266
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

The restrained unit: A case study on everyday sensegiving to a use-of-force policy calling for restraint

ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon
Pages 264-276 | Received 11 Dec 2019, Accepted 08 Mar 2021, Published online: 03 May 2021

References

  • Aguinis, H., & Solarino, A. M. (2019). Transparency and replicability in qualitative research: The case of interviews with elite informants. Strategic Management Journal, 40(8), 1291–1315.
  • Alpert, G. P., & MacDonald, J. M. (2001). Police use of force: An analysis of organizational characteristics. Justice Quarterly, 18(2), 393–409. doi:10.1080/07418820100094951
  • Ben-Ari, E. (2011). Hybrid wars in complex environments – Leadership in contemporary armies. Mirrors of Leadership, 3, 52–65.
  • Ben-Shalom, U., Klar, Y., & Benbenisty, Y. (2012). Characteristics of sense-making in combat. In J. H. Laurence & M. D. Matthews (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of military psychology (pp. 218–231). New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Broesder, W. A., Op den Buijs, T. P., Vogelaar, A. L. W., & Euwema, M. C. (2015). Can soldiers combine swords and ploughshares? The construction of the warrior–Peacekeeper role identity survey (WPRIS). Armed Forces and Society, 41(3), 519–540. doi:10.1177/0095327X14539326
  • Buhaug, H., Levy, J. S., & Urdal, H. (2014). 50 years of peace research: An introduction to the journal of peace research anniversary special issue. Journal of Peace Research, 51(2), 139–144. doi:10.1177/0022343314521649
  • Buijs, T. O. D., Broesder, W., Goldenberg, I., Resteigne, D., & Kivirähk, J. (2019). Warrior and peacekeeper role identities: Associations with self-esteem, organizational commitment and organizational citizenship behavior. Journal of Military Studies, 8(2019), 3–15. doi:10.2478/jms-2019-0002
  • Cohen, G. (2012, December 11). IDF soldiers in recent West Bank clashes were allowed to fire, but chose not to. Haaretz. https://www.haaretz.com/idf-soldiers-chose-not-to-shoot-1.5271174
  • Colville, I., Pye, A., & Carter, M. (2013). Organizing to counter terrorism: Sensemaking amidst dynamic complexity. Human Relations, 66(9), 1201–1223. doi:10.1177/0018726712468912
  • Corbin, J. M., & Strauss, A. (1990). Grounded theory research: Procedures, canons, and evaluative criteria. Qualitative Sociology, 13(1), 3–21. doi:10.1007/BF00988593
  • Devorah, M. (2017). The limits of socialization and the underproduction of military violence: Evidence from the IDF. Journal of Peace Research, 54(5), 606–619. doi:10.1177/0022343317713558
  • Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989). Building theories from case study research. Academy of Management Review, 14(4), 532–550. doi:10.5465/amr.1989.4308385
  • Eisenhardt, K. M., & Graebner, M. E. (2007). Theory building from cases: Opportunities and challenges. Academy of Management Journal, 50(1), 25–32. doi:10.5465/amj.2007.24160888
  • Fiss, P. C., & Zajac, E. J. (2006). The symbolic management of strategic change: Sensegiving via framing and decoupling. Academy of Management Journal, 49(6), 1173–1193. doi:10.5465/amj.2006.23478255
  • Flanagan, J. C. (1954). The critical incident technique. Psychological Bulletin, 51(4), 327–358. doi:10.1037/h0061470
  • Franke, V. C. (1999). Resolving identity tensions: The case of the peacekeeper. TheJournal of Conflict Studies, 19(2), 124–143.
  • Fyfe, J. J. (1988). Police use of deadly force: Research and reform. Justice Quarterly, 5(2), 165–205. doi:10.1080/07418828800089691
  • Gioia, D. A., & Chittipeddi, K. (1991). Sensemaking and sensegiving in strategic change initiation. Strategic Management Journal, 12(6), 433–448. doi:10.1002/smj.4250120604
  • Grossman, D., & Christensen, L. W. (2004). On combat: The psychology and physiology of deadly conflict in war and peace. Belleville, IL: PPCT Research Publications.
  • Hafner-Burton, E. M. (2014). A social science of human rights. Journal of Peace Research, 51(2), 273–286. doi:10.1177/0022343313516822
  • Hunt, J. G. (1991). Leadership: A new synthesis. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Hunt, J. G., & Ropo, A. (1995). Multi-level leadership: Grounded theory and mainstream theory applied to the case of General Motors. The Leadership Quarterly, 6(3), 379–412. doi:10.1016/1048-9843(95)90015-2
  • Isabella, L. A. (1990). Evolving interpretations as a change unfolds: How managers construe key organizational events. Academy of Management Journal, 33, 7–41.
  • Jacques, E., & Clement, S. D. (1994). Executive leadership: A practical guide to managing complexity. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
  • Jenne, N. (2020). Civilianizing the armed forces? Peacekeeping, a traditional mission for the military. Defence Studies, 20(2), 105–122. doi:10.1080/14702436.2020.1726741
  • Kark, R., Karazi-Presler, T., & Tubi, S. (2016). Paradox and challenges in military leadership. In Leadership lessons from compelling contexts (Monographs in leadership and management) (Vol. 8, pp. 157–187). Bingley: Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
  • Kraft, A., Sparr, J. L., & Peus, C. (2015). The critical role of moderators in leader sensegiving: A literature review. Journal of Change Management, 15(4), 308–331. doi:10.1080/14697017.2015.1091372
  • Kraft, A., Sparr, J. L., & Peus, C. (2018). Giving and making sense about change: The back and forth between leaders and employees. Journal of Business and Psychology, 33(1), 71–87. doi:10.1007/s10869-016-9474-5
  • Lüscher, L. S., & Lewis, M. W. (2008). Organizational change and managerial sensemaking: Working through paradox. Academy of Management Journal, 51(2), 221–240. doi:10.5465/amj.2008.31767217
  • Maitlis, S. (2005). The social processes of organizational sensemaking. Academy of Management Journal, 48(1), 21–49. doi:10.5465/amj.2005.15993111
  • Maitlis, S., & Christianson, M. (2014). Sensemaking in organizations: Taking stock and moving forward. The Academy of Management Annals, 8(1), 57–125. doi:10.5465/19416520.2014.873177
  • Maitlis, S., & Lawrence, T. B. (2007). Triggers and enablers of sensegiving in organizations. Academy of Management Journal, 50(1), 57–84. doi:10.5465/amj.2007.24160971
  • Minka-Brand, H. (2003). The relationship between personality characteristics and soldier behavior towards Palestinians in Judea and Samaria (M.A. thesis). Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv.
  • Moskos, C. (2005). Military systems in the 21st century: Changes and continuities. In T. Edmunds & M. Malešic (Eds.), Defence transformation in Europe: Evolving military roles (Vol. 2, pp. 19–26). Amsterdam, the Netherlands: IOS Press.
  • Nuciari, M. (2006). Models and explanations for Military Organization: An updated reconsideration. In G. Caforio (Ed.), Handbook of the sociology of the military (pp. 61–85). Boston, MA: Springer.
  • Padan, C., & Ben-Shalom, U. (2019). Sensemaking of military leaders in combat and its aftermath: A phenomenological inquiry. Political & Military Sociology–An Annual Review, 46(2), 324–342.
  • Pratt, M. G. (2000). The good, the bad, and the ambivalent: Managing identification among Amway distributors. Administrative Science Quarterly, 45(3), 456–493. doi:10.2307/2667106
  • Pratt, M. G. (2009). From the editors: For the lack of a boilerplate: Tips on writing up (and reviewing) qualitative research. Academy of Management Journal, 52(5), 856–862. doi:10.5465/amj.2009.44632557
  • Putnam, L. L., Fairhurst, G. T., & Banghart, S. (2016). Contradictions, dialectics, and paradoxes in organizations: A constitutive approach. The Academy of Management Annals, 10(1), 65–171. doi:10.5465/19416520.2016.1162421
  • Reed, B. J., & Segal, D. R. (2000). The impact of multiple deployments on soldiers’ peacekeeping attitudes, morale, and retention. Armed Forces and Society, 27(1), 57–78. doi:10.1177/0095327X0002700105
  • Schad, J., Lewis, M. W., Raisch, S., & Smith, W. K. (2016). Paradox research in management science: Looking back to move forward. The Academy of Management Annals, 10(1), 5–64. doi:10.5465/19416520.2016.1162422
  • Shaw, M. (2005). The new western way of war. Cambridge, UK: Polity press.
  • Sieck, W. R., Klein, G., Peluso, D. A., Smith, J. L., Harris-Thompson, D., & Gade, P. A. (2007). FOCUS: A model of sensemaking. Arlington, VA: Retrieved from Unites States Army Research Institute for the Behavioral and Social Sciences.
  • Smith, A. D., Plowman, D. A., & Duchon, D. (2010). Everyday sensegiving: A closer look at successful plant managers. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 46(2), 220–244. doi:10.1177/0021886310369932
  • Sparr, J. L. (2018). Paradoxes in organizational change: The crucial role of leaders’ sensegiving. Journal of Change Management, 18(2), 162–180. doi:10.1080/14697017.2018.1446696
  • Stein, R. L. (2017). GoPro occupation: Networked cameras, Israeli military rule, and the digital promise. Current Anthropology, 58(S15), S56–S64. doi:10.1086/688869
  • Von Billerbeck, S. (2020). No action without talk? UN peacekeeping, discourse, and institutional self-legitimation. Review of International Studies, 46(4), 1–18.
  • Von Clausewitz, C. (1832). On war ( Michael Howard and Peter Paret Ed. and Trans.). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1976.
  • Watkin, K. (2004). Controlling the use of force: A role for human rights norms in contemporary armed conflict. The American Journal of International Law, 98(1), 1–34. doi:10.2307/3139252
  • Weick, K. E. (1993). The collapse of sensemaking in organizations: The Mann Gulch disaster. Administrative Science Quarterly, 628–652.
  • Weick, K. E. (1995). Sensemaking in organizations. London, UK: Sage Publications.
  • Zhang, Y., Waldman, D. A., Han, Y.-L., & Li, X.-B. (2015). Paradoxical leader behaviors in people management: Antecedents and consequences. Academy of Management Journal, 58(2), 538–566. doi:10.5465/amj.2012.0995
  • Zohar, D. (2000). A group-level model of safety climate: Testing the effect of group climate on microaccidents in manufacturing jobs. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85(4), 587–596. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.85.4.587
  • Zohar, D., & Luria, G. (2004). Climate as a social-cognitive construction of supervisory safety practices: Scripts as proxy of behavior patterns. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89(2), 322. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.89.2.322
  • Zohar, D., & Luria, G. (2010). Group leaders as gatekeepers: Testing safety climate variations across levels of analysis. Applied Psychology, 59(4), 647–673. doi:10.1111/j.1464-0597.2010.00421.x

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.