Psychophysical principles of discrete event-driven vibrotactile feedback for prostheses

References

• Abiri A, Juo Y-Y, Tao A, Askari SJ, Pensa J, Bisley JW, Dutson EP, Grundfest WS. 2019. Artificial palpation in robotic surgery using haptic feedback. Surg Endosc. 33(4):1252–1259.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aboseria M, Clemente F, Engels LF, Cipriani C. 2018. Discrete vibro-tactile feedback prevents object slippage in hand prostheses more intuitively than other modalities. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng. 26(8):1577–1584.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Antfolk C, Björkman A, Frank S-O, Sebelius F, Lundborg G, Rosen B. 2012. Sensory feedback from a prosthetic hand based on air-mediated pressure from the hand to the forearm skin. J Rehabil Med. 44(8):702–707.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Antfolk C, D'Alonzo M, Controzzi M, Lundborg G, Rosén B, Sebelius F, Cipriani C. 2013. Artificial redirection of sensation from prosthetic fingers to the phantom hand map on transradial amputees: vibrotactile versus mechanotactile sensory feedback. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng. 21(1):112–120.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bark K, Hyman E, Tan F, Cha E, Jax SA, Buxbaum LJ, Kuchenbecker KJ. 2015. Effects of vibrotactile feedback on human learning of arm motions. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng. 23(1):51–63.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barone D, D'Alonzo M, Controzzi M, Clemente F, Cipriani C. 2017. A cosmetic prosthetic digit with bioinspired embedded touch feedback. IEEE Int Conf Rehabil Robot. 2017:1136–1141; A cosmetic prosthetic digit with bioinspired embedded touch feedback. Proceedings of the 2017 International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics; London.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Berg JA, Dammann JF, Tenore FV, Tabot GA, Boback JL, Manfredi LR, Peterson ML, Katyal KD, Johannes MS, Makhlin A, et al. 2013. Behavioral demonstration of a somatosensory neuroprosthesis. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng. 21(3):500–507.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bernstein LE, Schechter MB, Goldstein J. 1986. Child and adult vibrotactile thresholds for sinusoidal and pulsatile stimuli. J Acoust Soc Am. 80(1):118–123.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Biddiss E, Beaton D, Chau T. 2007. Consumer design priorities for upper limb prosthetics. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2(6):346–357.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Biddiss E, Chau T. 2007. Upper-limb prosthetics: critical factors in device abandonment. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 86(12):977–987.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bolanowski SJ, Gescheider GA, Verrillo RT, Checkosky CM. 1988. Four channels mediate the mechanical aspects of touch. J Acoust Soc Am. 84(5):1680–1694.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bolanowski SJ, Gescheider GA, Verrillo RT. 1994. Hairy skin: psychophysical channels and their physiological substrates. Somatosens Mot Res. 11(3):279–290.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cesini I, Martini E, Filosa M, Spigler G, Sabatini AM, Vitiello N, Oddo CM, Crea S. 2020. Perception of time-discrete haptic feedback on the waist is invariant with gait events. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng. doi:10.1109/TNSRE.2020.2984913
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chatterjee A, Chaubey P, Martin J, Thakor N. 2008. Testing a prosthetic haptic feedback simulator with an interactive force matching task. JPO J Prosthetics Orthot. 20(2):27–34.
   Google Scholar
• Cipriani C, Segil JL, Clemente F, ff Weir R, Edin B. 2014. Humans can integrate feedback of discrete events in their sensorimotor control of a robotic hand. Exp Brain Res. 232(11):3421–3429.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clemente F, D'Alonzo M, Controzzi M, Edin BB, Cipriani C. 2016. Non-invasive, temporally discrete feedback of object contact and release improves grasp control of closed-loop myoelectric transradial prostheses. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng. 24(12):1314–1322.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D’Alonzo M, Dosen S, Cipriani C, Farina D. 2014. HyVE-hybrid vibro-electrotactile stimulation-is an efficient approach to multi-channel sensory feedback. IEEE Trans Haptics. 7(2):181–190.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D’Anna E, Valle G, Mazzoni A, Strauss I, Iberite F, Patton J, Petrini FM, Raspopovic S, Granata G, Di Iorio R, et al. 2019. A closed-loop hand prosthesis with simultaneous intraneural tactile and position feedback. Sci Robot. 4(27):eaau8892.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dhillon GS, Horch KW. 2005. Direct neural sensory feedback and control of a prosthetic arm. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng. 13(4):468–472.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flanagan JR, Bowman MC, Johansson RS. 2006. Control strategies in object manipulation tasks. Curr Opin Neurobiol. 16(6):650–659.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flores G, Kurniawan SR, Manduchi R, Martinson E, Morales L, Sisbot EA. 2015. Vibrotactile guidance for wayfinding of blind walkers. IEEE Trans Haptics. 8(3):306–317.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frisina RD, Gescheider GA. 1977. Comparison of child and adult vibrotactile thresholds as a function of frequency and duration. Percept Psychophys. 22(1):100–103.
