Liminality of Trajectory Shifts in Institutional Entrepreneurship.” Organization Science 25 (3): 932–950. doi:10.1287/orsc.2013.0883.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hjorth, D. 2014. “Entrepreneuring as organisation-creation.” In Handbook of Research on Entrepreneurship and Creativity, edited by R. Sternberg and G. Krauss, 97–121, Cheltenham, Uk: Edward Elgar Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Hjorth, D., R. Holt, and C. Steyaert. 2015. “Entrepreneurship and Process Studies.” International Small Business Journal: Researching Entrepreneurship 33 (6): 599–611. doi:10.1177/0266242615583566.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hjorth, D., and A. Dawson. 2016. “The Burden of History in the Family Business Organization.” Organization Studies 37 (8): 1089–1111. doi:10.1177/0170840615613375.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hjorth, D., and T. Reay. 2018. “Organization Studies : Moving Entrepreneurially Ahead.” Organization Studies 39 (1): 7–18. doi:10.1177/0170840617749677.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holt, R., and A. Popp. 2013. “Emotion, Succession, and the Family Firm: Josiah Wedgwood & Sons.” Business History 55 (6): 892–909. doi:10.1080/00076791.2012.744588.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huault, I., V. Perret, and A. Spicer. 2014. “Beyond Macro- and Micro- Emancipation: Rethinking Emancipation in Organization Studies.” Organization 21 (1): 22–49. doi:10.1177/1350508412461292.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hytti, U., G. A. Alsos, J. Heinonen, and E. Ljunggren. 2017. “Navigating the Family Business: A Gendered Analysis of Identity Construction of Daughters.” International Small Business Journal: Researching Entrepreneurship 35 (6): 665–686. doi:10.1177/0266242616675924.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jack, S. L., and A. R. Anderson 1999. “The Effects of Embeddedness upon the Entrepreneurial Process.” Paper presented at the Global Entrepreneurship Research Conference, New Orleans, United States.
   Google Scholar
• Jack, S. L., and A. R. Anderson. 2002. “The Effects of Embeddedness on the Entrepreneurial Process.” Journal of Business Venturing 17 (5): 467–487. doi:10.1016/S0883-9026(01)00076-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jack, S., S. Moult, A. R. Anderson, and S. Dodd. 2010. “An Entrepreneurial Network Evolving: Patterns of Change.” International Small Business Journal 28 (4): 315–337. doi:10.1177/0266242610363525.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Janjuha-Jivraj, S., and L. J. Spence. 2009. “The Nature of Reciprocity in Family Firm Succession.” International Small Business Journal: Researching Entrepreneurship 27 (6): 702–719. doi:10.1177/0266242609344252.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jennings, J. E., P. D. Jennings, and M. Sharifian. 2014. “Living the Dream? Assessing the ‘Entrepreneurship as Emancipation’ Perspective in a Developed Region.” Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice 40 (1): 81–110. doi:10.1111/etap.12106.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johannisson, B. 2011. “Towards a Practice Theory of Entrepreneuring.” Small Business Economics 36 (2): 135–150. doi:10.1007/s11187-009-9212-8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kelly, L. M., N. Athanassiou, and W. F. Crittenden. 2000. “Founder Centrality and Strategic Behavior in the Family-Owned Firm.” Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice 25 (2): 27–42. doi:10.1177/104225870002500202.
   Google Scholar
• King, M. F., and G. C. Bruner. 2000. “Social Desirability Bias: A Neglected Aspect of Validity Testing.” Psychology and Marketing 17 (2): 79–103. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1520-6793(200002)17:2<79::AID-MAR2>3.0.CO;2-0.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knights, D. 2002. “Writing Organizational Analysis into Foucault.” Organization 9 (4): 575–593. doi:10.1177/135050840294004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kotlar, J., and J. J. Chrisman. 2019. “Point: How Family Involvement Influences Organizational Change.” Journal of Change Management 19 (1): 26–36. doi:10.1080/14697017.2017.1419804.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kraus, S., J. B. Craig, C. Dibrell, and S. Märk. 2012. “Family Firms and Entrepreneurship: Contradiction or Synonym?” Journal of Small Business & Entrepreneurship 25 (2): 135–139. doi:10.1080/08276331.2012.10593564.
   Google Scholar
• Laine, L., and E. Kibler. 2020. “The Social Imaginary of Emancipation in Entrepreneurship.” Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice 46(2): 393–420. doi:10.1177/1042258720959251.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lal, S., M. Suto, and M. Ungar. 2012. “Examining the Potential of Combining the Methods of Grounded Theory and Narrative Inquiry: A Comparative Analysis Qualitative Report. 17(21): 1–22.
   Google Scholar
• Lam, W. 2011. “Dancing to Two Tunes: Multi-entity Roles in the Family Business Succession Process.” International Small Business Journal: Researching Entrepreneurship 29 (5): 508–533. doi:10.1177/0266242610376357.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Langley, A., and H. Tsoukas. 2010. “Introducing Perspectives on Process Organization Studies.” In Process, Sensemaking, and Organizing, edited by T. Hernes and S. Maitlis, 1–27. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lefebvre, V., M. Radu-Lefebvre, W. B. Gartner, and J. Clarke. 2021. “Building Multitemporal Awareness and Reflexivity in Family Business: A Visual Sensemaking Exercise.” Entrepreneurship Education and Pedagogy 4 (2): 194–203. doi:10.1177/2515127420921388.
   Google Scholar
• Locke, K. 1996. “Rewriting the Discovery of Grounded Theory after 25 Years?” Journal of Management Inquiry 5 (3): 239–245. doi:10.1177/105649269653008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marcuse, H. 2013. One-Dimensional Man: Studies in the Ideology of Advanced Industrial Society. Hoboken: Taylor and Francis.
   Google Scholar
• Marlow, S., and M. McAdam. 2012. “Analyzing the Influence of Gender upon High-Technology Venturing within the Context of Business Incubation.” Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice 36 (4): 655–676. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6520.2010.00431.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marlow, S., and M. McAdam. 2015. “Incubation or Induction? Gendered Identity Work in the Context of Technology Business Incubation.” Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice 39 (4): 791–816. doi:10.1111/etap.12062.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martinez Dy, A., L. Martin, and S. Marlow. 2018. “Emancipation through Digital Entrepreneurship? A Critical Realist Analysis.” Organization 25 (5): 585–608. doi:10.1177/1350508418777891.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McAdam, M., and S. Marlow. 2013. “A Gendered Critique of the Copreneurial Business Partnership: Exploring the Implications for Entrepreneurial Emancipation.” The International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Innovation 14 (3): 151–163. doi:10.5367/ijei.2013.0120.
   Google Scholar
• McAdam, M., C. Crowley, and R. T. Harrison. 2019. “To Boldly Go Where No [Man] Has Gone before”-Institutional Voids and the Development of Women’s Digital Entrepreneurship.” Technological Forecasting and Social Change 146: 912–922. doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2018.07.051.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miles, M. B., and A. M. Huberman. 1994. Qualitative Data Analysis: An Expanded Sourcebook. 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Monticelli, J. M., R. Bernardon, and G. Trez. 2018. “Family as an Institution: The Influence of Institutional Forces in Transgenerational Family Businesses.” International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behavior & Research 26 (1): 54–75. doi:10.1108/IJEBR-10-2017-0403.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morris, M. H., D. F. Kuratko, M. Schindehutte, and A. J. Spivack. 2012. “Framing the Entrepreneurial Experience.” Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice 36 (1): 11–40. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6520.2011.00471.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murithi, W., N. Vershinina, and P. Rodgers. 2019. “Where Less Is More: Institutional Voids and Business Families in Sub-Saharan Africa.” International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behavior & Research 26 (1): 158–174. doi:10.1108/IJEBR-07-2017-0239.
   Google Scholar
• Naldi, L., M. Nordqvist, K. Sjöberg, and J. Wiklund. 2007. “Entrepreneurial Orientation, Risk Taking, and Performance in Family Firms.” Family Business Review 20 (1): 33–47. doi:10.1111/j.1741-6248.2007.00082.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ojediran, F. O., and A. Anderson. 2020. “Women’s Entrepreneurship in the Global South: Empowering and Emancipating?” Administrative Sciences 10 (4): 87. doi:10.3390/admsci10040087.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Polanyi, K. 1957. “The Economy as Instituted Process.” In Trade and Markets in the Early Empires, edited by K. Polanyi, C. M. Arensberg, and H. W. Pearson, 243–269. Chicago, IL: Regnery.
   Google Scholar
• Qiu, H., and M. Freel. 2020. “Managing Family-Related Conflicts in Family Businesses: A Review and Research Agenda.” Family Business Review 33 (1): 90–113. doi:10.1177/0894486519893223.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Radu-Lefebvre, M., V. Lefebvre, J. Clarke, and W. B. Gartner. 2020. “Entrepreneurial Legacy: How Narratives of the Past, Present and Future Affect Entrepreneurship in Business Families.” In A. Calabro, A Research Agenda for Family Business, 73–85. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Radu-Lefebvre, M., and K. Randerson. 2020. “Successfully Navigating the Paradox of Control and Autonomy in Succession: The Role of Managing Ambivalent Emotions.” International Small Business Journal 38 (3): 184–210. doi:10.1177/0266242619879078.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Radu-Lefebvre, M. 2021. “The Successor Conundrum: A Moral Dilemma. Family Entrepreneurship: Insights from Leading Experts on Successful Multi-Generational Entrepreneurial Families.” In Family Entrepreneurship: Insights from Leading Experts on Successful Multi-generational Entrepreneurial Families, edited by M. R. Allen and W. B. Gartner, 173–182, Springer: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Ramírez‐Pasillas, M., H. Lundberg, and M. Nordqvist. 2021. “Next Generation External Venturing Practices in Family Owned Businesses.” Journal of Management Studies 58 (1): 63–103. doi:10.1111/joms.12566.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Randerson, K., C. Bettinelli, A. Fayolle, and A. Anderson. 2015. “Family Entrepreneurship as a Field of Research: Exploring Its Contours and Contents.” Journal of Family Business Strategy 6 (3): 143–154. doi:10.1016/j.jfbs.2015.08.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richards, M., N. Kammerlander, and T. Zellweger. 2019. “Listening to the Heart or the Head? Exploring the “Willingness versus Ability” Succession Dilemma.” Family Business Review. 24, 330–353.
   Google Scholar
• Rindova, V., D. Barry, and D. J. Ketchen. 2009. “Entrepreneuring as Emancipation.” Academy of Management Review 34 (3): 477–491. doi:10.5465/amr.2009.40632647.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rose, M. B. 1993. “Beyond Buddenbrooks: The Management of Family Business Succession in nineteenth-century in Britain.” In Entrepreneurship, Networks, and Modern Business, edited by J. Brown and M. B. Rose. Manchester; New York: Manchester University Press : St. Martin’s Press. 127–143.
   Google Scholar
• Shen, W., and A. A. Cannella. 2002. “Power Dynamics within Top Management and Their Impacts on CEO Dismissal Followed by inside Succession.” Academy of Management Journal 45: 1195–1206.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sonfield, M. C., and R. N. Lussier. 2004. “First-, Second-, and Third-Generation Family Firms: A Comparison.” Family Business Review 17 (3): 189–201. doi:10.1111/j.1741-6248.2004.00013.x.
   Google Scholar
• Steyaert, C. 2004. “The Prosaics of Entrepreneurship.” In Narrative and Discursive Approaches in Entrepreneurship, edited by D. Hjorth and C. Steyaert, 8–21. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Steyaert, C. 2007. “Entrepreneuring’ as A Conceptual Attractor? A Review of Process Theories in 20 Years of Entrepreneurship Studies.” Entrepreneurship & Regional Development 19 (6): 453–477. doi:10.1080/08985620701671759.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Toledano, N., and A. R. Anderson. 2020. “Theoretical Reflections on Narrative in Action Research.” Action Research 18 (3): 302–318. doi:10.1177/1476750317748439.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Uhlaner, L. M., F. W. Kellermanns, K. A. Eddleston, and F. Hoy. 2012. “The Entrepreneuring Family: A New Paradigm for Family Business Research.” Small Business Economics 38 (1): 1–11. doi:10.1007/s11187-010-9263-x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Uzzi, B. 1996. “The Sources and Consequences of Embeddedness for the Economic Performance of Organizations: The Network Effect.” American Sociological Review 61 (4): 674–698. doi:10.2307/2096399.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Veliyath, R., and K. Ramaswamy. 2000. “Social Embeddedness, Overt and Covert Power, and Their Effects on CEO Pay: An Empirical Examination among Family Businesses in India.” Family Business Review 13 (4): 293–312. doi:10.1111/j.1741-6248.2000.00293.x.
   Google Scholar
• Verduijn, K., and C. Essers. 2013. “Questioning Dominant Entrepreneurship Assumptions: The Case of Female Ethnic Minority Entrepreneurs.” Entrepreneurship & Regional Development 25 (7–8): 612–630. doi:10.1080/08985626.2013.814718.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verduijn, K., P. Dey, D. Tedmanson, and C. Essers. 2014. “Emancipation and/or Oppression? Conceptualizing Dimensions of Criticality in Entrepreneurship Studies.” International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behavior & Research 20: 98–107. doi:10.1108/IJEBR-02-2014-0031.
   Google Scholar
• Verduyn, K., and C. Essers. 2017. “A Critical Reflection on Female Migrant Entrepreneurship in the Netherlands.” In Critical Perspectives on Entrepreneurship, 161–176. Oxon and New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Veyne, P. 2010. Foucault, His Thought, His Character. Cambridge, UK; Malden, MA: Polity.
   Google Scholar
• Whetten, D., P. Foreman, and W. G. Dyer. 2014. “Organizational Identity and Family Business.” In The SAGE Handbook of Family Business, edited by L. Melin, M. Nordqvist, and P. Sharma, 480–497. Los Angeles, California: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Wong, Y.-J., S.-C. Chang, and L.-Y. Chen. 2010. “Does a Family-controlled Firm Perform Better in Corporate Venturing?” Corporate Governance: An International Review 18 (3): 175–192. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8683.2010.00792.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xiong, L., I. Ukanwa, and A.R. Anderson. 2020. “Institutional Influence and the Role of Family in Poor Women’s Micropreneurship.” International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behavior & Research 26 (1): 122–140. doi:10.1108/IJEBR-05-2017-0162.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yin, R. K. 2018. Case Study Research and Applications: Design and Methods. Los Angeles: SAGE.
   Google Scholar