Adapting training in real time: An empirical test of adaptive difficulty schedules

References

• Andrieux, M., Danna, J., & Thon, B. (2012). Self-control of task difficulty during training enhances motor learning of a complex coincidence-anticipation task. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 83(1), 27–35. doi:10.1080/02701367.2012.10599822
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bedwell, W. L., & Salas, E. (2010). Computer‐based training: Capitalizing on lessons learned. International Journal of Training and Development, 14(3), 239–249.
   Google Scholar
• Bloom, B. S. (1984). The 2 sigma problem: The search for methods of group instruction as effective as one-to-one tutoring. Educational Researcher, 13(6), 4–16. doi:10.3102/0013189X013006004
   Google Scholar
• Camp, G., Paas, F., Rikers, R., & van Merriënboer, J. (2001). Dynamic problem selection in air traffic control training: A comparison between performance, mental effort and mental efficiency. Computers in Human Behavior, 17(5–6), 575–595. doi:10.1016/S0747-5632(01)00028-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Corbalan, G., Kester, L., & van Merriënboer, J. J. (2008). Selecting learning tasks: Effects of adaptation and shared control on learning efficiency and task involvement. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 33(4), 733–756. doi:10.1016/j.cedpsych.2008.02.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cote, D. O., Williges, B. H., & Williges, R. C. (1981). Augmented feedback in adaptive motor skill training. Human Factors, 23(4), 505–508. doi:10.1177/001872088102300413
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Durlach, P. J., & Ray, J. M. (2011). Designing adaptive instructional environments: Insights from empirical evidence. (Technical Report 1297). Arlington, VA: U.S. Army Research Institute for the Behavioral & Social Sciences.
   Google Scholar
• Guadagnoli, M. A., & Lee, T. D. (2004). Challenge point: A framework for conceptualizing the effects of various practice conditions in motor learning. Journal of Motor Behavior, 36(2), 212–224. doi:10.3200/JMBR.36.2.212-224
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hayes, A. F. (2017). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, D. F., & Haygood, R. C. (1984). The use of secondary tasks in adaptive training. Human Factors, 26(1), 105–108. doi:10.1177/001872088402600110
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kalyuga, S., & Sweller, J. (2005). Rapid dynamic assessment of expertise to improve the efficiency of adaptive e-learning. Educational Technology Research and Development, 53(3), 83–93. doi:10.1007/BF02504800
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kelley, C. R. (1969). What is adaptive training? Human Factors, 11(6), 547–556. doi:10.1177/001872086901100602
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kulik, J. A., & Fletcher, J. D. (2016). Effectiveness of intelligent tutoring systems: A meta-analytic review. Review of Educational Research, 86(1), 42–78. doi:10.3102/0034654315581420
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Landsberg, C. R., Mercado, A., Van Buskirk, W. L., Lineberry, M., & Steinhauser, N. (2012). Evaluation of an adaptive training system for submarine periscope operations. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 56th Annual Meeting, 56(1), 2422–2426. doi:10.1177/1071181312561493
   Google Scholar
• Landsberg, C. R., Van Buskirk, W. L., Astwood, R. S., Mercado, A. D., & Aakre, A. J. (2011). Adaptive training considerations for simulation-based training (Special report 2010-001). Orlando, FL: Naval Air Warfare Center Training Systems Division.
   Google Scholar
• Leppink, J. (2018). Analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) vs. moderated regression (MODREG): Why the interaction matters. Health Professions Education, 4(3), 225–232. doi:10.1016/j.hpe.2018.04.001
   Google Scholar
• Lintern, G., & Gopher, D. (1978). Adaptive training of perceptual-motor skills: Issues, results, and future directions. International Journal of Man-Machine Studies, 10(5), 521–551. doi:10.1016/S0020-7373(78)80018-2
   Google Scholar
• Ma, W., Adesope, O. O., Nesbit, J. C., & Liu, Q. (2014). Intelligent tutoring systems and learning outcomes: A meta-analysis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 106(4), 901–918. doi:10.1037/a0037123
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marraffino, M. D., Johnson, C. I., Whitmer, D. E., Steinhauser, N. B., & Clement, A. (2019). Advise when ready for game plan: Adaptive training for JTACs. Proceedings of the Interservice/Industry Training, Simulation & Education Conference (I/ITSEC). Orlando, FL: National Training Systems Association.
   Google Scholar
• Montoya, A. K. (2016). Extending the Johnson-Neyman procedure to categorical independent variables: Mathematical derivations and computational tools (Doctoral dissertation). OhioLink Electronic Theses & Dissertations Center, The Ohio State University.
   Google Scholar
• Paas, F., Tuovinen, J. E., Tabbers, H., & Van Gerven, P. W. (2003). Cognitive load measurement as a means to advance cognitive load theory. Educational Psychologist, 38(1), 63–71. doi:10.1207/S15326985EP3801_8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park, O., & Lee, J. (2003). Adaptive instructional systems. In D. Jonassen (Ed.), Handbook of research for educational communications and technology (pp. 651–684). New York, NY: MacMillan Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Salden, R. J., Paas, F., Broers, N. J., & van Merriënboer, J. J. (2004). Mental effort and performance as determinants for the dynamic selection of learning tasks in air traffic control training. Instructional Science, 32(1–2), 153–172. doi:10.1023/B:TRUC.0000021814.03996.ff
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schnotz, W., & Kürschner, C. (2007). A reconsideration of cognitive load theory. Educational Psychology Review, 19(4), 469–508. doi:10.1007/s10648-007-9053-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sweller, J. (2005). Implications of cognitive load theory for multimedia learning. In R. E. Mayer (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning (1st ed., pp. 19–30). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sweller, J., van Merriënboer, J. J., & Paas, F. G. (1998). Cognitive architecture and instructional design. Educational Psychology Review, 10(3), 251–296. doi:10.1023/A:1022193728205
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tseng, J. C., Chu, H. C., Hwang, G. J., & Tsai, C. C. (2008). Development of an adaptive learning system with two sources of personalization information. Computers & Education, 51(2), 776–786.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Buskirk, W. L., Steinhauser, N. B., Mercado, A. D., Landsberg, C. R., & Astwood, R. S. (2014). A comparison of the micro-adaptive and hybrid approaches to adaptive training. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, 58(1), 1159–1163. doi:10.1177/1541931214581242
   Google Scholar
• van Merriënboer, J. J., & Sweller, J. (2005). Cognitive load theory and complex learning: Recent developments and future directions. Educational Psychology Review, 17(2), 147–177. doi:10.1007/s10648-005-3951-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• VanLehn, K. (2011). The relative effectiveness of human tutoring, intelligent tutoring systems, and other tutoring systems. Educational Psychologist, 46(4), 197–221. doi:10.1080/00461520.2011.611369
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vygotsky, L. S. (2005). Interaction between learning and development. In M. Gauvain & M. Cole (Eds.), Readings on the development of children (4th ed., pp. 34–40). New York, NY: Worth.
   Google Scholar
• Wickens, C. D., Hutchins, S., Carolan, T., & Cumming, J. (2013). Effectiveness of part-task training and increasing-difficulty training strategies: A meta-analysis approach. Human Factors, 55(2), 461–470. doi:10.1177/0018720812451994
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar