References
- Ahadi, A., Hellas, A., Ihantola, P., Korhonen, A., & Petersen, A. Replication in computing education research: Researcher attitudes and experiences. In Proceedings of the 16th koli calling international conference on computing education research, Koli Calling ’16, 2–11, New York, NY, USA, 2016. Association for Computing Machinery. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1145/2999541.2999554
- Artifact Review and Badging – Current. (2020, August). https://www.acm.org/publications/policies/artifact-review-and-badging-current
- Bruton, S. V., Medlin, M., Brown, M., & Sacco, D. F. (2020, June). Personal motivations and systemic incentives: Scientists on questionable research practices. Science and Engineering Ethics, 260 (3), 0 1531–1547. 1471-5546 https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-020-00182-9
- Buffardi, K. (2020). assessing individual contributions to software engineering projects with Git Logs and User Stories. Association for Computing Machinery. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1145/3328778.3366948
- Center for Open Science. (2020).Registered reports. https://www.cos.io/initiatives/registered-reports
- Earp, B. D., & Trafimow, D. (2015). Replication, falsification, and the crisis of confidence in social psychology. Frontiers in Psychology, 6. 1664-1078. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00621
- Gopalakrishna, G., ter Riet, G., Vink, G., Stoop, I., Wicherts, J. M., & Bouter, L. M. (2022, Feb). Prevalence of questionable research practices, research misconduct and their potential explanatory factors: A survey among academic researchers in the Netherlands. PLOS ONE, 170(2), 0 1–16. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0263023
- Grant, D. B., Kovács, G., & Spens, K. (2018, January). Questionable research practices in academia: Antecedents and consequences. European Business Review, 300 (2), 0 101–127. 0955-534X https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1108/EBR-12-2016-0155
- Hao, Q., D. H. Smith, N. I., IV, Tsikerdekis, M., & Ko, A. J. (2019, August). A systematic investigation of replications in computing education research. ACM Transactions on Computing Education, 19(4), 42. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1145/3345328
- Lopez, M., Whalley, J., Robbins, P., & Lister, R. (2008). Relationships between reading, tracing and writing skills in introductory programming. In Proceedings of the fourth international workshop on computing education research, 101–112, New York, NY, USA, Association for Computing Machinery. 9781605582160. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1145/1404520.1404531
- Román-González, M., Pérez-González, J.-C., & Jiménez-Fernández, C. (2017). Which cognitive abilities underlie computational thinking? Criterion validity of the computational thinking test. Computers in Human Behavior, 72, 0 678–691. 0747-5632. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.08.047
- Romero, F. (2019). Philosophy of science and the replicability crisis. Philosophy Compass, 140(11), 0 e12633. e12633 PHCO-1228.R1. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/phc3.12633
- Zehra, S., Ramanathan, A., Zhang, L. Y., & Zingaro, D. (2018). Student misconceptions of dynamic programming. In Proceedings of the 49th ACM technical symposium on computer science education, SIGCSE ’18, 556–561, New York, NY, USA, Association for Computing Machinery .https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1145/3159450.3159528