   Google Scholar
• Geng B, Dong J, Jensen W, Dosen S, Farina D, Kamavuako EN. 2018. Psychophysical evaluation of subdermal electrical stimulation in relation to prosthesis sensory feedback. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng. 26(3):709–715.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geng B, Yoshida K, Jensen W. 2011. Impacts of selected stimulation patterns on the perception threshold in electrocutaneous stimulation. J Neuroengineering Rehabil. 8(1):9.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• George JA, Kluger DT, Davis TS, Wendelken SM, Okorokova EV, He Q, Duncan CC, Hutchinson DT, Thumser ZC, Beckler DT, et al. 2019. Biomimetic sensory feedback through peripheral nerve stimulation improves dexterous use of a bionic hand. Sci Robot. 4(32):eaax2352.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gescheider GA, Bolanowski SJ, Hall KL, Hoffman KE, Verrillo RT. 1994. The effects of aging on information-processing channels in the sense of touch : I. Absolute sensitivity. Somatosens Mot Res. 11(4):345–357.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gescheider GA, Bolanowski SJ, Verrillo RT. 2004. Some characteristics of tactile channels. Behav Brain Res. 148(1–2):35–40.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gescheider GA, Güçlü B, Sexton JL, Karalunas S, Fontana A. 2005. Spatial summation in the tactile sensory system: probability summation and neural integration. Somatosens Mot Res. 22(4):255–268.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gescheider GA. 1997. Psyhophysics: the fundamentals. 3rd ed. Mahwah (NJ): Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Greenspan JD, Bolanowski SJ. 1996. The psychophysics of tactile perception and its peripheral physiological basis. In: Kruger L, editor. Handbook of Perception and Cognition Pain and Touch. San Diego (CA): Academic Press; p. 25–103.
   Google Scholar
• Güçlü B, Bolanowski SJ. 2005. Vibrotactile thresholds of the Non-Pacinian I channel: I. Methodological issues. Somatosens Mot Res. 22(1–2):49–56.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Güçlü B, Dinçer ŞM. 2013. Neural coding in the Non-Pacinian I tactile channel: a psychophysical and simulation study of magnitude estimation. Somatosens Mot Res. 30(1):1–15.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Güçlü B, Gescheider GA, Bolanowski SJ, İstefanopulos Y. 2005. Population-response model for vibrotactile spatial summation. Somatosens Mot Res. 22(4):239–253.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Güçlü B, Öztek Ç. 2007. Tactile sensitivity of children: effects of frequency, masking, and the non-Pacinian I psychophysical channel. J Exp Child Psychol. 98(2):113–130.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Güçlü B. 2007. Deviation from Weber's law in the non-Pacinian I tactile channel: a psychophysical and simulation study of intensity discrimination. Neural Comput. 19(10):2638–2664.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Howard T, Szewczyk J. 2016. Improving precision in navigating laparoscopic surgery instruments toward a planar target using haptic and visual feedback. Front Robot AI. 3:37.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johansson RS, Edin BB. 1993. Predictive feed-forward sensory control during grasping and manipulation in man. Biomed Res. 14(4):95–106.
   Google Scholar
• Johansson RS, Flanagan JR. 2009. Coding and use of tactile signals from the fingertips in object manipulation tasks. Nat Rev Neurosci. 10(5):345–359.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kapur P, Jensen M, Buxbaum LJ, Jax SA, Kuchenbecker KJ. 2010. Spatially distributed tactile feedback for kinesthetic motion guidance. Proceeding of the 2010 IEEE Haptics Symposium; Mar 25–26; Waltham, (MA): IEEE; p. 519–526.
   Google Scholar
• Karakuş İ, Şahin H, Atasoy A, Kaplanoğlu E, Özkan M, Güçlü B. 2018. Evaluation of sensory feedback from a robotic hand: a preliminary study. In: Prattichizzo D, Shinoda H, Tan H, Ruffaldi E, Frisoli A, editors. EuroHaptics 2018. Lecture Notes in Computer Science; Pisa: Springer; p. 452–463.
   Google Scholar
• Maereg AT, Nagar A, Reid D, Secco EL. 2017. Wearable vibrotactile haptic device for stiffness discrimination during virtual interactions. Front Robot AI. 4(42).
   Google Scholar
• Mahns DA, Perkins NM, Sahai V, Robinson L, Rowe MJ. 2006. Vibrotactile frequency discrimination in human hairy skin. J Neurophysiol. 95(3):1442–1450.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Makous JC, Gescheider GA, Bolanowski SJ. 1996. The effects of static indentation on vibrotactile threshold. J Acoust Soc Am. 99(5):3149–3153.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Markovic M, Schweisfurth MA, Engels LF, Bentz T, Wüstefeld D, Farina D, Dosen S. 2018. The clinical relevance of advanced artificial feedback in the control of a multi-functional myoelectric prosthesis. J Neuroeng Rehabil. 15(1):28.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Micera S, Carpaneto J, Raspopovic S. 2010. Control of hand prostheses using peripheral information. IEEE Rev Biomed Eng. 3:48–68.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mikkelsen M, He J, Tommerdahl M, Edden RAE, Mostofsky SH, Puts N. 2020. Reproducibility of flutter-range vibrotactile detection and discrimination thresholds. Sci Rep. 10(1):6528.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Pena AE, Rincon-Gonzalez L, Abbas JJ, Jung R. 2019. Effects of vibrotactile feedback and grasp interface compliance on perception and control of a sensorized myoelectric hand. PLoS One. 14(1):e0210956.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rajanna V, Vo P, Barth J, Mjelde M, Grey T, Oduola C, Hammond T. 2016. KinoHaptics: an automated, wearable, haptic assisted, physio-therapeutic system for post-surgery rehabilitation and self-care. J Med Syst. 40(3):60.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raspopovic S, Capogrosso M, Petrini FM, Bonizzato M, Rigosa J, Di Pino G, Carpaneto J, Controzzi M, Boretius T, Fernandez E. 2014. Restoring natural sensory feedback in real-time bidirectional hand prostheses. Sci Transl Med. 6(222):222ra19.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raveh E, Friedman J, Portnoy S. 2018. Evaluation of the effects of adding vibrotactile feedback to myoelectric prosthesis users on performance and visual attention in a dual-task paradigm. Clin Rehabil. 32(10):1308–1316.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raveh E, Portnoy S, Friedman J. 2018. Adding vibrotactile feedback to a myoelectric-controlled hand improves performance when online visual feedback is disturbed. Hum Mov Sci. 58:32–40.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schiefer MA, Graczyk EL, Sidik SM, Tan DW, Tyler DJ. 2018. Artificial tactile and proprioceptive feedback improves performance and confidence on object identification tasks. PLoS One. 13(12):e0207659.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schlereth T, Magerl W, Treede R-D. 2001. Spatial discrimination thresholds for pain and touch in human hairy skin. Pain. 92(1–2):187–194.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schofield JS, Shell CE, Beckler DT, Thumser ZC, Marasco PD. 2020. Long-term home-use of sensory-motor-integrated bidirectional bionic prosthetic arms promotes functional, perceptual, and cognitive changes. Front Neurosci. 14:120.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shionoiri H, Sakuragi R, Kodama R, Kajimoto H. 2018. Vibrotactile feedback to combine with swing presentation for virtual reality applications. In: Prattichizzo D, Shinoda H, Tan H, Ruffaldi E, Frisoli A, editors. EuroHaptics 2018. Lecture Notes in Computer Science; Pisa: Springer; p. 114–124.
   Google Scholar
• Stephens-Fripp B, Alici G, Mutlu R. 2018. A review of non-invasive sensory feedback methods for transradial prosthetic hands. IEEE Access. 6:6878–6899.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Svensson P, Wijk U, Björkman A, Antfolk C. 2017. A review of invasive and non-invasive sensory feedback in upper limb prostheses. Expert Rev Med Devices. 14(6):439–447.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verrillo RT, Bolanowski J. 1986. The effects of skin temperature on the psychophysical responses to vibration on glabrous and hairy skin. J Acoust Soc Am. 80(2):528–532.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verrillo RT. 1963. Effect of contactor area on the vibrotactile threshold. J Acoust Soc Am. 35(12):1962–1966.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verrillo RT. 1966a. Effect of spatial parameters on the vibrotactile threshold. J Exp Psychol. 71(4):570–575.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Verrillo RT. 1966b. Vibrotactile thresholds for hairy skin. J Exp Psychol. 72(1):47–50.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Verrillo RT. 1971. Vibrotactile thresholds measured at the finger. Percept Psychophys. 9(4):329–330.
   Google Scholar
• Verrillo RT. 1979. Comparison of vibrotactile threshold and suprathreshold responses in men and women. Percept Psychophys. 26(1):20–24.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Witteveen HJB, Droog EA, Rietman JS, Veltink PH. 2012. Vibro- and electrotactile user feedback on hand opening for myoelectric forearm prostheses. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 59(8):2219–2226.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yıldız MZ, Güçlü B. 2013. Relationship between vibrotactile detection threshold in the Pacinian channel and complex mechanical modulus of the human glabrous skin. Somatosens Mot Res. 30(1):37–47.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yıldız MZ, Toker İ, Özkan FB, Güçlü B. 2015. Effects of passive and active movement on vibrotactile detection thresholds of the Pacinian channel and forward masking. Somatosens Mot Res. 32(4):262–272.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zwislocki JJ, Relkin EM. 2001. On a psychophysical transformed-rule up and down method converging on a 75% level of correct responses. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 98(8):4811–4814.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar