Attributions of Responsibility for Military Misconduct: Constraint, Identification, and Severity

References

• Alicke, M. D. (2000). Culpable control and the psychology of blame. Psychological Bulletin, 126, 556–574. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.126.4.556
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alicke, M. D., Mandel, D. R., Hilton, D. J., Gerstenberg, T., & Lagnado, D. A. (2015). Causal conceptions in social explanation: A historical tour. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 10, 790–812. doi:10.1177/1745691615601888
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson, S. (2017). Coercion. In E. N. Zalta Ed., The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy (Winter 2017 ed.). <https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2017/entries/coercion/>
   Google Scholar
• Asch, S. (1955). Opinions and social pressure. Scientific American, 19, 31–35. doi:10.1038/scientificamerican1155-31
   Google Scholar
• Bell, N. E., & Tetlock, P. E. (1989). The intuitive politician and the assignment of blame in organizations. In R. A. Glacalone & P. Rosenfeld (Eds.), Impression management in the organization) (pp. 105–123). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Bilton, M., & Sim, K. (1993). Four hours in My Lai. London, UK: Penguin.
   Google Scholar
• Branscombe, N. R., Owen, S., Garstka, T. A., & Coleman, J. (1996). Rape and accident counterfactuals: Who might have done otherwise and would it have changed the outcome? Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 26(12), 1042–1067. doi:10.1111/j.1559-1816.1996.tb01124.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bratman, M. E. (1996). Identification, decision, and treating as a reason. Philosophical Topics, 24, 1–18. doi:10.5840/philtopics19962429
   Google Scholar
• Brink, D. O. (2019). The Nature and Significance of Culpability. Criminal Law and Philosophy, 13(2), 347–373. doi:10.1007/s11572-018-9476-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Catino, M. (2008). A review of literature: Individual blame vs. organizational function logics in accident analysis. Journal of Contingencies and Crisis Management, 16, 53–62. doi:10.1111/j.1468-5973.2008.00533.x
   Google Scholar
• Choi, I., Nisbett, R. E., & Norenzayan, A. (1999). Causal attribution across cultures: Variation and universality. Psychological Bulletin, 125, 47–63. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.125.1.47
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cialdini, R., & Trost, M. (1998). Social influence: Social norms, conformity, and compliance. In D. T. Gilbert, S. T. Fiske, & G. Lindzey (Eds.), Handbook of social psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 151–192). Boston, MA: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Clark, J. N. (2009). Genocide, war crimes and the conflict in Bosnia: Understanding the perpetrators. Journal of Genocide Research, 11(4), 421–455. doi:10.1080/14623520903309479
   Google Scholar
• Crant, M. J., & Bateman, T. S. (1993). Assignment of credit and blame for performance outcomes. Academy of Management Journal, 36, 7–27.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cushman, F., & Greene, J. D. (2011). Finding faults: How moral dilemmas illuminate cognitive structure. Social Neuroscience, 7(3), 269–279. doi:10.1080/17470919.2011.614000
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cushman, F., & Young, L. (2009). The psychology of dilemmas and the philosophy of morality. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice, 12(1), 9–24. doi:10.1007/s10677-008-9145-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doris, J. M. (2002). Lack of character: Personality and moral behavior. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Doris, J. M. (2015). Talking to our selves: Reflection, ignorance, and agency. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Doris, J. M., Knobe, J., & Woolfolk, R. L. (2007). Variantism about responsibility. Philosophical Perspectives: Philosophy of Mind, 21, 183–214. doi:10.1111/j.1520-8583.2007.00125.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doris, J. M., & Murphy, D. (2007). From My Lai to Abu Ghraib: The moral psychology of atrocity. Midwest Studies in Philosophy, 31, 25–55. doi:10.1111/j.1475-4975.2007.00149.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feinberg, M., Fang, R., Liu, S., & Peng, K. (2019). A world of blame to go around: Cross-cultural determinants of responsibility and punishment judgments. Personality & Social Psychology Bulletin, 45(4), 634–651. doi:10.1177/0146167218794631
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frankfurt, H. G. (1988). The importance of what we care about: Philosophical essays. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Frésard, -J.-J. (2004). The roots of behavior in war: A survey of the literature. Geneva, Switzerland: International Committee of the Red Cross.
   Google Scholar
• Glover, J. (2012). Humanity: A moral history of the twentieth century. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Greene, J. D., Nystrom, L. E., Engell, A. D., Darley, J. M., & Cohen, J. D. (2004). The neural bases of cognitive conflict and control in moral judgment. Neuron, 44(2), 389–400. doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2004.09.027
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guglielmo, S., & Malle, B. F. (2019 March 12). Asymmetric morality: Blame is more differentiated and more extreme than praise. PLOS, 2019. Published doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0213544
   Google Scholar
• Hamilton, V. L. (1978). Who is responsible? Towards a social psychology of responsibility attribution. Social Psychology, 41, 316–328. doi:10.2307/3033584
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hamilton, V. L. (1980). Intuitive psychologist or intuitive lawyer? Alternative models of the attribution process. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39, 767–772. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.39.5.767
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hannah, S. T., Thompson, R., & Herbst, K. (2020). Moral identity complexity: Situated morality within and across work and social roles. Journal of Management, 46, 727–757.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hartle, A. E. (1989). Moral issues in military decision making. Lawrence, KS: University Press of Kansas.
   Google Scholar
• Jennings, P. L., & Hannah, S. T. (2011). The moralities of obligation and aspiration: Towards a concept of exemplary military ethics and leadership. Military Psychology, 23, 1–22. doi:10.1080/08995605.2011.600158
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, E. E., & Davis, K. E. (1965). From acts to dispositions: The attribution process in person perception. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology. (Vol. 2) (pp. 219–266). New York: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jones, E. E. (1990). Interpersonal perception. New York, NY: W. H. Freeman and Company.
   Google Scholar
• Kelley, H. H. (1972). Attribution in social interaction. In E. E. Jones, D. E. Kanouse, H. H. Kelley, R. Nisbett, S. Valins, & B. Weiner (Eds.), Attribution: Perceiving the causes of behavior. (pp. 1–26). Morristown, NJ: General Learning Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kelman, H., & Hamilton, V. L. (1989). Crimes of Obedience: Toward a social psychology of authority and responsibility. New Haven: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kneer, M., & Machery, E. (2019). No luck for moral luck. Cognition, 182, 331–348. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2018.09.003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Larkin, P. J. (2014). Strict liability offenses, incarceration, and the cruel and unusual punishments clause. Harvard Journal of Law & Public Policy, 37(3), 165–1121.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McMahan, J. (2009). Killing in war. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Milgram, S. (1974). Obedience to authority. New York, NY: Harper Colophon.
   Google Scholar
• Monroe, A. E., & Malle, B. F. People systematically update moral judgments of blame. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 2019 Feb. 1162, 215–236. doi:10.1037/pspa0000137. Epub. 2018 Oct 25.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Monroe, A. E., Malle, B. F., & Moore, M. S. (2018). The strictness of strict liability. Criminal Law and Philosophy, 12(3), 513–529. doi:10.1007/s11572-017-9438-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murphy, D., & Doris, J. M. (forthcoming). Skepticism about evil: Atrocity and the limits of responsibility. In D. Nelkin & D. Pereboom (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Moral Responsibility. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nichols, S., & Knobe, J. (2007). Moral responsibility and determinism: The cognitive science of folk intuitions. Nous, 41(4), 663–685. doi:10.1111/j.1468-0068.2007.00666.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ohtsubo, Y. (2007). Perceived intentionality intensifies blameworthiness of negative behaviors: Blame-praise asymmetry in intensification effect. Japanese Psychological Research, 49(2), 100–110. doi:10.1111/j.1468-5884.2007.00337.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Osiel, M. (1999). Obeying orders: Atrocity, military discipline and the law of war.
   Google Scholar
• Parfit, D. (1984). Reasons and persons. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pizzaro, D., Uhlmann, E., & Salovey, P. (2003). Asymmetry in judgments of moral praise and blame: The role of metadesires. Psychological Science, 14, 267–272. doi:10.1111/1467-9280.03433
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pratt, M. G., Rockmann, K. W., & Kauffman, J. B. (2006). Constructing professional identity: The role of work and identity learning cycles in the customization of identity among medical residents. Academy of Management Journal, 49, 235–262. doi:10.5465/amj.2006.20786060
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reeder, G. D., Kumar, S., Hesson-McInnis, M. S., & Trfimow, D. (2002). Inferences about the morality of an aggressor: The role of perceived motive. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83, 789–803. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.83.4.789
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rest, J. R., Narvaez, D., Bebeau, M. J., & Thoma, S. J. (1999). Postconventional moral thinking: A neo-Kohlbergian approach. Mahway, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Ross, L. (1977). The intuitive psychologist and his shortcomings: Distortions in the attribution process. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology. (Vol. 10, pp. 174–221). New York: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rucker, D. D., Polifroni, M., Tetlock, P. E., & Scott, A. L. (2004). On the assignment of punishment: The impact of general-societal threat and the moderating role of severity. Personality & Social Psychology Bulletin, 30, 673–684. doi:10.1177/0146167203262849
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schlenker, B. R., Britt, T. W., Pennington, J., Murphy, R., & Doherty, K. (1994). The triangle model of responsibility. Psychological Review, 101, 632–652. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.101.4.632
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SEP Malpas, J., “Donald Davidson”, The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Winter 2012 Edition), Edward N. Zalta (ed.). <https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2012/entries/davidson/>.
   Google Scholar
• Shoemaker, D. (2012). Blame and punishment. In D. J. Coates & N. A. Tognazzini (Eds.), Blame: Its nature and norms, 100–118 2012. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sinnott-Armstrong, W. (2019). Consequentialism. In E. N. Zalta (Ed.), The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy (Summer 2019 ed). <https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2019/entries/consequentialism/>.
   Google Scholar
• Skowronski, J. J., & Carlston, D. E. (1989). Negativity and extremity biases in impression formation: A review of explanations. Psychological Bulletin, 105(1), 131–142. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.105.1.131
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, J. W. (1961). Impossibility and morals. Mind, 70, 362–375. doi:10.1093/mind/LXX.279.362
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tadros, V. (2005). Criminal responsibility. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Talbert, M., & Wolfendale, J. (2018). War Crimes: Causes, Excuses, and Blame. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Uniform Code of Military Justice, 64 Statute 109, 10 U.S.C. § 47. 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Velleman, J. D. (1992). What happens when someone acts? Mind, 101, 461–481. doi:10.1093/mind/101.403.461
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Viney, W., Parker-Martin, P., & Dotten, S. D. H. (1988). Beliefs in free will and determinism and lack of relation to punishment rationale and magnitude. The Journal of General Psychology, 115(1), 15–23. doi:10.1080/00221309.1988.9711084
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Viney, W., Waldmann, D., & Bachilon, J. (1982, November 1). Attitudes toward punishment in relation to beliefs in free will and determinism. Human Relations, 35(11), 939–949. doi:10.1177/001872678203501101
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Waldmann, M., & Wallace, R. J. (1994). Responsibility and the moral sentiments. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Waldmann, M. R., & Wiegmann, A. (2010). A double causal contrast theory of moral intuitions in trolley dilemmas. In Proceedings of the 32nd annual conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 2589–2594). Austin, TX: Cognitive Science Society.
   Google Scholar
• Walster, E. (1966). The assignment ofresponsibility for an accident. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 3, 73–79.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watson, G. (1996). Two faces of responsibility. Philosophical Topics:, 24, 227–248. doi:10.5840/philtopics199624222
   Google Scholar
• Weiner, B. (1995). Judgments of responsibility: A foundation for a theory of social conduct. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Willemsen, P., & Reuter, K. (2016). Is there really an omission effect? Philosophical Psychology, 29(8). doi:10.1080/09515089.2016.1225194.
   Google Scholar
• Woolfolk, R. L., Doris, J. M., & Darley, J. M. (2006). Identification, situational constraint, and social cognition: Studies in the attribution of moral responsibility. Cognition, 100, 283–391. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2005.05.002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Young, L., Cushman, F., Hauser, M., & Saxe, R. (2007, May 15). The neural basis of the interactionbetween theory of mind and moral judgment. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 104(20), 8235–8240. doi:10.1073/pnas.0701408104
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zimbardo, P. G. (2007). The Lucifer effect: Understanding how good people turn evil. New York: Random House.
   Google Scholar