Collaborative learning through formative peer review: pedagogy, programs and potential

References

• Anewalt , K. 2005 . Using peer review as a vehicle for communication skill development and active learning . Journal of Computing in Small Colleges , 21 ( 2 ) : 148 – 155 .
   Google Scholar
• Boud , D. , Cohen , R. and Sampson , J. 2001 . Peer learning in higher education , London : Kogan Page .
   Google Scholar
• Boud , D. and Falchikov , N. 2007 . Rethinking assessment in higher education: Learning for the longer term , Oxon : Routledge .
   Google Scholar
• Brown , S. and Glasner , A. 1999 . Assessment matters in higher education: Choosing and using diverse approaches , Buckingham : Society for Research into Higher Education .
   Google Scholar
• Burkhardt , H. 2006 . “ From design research to large-scale impact: Engineering research in education [chapter 10] ” . In Educational design research , Edited by: van den Akker , J. , Gravemeijer , K. , McKenney, & , S. and Nieveen , N. London : Routledge .
   Google Scholar
• Cho , K. , Chung , T.R. , King , W.R. and Schunn , C. 2008 . Peer-based computer-supported knowledge refinement: An empirical investigation . Commmunications of the ACM , 51 : 83 – 88 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cho , K. and Schunn , C.D. 2007 . Scaffolded writing and rewriting in the discipline: A web-based reciprocal peer review system . Computers and Education , 48 : 409 – 426 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cho , K. , Schunn , C.D. and Wilson , R.W. 2006 . Validity and reliability of scaffolded peer assessment of writing from instructor and student perspectives . Journal of Educational Psychology , 98 : 891 – 901 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collis , B. and Moonen , J. 2005 . “ Contribution-oriented pedagogy ” . In Encyclopedia of distance learning , 415 – 422 . Harrisburg , PA : Information Science Reference .
   Google Scholar
• Collis , B. and Moonen , J. 2006 . “ The contributing student: Learners as co-developers of learning resources for reuse in web environments ” . In Engaged learning with emerging technologies , Edited by: Hung , D. and Khine , M.S. 49 – 67 . Dordrecht : Springer .
   Google Scholar
• Crespo , R.M. , Pardo , A. and Kloos , C. An adaptive strategy for peer review . Proceedings of the 34th ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE2004) . pp. FF3F-7 – F3F-13 . Washington, DC : IEEE Computer Society .
   Google Scholar
• Cross , K.P. 1998 . Why learning communities? Why now? . About Campus , 3 ( 3 ) : 4 – 11 .
   Google Scholar
• Denny , P. , Luxton-Reilly , A. and Hamer , J. Student use of the PeerWise system . Proceedings of the 13th Annual SIGCSE Conference on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education . pp. 73 – 77 . New York, NY : ACM .
   Google Scholar
• de Raadt , M. , Toleman , M. and Watson , R. Electronic peer review: A large cohort teaching themselves? . Proceedings of ASCILITE 2005 . Edited by: H. , Goss . pp. 159 – 168 . Retrieved September 25, 2012, from www.ascilite.org.au/conferences/brisbane05/blogs/proceedings/17_de Raadt.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Falchikov , N. 2005 . Improving assessment through student involvement , New York , NY : RoutledgeFalmer .
   Google Scholar
• Falchikov , N. 2007 . “ The place of peers in learning and assessment ” . In Rethinking assessment in higher education: Learning for the longer term , Edited by: Boud , D. and Falchikov , N. 128 – 143 . Oxon : Routledge .
   Google Scholar
• Falchikov , N. and Goldfinch , J. 2000 . Student peer assessment in higher education: A meta-analysis comparing peer and teacher marks . Review of Educational Research , 70 : 287 – 322 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garousi , V. 2010 . Applying peer reviews in software engineering education: An experiment and lessons learned . IEEE Transactions on Education , 53 : 182 – 193 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gehringer , E.F. Electronic peer review and peer grading in computer-science courses . Proceedings of the 32nd SIGCSE Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education . pp. 139 – 143 . Proceedings published as SIGCSE Bulletin 33(1)
   Google Scholar
• Gibbs , G. 1999 . “ Using assessment strategically to change the way students learn ” . In Assessment matters in higher education: Choosing and using diverse approaches , Edited by: Brown , S. and Glasner , A. 41 – 53 . Buckingham : Society for Research into Higher Education, and Open University Press .
   Google Scholar
• Gouli , E. , Gogoulou , A. and Grigoriadou , M. 2008 . Supporting self-, peer-, and collaborative-assessment in e-learning: The case of the PEer and Collaborative ASSessment Environment (PECASSE) . Journal of Interactive Learning Research , 19 ( 4 ) : 615 – 647 .
   Google Scholar
• Gruba , P. and Søndergaard , H. 2001 . A constructivist approach to communication skills instruction in computer science . Computer Science Education , 11 : 203 – 219 .
   Google Scholar
• Hämäläinen , H. , Hyyrynen , V. , Ikonen , J. and Porras , J. 2011 . Applying peer-review for programming assignments . International Journal for Information Technologies and Security , 1 : 3 – 17 .
   Google Scholar
• Hamer , J. , Cutts , Q. , Jackova , J. , Luxton-Reilly , A. , McCartney , R. , Purchase , H. … and Sheard , J. 2008 . Contributing Student Learning . SIGCSE Bulletin , 40 ( 4 ) : 194 – 212 .
   Google Scholar
• Hamer , J. , Luxton-Reilly , A. , Purchase , H.C. and Sheard , J. 2011 . Tools for “contributing student learning” . Inroads , 2 : 78 – 91 .
   Google Scholar
• Hamer , J. , Ma , K.T.K. and Kwong , H.H.F. A method of automatic grade calibration in peer assessment . Proceedings of the Seventh Australasian Computing Education Conference (ACE2004) . Edited by: Young , A. and Tolhurst , D. pp. 67 – 72 . volume 42 of Conferences in Research and Practice in Information Technology http://crpit.com/Vol42.html
   Google Scholar
• Hübscher-Younger , T. and Narayanan , N.H. Constructive and collaborative learning of algorithms . Proceedings of the 34th SIGCSE Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education . pp. 6 – 10 . New York, NY : ACM .
   Google Scholar
• Hundhausen , C. , Agrawal , A. , Fairbrother , D. and Trevisan , M. Integrating pedagogical code reviews into a CS1 course . Proceedings of the 40th SIGCSE Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education . pp. 117 – 122 . New York, NY : ACM .
   Google Scholar
• Hundhausen , C. , Agarwal , P. and Trevisan , M. Online vs face-to-face pedagogical code reviews: An empirical comparison . Proceedings of the 42nd SIGCSE Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education . pp. 117 – 122 . New York, NY : ACM .
   Google Scholar
• iParadigms . 2011 . Turnitin instructor user manual , PeerMark , , Oakland, CA : iParadigms . Chapter 3
   Google Scholar
• Kollar , I. and Fischer , F. 2010 . Peer assessment as collaborative learning: A cognitive perspective . Learning and Instruction , 20 : 344 – 348 . Commentary to Learning and Instruction's special issue on peer assessment
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu , N. and Carless , D. 2006 . Peer feedback: The learning element of peer assessment . Teaching in Higher Education , 11 : 279 – 290 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luxton-Reilly , A. 2009 . A systematic review of tools that support peer assessment . Computer Science Education , 19 : 209 – 232 .
   Google Scholar
• Machanick , P. Peer assessment for action learning of data structures and algorithms . Proceedings of the Seventh Australasian Computing Education Conference (ACE2004) . Edited by: Young , A. and Tolhurst , D. pp. 73 – 82 . volume 42 of Conferences in Research and Practice in Information Technology http://crpit.com/Vol42.html
   Google Scholar
• Mulder , R. and Pearce , J. PRAZE: Innovating teaching through peer review . Proceedings of ASCILITE 2007 . Edited by: Atkinson , R.J. , McBeath , C. , Soong , S.K.A. and Cheers , C. pp. 727 – 736 . Retrieved September 25, 2012, from www.ascilite.org.au/conferences/singapore07/procs/mulder.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Navalta , J.W. and Lyons , T.S. 2010 . Student peer review decisions on submitted manuscripts are as stringent as faculty peer reviewers . Advances in Physiology Education , 34 : 170 – 173 .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olson , D.R. 2004 . The triumph of hope over experience in the search for “what works”: A response to Slavin . Educational Researcher , 33 ( 1 ) : 24 – 26 .
   Google Scholar
• Patchan , M.M. , Charney , D. and Schunn , C.D. 2009 . A validation study of students' end comments: Comparing comments by students, a writing instructor, and a content instructor . Journal of Writing Research , 1 : 124 – 152 .
   Google Scholar
• Pearce , J. , Mulder , R. and Baik , C. 2009 . Involving students in peer review , Melbourne, Australia : Centre for the Study of Higher Education, The University of Melbourne . Retrieved September 25, 2012, from www.cshe.unimelb.edu.au/resources_teach/teaching_in_practice/docs/Student_Peer_Review.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Purchase , H.C. 2000 . Learning about interface design through peer assessment . Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education , 25 : 341 – 352 .
   Google Scholar
• Race , P. , Brown , S. and Smith , B. 2005 . 500 tips on assessment , (2nd ed) , Oxon : RoutledgeFalmer .
   Google Scholar
• Reeves , T. 2006 . Design research from a technology perspective , Edited by: van den Akker . London : Routledge . (Chapter 5)
   Google Scholar
• Reily , K. , Finnerty , P. and Terveen , L. Two peers are better than one: Aggregating peer reviews for computing assignments is surprisingly accurate . Proceedings of the ACM 2009 International Conference on Supporting Group Work . pp. 115 – 124 . NewYork, NY : ACM .
   Google Scholar
• Russell , A.A. Calibrated Peer Review – a writing and critical thinking instructional tool . Proceedings of the AAAS Conference on Invention and Impact: Building Excellence in Undergraduate Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics (STEM) Education . pp. 67 – 71 . Washington, DC : American Association for the Advancement of Science .
   Google Scholar
• Russell , A.A. , Chapman , O.L. and Wegner , P.A. 1998 . Molecular science: Network-deliverable curricula . Journal of Chemical Education , 75 : 578 – 579 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Settle , A. , Wilcox , C. and Settle , C. Engaging game design students using peer evaluation . Proceedings of ACM SIGITE’11 . pp. 73 – 78 . New York, NY : ACM .
   Google Scholar
• Sfard , A. 1998 . On two metaphors for learning and the dangers of choosing just one . Educational Researcher , 27 : 4 – 13 .
   Google Scholar
• Shute , V.J. 2008 . Focus on formative feedback . Review of Educational Research , 78 ( 1 ) : 153 – 189 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Silva , E. and Moreira , D. 2003 . WebCoM: A tool to use peer review to improve student interaction . ACM Journal on Educational Resources in Computing , 3 ( 1 ) Article 3
   Google Scholar
• Sitthiworachart , J. and Joy , M. Web-based peer assessment in learning computer programming . Proceedings of the Third IEEE International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies (ICALT 03) . pp. 180 – 184 . Washington, DC : IEEE Computer Society .
   Google Scholar
• Sitthiworachart , J. and Joy , M. Effective peer assessment for learning computer programming . Proceedings of the Ninth Annual SIGCSE Conference on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education . pp. 122 – 126 . New York, NY : ACM .
   Google Scholar
• Sluijsmans , D. , Dochy , F. and Moerkerke , G. 1999 . Creating a learning environment by using self-, peer- and co-assessment . Learning Environments Research , 1 : 293 – 319 .
   Google Scholar
• Søndergaard , H. Learning from and with peers: The different roles of student peer reviewing . Proceedings of the 14th Annual SIGCSE/SIGCUE Conference on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education . pp. 31 – 35 . New York, NY : ACM .
   Google Scholar
• Strijbos , J.-W. and Sluijsmans , D. 2010 . Unravelling peer assessment: Methodological, functional, and conceptual developments . Learning and Instruction , 20 : 265 – 269 . Introduction to Learning and Instruction's special issue on peer assessment
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Topping , K. 1998 . Peer assessment between students in colleges and universities . Review of Educational Research , 68 : 249 – 276 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Topping , K. 2010 . Methodological quandaries in studying process and outcomes in peer assessment . Learning and Instruction , 20 : 339 – 343 . Commentary to Learning and Instruction's special issue on peer assessment
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trahasch , S. From peer assessment towards collaborative learning . Proceedings of the 34th ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE2004) . pp. F3F-16 – F3F-20 . Washington DC : IEEE Computer Society .
   Google Scholar
• Trytten , D.A. A design for team peer code review . Proceedings of the 36th SIGCSE Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education . pp. 455 – 459 . Proceedings published as SIGCSE Bulletin 37(1)
   Google Scholar
• Turner , S.A. , Quintana-Castillo , R. , Pérez-Quiñones , M.A. and Edwards , S.H. 2008 . Misunderstandings about object-oriented design: Experiences using code reviews . SIGCSE Bulletin , 40 ( 1 ) : 97 – 101 .
   Google Scholar
• van den Akker , J. , Branch , R. , Gustafson , K. , Nieveen , N. and Plomp , T. 1999 . Design approaches and tools in education and training , Dordrecht : Kluwer .
   Google Scholar
• van den Akker , J. , Gravemeijer , K. , McKenney , S. and Nieveen , N. 2006 . Educational design research , London : Routledge .
   Google Scholar
• Van Zundert , M. , Sluijsmans , D. and van Merriënboer , J. 2010 . Effective peer assessment processes: Research findings and future directions . Learning and Instruction , 20 : 270 – 279 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wiegers , K.E. 2002 . Peer reviews in software: A practical guide , Boston : Addison-Wesley .
   Google Scholar
• Zeller , A. Making students read and review code . Proceedings of the Fifth Annual SIGCSE/SIGCUE Conference on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education . pp. 89 – 92 . New York, NY : ACM .
   Google Scholar