Secondary somatosensory area is involved in vibrotactile temporal-structure processing: MEG analysis of slow cortical potential shifts in humans

References

• Battelli L, Pascual-Leone A, Cavanagh P. 2007. The ‘when’ pathway of the right parietal lobe. Trends Cogn Sci. 11(5):204–210.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bensmaïa SJ, Hollins M. 2003. The vibrations of texture. Somatosens Mot Res. 20(1):33–43.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bolker BM, Brooks ME, Clark CJ, Geange SW, Poulsen JR, Stevens MH, White JS. 2009. Generalized linear mixed models: a practical guide for ecology and evolution. Trends Ecol Evol. 24(3):127–135.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burton H, Sinclair RJ, McLaren DG. 2008. Cortical network for vibrotactile attention: a fMRI study. Hum Brain Mapp. 29(2):207–221.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caetano G, Jousmäki V. 2006. Evidence of vibrotactile input to human auditory cortex. Neuroimage. 29(1):15–28.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cascio CJ, Sathian K. 2001. Temporal cues contribute to tactile perception of roughness. J Neurosci. 21(14):5289–5296.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collins DL, Neelin P, Peters TM, Evans AC. 1994. Automatic 3D intersubject registration of MR volumetric data in standardized Talairach space. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 18(2):192–205.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Colon E, Legrain V, Mouraux A. 2012. Steady-state evoked potentials to study the processing of tactile and nociceptive somatosensory input in the human brain. Neurophysiol Clin. 42(5):315–323.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cruccu G, Aminoff MJ, Curio G, Guerit JM, Kakigi R, Mauguiere F, Rossini PM, Treede RD, Garcia-Larrea L. 2008. Recommendations for the clinical use of somatosensory-evoked potentials. Clin Neurophysiol. 119(8):1705–1719.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dale AM, Fischl B, Sereno MI. 1999. Cortical surface-based analysis. I. Segmentation and surface reconstruction. Neuroimage. 9(2):179–194.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dale AM, Liu AK, Fischl BR, Buckner RL, Belliveau JW, Lewine JD, Halgren E. 2000. Dynamic statistical parametric mapping: combining fMRI and MEG for highresolution imaging of cortical activity. Neuron. 26(1):55–67.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dale AM, Sereno MI. 1993. Improved localizadon of cortical activity by combining EEG and MEG with MRI cortical surface reconstruction: a linear approach. J Cogn Neurosci. 5(2):162–176.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fischl B, Sereno MI, Dale AM. 1999. Cortical surface-based analysis. II: inflation, flattening, and a surface-based coordinate system. Neuroimage. 9(2):195–207.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Forss N, Narici L, Hari R. 2001. Sustained activation of the human SII cortices by stimulus trains. Neuroimage. 13(3):497–501.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foxe JJ, Wylie GR, Martinez A, Schroeder CE, Javitt DC, Guilfoyle D, Ritter W, Murray MM. 2002. Auditory-somatosensory multisensory processing in auditory association cortex: an fMRI study. J Neurophysiol. 88(1):540–543.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fujiwara N, Imai M, Nagamine T, Mima T, Oga T, Takeshita K, Toma K, Shibasaki H. 2002. Second somatosensory area (SII) plays a significant role in selective somatosensory attention. Brain Res Cogn Brain Res. 14(3):389–397.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gamzu E, Ahissar E. 2001. Importance of temporal cues for tactile spatial-frequency discrimination. J Neurosci. 21(18):7416–7427.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giabbiconi CM, Dancer C, Zopf R, Gruber T, Müller MM. 2004. Selective spatial attention to left or right hand flutter sensation modulates the steady-state somatosensory evoked potential. Brain Res Cogn Brain Res. 20(1):58–66.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Giabbiconi CM, Trujillo-Barreto NJ, Gruber T, Müller MM. 2007. Sustained spatial attention to vibration is mediated in primary somatosensory cortex. Neuroimage. 35(1):255–262.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gutschalk A, Patterson RD, Rupp A, Uppenkamp S, Scherg M. 2002. Sustained magnetic fields reveal separate sites for sound level and temporal regularity in human auditory cortex. Neuroimage. 15(1):207–216.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hagiwara K, Ogata K, Okamoto T, Uehara T, Hironaga N, Shigeto H, Kira J, Tobimatsu S. 2014. Age-related changes across the primary and secondary somatosensory areas: an analysis of neuromagnetic oscillatory activities. Clin Neurophysiol. 125(5):1021–1029.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hagiwara K, Okamoto T, Shigeto H, Ogata K, Somehara Y, Matsushita T, Kira J, Tobimatsu S. 2010. Oscillatory gamma synchronization binds the primary and secondary somatosensory areas in humans. Neuroimage. 51(1):412–420.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hämäläinen MS, Ilmoniemi RJ. 1994. Interpreting magnetic fields of the brain: minimum norm estimates. Med Biol Eng Comput. 32(1):35–42.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hari R. 1980. Evoked potentials elicited by long vibrotactile stimuli in the human EEG. Pflugers Arch. 384(2):167–170.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hari R, Aittoniemi K, Järvinen ML, Katila T, Varpula T. 1980. Auditory evoked transient and sustained magnetic fields of the human brain. Localization of neural generators. Exp Brain Res. 40(2):237–240.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harvey MA, Saal HP, Dammann JF, 3rd, Bensmaia SJ. 2013. Multiplexing stimulus information through rate and temporal codes in primate somatosensory cortex. PLoS Biol. 11(5):e1001558.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hayamizu M, Hagiwara K, Hironaga N, Ogata K, Hoka S, Tobimatsu S. 2016. A spatiotemporal signature of cortical pain relief by tactile stimulation: an MEG study. Neuroimage. 130:175–183.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hironaga N, Hagiwara K, Ogata K, Hayamizu M, Urakawa T, Tobimatsu S. 2014. Proposal for a new MEG–MRI co-registration: a 3D laser scanner system. Clin Neurophysiol. 125(12):2404–2412.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hollins M, Bensmaïa SJ, Roy EA. 2002. Vibrotaction and texture perception. Behav Brain Res. 135(1–2):51–56.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hollins M, Risner SR. 2000. Evidence for the duplex theory of tactile texture perception. Percept Psychophys. 62(4):695–705.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hsiao S. 2008. Central mechanisms of tactile shape perception. Curr Opin Neurobiol. 18(4):418–424.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jamali S, Ross B. 2013. Somatotopic finger mapping using MEG: toward an optimal stimulation paradigm. Clin Neurophysiol. 124(8):1659–1670.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jiang W, Tremblay F, Chapman CE. 1997. Neuronal encoding of texture changes in the primary and the secondary somatosensory cortical areas of monkeys during passive texture discrimination. J Neurophysiol. 77(3):1656–1662.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaas AL, van Mier H, Visser M, Goebel R. 2013. The neural substrate for working memory of tactile surface texture. Hum Brain Mapp. 34(5):1148–1162.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Katz D. 1989. The world of touch. In: Krueger LE, translator. Hillsdale (NJ): Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Keceli S, Okamoto H, Kakigi R. 2015. Hierarchical neural encoding of temporal regularity in the human auditory cortex. Brain Topogr. 28(3):459–470.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kodaira M, Wasaka T, Motomura E, Tanii H, Inui K, Kakigi R. 2013. Effects of acute nicotine on somatosensory change-related cortical responses. Neuroscience. 229:20–26.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li Hegner Y, Saur R, Veit R, Butts R, Leiberg S, Grodd W, Braun C. 2007. BOLD adaptation in vibrotactile stimulation: neuronal networks involved in frequency discrimination. J Neurophysiol. 97(1):264–271.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manfredi LR, Saal HP, Brown KJ, Zielinski MC, Dammann JF, 3rd, Polashock VS, Bensmaia SJ. 2014. Natural scenes in tactile texture. J Neurophysiol. 111(9):1792–1802.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mauguiere F, Garcia-Larrea L. 2018. Somatosensory and pain evoked potentials: normal responses, abnormal waveforms, and clinical applications in neurological diseases. In: Schomer DL, Lopes da Silva FH, editors. Electroencephalography: basis principles, clinical applications, and related fields, 7 ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press; p. 1071.
   Google Scholar
• Mima T, Nagamine T, Nakamura K, Shibasaki H. 1998. Attention modulates both primary and second somatosensory cortical activities in humans: a magnetoencephalographic study. J Neurophysiol. 80(4):2215–2221.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miyaji H, Hironaga N, Umezaki T, Hagiwara K, Shigeto H, Sawatsubashi M, Tobimatsu S, Komune S. 2014. Neuromagnetic detection of the laryngeal area: sensory-evoked fields to air-puff stimulation. Neuroimage. 88:162–169.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Molins A, Stufflebeam SM, Brown EN, Hämäläinen MS. 2008. Quantification of the benefit from integrating MEG and EEG data in minimum l2-norm estimation. Neuroimage. 42(3):1069–1077.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Münte TF, Jöbges EM, Wieringa BM, Klein S, Schubert M, Johannes S, Dengler R. 1996. Human evoked potentials to long duration vibratory stimuli: role of muscle afferents. Neurosci Lett. 216(3):163–166.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nangini C, Ross B, Tam F, Graham SJ. 2006. Magnetoencephalographic study of vibrotactile evoked transient and steady-state responses in human somatosensory cortex. Neuroimage. 33(1):252–262.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Okamoto H, Kakigi R. 2015. Encoding of frequency-modulation (FM) rates in human auditory cortex. Sci Rep. 5:18143.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Onishi H, Oyama M, Soma T, Kubo M, Kirimoto H, Murakami H, Kameyama S. 2010. Neuromagnetic activation of primary and secondary somatosensory cortex following tactile-on and tactile-off stimulation. Clin Neurophysiol. 121(4):588–593.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pang CY, Mueller MM. 2014. Test-retest reliability of concurrently recorded steady-state and somatosensory evoked potentials in somatosensory sustained spatial attention. Biol Psychol. 100:86–96.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pantev C, Eulitz C, Elbert T, Hoke M. 1994. The auditory evoked sustained field: origin and frequency dependence. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 90(1):82–90.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Pleger B, Foerster AF, Ragert P, Dinse HR, Schwenkreis P, Malin JP, Nicolas V, Tegenthoff M. 2003. Functional imaging of perceptual learning in human primary and secondary somatosensory cortex. Neuron. 40(3):643–653.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Preusser S, Thiel SD, Rook C, Roggenhofer E, Kosatschek A, Draganski B, Blankenburg F, Driver J, Villringer A, Pleger B. 2015. The perception of touch and the ventral somatosensory pathway. Brain. 138(Pt 3):540–548.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rao SM, Mayer AR, Harrington DL. 2001. The evolution of brain activation during temporal processing. Nat Neurosci. 4(3):317–323.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Regan D editor. 1989. Human brain electrophysiology. Evoked potentials and evoked magnetics fields in science and medicine. New York (NY): Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Rocchi L, Casula E, Tocco P, Berardelli A, Rothwell J. 2016. Somatosensory temporal discrimination threshold involves inhibitory mechanisms in the primary somatosensory area. J Neurosci. 36(2):325–335.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Romo R, Hernandez A, Zainos A, Lemus L, Brody CD. 2002. Neuronal correlates of decision-making in secondary somatosensory cortex. Nat Neurosci. 5(11):1217–1225.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Romo R, Salinas E. 2003. Flutter discrimination: neural codes, perception, memory and decision making. Nat Rev Neurosci. 4(3):203–218.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ryun S, Kim JS, Lee H, Chung CK. 2017. Tactile frequency-specific high-gamma activities in human primary and secondary somatosensory cortices. Sci Rep. 7(1):15442.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Simões-Franklin C, Whitaker TA, Newell FN. 2011. Active and passive touch differentially activate somatosensory cortex in texture perception. Hum Brain Mapp. 32(7):1067–1080.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Snyder A. 1992. Steady-state vibration evoked potentials: descriptions of technique and characterization of responses. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 84(3):257–268.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Taulu S, Kajola M, Simola J. 2004. Suppression of interference and artifacts by the signal space separation method. Brain Topogr. 16(4):269–275.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taulu S, Simola J. 2006. Spatiotemporal signal space separation method for rejecting nearby interference in MEG measurements. Phys Med Biol. 51(7):1759–1768.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tobimatsu S, Zhang Y, Kato M. 1999. Steady-state vibration somatosensory evoked potentials: physiological characteristics and tuning function. Clin Neurophysiol. 110(11):1953–1958.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weber AI, Saal HP, Lieber JD, Cheng JW, Manfredi LR, Dammann JF, Bensmaia SJ. 2013. Spatial and temporal codes mediate the tactile perception of natural textures. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 110(42):17107–17112.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yamashiro K, Inui K, Otsuru N, Urakawa T, Kakigi R. 2011. Temporal window of integration in the somatosensory modality: an MEG study. Clin Neurophysiol. 122(11):2276–2281.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar