Age differences in tactile pattern recognition at the fingertip

References

• Bruce MF. The relation of tactile thresholds to histology in the fingers of elderly people. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1980; 43: 730–734
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cauna N. The effects of aging on the receptor organs of the human dermis. Advances in biology of skin, W Montagna. Pergamon Press, Elmsford, NY 1965; 63–96
   Google Scholar
• Gazzaley A, Cooney JW, Rissman J, D’Esposito M. Top-down suppression deficit underlies working memory impairment in normal aging. Nat Neurosci 2005; 8: 1298–1300
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hsiao SS, Lane J, Fitzgerald P. Representation of orientation in the somatosensory system. Behav Brain Res 2002; 135: 93–103
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Johnson KO. The roles and functions of cutaneous mechanoreceptors. Curr Opin Neurobiol 2001; 11: 455–461
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson KO, Phillips JR. Tactile spatial resolution. I. Two-point discrimination, gap detection, grating resolution, and letter recognition. J Neurophysiol 1981; 46: 1177–1192
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson KO, Van Boven RW, Hsiao SS. The perception of two points is not the spatial resolution threshold. Touch, temperature and pain in health and disease: Mechanisms and assessments, J Boivie, P Hansson, U Lindblom. IASP Press, Seattle 1994; 389–404
   Google Scholar
• Johnson KO, Yoshioka T, Vega-Bermudez F. Tactile functions of mechanoreceptive afferents innervating the hand. J Clin Neurophysiol 2000; 17: 539–558
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kastenbauer T, Sauseng S, Brath H, Abrahamian H, Irsigler K. The value of the Rydel–Seiffer tuning fork as a predictor of diabetic polyneuropathy compared with a neurothesiometer. Diabet Med 2004; 21: 563–567
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lederman SJ, Klatzky RL. Relative availability of surface and object properties during early haptic processing. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 1997; 23: 1680–1707
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loomis JM. On the tangibility of letters and Braille. Percept Psychophys 1981a; 29: 37–46
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loomis JM. Tactile pattern perception. Perception 1981b; 10: 5–27
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loomis JM. Analysis of tactile and visual confusion matrices. Percept Psychophys 1982; 31: 41–52
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loomis JM. A model of character recognition and legibility. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 1990; 16: 106–120
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Martina ISJ, van Koningsveld R, Schmitz PIM, van der Meche FGA, van Doorn PA. Measuring vibration threshold with a graduated tuning fork in normal aging and in patients with polyneuropathy. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1998; 65: 743–747
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pestronk A, Florence J, Levine T, Al-Lozi MT, Lopate G, Miller T, Ramneantu I, Waheed W, Stambuk M. Sensory exam with a quantitative tuning fork: Rapid, sensitive and predictive of SNAP amplitude. Neurology 2004; 62: 461–464
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Phillips JR, Johnson KO, Brown HM. A comparison of visual and two modes of tactual letter resolution. Percept Psychophys 1983; 34: 243–249
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Phillips JR, Johnson KO, Hsiao SS. Spatial pattern representation and transformation in monkeys somatosensory cortex. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1988; 85: 1317–1321
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scialfa CT. The role of sensory factors in cognitive aging research. Can J Exp Psychol 2002; 56: 153–163
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stevens JC, Alvarez-Reeves M, Dipietro L, Mack GW, Green BG. Decline of tactile acuity in aging: A study of body site, blood flow, and lifetime habits of smoking and physical activity. Somatosens Mot Res 2003; 20: 271–279
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stevens JC, Choo KK. Spatial acuity of the body surface over the life span. Somatosens Mot Res 1996; 13: 153–166
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stevens JC, Cruz LA. Spatial acuity of touch: Ubiquitous decline with aging revealed by repeated threshold testing. Somatosens Mot Res 1996; 13: 1–10
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stevens JC, Patterson MQ. Dimensions of spatial acuity in the touch sense: Changes over the life span. Somatosens Mot Res 1995; 12: 29–47
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tremblay F, Cuenco A, Backman A, Vant K, Wassef M-A. Assessment of spatial acuity at the fingertip with grating (JVP) domes: Validity for use in an elderly population. Somatosens Mot Res 2000; 17: 61–66
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tremblay F, Wong K, Sanderson R, Cote L. Tactile spatial acuity in elderly persons: Assessment with grating domes and relationship with manual dexterity. Somatosens Mot Res 2003; 20: 127–132
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Valeriani M, Ranghi F, Giaquinto S. The effects of aging on selective attention to touch: A reduced inhibitory control in elderly subjects?. Int J Psychophysiol 2003; 49: 75–87
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Boven RW, Johnson KO. The limit of tactile spatial resolution in humans: Grating orientation discrimination at the lip, tongue, and finger. Neurology 1994a; 44: 2361–2366
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Boven RW, Johnson KO. A psychophysical study of the mechanisms of sensory recovery following nerve injury in humans. Brain 1994b; 117: 149–167
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Boven RW, Johnson KO, Tilghman DM. A new clinical test for quantifying somatosensory impairment. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1991; 49: 141
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Van Boven RW, Tilghman DM, Johnson KO. Oral tactile spatial resolution: A psychophysical study. J Dent Res 1989; 68: 329
   Google Scholar
• Vega-Bermudez F, Johnson KO. Differences in spatial acuity between digits. Neurology 2001; 56: 1389–1391
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vega-Bermudez F, Johnson KO. Spatial acuity after digit amputation. Brain 2002; 125: 1256–1264
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Vega-Bermudez F, Johnson KO. Fingertip skin conformance accounts, in part, for differences in tactile spatial acuity in young subjects, but not for the decline in spatial acuity with aging. Percept Psychophys 2004; 66: 60–67
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vega-Bermudez F, Johnson KO, Hsaio SS. Human tactile pattern recognition: Active versus passive touch, velocity effect and patterns of confusion. J Neurophysiol 1991; 65: 531–546
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar