Mapping students’ ideas to understand learning in a collaborative programming environment

References

• Agar, M. (1994). Language shock: Understanding the culture of conversation. New York, NY: Morrow.
   Google Scholar
• Anderson, D. R. (1986). The evolution of Peirce’s concept of abduction. Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society, 22, 145–164.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blackmore, S. J. (2000). The meme machine. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bontá, P., Papert, A., & Silverman, B. (2010). TurtleArt. Proceedings of Constructionism, August 16–20, Paris, France.
   Google Scholar
• Brennan, K., & Resnick, M. (2012). New frameworks for studying and assessing the development of computational thinking. In Proceedings of the 2012 Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Vancouver, Canada.
   Google Scholar
• Brilliant-Mills, H. (1994). Becoming a mathematician: Building a situated definition of mathematics. Linguistics and Education, 5, 301–334.
   Google Scholar
• Collins, E., & Green, J. L. (1992). Learning in classroom settings: making or breaking a culture. In H. Marshall (Ed.), Redefining students learning (pp. 85–98). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
   Google Scholar
• Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1993). The evolving self: A psychology for the third millennium. New York, NY: Harper Collins.
   Google Scholar
• Dawkins, R. (1976). The selfish gene. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dunleavy, M., & Heinecke, W. F. (2008). The impact of 1: 1 laptop use on middle school math and science standardized test scores. Computers in the Schools, 24, 7–22.
   Google Scholar
• Eshach, H. (2010). An analysis of conceptual flow patterns and structures in the physics classroom. International Journal of Science Education, 32, 451–477.10.1080/09500690802635247
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flannery, L., Kazakoff, E., Bontá, P., Silverman, B., Bers, M., & Resnick, M. (2013). Designing Scratch Jr: Support for early childhood learning through computer programming. In Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Interaction Design and Children (IDC), New York, NY.
   Google Scholar
• Franklin, D., Conrad, P., Boe, B., Nilsen, K., Hill, C., Len, M., .… Waite, R. (2013, March). Assessment of computer science learning in a Scratch-based outreach program. In Proceeding of the 44th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education (pp. 371–376), ACM.
   Google Scholar
• Gee, J. P. (2003). What video games have to teach us about learning and literacy. New York, NY: MacMillan.
   Google Scholar
• Green, J. L. (1983). Exploring classroom discourse: Linguistic perspectives on teaching-learning processes. Educational Psychologist, 18, 1532–6985, 180–199.10.1080/00461528309529273
   Google Scholar
• Green, J., & Wallat, C. (1981). Mapping instructional conversations: A sociolinguistic ethnography. In J. Green & C. Wallat (Eds.), Ethnography and language in educational settings (pp. 161–205). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
   Google Scholar
• Hatano, G., & Inagaki, K. (1986). Two courses of expertise. In H. A. H. Stevenson & K. Hakuta (Eds.), Child development and education in Japan (pp. 262–272). New York, NY: Freeman.
   Google Scholar
• Hayes, E., & Games, I. (2008). Making computer games and design thinking: A review of current software and strategies. Games and Culture, 3, 309–332.10.1177/1555412008317312
   Google Scholar
• Maloney, J. H., Peppler, K., Kafai, Y., Resnick, M., & Rusk, N. (2008). Programming by choice: Urban youth learning programming with Scratch. ACM SIGCSE Bulletin, 40, 367–371.10.1145/1352322
   Google Scholar
• Monroy-Hernández, A., & Resnick, M. (2008). Empowering kids to create and share programmable media. Interactions, 15, 50–53.10.1145/1340961
   Google Scholar
• Papert, S. (1980). Mindstorms: children, computers, and powerful ideas. New York, NY: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Papert, S. (1991). Situating constructionism. In S. Papert, & I. Harel (Eds.), Constructionism: Research reports and essays (pp. 1985–1990). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
   Google Scholar
• Resnick, M. (2006). Computer as paint brush: Technology, play, and the creative society. In D. Singer, R. Golikoff, & K. Hirsh-Pasek (Eds.), Play = Learning: How play motivates and enhances children’s cognitive and social-emotional growth (pp. 192–208). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Resnick, M., Maloney, J., Monroy-Hernández, A., Rusk, N., Eastmond, E., Brennan, K., … Kafai, Y. (November, 2009). Scratch: Programming for all. Communications of the ACM, 52, 60–67.
   Google Scholar
• Richtel, M. (2014). Reading, writing, arithmetic, and lately, coding. The New York Times. Retrieved from http://www.nytimes.com/2014/05/11/us/reading-writing-arithmetic-and-lately-coding.html
   Google Scholar
• Schwartz, D., Bransford, J., & Sears, D. (2005). Efficiency and Innovation in transfer. In J. Mestre (Ed.), Transfer of learning from a modern multidisciplinary perspective (pp. 1–51). Greenwich: Information Age Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Seehorn, D., Carey, S., Fuschetto, B., Lee, I., Moix, D., O’Grady-Cuniff, D., ... Verno, A. (2011). CSTA K-12 computer science standards. CSTA standards task force.
   Google Scholar
• Spradley, J. (1980). Participant observation. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
   Google Scholar
• Topper, A., & Lancaster, S. (2013). Common challenges and experiences of school districts that are implementing one-to-one computing initiatives. Computers in the Schools, 30, 346–358.10.1080/07380569.2013.844640
   Google Scholar
• Sternberg. (1999). Handbook of creativity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Yoon, S. (2007). Using memes and memetic processes to explain social and conceptual influences on student understanding about complex socio-scientific issues. Journal of Research and Science Teaching, 45, 900–921.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar