Situational judgment test for measuring military tactical decision-making skills

References

• Arthur, W., Glaze, R., Bhupatkar, A., Villado, A. B., & Rowe, L. (2012). Team analysis: Differentiating between tasks using team relatedness and team workflow as metrics of team task interdependence. Human Factors, 54(2), 277–295. doi: 10.1177/0018720811435234
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bartram, D. (2007). Increasing validity with forced-Choice criterion measurement formats. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 263–272. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2389.2007.00386.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bergman, M. E., Drasgow, F., Donovan, M. A., Henning, J. B., & Juraska, S. E. (2006). Scoring situational judgment tests: Once you get the data, your troubles begin. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 14(3), 223–235. doi:10.1111/ijsa.2006.14.issue-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, A. (2012). Fitting a thurstonian IRT model to forced-choice data using Mplus. Behavior Research Method, 1135–1147. doi:10.3758/s13428-012-0217-x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campion, M. C., Ployhart, R. E., & MacKenzie, W. I. (2014). The state of research on situational judgment tests: A content analysis and directions for future research. Human Perfomance, 27, 283–310. doi:10.1080/08959285.2014.929693
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chan, D., & Schmitt, N. (2002). Situational judgment and job performance. Human Performance, 15(3), 233–254. doi: 10.1207/S15327043HUP1503_01
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chancey, E., & Bliss, J. (2012). Unreliable Information in Infantry Situation Awareness: Improvement Through Game-Based Training. Simulation & Gaming, 43(5), 1–19. doi:10.1177/1046878112439452
   Google Scholar
• Cheung, M. W., & Chan, W. (2002). Reducing uniform response bias with ipsative measurement in multiple-group confirmatory factor analysis. Structural Equation Modeling, 55–77. doi:10.1207/S15328007SEM0901_4
   Google Scholar
• Dees, R. A., Nestler, S. T., & Kewley, R. (2013). WholeSoldier performance appraisal to support mentoring and personnel decisions. Decision Analysis, 82–97. doi:10.1287/deca.1120.0263
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hauenstein, N. M., Findlay, R. A., & McDonald, D. P. (2010). Using situational judgment tests to assess training effectiveness: Lessons learned evaluating military equal opportunity advisor trainees. Military Psychology, 262–281. doi:10.1080/08995605.2010.492679
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hedlund, J., Horvath, J. A., Forsythe, G. B., Snook, S., Bullis, R. C., Dennis, M., & Sternberg, R. J. (1998). Tacit Knowledge in Military Leadership: Evidence of Construct Validity ( Technical Report 1080). Alexandria, VA: United States Army Research Institute for the Behavioral and Social Sciences.
   Google Scholar
• Horvath, J., Sternberg, R., Forsythe, G., Sweeney, P., Williams, W., & Dennis, M. (1996). Tacit knowledge in military leadership: Supporting instrument development. Alexandria, VA: United States Army Research Insitute for the Behavioral and Social Sciences.
   Google Scholar
• Jonassen, D. H. (2000). Toward a design theory of problem solving. Educational Technology Research and Development, 48, 63–85. doi:10.1007/BF02300500
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaju, G. (2013). Aruanne kaitseväekohustuse täitmisest ja kaitseväeteenistuse korraldamisest 2013. aastal. Harju, Estonia: Kaitseministeerium.
   Google Scholar
• Klein, G. (1999). Sources of power: How people make decisions. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Leeds, J. (2012). The theory of cognitive acuity: Extending psychophysics to the measurement of situational judgment. Journal of Neuroscience, Psychology, and Economics, 5(3), 106–181. doi: 10.1037/a0027294
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lievens, F., & Sackett, P. R. (2006). Video-based versus written situational judgment tests: A comparison in predictive validity. Journal of Applied Psychology, 1181–1188. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.91.5.1181
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Männiste, T., & Pedaste, M. (2015). Probleemi mõiste sõjanduses ning probleemõppe lõimimisvõimalustest sõjaväelise väljaõppega. KVÜÕA Toimetised, 20, 198–244.
   Google Scholar
• Männiste, T., Pedaste, M., & Schimanski, R. (2019). Review of instruments measuring decision making performance in military tactical level battle situation context. Military Psychology, doi:10.1080/08995605.2019.1645538
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McDaniel, M., Hartman, N., Whetzel, D., & Grubb, W. L. (2007). Situational judgment tests, response instructions and validity: A meta-analysis. Personnel Psychology, 63–91. doi:10.1111/j.1744-6570.2007.00065.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McDaniel, M., Morgeson, F., Finnegan, E., Campion, M., & Braverman, E. (2001). Predicting job performance using situational judgment tests: A clarification of the literature. Journal of Applied Psychology, 730–740. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.86.4.730
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McDaniel, M. A., & Nguyen, N. T. (2001). Situational judgment tests: A review of practice and constructs assessed. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 9(1–2), 103–113. doi:10.1111/1468-2389.00167
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morrison, J. G., Kelly, R. T., Moore, R. A., & Hutchins, S. G. (1996). Tactical Decision Making under Stress (TADMUS) decision support system. Monterey, California: Naval Postgraduate School. Allikas. Retrieved from https://calhoun.nps.edu/handle/10945/41225
   Google Scholar
• Nunnally, J. C. (1978). Psychometric Theory (2nd ed.). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Ployhart, R. E., & Ehrhart, M. G. (2003). Be careful what you ask for: Effects of response instructions on the construct validity and reliability of situational judgment tests. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 11(1), 1–16. doi:10.1111/ijsa.2003.11.issue-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salas, E., Priest, H. A., Wilson, K. A., & Burke, S. C. (2006). Scenario-Based Training: Improving Military Mission Performance and Adaptability. In B. A. Adler, C. A. Castro, & T. W. Britt. Military Life: The Psychology of Serving in Peace and Combat: Operational Stress (pp. 32–53). Westport, CT: Praeger Security international.
   Google Scholar
• Saldago, J., Viesewaran, C., & Ones, D. (2001). Predictors used for personnel selection: An overview of constructs, methods, and techniques. In N. Anderson, D. Ones, H. Sinagil, & C. Visewaran, Handbook of industrial, work, & organizational psychology, Vol. 1. (pp. 165–199). London, UK: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Shadrick, S. B., & Lussier, J. W. (2004). Assessment of the think like a commander training program. Fort Knox, KY: U.S. Army Research Institute for the Behavioural and Social Sciences.
   Google Scholar
• Silm, G., Pedaste, M., & Tzäht, K. (submitted). Measuring test-taking effort with self-report and time-based measures of effort: A meta-analytic review.
   Google Scholar
• Sookermany, A. (2012). Learning in doing – skills acquisition in [Post-] modernised military. Defence Studies, 11(4), 615–635. doi:10.1080/14702436.2011.642195
   Google Scholar
• Weekley, J. A., & Ployhart, R. E. (2006). An Introduction to Situational Judgement Testing. In J. A. Weekley, & R. E. Ployhart (Eds.), Situational Judgment Tests: Theory, Measurement, and Application (pp. 18–25). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Whetzel, D. L., & McDaniel, M. (2009). Situational judgment tests: An overview of current research. Human Resource Management Review, 188–202. doi:10.1016/j.hrmr.2009.03.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wise, S. L., & DeMars, C. E. (2005). Low Examinee Effort in Low-Stakes Assessment: Problems and Potential Solutions. Educational Assessment, 10(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326977ea1001_1
   Google Scholar