Women planning to major in computer science: Who are they and what makes them unique?

References

• Astin, A. W., & Astin, H. S. (1992). Undergraduate science education: The impact of different college environments on the educational pipeline in the sciences. Retrieved from http://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED362404
   Google Scholar
• Beyer, S. (2008). Predictors of female and male computer science students’ grades. Journal of Women and Minorities in Science and Engineering, 14(4). Retrieved from http://www.dl.begellhouse.com/journals/00551c876cc2f027,425125ee795ed2f6,1614a9e84ae23b44.html
   Google Scholar
• Beyer, S. (2014). Why are women underrepresented in Computer Science? Gender differences in stereotypes, self-efficacy, values, and interests and predictors of future CS course-taking and grades. Computer Science Education, 24, 153–192. doi:10.1080/08993408.2014.963363
   Google Scholar
• Beyer, S., & Haller, S. (2006). Gender differences and intragender differences in computer science students: Are female CS majors more similar to male CS majors or female nonmajors? Journal of Women and Minorities in Science and Engineering, 12(4), doi:10.1615/JWomenMinorScienEng.v12.i4.50
   Google Scholar
• Beyer, S., Rynes, K., & Haller, S. (2004). Deterrents to women taking computer science courses. IEEE Technology and Society Magazine, 23, 21–28. doi:10.1109/MTAS.2004.1273468
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beyer, S., Rynes, K., Perrault, J., Hay, K., & Haller, S. (2003). Gender differences in computer science students. In Proceedings of the 34th SIGCSE technical symposium on computer science education (pp. 49–53). New York, NY: ACM. doi:10.1145/611892.611930
   Google Scholar
• Blickenstaff, J. (2005). Women and science careers: Leaky pipeline or gender filter? Gender and Education, 17, 369–386. doi:10.1080/09540250500145072
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bong, M., & Skaalvik, E. M. (2003). Academic self-concept and self-efficacy: How different are they really? Educational Psychology Review, 15(1), 1–40.10.1023/A:1021302408382
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carlone, H. B., & Johnson, A. (2007). Understanding the science experiences of successful women of color: Science identity as an analytic lens. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 44, 1187–1218.10.1002/(ISSN)1098-2736
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carter, L. (2006). Why students with an apparent aptitude for computer science don’t choose to major in computer science. ACM SIGCSE Bulletin, 38, 27–31.10.1145/1124706
   Google Scholar
• Cassel, Lillian.N. (2011). Interdisciplinary computing is the answer ACM Inroads, 2, 4–6.10.1145/1929887
   Google Scholar
• Cheryan, S., Ziegler, S. A., Montoya, A. K., & Jiang, L. (2017). Why are some STEM fields more gender balanced than others? Psychological Bulletin 143 (1), 1–35. doi:10.1037/bul0000052.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohoon, J. M. (2001). Toward improving female retention in the computer science major. Communications of the ACM, 44, 108–114. doi:10.1145/374308.374367
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohoon, J. M. (2002). Recruiting and retaining women in undergraduate computing majors. ACM SIGCSE Bulletin, 34, 48–52.10.1145/543812
   Google Scholar
• Cohoon, J., & Aspray, W. (2008). A critical review of the research on women’s participation in postsecondary computing education. In Women and information technology: Research on underrepresentation (pp. 137–180). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Retrieved from http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/xpl/articleDetails.jsp?arnumber=6280964
   Google Scholar
• Computer Science Teachers Association & The Association for Computing Machinery. (2013). Bugs in the system: Computer science teacher certification in the U.S. New York, NY: ACM. Retrieved from https://csta.acm.org/ComputerScienceTeacherCertification/sub/StateRequirements.html
   Google Scholar
• Davison, M. L., Jew, G. B., & Davenport, E. C. (2014). Patterns of SAT scores, choice of STEM major, and gender. Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development, 47, 118–126. doi:10.1177/0748175614522269
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dempsey, J., Snodgrass, R. T., Kishi, I., & Titcomb, A. (2015, February). The emerging role of self-perception in student intentions. In Proceedings of the 46th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education (pp. 108–113). New York, NY: ACM.
   Google Scholar
• Dunn, O. J. (1959). Estimation of the medians for dependent variables. The Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 30, 192–197.10.1214/aoms/1177706374
   Google Scholar
• Dunn, O. J. (1961). Multiple comparisons among means. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 56, 52–64.10.1080/01621459.1961.10482090
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eagan, K., Stolzenberg, E. B., Ramirez, J. J., Aragon, M. C., Suchard, M. R., & Hurtado, S. (2014). The American freshman: National norms fall 2014. Los Angeles, CA: Higher Education Research Institute, UCLA.
   Google Scholar
• Goode, J. (2007). If you build teachers, will students come? The role of teachers in broadening computer science learning for urban youth. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 36, 65–88. doi:10.2190/2102-5G77-QL77-5506
   Google Scholar
• Green, K. C. (1989). A profile of undergraduates in the sciences. The American Scientist, 78, 475–480.
   Google Scholar
• Gurer, D., & Camp, T. (2001). Investigating the incredible shrinking pipeline for women in computer science ( Final Report – NSF Project, 9812016). Retrieved from http://womendev.acm.org/archives/documents/finalreport.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Hewlett, S. A., Luce, C. B., Servon, L. J., Sherbin, L., Shiller, P., Sosnovich, E., & Sumberg, K. (2008). The Athena factor: Reversing the brain drain in science, engineering, and technology ( Harvard Business Review Research Report, 10094). Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Lisa_Servon/publication/268325574_The_Athena_Factor_Reversing_the_Brain_Drain_in_Science_Engineering_and_Technology/links/556da5d808aeab7772244061.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Huang, G., Taddese, N., & Walter, E. (2000). Entry and persistence of women and minorities in college science and engineering education. Education Statistics Quarterly, 2, 59–60.
   Google Scholar
• Kanny, M. A., Sax, L. J., & Riggers-Piehl, T. A. (2014). Investigating forty years of stem research: How explanations for the gender gap have evolved over time. Journal of Women and Minorities in Science and Engineering, 20, 127–148. doi:10.1615/JWomenMinorScienEng.2014007246
   Google Scholar
• Lee, J. J. (2007). The shaping of the departmental culture: Measuring the relative influences of the institution and discipline. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 29, 41–55. doi:10.1080/13600800601175771
   Google Scholar
• Lim, K. M. (2016). Major matters: Exploration of the gender wage gap among STEM graduates. Retrieved from http://escholarship.org/uc/item/5d87v86c
   Google Scholar
• Margolis, J., Estrella, R., Goode, J., Holme, J. J., & Nao, K. (2008). Stuck in the shallow end: Education, race, and computing. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Margolis, J., & Fisher, A. (2002). Unlocking the clubhouse: Women in computing. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Margolis, J., Fisher, A., & Miller, F. (2000). The anatomy of interest: Women in undergraduate computer science. Women’s Studies Quarterly, 28, 104–127.
   Google Scholar
• Marsh, H. W. (1989). Effects of single-sex and coeducational schools: A response to Lee and Bryk. Journal of Educational Psychology, 81, 651–653.10.1037/0022-0663.81.4.651
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, C. C. (2014, April 5). Technology’s man problem. The New York Times. Retrieved from http://www.nytimes.com/2014/04/06/technology/technologys-man-problem.html
   Google Scholar
• Miner, A. S., Milstein, A., Schueller, S., Hegde, R., Mangurian, C., & Linos, E. (2016). Smartphone-based conversational agents and responses to questions about mental health, interpersonal violence, and physical health. JAMA Internal Medicine, 176, 619–625.10.1001/jamainternmed.2016.0400
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mittelhammer, R. C., Judge, G. G., & Miller, D. J. (2000). Econometric foundations pack with CD-ROM (Vol. 1). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• National Center for Education Statistics. (2014). Digest of education statistics: Bachelor’s degrees conferred by degree granting institutions, by field of study. Retrieved July 17, 2016, from https://nces.ed.gov/programs/digest/d15/tables/dt15_322.40.asp and https://nces.ed.gov/programs/digest/d15/tables/dt15_322.50.asp
   Google Scholar
• National Center for Women and Information Technology. (2014). EngageCSEdu. Retrieved October 2, 2016, from https://www.engage-csedu.org/
   Google Scholar
• National Science Foundation. (2015). Women, minorities, and persons with disabilities in science and engineering: 2015 ( Special Report NSF 15-311). Arlington, VA.
   Google Scholar
• Nicholls, G. M., Wolfe, H., Besterfield-Sacre, M., Shuman, L. J., & Larpkiattaworn, S. (2007). A method for identifying variables for predicting STEM enrollment. Journal of Engineering Education, 96, 33–44. doi:10.1002/j.2168-9830.2007.tb00913.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ong, M., Wright, C., Espinosa, L. L., & Orfield, G. (2011). Inside the double bind: A synthesis of empirical research on undergraduate and graduate women of color in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics. Harvard Educational Review, 81, 172–209.10.17763/haer.81.2.t022245n7x4752v2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ong, Y. (2014). Google’s helping young girls, but how can we get women in college to code? Forbes. Retrieved from http://www.forbes.com/sites/yunitaong/2014/07/01/googles-helping-young-girls-but-how-can-we-get-women-in-college-to-code/
   Google Scholar
• Sax, L. J. (1994). Retaining tomorrow’s scientists: Exploring the factors that keep male and female college students interested in science careers. Journal of Women and Minorities in Science and Engineering, 1, 45–61.10.1615/JWomenMinorScienEng.v1.i1
   Google Scholar
• Sax, L. J. (2001). Undergraduate science majors: Gender differences in who goes to graduate school. The Review of Higher Education, 24, 153–172.10.1353/rhe.2000.0030
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sax, L. J. (2008). The gender gap in college: Maximizing the developmental potential of women and men. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Sax, L. J., & Bryant, A. N. (2006). The impact of college on sex-atypical career choices of men and women. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 68, 52–63.10.1016/j.jvb.2005.01.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sax, L. J., Kanny, M. A., Riggers-Piehl, T. A., Whang, H., & Paulson, L. (2015). “But I’m not good at math”: The changing salience of mathematical self-concept in shaping women’s and men’s STEM aspirations. Research in Higher Education, 56, 813–842. doi:10.1007/s11162-015-9375-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sax, L. J., Lehman, K., Jacobs, J. A., Kanny, M. A., Lim, G., Monje-Paulson, L., & Zimmerman, H. (2016). Anatomy of an enduring gender gap: The evolution of women’s participation in computer science. The Journal of Higher Education. doi: 10.1080/00221546.2016.1257306
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seymour, E., & Hewitt, N. M. (1997). Talking about leaving: Why undergraduates leave the sciences. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
   Google Scholar
• Singh, K., Allen, K. R., Scheckler, R., & Darlington, L. (2007). Women in computer-related majors: A critical synthesis of research and theory from 1994 to 2005. Review of Educational Research, 77, 500–533. doi:10.3102/0034654307309919
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• St. Rose, A. (2010). STEM major choice and the gender pay gap. On Campus with Women, 39(1). Retrieved from http://www.aacu.org/ocww/volume39_1/feature.cfm?section=1
   Google Scholar
• Takahashi, D. (2013, April 24). How Pixar made Monsters University, its latest technological marvel. VentureBeat. Retrieved from http://venturebeat.com/2013/04/24/the-making-of-pixars-latest-technological-marvel-monsters-university/
   Google Scholar
• Tam, M.-Y. S., & Bassett, G. W., Jr. (2006). The gender gap in information technology. In J. M. Bystydzienski & S. R. Bird (Eds.), Removing barriers: Women in academic science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (pp. 119–133). Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.
   Google Scholar
• United States Census Bureau. (2013). Women’s employment in science, tech, engineering and math jobs slowing as their share of computer employment falls. Retrieved July 22, 2014, from http://www.census.gov/newsroom/releases/archives/employment_occupations/cb13-162.html
   Google Scholar
• Ware, N. C., Steckler, N. A., & Leserman, J. (1985). Undergraduate women: Who chooses a science major? The Journal of Higher Education, 56, 73–84. doi:10.2307/1981723
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weinberger, C. J. (2004). Just ask! Why surveyed women did not pursue IT courses or careers. IEEE Technology and Society Magazine, 23, 28–35.10.1109/MTAS.2004.1304399
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• White, P. E. (1992). Women and minorities in science and engineering: An update. Washington, DC: National Science Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Wigfield, A., Eccles, J. S., Yoon, K. S., Harold, R. D., Arbreton, A. J. A., & Freedman-Doan, C. (1997). Change in children’s competence beliefs and subjective task values across the elementary school years: A 3-year study. Journal of Educational Psychology, 89, 451–469.10.1037/0022-0663.89.3.451
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson, B. C. (2002). A study of factors promoting success in computer science including gender differences. Computer Science Education, 12, 141–164.10.1076/csed.12.1.141.8211
   Google Scholar
• Wilson, B. C., & Shrock, S. (2001). Contributing to success in an introductory computer science course: A study of twelve factors. In A. Fcvnxc (Ed.), Proceedings of the thirty-second SIGCSE technical symposium on computer science education (pp. 184–188). New York, NY: ACM. doi:10.1145/364447.364581
   Google Scholar
• Wright, R., & Jacobs, J. A. (1994). Male flight from computer work: A new look at occupational resegregation and ghettoization. American Sociological Review, 59, 511–536.10.2307/2095929
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zweben, S., & Bizot, B. (2016). 2015 Taulbee Survey: Continued booming undergraduate CS enrollment; Doctoral degree production dips slightly. Computing Research News, 28, 2–60.
   Google Scholar