Gender neutrality improved completion rate for all

References

• Amelink, C. T., & Meszaros, P. S. (2011). A comparison of educational factors promoting or discouraging the intent to remain in engineering by gender. European Journal of Engineering Education, 36, 47–62.10.1080/03043797.2010.531695
   Google Scholar
• Bälter, O., Cleveland-Innes, M., Pettersson, K., Scheja, M., & Svedin, M. (2013). Student approaches in relation to online course completion. Canadian Journal of Higher Education, 43, 1–18.
   Google Scholar
• Bälter, O., Enström, E., & Klingenberg, B. (2013). The effect of short formative diagnostic web quizzes with minimal feedback. Computers & Education, 60, 234–242.10.1016/j.compedu.2012.08.014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barnard, S., Hassan, T., Bagilhole, B., & Dainty, A. (2012). ‘They’re not girly girls’: An exploration of quantitative and qualitative data on engineering and gender in higher education. European Journal of Engineering Education, 37, 193–204.10.1080/03043797.2012.661702
   Google Scholar
• Beddoes, K. (2013). Feminist methodologies and engineering education research. European Journal of Engineering Education, 38, 107–118.10.1080/03043797.2012.748015
   Google Scholar
• Beyer, S. (2014). Why are women underrepresented in Computer Science? Gender differences in stereotypes, self-efficacy, values, and interests and predictors of future CS course-taking and grades. Computer Science Education, 24, 153–192.10.1080/08993408.2014.963363
   Google Scholar
• Brawner, C. E., Camacho, M. M., Lord, S. M., Long, R. A., & Ohland, M. W. (2012). Women in industrial engineering: Stereotypes, persistence, and perspectives. Journal of Engineering Education, 101, 288–318.10.1002/j.2168-9830.2012.tb00051.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cano, F., & Berbén, A. B. G. (2009). University students’ achievement goals and approaches to learning in mathematics. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 79, 131–153.10.1348/000709908X314928
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cassell, J. (2002). Genderizing HCI. In J. Jacko & A. Sears (Eds.), The handbook of human computer interaction (pp. 402–411). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Cheryan, S., Master, A., & Meltzoff, A. N. (2015). Cultural stereotypes as gatekeepers: Increasing girls’ interest in computer science and engineering by diversifying stereotypes. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 49.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheryan, S., Meltzoff, A. N., & Kim, S. (2011). Classrooms matter: The design of virtual classrooms influences gender disparities in computer science classes. Computers & Education, 57, 1825–1835.10.1016/j.compedu.2011.02.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohoon, J., & Aspray, W. (Eds.). (2006). A critical review of the research on women’s participation in postsecondary computing education. In Women and information technology: Research on under representation (pp. 137–180). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dempsey, J., Snodgrass, R. T., Kishi, I., & Titcomb, A. (2015). The emerging role of self-perception in student intentions. In Proceedings of the 46th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education (SIGCSE ‘15) (pp. 108–113). New York, NY: ACM.
   Google Scholar
• Diekman, A. B., Brown, E. R., Johnston, A. M., & Clark, E. K. (2010). Seeking congruity between goals and roles: A new look at why women opt out of science, technology, engineering, and mathematics careers. Psychological Science, 21, 1051–1057.10.1177/0956797610377342
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Diseth, Å. (2011). Self-efficacy, goal orientations and learning strategies as mediators between preceding and subsequent academic achievement. Learning and Individual Differences, 21, 191–195.10.1016/j.lindif.2011.01.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doubé, W., & Lang, C. (2012). Gender and stereotypes in motivation to study computer programming for careers in multimedia. Computer Science Education, 22, 63–78.10.1080/08993408.2012.666038
   Google Scholar
• Entwistle, N. (1988). Motivational factors in students’ approaches to learning. In Ronald R. Schmeck (Ed.), Learning strategies and learning styles (pp. 21–51). New York, NY: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Erson, E. (1992). There’s the moon to reach … . A study of the language and world of ideas of some computer interested boys [Written in Swedish with a summary in English.] NORDSVENSKA. Skrifter utgivna av Institutionen för nordiska språk vid Umeå universitet (Nr 9). Umeå: Department of Scandinavian Languages, Umeå University. p. 226. Monograph.
   Google Scholar
• Faulkner, W. (2007). ‘Nuts and bolts and people’: Gender-troubled engineering identities. Social Studies of Science, 37, 331–356.10.1177/0306312706072175
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fincher, S., & Petre, M. (2004). Computer science education research. Taylor & Francis, London, UK: Routledge Falmer.
   Google Scholar
• Fisher, A., & Margolis, J. (2002). Unlocking the clubhouse: The Carnegie Mellon experience. ACM SIGCSE Bulletin, 34, 79–83.10.1145/543812
   Google Scholar
• Frieze, C., & Quesenberry, J. L. (2013). From difference to diversity: Including women in the changing face of computing. In Proceeding of the 44th ACM technical symposium on Computer science education (SIGCSE ‘13) (pp. 445–450). New York, NY: ACM.
   Google Scholar
• Herring, S. C., & Marken, J. A. (2008). Implications of gender consciousness for students in information technology. Women’s Studies, 37, 229–256.10.1080/00497870801917150
   Google Scholar
• Huff, C. (2002). Gender, software design, and occupational equity. ACM SIGCSE Bulletin, 34, 112–115.10.1145/543812
   Google Scholar
• van der Kleij, F. M., Eggen, T. J. H. M., Timmers, C. F., & Veldkamp, B. P. (2012). Effects of feedback in a computer-based assessment for learning. Computers & Education, 58, 263–272.10.1016/j.compedu.2011.07.020
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kolmos, A., Mejlgaard, N., Haase, S., & Egelund Holgaard, J. (2013). Motivational factors, gender and engineering education. European Journal of Engineering Education, 38, 340–358.10.1080/03043797.2013.794198
   Google Scholar
• Magee, R. M., Sebastian, R., Wiedenbeck, S., & Rode, J. A. (2011). Gendering infrastructure, CHI 2011. Vancouver, Canada.
   Google Scholar
• Meyer, M., & Marx, S. (2014). Engineering dropouts: A qualitative examination of why undergraduates leave engineering. Journal of Engineering Education, 103, 525–548.10.1002/jee.v103.4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mills, J., Ayre, M., & Gill, J. (2010). Gender inclusive engineering education. Routledge Research in education. New York, NY: Taylor & Francis group.
   Google Scholar
• Ngambeki, I., Habashi, M. M., Evangelou, D., Graziano, W. G., Sakka, D., & Corapci, F. (2012). Using profiles of person – Thing orientation to examine the underrepresentation of women in engineering in three cultural contexts. International Journal of Engineering Education, 28, 621–632.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Öhrstedt, M. (2009). Approaches to studying, stress, academic achievement and the ability to assess own performance [Studieapproach, stress, studieresultat och förmåga att bedöma egen prestation]. (Master’s thesis). Stockholm: Department of Psychology, Stockholm University.
   Google Scholar
• Patitsas, E., Craig, M., & Easterbrook, S. (2015, July). Scaling up Women in Computing Initiatives: What Can We Learn from a Public Policy Perspective? In Proceedings of the eleventh annual International Conference on International Computing Education Research (pp. 61–69). ACM.
   Google Scholar
• Pintrich, P. M. (2000). An achievement goal theory perspective on issues in motivation terminology, theory, and research. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25, 92–104.10.1006/ceps.1999.1017
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Powell, A., Dainty, A., & Bagilhole, B. (2012). Gender stereotypes among women engineering and technology students in the UK: Lessons from career choice narratives. European Journal of Engineering Education, 37, 541–556.10.1080/03043797.2012.724052
   Google Scholar
• Richards, Z., & Hewstone, M. (2001). Subtyping and subgrouping: Processes for the prevention and promotion of stereotype change. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 5, 52–73.10.1207/pspr.2001.5.issue-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rode, J. A. (2011). A theoretical agenda for feminist HCI. Interacting with Computers, 23, 393–400.10.1016/j.intcom.2011.04.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosenberg-Kima, R. B., Plant, E. A., Doerr, C. E., & Baylor, A. L. (2010). The influence of computer-based model’s race and gender on female students’ attitudes and beliefs towards engineering. Journal of Engineering Education, 99, 35–44.10.1002/jee.2010.99.issue-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salminen-Karlsson, M. (2002). Gender-inclusive computer engineering education: Two attempts at curriculum change. International Journal of Engineering Education, 18, 430–437.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salminen-Karlsson, M. (2011). The problem in the eye of the beholder: Working with gender reforms in computer engineering. International Journal of Gender, Science and Technology, 3, 445–459.
   Google Scholar
• Sele, L. (2012). Talking Nerdy: The invisibility of female computer Nerds in Popular culture and the subsequent fewer number of women and girls in the computer sciences. Journal of Integrated Studies, 1(3), 1–14.
   Google Scholar
• Spencer, S. J., Steele, C. M., & Quinn, D. M. (1999). Stereotype threat and women’s math performance. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 35, 4–28.10.1006/jesp.1998.1373
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sturman, S. M. (2009). ‘Women in computing’ as problematic: Gender, ethics and identity in university computer science education (Thesis). Toronto: Department of Sociology and Equity Studies in Education, University of Toronto.
   Google Scholar
• Svedin, M., Bälter, O., Scheja, M., & Pettersson, K. (2013, March). A strategic approach to learning rewards first-year engineering students [rev.]. In Proceedings of the First International Conference on Learning and Teaching in Computing and Engineering (LATICE 2013) (pp. 143–147). Macau.
   Google Scholar
• Tjusningen med programmering [The fascination of programming]. (2014). Retrieved November 24, 2014, from http://www.sommarprogrammering.se/katarina-om-tjusningen-med-programmering/
   Google Scholar
• Veilleux, N., Bates, R., Allendoerfer, C., Jones, D., Crawford, J., & Smith, T. F. (2013). The relationship between belonging and ability in computer science. In Proceeding of the 44th ACM technical symposium on Computer science education (SIGCSE ‘13) (pp. 65–70). New York, NY: ACM.
   Google Scholar
• Viefers, S. F., Christie, M. F., & Ferdos, F. (2006). Gender equity in higher education: Why and how? A case study of gender issues in a science faculty. European Journal of Engineering Education, 31, 15–22.10.1080/03043790500429948
   Google Scholar
• Wilson, B. C. (2002). A study of factors promoting success in computer science including gender differences. Computer Science Education, 12, 141–164.10.1076/csed.12.1.141.8211
   Google Scholar
• Zimmermann, L., & Sprung, G. (2008). Technology is female: How girls can be motivated to learn programming and take up technical studies through adaptations of the curriculum, changes in didactics, and optimized interface design. In Proceedings of ICEE (Vol. 8).
   Google Scholar
• Zingaro, D., & Porter, L. (2016). Impact of student achievement goals on CS1 outcomes. In Proceedings of the 47th ACM technical symposium on Computing Science Education, March 2–5, Memphis, TN (pp. 279–296). New York, NY: ACM.
   Google Scholar