137
Views
7
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Article

Somatosensory cortex excitability changes due to differences in instruction conditions of motor imagery

, , , , , , & show all
Pages 151-157 | Received 21 Mar 2017, Accepted 14 Aug 2017, Published online: 21 Sep 2017

References

  • Allison T, McCarthy G, Wood CC, Darcey TM, Spencer DD, Williamson PD. 1989. Human cortical potentials evoked by stimulation of the median nerve. I. Cytoarchitectonic areas generating short-latency activity. J Neurophysiol 62:694–710.
  • Al-Rawi MAW, Hamdan FB, Abdul-Muttalib AK. 2009. Somatosensory evoked potentials as a predictor for functional recovery of the upper limb in patients with stroke. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Di 18:262–268.
  • Amemiya K, Ishizu T, Ayabe T, Kojima S. 2010. Effects of motor imagery on intermanual transfer: A near-infrared spectroscopy and behavioural study. Brain Res 1343:93–103.
  • Beukelaar TT, Alaerts K, Swinnen SP, Wenderoth N. 2016. Motor facilitation during action observation: The role of M1 and PMv in grasp predictions. Cortex 75:180–192.
  • Bonda E, Petrides M, Frey S, Evans A. 1995. Neural correlates of mental transformations of the body-in-space. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 92:11180–11184.
  • Buccino G. 2014. Action observation treatment: a novel tool in neurorehabilitation. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 369:20130185.
  • Callow N, Hardy L. 2004. The relationship between the use of kinaesthetic imagery and different visual imagery perspectives. J Sports Sci 22:167–177.
  • Coppola G, Pasqua V, PierellI F, Schoene J. 2012. Effects of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation on somatosensory evoked potentials and high frequency oscillations in migraine. Int Headache Soci 32:700–709.
  • Decety J, Jeannerod M. 1995. Mentally simulated movements in virtual reality: does Fitts's law hold in motor imagery? Behav Brain Res 72:127–134.
  • Eaves DL, Riach M, Holmes PS, Wright DJ. 2016. Motor imagery during action observation: a brief review of evidence, theory and future research opportunities. Front Neurosci 10:514.
  • Fadiga L, Fogassi L, Pavesi G, Rizzolatti G. 1995. Motor facilitation during action observation: a magnetic stimulation study. J Neurophysiol 73:2608–2611.
  • Hasegawa T, Sagari A, Tanaka K, Iso N, Tabira T. 2011. The change in excitability of the somatosensory area during motor imagery in the observation of self-movement with a mirror box. Sogo Rihabiriteshon 39:1075–1079.
  • Hua L, Luping S, Tong Z. 2014. Changes in brain activation in stroke patients after mental practice and physical exercise: a functional MRI study. Neural Regener Res 9:1474–1484.
  • Iwamura Y. 1998. Hierarchical somatosensory processing. Curr Opin Neurobiol 8:522–552.
  • Jeannerod M, Decety J. 1995. Mental motor imagery: a window into the representational stages of action. Curr Opin Neurobiol 5:727–732.
  • Jeannerod M. 2001. Neural simulation of action: a unifying mechanism for motor cognition. Neuroimage 14:S103–S109.
  • Li S, Stevens JA, Rymer WZ. 2009. Interactions between imagined movement and the initiation of voluntary movement: A TMS study. Neuroimage 120:1154–1160.
  • Lotze M, Scheler G, Tan H-RM, Braun C, Birbaumer N. 2003. The musician's brain: Functional imaging of amateurs and professionals during performance and imagery. Neuroimage 20:1817–1829.
  • Machado S, Lattari E, de S, AS, Rocha NBF, Yuan T-F, Paes F, Wegner M, Budde H, Nardi AE, Arias-Carrión O. 2015. Is mental practice an effective adjunct therapeutic strategy for upper limb motor restoration after stroke? A systematic review and meta-analysis. CNS Neuro Disord Drug Targets 14:567–75.
  • Mihara M, Miyai I, Hattori N, Hatakenaka M, Yagura H, Kawano T, Okibayashi M, Danjo N, Ishikawa A, Inoue Y, Kubota K. 2012. Neurofeedback using real-time near-infrared spectroscopy enhances motor imagery related cortical activation. PLoS One 7:e32234.
  • Miyazaki M, Fujii E, Saijo T, Mori K, Kagami S. 2007. Somatosensory evoked potentials in attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder and tic disorder. Clin Neurophysiol 118:1286–1290.
  • Mizuguchi N, Sakamoto M, Muraoka T, Kanosue K. 2009. Influence of touching an object on corticospinal excitability during motor imagery. Exp Brain Res 196:529–535.
  • Mizuguchi N, Sakamoto M, Muraoka T, Nakagawa K, Kanazawa S, Nakata H, Moriyama N, Kanosue K. 2011. The modulation of corticospinal excitability during motor imagery of actions with objects. PLoS One 6:e26006.
  • Nakata H, Inui K, Wasaka T, Nishihira Y, Kakigi R. 2003. Mechanisms of differences in gating effects on short- and long-latency somatosensory evoked potentials relating to movement. Brain Topogr 15:211–22.
  • Nakata H, Sakamoto K, Yumoto M, Kakigi R. 2011. The relationship in gating effects between short-latency and long-latency somatosensory-evoked potentials. NeuroReport 22:1000–1004.
  • Nishihira Y, Araki H, Ishihara A. 1990. Suppression of cerebral evoked potentials preceding rapid reaction movement. J Sports Med Phys Fitness 30:291–296.
  • Ruby P, Decety J. 2001. Effect of subjective perspective taking during simulation of action: A PET investigation of agency. Nat Neurosci 4:546–550.
  • Sharma N, Simmons LH, Jones PS, Day DJ, Carpenter TA, Pomeroy VM, Warburton EA, Baron JC. 2009. Motor imagery after subcortical stroke: A functional magnetic resonance imaging study. Stroke 40:1315–1324.
  • Stinear CM, Byblow WD, Steyvers M, Levin O, Swinnen SP. 2006. Kinesthetic, but not visual, motor imagery modulates corticomotor excitability. Exp Brain Res 168:157–164.
  • Tanakaa M, Kubotaa S, Onmyojia Y, Hiranoa M, Ueharaa K, Morishitaa T, Funasea K. 2015. Effect of tactile stimulation on primary motor cortex excitability during action observation combined with motor imagery. Neurosci Lett 600:1–5.
  • Tsukazaki I, Uehara K, Morishita T, Ninomiya M, Funase K. 2012. Effect of observation combined with motor imagery of a skilled hand-motor task on motor cortical excitability: Difference between novice and expert. Neurosci Lett 518:96–100.
  • Tucker M, Ellis R. 2004. Action priming by briefly presented objects. Acta Psychol (Amst) 116:185–203.
  • Vogt S, Di Rienzo F, Collet C, Collins A, Guillot A. 2013. Multiple roles of motor imagery during action observation. Front Hum Neurosci 7:807
  • Voisin JI, Mercier C, Jackson PL, Richards CL. 2011. Is somatosensory excitability more affected by the perspective or modality content of motor imagery? Neurosci Lett 493:33–37.
  • Wriessnegger SC, Kurzmann J, Neuper C. 2008. Spatio-temporal differences in brain oxygenation between movement execution and imagery: A multichannel near-infrared spectroscopy study. J Neurophysiol 67:54–63.
  • Wright DJ, McCormick SA, Williams J, Holmes PS. 2016. Viewing instructions accompanying action observation modulate corticospinal excitability. Front Hum Neurosci 10:17.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.