AAC Interventions for Children in a Family Environment: Implementing Evidence in Practice

References

• Alant E. Intervention issues. Augmentative and alternative communication and severe disabilities, E. Alant, L. Lloyd. Whurr Publishers, London 2005
   Google Scholar
• Albin R., Lucyshyn J., Horner R., Flannery K. Contextual fit for behavioral support plans. A model for “goodness of fit”. Positive behavioral support: Including people with difficult behavior in the community, L. Koegel, R. Koegel, G. Dunlap. Paul H. Brookes, Baltimore, MD 1996; 81–98
   Google Scholar
• Andersson I. Pedagogisk intervention för barn med autism – en systematisk review, (in press) [Educational intervention for children with autism – A systematic review]. Unpublished master's thesis, Västerås: Mälardalen University, Västerås, Sweden
   Google Scholar
• Angelo D., Kokoska S., Jones S. Family perspectives on augmentative and alternative communication: Families of adolescent and young adults. Augmentative and Alternative Communication 1996; 12: 13–20
   Google Scholar
• Björck-Åkesson E. Communicative interaction between young non-speaking physically disabled children and their primary care givers – a longitudinal study. Acta Universitatis Gothenburgensis, Gothenburg 1992
   Google Scholar
• Björck-Åkesson E., Brodin J., Fälth I.-B. Åskboken. WRP International, KalmarSweden 1997, [Book on Implementation of communication interventions]
   Google Scholar
• Blackstone S., Hunt-Berg M. Social networks: An assessment and intervention planning inventory for individuals with complex communication needs and their communication partners. Augmentative and Alternative Communication Inc, Monterey, CA 2003
   Google Scholar
• Bronfenbrenner U. Theoretical overview of the structure of the environment. Measuring environment across the life span, S. L. Fiedman, T. Wachs. American Psychological Association, Washington, DC 1999; 3–30
   Google Scholar
• Campbell P., Brook Sawyer L. Supporting learning opportunities in natural settings through participation-based services. Journal of Early Intervention 2007; 29: 287–305
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campbell D. T., Stanley J. C. Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for research. Houghton Mifflin Co. 1963
   Google Scholar
• Fager S., Hux K., Beukelman D., Karantounis R. Augmentative and alternative communication use and acceptance by adults with traumatic brain injury. Augmentative and Alternative Communication 2006; 22: 37–47
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Folkö M. Föräldrars uppfattning om givna interventioner till små barn med autism. Är åtgärderna anpassade till familjen vardag?. Mälardalen University, Västerås, Sweden, Västerås 2006, [Parents’ perceptions of interventions for young children with autism – Is there contextual fit?]. Unpublished master's thesis
   Google Scholar
• Goldbart J., Marshall J. “Pushes and pulls” on the parents of children who use AAC. Augmentative and Alternative Communication 2004; 20: 194–208
   Google Scholar
• Granlund M., Björck-Åkesson E., Alant E. Family centred early childhood intervention: New perspectives. Augmentative and alternative communication and severe disabilities – Beyond poverty, E. Alant, L. Lloyd. Whurr Publishers, London 2005; 221–242
   Google Scholar
• Green L., Glasgow R. Evaluating the relevance, applicability and generalization of research. Evaluation and the Health Professionals 2006; 29: 126–153
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hamm B., Mirenda P. Post-school quality of life for individuals with developmental disabilities who use AAC. Augmentative and Alternative Communication 2006; 22: 134–146
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harty M., Joseph N., Wilder J., Rajaram P. Support networks and support of families: Toward positive family functioning. South African Journal of Occupational Therapy 2007; 31
   Google Scholar
• Iacono T. The evidence base in augmentative and alternative communication. Evidence practice in speech pathology, S. Reilly, A. Perry, J. Douglas. Whurr Publishers, London 2003; 288–313
   Google Scholar
• Johnston S., McDonnell A., Nelson C., Magnavito A. Teaching functional communication skills using augmentative and alternative communication in inclusive settings. Journal of Early Intervention 2003; 25: 263–280
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Joseph N., Alant E. Strangers in the house? Communication between mother and their children who are hearing impaired. South African Journal of Communication Disorders 2000; 47: 15–24
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kiresuk T., Smith A., Cardillio J. Goal attainment scaling: Applications, theory and measurement. Lawrence Earlbaum, Hillsdale, New Jersey 1994
   Google Scholar
• Lancioni G., O'Reilly R., Basili G. Use of micro-switches and speech output systems with people with severe/profound intellectual or multiple disabilities: A literature review. Research in Developmental Disabilities 2001; 22: 21–40
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lund S., Light J. Long term outcomes for individuals who use augmentative and alternative communication: Part 1 – What is a good outcome?. Augmentative and Alternative Communication 2006; 22: 284–299
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Margalit M., Al-Yagon M., Kleitman T. Family subtyping and early intervention. Journal of Policy and Practice in Intellectual Disabilities 2006; 3: 33–41
   Google Scholar
• McNaughton D., Rackensperger T., Benedek-Wood E., Krezman C., Williams M., Light L. “A child needs to be given a chance to succeed”: Parents of individuals who use AAC describe the benefits and challenges of learning. Augmentative and Alternative Communication 2008; 24: 43–55
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moes D, Frea W. Using family context to inform intervention planning for the treatment of a child with autism. Journal of Positive Behavior 2000; 2: 40–46
   Google Scholar
• Moes D., Frea W. Contextualized behavioral support in early intervention for children with autism and their families. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders 2002; 32: 519–533
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ödman P. Intensive training in group for children with cerebral palsy. Linköping University Medical Dissertations No 1008, Linköping 2007
   Google Scholar
• Osher T., Osher D. The paradigm shift to true collaboration with families. Journal of Child and Family Studies 2002; 11: 47–60
   Google Scholar
• Parette H., Angelo D. Augmentative and alternative communication impact on families. Trends and future directions. Journal of Special Education 1996; 30: 77–79
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parette H., Marr D. Assisting children and families who use augmentative and alternative communication (AAC) devices: Best practices for school psychologists. Psychology in Schools 1997; 34: 337–345
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raghavendra P., Bornman J., Granlund M., Björck-Åkesson E. The World Health Organization's international classification of functioning, disability and health: Implications for clinical and research practice in the field of augmentative and alternative communication. Augmentative and Alternative Communication 2007; 23: 349–361
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Romski M. A., Sevcik R. A. Augmentative communication and early intervention: Myths and realities. Infants and Young Children 2005; 18: 174–185
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rycroft-Malone J. The PARIHS framework – A framework for guiding the implementation of evidence based practice. Journal of Nursing Care Quality 2004; 19: 297–304
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rycroft-Malone J. Implementing evidence in practice: A contact sport. StockholmSweden November, 2007, Keynote presentation at the 7th annual conference on Advances in Health Care Research
   Google Scholar
• Rycroft-Malone J., Seers K., Titchen A., Harvey G., Kitson A., McCormack B. What counts as evidence in evidence based practice?. Journal of Advanced Nursing 2004; 47: 81–90
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sevcik R., Romski M. Issues in augmentative and alternative communication in child psychiatry. Child and Adolescents Psychiatric Clinics of North America 1999; 8: 77–87
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sigafoos J., Didden R., O'Reilly M. Effects of speech output on maintenance of requesting and frequency of vocalizing in three children with developmental disabilities. Augmentative and Alternative Communication 2003; 19: 34–47
   Google Scholar
• Sigafoos J., O'Reilly S., Seely-York J., Weru J., Son S., Lancioni G. Transferring AAC intervention to the home. Disability and Rehabilitation 2004; 26: 1330–1334
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Snell M., Chen L. Y., Hoover K. Teaching augmentative and alternative communication to students with severe disabilities: A review of intervention research 1997–2003. Research and Practices for Persons with Severe Disabilities 2006; 31: 203–214
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thunstam L. Sociala nätverk och kommunikation för barn med dövhet/hörselskada och ytteligare funktionshinder. Mälardalen University, Västerås, Sweden, Västerås 2004, [Social networks and communication for children with deafness and additional impairments]. Unpublished master's thesis
   Google Scholar
• Wilder J., Granlund M. Children with multiple disabilities: Family accommodation, social networks, interaction and child characteristics. Manuscript in preparation. 2008
   Google Scholar
• WHO. International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF). World Health Organization, Geneva 2001
   Google Scholar
• WHO. International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health – Child and Youth version (ICF-CY). World Health Organization, Geneva 2007
   Google Scholar
• Ylvén R. Identifying and building on family strength – A thematic analysis. Manuscript in preparation. 2008
   Google Scholar
• Ylvén R., Björck-Åkesson E., Granlund M. Literature review of positive functioning in families with children with a disability. Journal of Policy and Practice in Intellectual Disabilities 2006; 3: 253–270
   Google Scholar