Elaborating on threshold concepts

References

• Anderson, J. (1982). Acquisition of cognitive skill. Psychological Review,89, 369–406.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baillie, S., Bowden, J. A., & Meyer, J. H. F. (2013). Threshold capabilities: Threshold concepts and knowledge capability linked through variation theory. Higher Education,65, 227–246.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barradell, S. (2013). The identification of threshold concepts: A review of theoretical complexities and methodological challenges. Higher Education,65, 265–276.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bereiter, C. (1985). Toward a solution of the learning paradox. Review of Educational Research,55, 201–226.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bloom, B. (1956). Taxonomy of educational objectives handbook 1: Cognitive domain. New York, NY: Longman.
   Google Scholar
• Boustedt, J., Eckerdal, A., McCartney, R., Moström, J. E., Ratcliffe, M., Sanders, K., & Zander, C. (2007). Threshold concepts in computer science: Do they exist and are they useful?SIGCSE Bulletin,39, 504–508.
   Google Scholar
• Bruner, J. S. (1960). The process of education. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Carstensen, A., & Carstensen, A. K. (2010). Transforming a first programming course – Some critical aspects. In Third Biennial Threshold Concepts Symposium. Exploring transformative dimensions of threshold concepts. Retrieved from http://www.thresholdconcepts2010.unsw.edu.au.
   Google Scholar
• Chi, M., & Ohlsson, S. (2005). Complex declarative learning. In K.Holyoak, & R.Morrison (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of thinking and reasoning (pp. 317–399). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cousin, G. (2010). Neither teacher-centred nor student-centred: Threshold concepts and research partnerships. Journal of Learning Development in, Higher Education,2, 1–9.
   Google Scholar
• Craik, K. (1943). The nature of explanation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Davidson, M., Dove, L., & Weltz, J. (1999). Mental models and usability. Retrieved from http://www.lauradove.info/reports/mental%20models.htm
   Google Scholar
• Drummond, S., & Jamieson, S. (2005). The threshold concept: Helping students towards mastery. Higher Education Academy, Information and Computer Science Subject Centre Report. Retrieved January 12, 2012, from http://www.ics.heacademy.ac.uk/Events/HEAYork2005/proceedings/presentations/Wednesday/Drummond%20Jamieson.ppt
   Google Scholar
• Eckerdal, A., McCartney, R., Moström, J. E., Ratcliffe, M., Sanders, K., & Zander, C. (2006). Putting threshold concepts into context in computer science education. SIGCSE Bulletin,38, 103–107.
   Google Scholar
• Eckerdal, A., McCartney, R., Moström, J. E., Sanders, K., Thomas, L., & Zander, C. (2007). From Limen to Lumen: Computing Students in Liminal Spaces. In ICER ’07, Proceedings of the Third International Workshop on Computing Education Research, Atlanta, Georgia, USA, (pp. 123–132). New York, NY.
   Google Scholar
• Gardner, H. (1993). Multiple intelligneces: The theory in practice. New York, NY: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Gentner, D., & Stevens, A. L. (1983). Mental models. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Haskell, R. (2001). Transfer of learning: Cognition, instruction, and reasoning. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Holloway, M., Alpay, E., & Bull, A. (2010). A quantitative approach to identifying threshold concepts in engineering education. In Engineering Education 2010 (EE2010). Retrieved January 2012, from http://www.ee2010.info/programme-papers.asp
   Google Scholar
• Johnson-Laird, P. (1983). Mental models: Towards a cognitive science of language, inference, and consciousness. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Khalife, J. T. (2006). Threshold for the introduction of programming: Providing learners with a simple computer model. In P.Romero, J.Good, E.Acosta, & S.Bryant (Eds.), Proceedings of the 18th Workshop of the Psychology of Programming Interest Group (pp. 244–254). Brighton: University of Sussex.
   Google Scholar
• Krathwohl, D. R. (2002). A revision of Bloom’s taxonomy: An overview. Theory Into Practice,41, 212–218.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Land, R. (2011). There could be trouble ahead: Using threshold concepts as a tool for analysis. International Journal for Academic Development,16, 175–178.
   Google Scholar
• Land, R., Cousin, G., Meyer, J. H. F., & Davies, P. (2006). Implications of threshold concepts for course design and evaluation. In J. H. F.Meyer, & R.Land (Eds.), Overcoming barriers to student understanding: Threshold concepts and troublesome knowledge (pp. 195–206). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Land, R., Meyer, J. H., & Baillie, C. (2010). Threshold concepts and transformational learning. Rotterdam: Sense.
   Google Scholar
• Land, R., Meyer, J. H., & Smith, J. (2008). Threshold concepts within the disciplines. Rotterdam: Sense.
   Google Scholar
• McCartney, R., Boustedt, J., Eckerdal, A., Moström, J. E., Sanders, K., Thomas, L., & Zander, C. (2009). Liminal spaces and learning computing. European Journal of Engineering Education,34, 383–391.
   Google Scholar
• McCartney, R., Eckerdal, A., Mostrom, J. E., Sanders, K., & Zander, C. (2007). Successful students’ strategies for getting unstuck. SIGCSE Bulletin,39, 156–160.
   Google Scholar
• McCartney, R., & Sanders, K. (2005). What are the “Threshold Concepts” in Computer Science?. In Proceedings of the 5th Baltic Sea Conference on Computing Education Research (Koli Calling2005) (p. 185).
   Google Scholar
• McGrath, H., & Noble, T. (2005). Eight ways at once. Frenchs Forest: Pearson.
   Google Scholar
• Meyer, J. H. F., & Land, R. (2005). Threshold concepts and troublesome knowledge (2): Epistemological considerations and a conceptual framework for teaching and learning. Higher Education,49, 373–388.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meyer, J., & Land, R. (2003). Threshold concepts and troublesome knowledge – Linkages to ways of thinking and practising. In C.Rust (Ed.), Improving student learning – Theory and practice ten years on (pp. 412–424). Oxford: Oxford Centre for Staff and Learning Development OCSLD.
   Google Scholar
• Meyer, J. H. F., Land, R., & Davies, P. (2008). Threshold concepts and troublesome knowledge (4): Issues of variation and variability. In: R.Land, J. H. F.Meyer, & J.Smith (Eds.), Threshold concepts within the disciplines (pp. 59–74). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Meyer, J. H., & Land, R. (2006). Overcoming barriers to student understanding: Threshold concepts and troublesome knowledge. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Moström, J. E., Boustedt, J., Eckerdal, A., McCartney, R., Sanders, K., Thomas, L., & Zander, C. (2008a). Concrete examples of abstraction as manifested in students’ transformative experiences. In Proceedings of the Fourth international Workshop on Computing Education Research, ICER ’08, Sydney, Australia (pp. 125–136).
   Google Scholar
• Moström, J. E., Boustedt, J., Eckerdal, A., McCartney, R., Sanders, K., Thomas, L., & Zander, C. (2008b). A multi-national, multi-institutional project on threshold concepts in computer science: Results and implications. In Threshold concepts conference. Canada: Queen’s University, Kingston.
   Google Scholar
• Moström, J. E., Boustedt, J., Eckerdal, A., McCartney, R., Sanders, K., Thomas, L., & Zander, C. (2009). Computer science student transformations: Changes and causes. Proceedings of the 14th annual ACM SIGCSE Conference on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education, ITiCSE ’09, Paris, France (pp. 181–185). New York, NY: ACM.
   Google Scholar
• Neisser, U., Boodoo, G., Bouchard, T. J., Jr, Boykin, A. W., Brody, N., Ceci, S. J., Halpern, D. F., Loehlin, J. C., Perloff, R., Sternberg, R. J., & Urbina, S. (1996). Intelligence: Knowns and unknowns. American Psychologist,51, 77–101.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Newell, A. (1990). Unified theories of cognition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Newell, A., & Rosenbloom, P. (1981). Mechanisms of skill acquisition and the law of practice. In J.Anderson (Ed.), Cognitive skills and their acquisition. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Noble, T. (2004). Integrating the revised Bloom’s taxonomy with multiple intelligences: A planning tool for curriculum differentiation. Teachers College Record,106, 193–211.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Donnell, R. (2009). Threshold concepts and their relevance to economics. In ATEC 2009: 14th Annual Australasian Teaching Economics Conference. (pp. 190–200). Brisbane: School of Economics and Finance, Queensland University of Technology.
   Google Scholar
• Pressley, M., Borkowski, J., & Schneider, W. (1987). Cognitive strategies: Good strategy users coordinate metacognition and knowledge. In R.Vasta, & G.Whitehurst (Eds.), Annals of child development (pp. 88–129). New York, NY: JAI Press.
   Google Scholar
• Robins, A. (1996). Transfer in cognition. Connection Science,8, 185–203.
   Google Scholar
• Robins, A., Rountree, J., & Rountree, N. (2003). Learning and teaching programming: A review and discussion. Computer Science Education,13, 137–172.
   Google Scholar
• Rountree, J., & Rountree, N. (2009). Issues regarding threshold concepts in computer science. Proceedings of the Eleventh Australasian Conference on Computing Education – Volume 95, ACE ’09, Wellington, New Zealand (pp. 139–146). Australian Computer Society: Darlinghurst.
   Google Scholar
• Rowbottom, D. P. (2007). Demystifying threshold concepts. Journal of Philosophy of Education,41, 263–270.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sanders, K., Boustedt, J., Eckerdal, A., McCartney, R., Moström, J. E., Thomas, L., & Zander, C. (2008). Student understanding of object-oriented programming as expressed in concept maps. Proceedings of the 39th SIGCSE Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education, SIGCSE ’08, Portland, OR, USA (pp. 332–336). New York, NY: ACM.
   Google Scholar
• Sanders, K., Boustedt, J., Eckerdal, A., McCartney, R., Moström, J. E., Thomas, L., & Zander, C. (2012). Threshold Concepts and Threshold Skills in Computing. ICER ’12: Proceedings of the Ninth International Workshop on Computing Education Research, Auckland, New Zealand (pp. 23–30). New York, NY: ACM.
   Google Scholar
• Schwill, A. (1994). Fundamental ideas of computer science. EATCS-Bulletin,53, 274–295.
   Google Scholar
• Shinners-Kennedy, D., & Fincher, S. (2013). Identifying threshold concepts: From dead end to a new direction. Proceedings of the Ninth Annual International ACM Conference on International Computing Education Research (ICER ’13), San Diego, CA (pp. 9–18). New York, NY: ACM.
   Google Scholar
• Sien, V. Y., & Chong, D. W. K. (2011). Threshold concepts in object-oriented modelling. In 7th Educators Symposium@MODELS 2011. (pp. 55–64). Retrieved from http://www.se.uni-oldenburg.de/documents/olnse-2-2011-EduSymp.pdf page=5
   Google Scholar
• Sorva, J. (2010). Reflections on threshold concepts in computer programming and beyond. Proceedings of the 10th Koli Calling International Conference on Computing Education Research, Koli Calling ’10, Koli, Finland (pp. 21–30). New York, NY: ACM.
   Google Scholar
• Sweller, J., & Chandler, P. (1994). Why some material is difficult to learn. Cognition and Instruction,12, 185–233.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomas, L., Boustedt, J., Eckerdal, A., McCartney, R., Moström, J. E., Sanders, K., & Zander, C. (2010). Threshold concepts in computer science: An ongoing empirical investigation. In J. H. F.Meyer, R.Land, & C.Baillie (Eds.), Threshold concepts and transformational learning (pp. 241–257). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Vagianou, E. (2006). Program working storage: A Beginner’s Model. In A.Berglund, & M.Wiggberg (Eds.), Proceedings of the 6th Baltic Sea Conference on Computing Education Research (Koli Calling2006) (pp. 69–76).
   Google Scholar
• Zander, C., Boustedt, J., Eckerdal, A., McCartney, R., Moström, J. E., Ratcliffe, M., & Thomas, L. (2008). Threshold concepts in computer science: A multi-national empirical investigation. In R.Land, J. H. F.Meyer, & J.Smith (Eds.), Threshold concepts within the disciplines (pp. 105–118). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Zander, C., Boustedt, J., McCartney, R., Moström, J. E., Sanders, K., & Thomas, L. (2009). Student transformations: Are they computer scientists yet?Proceedings of the Fifth International Workshop on Computing Education Research Workshop, ICER ’09, Berkeley, CA (pp. 129–140). New York, NY: ACM.
   Google Scholar