5,227
Views
27
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

‘I’m good, but not that good’: digitally-skilled young people’s identity in computing

ORCID Icon
Pages 299-317 | Received 21 Jun 2016, Accepted 24 Jan 2017, Published online: 17 Feb 2017

References

  • Archer, L., DeWitt, J., Osborne, J., Dillon, J., Willis, B., & Wong, B. (2010). “Doing” science versus “being” a scientist: Examining 10/11-year-old schoolchildren’s constructions of science through the lens of identity. Science Education, 94, 617–639. doi:10.1002/sce.20399
  • Archer, L., DeWitt, J., Osborne, J., Dillon, J., Willis, B., & Wong, B. (2012). Science aspirations and family habitus: How families shape children’s engagement and identification with science. American Educational Research Journal, 49, 881–908. doi:10.3102/0002831211433290
  • Ashcraft, K. L., & Ashcraft, C. (2015). Breaking the “glass slipper”: What diversity interventions can learn from the historical evolution of occupational identity in ICT and commercial aviation. In V. Schafer & B.G. Thierry (Eds.), Connecting women (pp. 137–155). Switzerland: Springer International Publishing.10.1007/978-3-319-20837-4
  • Buckingham, D. (2008). Youth, identity and digital media. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • Butler, J. (1990). Gender trouble. New York, NY: Routledge.
  • Carlone, H. B., & Johnson, A. C. (2007). Understanding the science experiences of women of color: Science identity as an analytic lens. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 44, 1187–1218. doi:10.1002/tea.20237
  • Cheryan, S., Plaut, V. C., Davies, P. G., & Steele, C. M. (2009). Ambient belonging: How stereotypical cues impact gender participation in computer science. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 97, 1045–1060. doi:10.1037/a0016239
  • Cohoon, J. M., & Aspray, W. (2006). Women and information technology: Research on under representation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.10.7551/mitpress/9780262033459.001.0001
  • Connell, R. W. (1995). Masculinities. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
  • DeWitt, J., Archer, L., & Osborne, J. (2013). Nerdy, brainy and normal: Children’s and parents’ constructions of those who are highly engaged with science. Research in Science Education, 43, 1455–1476. doi:10.1007/s11165-012-9315-0
  • DfE. (2015). Further additional GCSE and A-level subject content consultation. London: Department for Education.
  • Dictionaries, O. (2010). Oxford dictionary of English. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • DiSalvo, B., Guzdial, M., Bruckman, A., & McKlin, T. (2014). Saving face while geeking out: Video game testing as a justification for learning computer science. Journal of the Learning, Sciences, 23, 272–315. doi:10.1080/10508406.2014.893434
  • ECU. (2015). Equality in higher education: Statistical report 2015 Part 2: Students. London: Equality Challenge Unit.
  • Ensmenger, N. L. (2012). The computer boys take over: Computers, programmers, and the politics of technical expertise. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • Francis, F. J. (1994). The relationship between computer related attitudes and gender stereotyping of computer use. Computers and Education, 22, 283–289. doi:10.1016/0360-1315(94)90050-7
  • Francis, B., & Skelton, C. (2005). Reassessing gender and achievement: Questioning contemporary key debates. London: Routledge.10.4324/9780203412923
  • Gardner, H., & Davis, K. (2013). The app generation: How today’s youth navigate identity, intimacy, and imagination in a digital world. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
  • Goode, J. (2010). The digital identity divide: How technology knowledge impacts college students. New Media and Society, 12, 497–513. doi:10.1177/1461444809343560
  • Halbert, D. (1997). Discourses of danger and the computer hacker. The Information Society, 13, 361–374. doi:10.1080/019722497129061
  • Hall, S. (1990). Cultural identity and diaspora. In J. Rutherford (Ed.), Identity: Community, Culture, Difference (pp. 222–237). London: Lawrence and Wishart.
  • Hatmaker, D. M. (2013). Engineering identity: Gender and professional identity negotiation among women engineers. Gender, Work and Organization, 20, 382–396. doi:10.1111/j.1468-0432.2012.00589.x
  • House of Commons. (2016). Digital skills crisis. London: House of Commons Science and Technology Committee.
  • JCQ. (2015). Entry trends, gender and regional charts GCE 2015. London: Joint Councils for Qualifications.
  • Kemp, P., Wong, B., & Berry, M. (2016). The Roehampton computing education report: Data from 2015. London: University of Roehampton.
  • Kendall, L. (2011). “White and nerdy”: Computers, race, and the nerd stereotype. The Journal of Popular Culture, 44, 505–524. doi:10.1111/j.1540-5931.2011.00846.x
  • Kinnunen, P., Butler, M., Morgan, M., Nylen, A., Peters, A., Sinclair, J., … Pesonen, E. (2016). Understanding initial undergraduate expectations and identity in computing studies. European Journal of Engineering Education. Epub ahead of print 24 Feb 2016. doi: 10.1080/03043797.2016.1146233
  • Klawe, M., & Shneiderman, B. (2005). Crisis and opportunity in computer science. Communications of the ACM, 48, 27–28. doi:10.1145/1096000.1096024
  • Koch, S. C., Müller, S. M., & Sieverding, M. (2008). Women and computers. Effects of stereotype threat on attribution of failure. Computers and Education, 51, 1795–1803. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2008.05.007
  • Lareau, A. (2003). Unequal childhood. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
  • Leech, R. (2007). Geek chic: Getting girls into it. Teacher: The National Education Magazine, 4–6, 8–10. URL: http://search.informit.com.au/documentSummary;dn=351119117602686;res=IELHSS
  • Livingstone, S., & Sefton-Green, J. (2016). The class: Living and learning in the digital age. New York, NY: New York University Press.10.18574/nyu/9781479884575.001.0001
  • Losh, S. C. (2010). Stereotypes about scientists over time among US adults: 1983 and 2001. Public Understanding of Science, 19, 372–382. doi:10.1177/0963662508098576
  • Margolis, J., & Fisher, A. (2002). Unlocking the clubhouse: Women in computing. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • McArthur, J. A. (2009). Digital subculture: A geek meaning of style. Journal of Communication Inquiry, 33, 58–70. doi:10.1177/0196859908325676
  • Mendick, H. (2005). A beautiful myth? The gendering of being/doing “good at maths”. Gender and Education, 17, 203–219. doi:10.1080/0954025042000301465
  • Mendick, H., & Francis, B. (2012). Boffin and geek identities: Abject or privileged? Gender and Education, 24, 15–24. doi:10.1080/09540253.2011.564575
  • Mendick, H., & Moreau, M. P. (2013). New media, old images: Constructing online representations of women and men in science, engineering and technology. Gender and Education, 25, 325–339. doi:10.1080/09540253.2012.740447
  • Mercier, E. M., Barron, B., & O’Connor, K. M. (2006). Images of self and others as computer users: The role of gender and experience. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 22, 335–348. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2729.2006.00182.x
  • Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Ofcom. (2015). Adults’ media use and attitudes: Report 2015. London: Office of Communication.
  • Peters, A. (2014). The role of students’ identity development in higher education in computing (Licentiate thesis). Uppsala University, Uppsala.
  • Skibell, R. (2002). The myth of the computer hacker. Information, Communication and Society, 5, 336–356. doi:10.1080/13691180210159292a
  • Stoilescu, D., & Egodawatte, G. (2010). Gender differences in the use of computers, programming, and peer interactions in computer science classrooms. Computer Science Education, 20, 283–300. doi:10.1080/08993408.2010.527691
  • Tocci, J. (2009). Geek cultures: Media and identity in the digital age (Unpublished PhD thesis). Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania.
  • Tondeur, J., Sinnaeve, I., van Houtte, M., & van Braak, J. (2010). ICT as cultural capital: The relationship between socioeconomic status and the computer-use profile of young people. New Media & Society, 13, 151–168. doi:10.1177/1461444810369245
  • Van Deursen, A. J. A. M. & Van Dijk, J. A. G. M. (2014). The digital divide shifts to differences in usage. New Media and Society, 16, 507–526. doi:10.1177/1461444813487959
  • Varma, R. (2007). Women in computing: The role of geek culture. Science as Culture, 16, 359–376. doi:10.1080/09505430701706707
  • Varma, R. (2010). Why so few women enroll in computing? Gender and ethnic differences in students’ perception. Computer Science Education, 20, 301–316. doi:10.1080/08993408.2010.527697
  • Wainer, J., Vieira, P., & Melguizo, T. (2015). The association between having access to computers and Internet and educational achievement for primary students in Brazil. Computers & Education, 80, 68–76. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2014.08.007
  • Ward, M. R. M. (2014). ‘I’m a geek I am’: Academic achievement and the performance of a studious working-class masculinity. Gender and Education, 26, 709–725. doi:10.1080/09540253.2014.953918.
  • Warschauer, M., Knobel, M., & Stone, L. (2004). Technology and equity in schooling: Deconstructing the digital divide. Educational Policy, 18, 562–588. doi:10.1177/0895904804266469
  • Windley, P. J. (2005). Digital identity. Sebastopol, CA: O’Reilly Media Inc.
  • Wong, B. (2012). Identifying with science: A case study of two 13 year-old British Asian “high achieving working class” schoolgirls. International Journal of Science Education, 34, 43–65. doi:10.1080/09500693.2010.551671
  • Wong, B. (2015). Careers “From” but not “in” science: Why are aspirations to be a scientist challenging for minority ethnic students? Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 52, 979–1002. doi:10.1002/tea.21231
  • Wong, B. (2016). Science education, career aspirations and minority ethnic students. Basingstoke: Palgrave MacMillan.10.1057/9781137533982
  • Wong, B., & Kemp, P. (under review). Technical boys and creative girls: The career aspirations of digitally-competent youths.
  • Zhao, S., Grasmuck, S., & Martin, J. (2008). Identity construction on Facebook: Digital empowerment in anchored relationships. Computers in Human Behavior, 24, 1816–1836. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2008.02.012