The Nature and Consequences of Group Cohesion in a Military Sample

REFERENCES

• Ahronson, A. (2001). Conceptual and measurement considerations for cohesion in university workgroups. Unpublished manuscript.
   Google Scholar
• Baumeister , R. F. and Leary , M. R. 1995 . The need to belong: Desire for interpersonal attachments as a fundamental human motivation. . Psychological Review , 117 : 497 – 529 .
   Google Scholar
• Bentler , P. M. and Chou , C. P. 1987 . Practical issues in structural equation modeling. . Sociological Methods & Research , 16 : 78 – 117 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bliese , P. D. and Halverson , R. R. 1996 . Individual and nomothetic models of job stress: An examination of work hours, cohesion, and well-being. . Journal of Applied Social Psychology , 26 : 1171 – 1189 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bollen , K. A. and Hoyle , R. H. 1990 . Perceived cohesion: A conceptual and empirical examination. . Social Forces , 69 : 479 – 504 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cameron , J. E. 1999 . Social identity and the pursuit of possible selves: Implications for the psychological well-being of university students. . Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice , 3 : 179 – 189 .
   Google Scholar
• Carless , S. A. and De Paola , C. 2000 . The measurement of cohesion in work teams. . Small Group Research , 31 : 71 – 88 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carron , A. V. and Brawley , L. R. 2000 . Cohesion: Conceptual and measurement issues. . Small Group Research , 31 : 71 – 88 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carron , A. V. , Brawley , L. R. and Widmeyer , W. N. 1998 . “ Measurement of cohesion in sport and exercise ” . In Measurement in sport and exercise , Edited by: Duda , J. 213 – 226 . Morgantown, WV : Fitness Information Technology .
   Google Scholar
• Carron , A. V. , Widmeyer , W. N. and Brawley , L. R. 1985 . The development of an instrument to assess cohesion in sport teams: The Group Environment Questionnaire. . Journal of Sport Psychology , 7 : 244 – 266 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chin , W. W. and Salisbury , W. D. 1999 . Perceived cohesion in small groups. . Small Group Research , 30 : 751 – 767 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen , S. and Willis , T. 1985 . Stress, social support, and the buffering hypothesis. . Psychological Bulletin , 98 : 310 – 357 .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dion , K. L. 2000 . Group cohesion: From “field of forces” to multidimensional construct. . Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice , 4 : 7 – 26 .
   Google Scholar
• Dobbins , G. H. and Zaccaro , S. J. 1986 . The effects of group cohesion and leader behavior on subordinate satisfaction. . Group and Organization Studies , 11 : 203 – 219 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dohrenwend , B. S. and Dohrenwend , B. P. , eds. 1984 . Stressful life events and their contexts , New York : Neale Watson .
   Google Scholar
• Dyce , J. A. and Cornell , J. 1996 . Factorial validity of the Group Environment Questionnaire among musicians. . Journal of Social Psychology , 136 : 263 – 264 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evans , C. R. and Dion , K. L. 1991 . Group cohesion and performance: A meta-analysis. . Small Group Research , 22 : 175 – 186 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gerbing , D. and Hamilton , J. G. 1996 . Viability of exploratory factor analysis as a precursor to confirmatory factor analysis. . Structural Equation Modeling , 3 : 62 – 72 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Griffith , J. 1988 . Measurement of group cohesion in U.S. Army units. . Basic and Applied Social Psychology , 9 : 149 – 171 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gully , S. M. , Devine , D. J. and Whitney , D. J. 1995 . A meta-analysis of cohesion and performance: Effects of level of analysis and task interdependence. . Small Group Research , 26 : 497 – 520 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoyle , R. H. and Crawford , A. A. 1994 . Use of individual-level data to investigate group phenomena: Issues and strategies. . Small Group Research , 25 : 464 – 485 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hu , L. and Bentler , P. M. 1995 . “ Evaluating model fit ” . In Structural equation modeling: Concepts, issues, and applications , Edited by: Hoyle , R. H. 76 – 100 . London : Sage .
   Google Scholar
• Hu , L. and Bentler , P. M. 1999 . Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. . Structural Equation Modeling , 6 : 1 – 55 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jöreskog , K. G. and Sörbom , D. 1992 . LISREL VIII: Analysis of linear structural relations , Mooresville, IN : Scientific Software .
   Google Scholar
• Judge , T. A. , Bono , J. E. , Thoresen , C. J. and Patton , G. K. 2001 . The job satisfaction-job performance relationship: A qualitative and quantitative review. . Psychological Bulletin , 127 : 376 – 407 .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kelloway , E. K. 1998 . Using LISREL for structural equation modelling: A researcher's guide , Thousand Oaks, CA : Sage .
   Google Scholar
• Kelloway , E. K. , Catano , V. M. and Southwell , R. R. 1992 . The construct validity of union commitment: Development and dimensionality of a shorter scale. . Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology , 65 : 197 – 211 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kozub , S. A. and McDonnell , J. F. 2000 . Exploring the relationship between cohesion and collective efficacy in rugby teams. . Journal of Sport Behavior , 23 : 120 – 128 .
   Google Scholar
• Langfred , C. W. 2000 . The paradox of self-management. . Journal of Organizational Behavior , 21 : 563 – 585 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li , F. and Harmer , P. 1996 . Confirmatory factor analysis of the Group Environment Questionnaire with an intercollegiate sample. . Journal of Sport & Exercise Psychology , 18 : 49 – 63 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mudrack , P. E. 1989 . Group cohesiveness and productivity: A closer look. . Human Relations , 42 : 771 – 785 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mullen , B. and Cooper , C. 1994 . The relationship between group cohesiveness and performance: An integration. . Psychological Bulletin , 115 : 2210 – 227 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oliver , L. W. , Harman , J. , Hoover , E. , Hayes , S. M. and Pandhi , N. A. 1999 . A quantitative integration of the military cohesion literature. . Military Psychology , 11 : 57 – 83 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prapavessis , H. and Carron , A. V. 1997 . Cohesion and work output. . Small Group Research , 28 : 294 – 301 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schutz , R. , Eom , H. J. , Smoll , F. L. and Smith , R. E. 1994 . Examination of the factorial validity of the Group Environment Questionnaire. . Research Quarterly for Exercise & Sport , 65 : 226 – 236 .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shangley , M. and Langfred , C. W. 1998 . The importance of organizational context: an empirical test of work group cohesiveness and effectiveness in two government bureaucracies. . Public Administration Quarterly , 21 : 465 – 485 .
   Google Scholar
• Siebold , G. L. 1999 . The evolution of measurement of cohesion. . Military Psychology , 11 : 5 – 26 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Solomon , Z. , Mikulincer , M. and Hobfoll , S. E. 1986 . Effects of social support and battle intensity on loneliness and breakdown during combat. . Journal of Personality and Social Psychology , 51 : 1269 – 1276 .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tabachnik , B. G. and Fidell , L. S. 2001 . Using multivariate statistics , 4th ed. , Allyn & Bacon .
   Google Scholar
• Tajfel , H. and Turner , J. C. 1979 . “ An integrative theory of intergroup conflict ” . In The social psychology of intergroup relations , Edited by: Austin , W. G. and Worchel , S. 33 – 47 . Monterey, CA : Brooks-Cole .
   Google Scholar
• Tziner , A. and Vardi , Y. 1983 . Ability as a moderator between cohesiveness and tank crews performance. . Journal of Occupational Behaviour , 4 : 137 – 143 .
   Google Scholar
• Wanous , J. P. , Reichers , A. E. and Hudy , M. J. 1997 . Overall job satisfaction: How good are single-item measures? . Journal of Applied Psychology , 82 : 247 – 252 .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wech , B. A. , Mossholder , K. W. , Steel , R. P. and Bennett , N. 1998 . Does work group cohesiveness affect individuals' performance and organizational commitment? A cross-level examination. . Small Group Research , 29 : 472 – 495 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wright , T. A. and Staw , B. M. 1999 . Affect and favorable work outcomes: Two longitudinal tests of the happy-productive worker thesis. . Journal of Organizational Behavior , 20 : 1 – 23 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zacarro , S. J. 1991 . Nonequivalent association between forms of cohesiveness and group-related outcomes: Evidence for multidimensionality. . Journal of Social Psychology , 13 : 387 – 399 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zaccaro , S. J. and Lowe , C. A. 1988 . Cohesiveness and performance on an additive task: Evidence for multidimensionality. . Journal of Social Psychology , 128 : 547 – 558 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar